Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

BREAST CANCER

PERSEPHONE — implications for clinical practice in 2019

Five randomized trials have been conducted to prove that shorter duration of trastuzumab treatment (9 weeks or 6 months) can replace the standard duration (1 year). The results of PERSEPHONE, the most recent trial, suggest that the efficacy of a 6-month treatment is non-inferior to that of 1 year, although not for all patients. We discuss these results in the context of current treatment standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Romond, E. H. et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 1673–1684 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Piccart-Gebhart, M. J. et al. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 1659–1672 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Slamon, D. et al. Adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 1273–1283 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Joensuu, H. et al. Adjuvant docetaxel or vinorelbine with or without trastuzumab for breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 354, 809–820 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pivot, X. et al. 6 months versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab in early breast cancer (PHARE): final analysis of a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet 393, 2591–2598 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mavroudis, D. et al. Six versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab in combination with dose-dense chemotherapy for women with HER2-positive breast cancer: a multicenter randomized study by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG). Ann. Oncol. 26, 1333–1340 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Earl, H. M. et al. 6 versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (PERSEPHONE): 4-year disease-free survival results of a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet 393, 2599–2612 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Conte, P. et al. Nine weeks versus 1 year adjuvant trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy: final results of the phase III randomized Short-HER study‡. Ann. Oncol. 29, 2328–2333 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Joensuu, H. et al. Effect of adjuvant trastuzumab for a duration of 9 weeks versus 1 year with concomitant chemotherapy for early human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive breast cancer: the SOLD randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 4, 1199–1206 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pondé, N., Gelber, R. D. & Piccart, M. PERSEPHONE: are we ready to de-escalate adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer? NPJ Breast Cancer 5, 8 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. von Minckwitz, G. et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 380, 617–628 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cardoso, F. et al. Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz173 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evandro de Azambuja.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

N.P. has received travel grants from Roche–Genentech and has participated in clinical trials sponsored and/or funded by Roche–Genentech. E.d.A. has received research and travel grants and fees from Roche–Genentech and works in an institution that participated in the HERA and APHINITY trials.

Additional information

Related links

ClinicalTrials.gov: https://clinicaltrials.gov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pondé, N., de Azambuja, E. PERSEPHONE — implications for clinical practice in 2019. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 16, 663–664 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-019-0256-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-019-0256-7

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer