Abstract
Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies have substantially improved the overall survival of a subset of patients across multiple solid tumour types, but other patients can have a deterioration of their disease as a result of such therapies. This paradoxical phenomenon is defined as hyperprogression. In this Review, we present the available evidence of hyperprogressive disease following immune-checkpoint inhibition, the pathophysiological hypotheses that might explain hyperprogressive disease and the current challenges for patient management in routine clinical settings. Finally, we also discuss how the risk of hyperprogressive disease should be taken into account in clinical decisions involving immune-checkpoint inhibition.
Key points
-
Hyperprogressive disease is a paradoxical acceleration of tumour growth kinetics after the initiation of treatment with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents, but it has also been reported in patients receiving other treatments.
-
The incidence of hyperprogressive disease observed across different solid tumour types is variable (~10%); no consistent predictor of hyperprogressive disease has been reported thus far.
-
Possible explanations as to why PD-1/PD-L1 blockade might paradoxically lead to hyperprogressive disease include the expansion of PD-1+ regulatory T cells, exhaustion of compensatory T cells, modulation of pro-tumorigenic immune cell subsets, activation of aberrant inflammation or activation of oncogenic signalling.
-
Most of the current immune-related response criteria are designed to identify pseudoprogression but not hyperprogression; implementation of an early disease assessment tool and the integration of pretreatment tumour kinetics is crucial to improving the evaluation of patients receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies.
-
The evaluation of tumour biopsy samples obtained at the time of tumour growth acceleration will be key to evaluating the biological mechanisms underlying hyperprogressive disease, to interrogate the immunological nature of this phenomenon and to identify the best therapeutic strategies.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
A comprehensive regulatory and industry review of modeling and simulation practices in oncology clinical drug development
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Open Access 04 March 2023
-
Regulatory cells and the effect of cancer immunotherapy
Molecular Cancer Open Access 04 February 2023
-
Cellular senescence affects energy metabolism, immune infiltration and immunotherapeutic response in hepatocellular carcinoma
Scientific Reports Open Access 20 January 2023
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 per month
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout





References
Larkin, J. et al. Overall survival in patients with advanced melanoma who received nivolumab versus investigator’s choice chemotherapy in CheckMate 037: a randomized, controlled, open-label phase III trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 383–390 (2018).
Rittmeyer, A. et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 389, 255–265 (2017).
Reck, M. et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1–positive non–small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 1823–1833 (2016).
Motzer, R. J. et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 1803–1813 (2015).
Ferris, R. L. et al. Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 1856–1867 (2016).
Bellmunt, J. et al. Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 1015–1026 (2017).
Powles, T. et al. Atezolizumab versus chemotherapy in patients with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (IMvigor211): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 391, 748–757 (2018).
Wolchok, J. D. et al. Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 7412–7420 (2009).
Bohnsack, O., Ludajic, K. & Hoos, A. Adaptation of the immune-related response criteria: irRECIST. Ann. Oncol. 25 (Suppl. 4), iv361–iv372 (2014).
Seymour, L. et al. iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol. 18, e143–e152 (2017).
Hodi, F. S. et al. Evaluation of immune-related response criteria and RECIST v1.1 in patients with advanced melanoma treated with pembrolizumab. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 1510–1517 (2016).
Tazdait, M. et al. Patterns of responses in metastatic NSCLC during PD-1 or PDL-1 inhibitor therapy: comparison of RECIST 1.1, irRECIST and iRECIST criteria. Eur. J. Cancer 88, 38–47 (2018).
Champiat, S. et al. Hyperprogressive disease is a new pattern of progression in cancer patients treated by anti-PD-1/PD-L1. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 1920–1928 (2017).
Kato, S. et al. Hyperprogressors after immunotherapy: analysis of genomic alterations associated with accelerated growth rate. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 4242–4250 (2017).
Saâda-Bouzid, E. et al. Hyperprogression during anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Ann. Oncol. 28, 1605–1611 (2017).
Ferrara, R. et al. Hyperprogressive disease in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors or with single-agent chemotherapy. JAMA Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3676 (2018).
Zuazo-Ibarra, M. et al. Highly differentiated CD4 T cells unequivocally identify primary resistance and risk of hyperprogression to PD-L1/PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade in lung cancer. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/320176 (2018).
Kanai, O., Fujita, K., Okamura, M., Nakatani, K. & Mio, T. Severe exacerbation or manifestation of primary disease related to nivolumab in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status or brain metastases. Ann. Oncol. 27, 1354–1356 (2016).
Chubachi, S. et al. A case of non-small cell lung cancer with possible ‘disease flare’ on nivolumab treatment. Case Rep. Oncol. Med. 2016, 1075641–1075643 (2016).
Yoshida, T., Furuta, H. & Hida, T. Risk of tumor flare after nivolumab treatment in patients with irradiated field recurrence. Med. Oncol. 34, 34 (2017).
Kobari, Y. et al. Rapid progressive disease after nivolumab therapy in three patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In Vivo 31, 769–771 (2017).
Weiss, G. J. et al. Tumor cell-free DNA copy number instability predicts therapeutic response to immunotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 5074–5081 (2017).
Forschner, A. et al. Genomics of immunotherapy-associated hyperprogressors-letter. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 6374–6375 (2017).
Groisberg, R. et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced sarcoma enrolled in early phase immunotherapy trials. J. Immunother. Cancer 5, 100 (2017).
Faure, M. et al. Hyperprogressive disease in anorectal melanoma treated by PD-1 inhibitors. Front. Immunol. 9, 797 (2018).
Ratner, L., Waldmann, T. A., Janakiram, M. & Brammer, J. E. Rapid progression of adult T-Cell leukemia-lymphoma after PD-1 inhibitor therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 1947–1948 (2018).
Borghaei, H. et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 1627–1639 (2015).
Peters, S. et al. OA03.05 analysis of early survival in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC treated with nivolumab versus docetaxel in CheckMate 057. J. Thorac. Oncol. 12, S253 (2017).
Hellmann, M. D. et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in lung cancer with a high tumor mutational burden. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 2093–2104 (2018).
Wilkerson, J. et al. Estimation of tumour regression and growth rates during treatment in patients with advanced prostate cancer: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 18, 143–154 (2017).
Stein, W. D. et al. Analyzing the pivotal trial that compared sunitinib and IFN-α in renal cell carcinoma, using a method that assesses tumor regression and growth. Clin. Cancer Res. 18, 2374–2381 (2012).
Stein, W. D. et al. Tumor regression and growth rates determined in five intramural NCI prostate cancer trials: the growth rate constant as an indicator of therapeutic efficacy. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 907–917 (2011).
Ferté, C. et al. Tumor growth rate is an early indicator of antitumor drug activity in phase I clinical trials. Clin. Cancer Res. 20, 246–252 (2014).
Ferté, C. et al. Tumor growth rate provides useful information to evaluate sorafenib and everolimus treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: an integrated analysis of the TARGET and RECORD phase 3 trial data. Eur. Urol. 65, 713–720 (2014).
Ferte, C., Koscielny, S. & Soria, J. C. TGR analysis in phase I clinical trials—response. Clin. Cancer Res. 20, 2497–2497 (2014).
Gomez-Roca, C. et al. Tumour growth rates and RECIST criteria in early drug development. Eur. J. Cancer 47, 2512–2516 (2011).
Eisenhauer, E. A. et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur. J. Cancer. 45, 228–247 (2009).
Demicheli, R., Retsky, M. W., Hrushesky, W. J. M., Baum, M. & Gukas, I. D. The effects of surgery on tumor growth: a century of investigations. Ann. Oncol. 19, 1821–1828 (2008).
Lagadec, C., Vlashi, E., Donna, Della, L., Dekmezian, C. & Pajonk, F. Radiation-induced reprogramming of breast cancer cells. Stem Cells 30, 833–844 (2012).
Kim, J. J. & Tannock, I. F. Repopulation of cancer cells during therapy: an important cause of treatment failure. Nat. Rev. Cancer 5, 516–525 (2005).
Bourhis, J. et al. Rapid tumour cell proliferation after induction chemotherapy in oropharyngeal cancer. Laryngoscope 104, 468–472 (1994).
Tarnawski, R. et al. How fast is repopulation of tumour cells during the treatment gap? Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 54, 229–236 (2002).
Barton, M. B., Keane, T. J., Gadalla, T. & Maki, E. The effect of treatment time and treatment interruption on tumour control following radical radiotherapy of laryngeal cancer. Radiother. Oncol. 23, 137–143 (1992).
Fyles, A., Keane, T. J., Barton, M. & Simm, J. The effect of treatment duration in the local control of cervix cancer. Radiother. Oncol. 25, 273–279 (1992).
Maciejewski, B. & Majewski, S. Dose fractionation and tumour repopulation in radiotherapy for bladder cancer. Radiother. Oncol. 21, 163–170 (1991).
Sun, Y. et al. Treatment-induced damage to the tumor micro- environment promotes prostate cancer therapy resistance through WNT16B. Nat. Med. 18, 1359–1368 (2012).
Kuilman, T. & Peeper, D. S. Senescence-messaging secretome: SMS-ing cellular stress. Nat. Rev. Cancer 9, 81–94 (2009).
Valkenburg, K. C., de Groot, A. E. & Pienta, K. J. Targeting the tumour stroma to improve cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 15, 366–381 (2018).
Heidorn, S. J. et al. Kinase-dead BRAF and oncogenic RAS cooperate to drive tumor progression through CRAF. Cell 140, 209–221 (2010).
Su, F. et al. RAS mutations in cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 207–215 (2012).
Andrews, M. C. et al. BRAF inhibitor-driven tumor proliferation in a KRAS-mutated colon carcinoma is not overcome by MEK1/2 inhibition. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, e448–e451 (2013).
Boussemart, L. et al. Secondary tumors arising in patients undergoing BRAF inhibitor therapy exhibit increased BRAF-CRAF heterodimerization. Cancer Res. 76, 1476–1484 (2016).
Callahan, M. K. et al. Progression of RAS-mutant leukemia during RAF inhibitor treatment. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 2316–2321 (2012).
Grey, A. et al. Progression of KRAS mutant pancreatic adenocarcinoma during vemurafenib treatment in a patient with metastatic melanoma. Intern. Med. J. 44, 597–600 (2014).
Novik, A. V. et al. Vemurafenib-induced progression of breast cancer: a case report and review of the literature. Target Oncol. 11, 235–238 (2015).
Mellema, W. W., Burgers, S. A. & Smit, E. F. Tumor flare after start of RAF inhibition in KRAS mutated NSCLC: A case report. Lung Cancer 87, 201–203 (2015).
Riely, G. J. et al. Prospective assessment of discontinuation and reinitiation of erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib followed by the addition of everolimus. Clin. Cancer Res. 13, 5150–5155 (2007).
Chaft, J. E. et al. Disease flare after tyrosine kinase inhibitor discontinuation in patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer and acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib: implications for clinical trial design. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 6298–6303 (2011).
Chen, H.-J. et al. Disease flare after EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor cessation predicts poor survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 19, 833–838 (2013).
Pop, O., Pirvu, A., Toffart, A.-C. & Moro-Sibilot, D. Disease flare after treatment discontinuation in a patient with EML4-ALK lung cancer and acquired resistance to crizotinib. J. Thorac. Oncol. 7, e1–e2 (2012).
Kuriyama, Y. et al. Disease flare after discontinuation of crizotinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive lung cancer. Case Rep. Oncol. 6, 430–433 (2013).
Yang, J.-J. et al. Clinical modes of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor failure and subsequent management in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 79, 33–39 (2013).
Ramirez-Tirado, L.-A. et al. Characteristics of progression to tyrosine kinase inhibitors predict overall survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring an EGFR mutation. J. Thorac. Dis. 10, 2166–2178 (2018).
Ebos, J. M. L. & Kerbel, R. S. Antiangiogenic therapy: impact on invasion, disease progression, and metastasis. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 8, 210–221 (2011).
Wolter, P., Beuselinck, B., Pans, S. & Schöffski, P. Flare-up: an often unreported phenomenon nevertheless familiar to oncologists prescribing tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Acta Oncol. 48, 621–624 (2009).
Desar, I. M. E. et al. The reverse side of the victory: flare up of symptoms after discontinuation of sunitinib or sorafenib in renal cell cancer patients. A report of three cases. Acta Oncol. 48, 927–931 (2009).
Iacovelli, R. et al. Evidence and clinical relevance of tumor flare in patients who discontinue tyrosine kinase inhibitors for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur. Urol. 68, 154–160 (2015).
Powles, T. et al. A prospective evaluation of VEGF-targeted treatment cessation in metastatic clear cell renal cancer. Ann. Oncol. 24, 2098–2103 (2013).
Tanigawa, T. et al. Tumors sharply increased after ceasing pazopanib therapy for a patient with advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma: experience of tumor flare. Case Rep. Obstetr. Gynecol. 2017, 4801650–4801654 (2017).
Mancuso, M. R. et al. Rapid vascular regrowth in tumors after reversal of VEGF inhibition. J. Clin. Invest. 116, 2610–2621 (2006).
Griffioen, A. W. et al. Rapid angiogenesis onset after discontinuation of sunitinib treatment of renal cell carcinoma patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 18, 3961–3971 (2012).
Sharpe, K. et al. The effect of VEGF-targeted therapy on biomarker expression in sequential tissue from patients with metastatic clear cell renal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 6924–6934 (2013).
Norden, A. D. et al. Bevacizumab for recurrent malignant gliomas: efficacy, toxicity, and patterns of recurrence. Neurology 70, 779–787 (2008).
di Tomaso, E. et al. Glioblastoma recurrence after cediranib therapy in patients: lack of ‘rebound’ revascularization as mode of escape. Cancer Res. 71, 19–28 (2011).
Miles, D. et al. Disease course patterns after discontinuation of bevacizumab: pooled analysis of randomized phase III trials. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 83–88 (2011).
de Gramont, A. et al. Bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer (AVANT): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 13, 1225–1233 (2012).
Strannegård, Ö. & Thorén, F. B. Opposing effects of immunotherapy in melanoma using multisubtype interferon-alpha - can tumor immune escape after immunotherapy accelerate disease progression? Oncoimmunology 5, e1091147 (2016).
Eggermont, A. M. M. et al. Long-term results of the randomized phase III trial EORTC 18991 of adjuvant therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2b versus observation in resected stage III melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 30, 3810–3818 (2012).
Korte, W., Jost, C., Cogliatti, S., Hess, U. & Cerny, T. Accelerated progression of multiple myeloma during anti-CD20 (Rituximab) therapy. Ann. Oncol. 10, 1249–1250 (1999).
Ozgüroglu, M. & Turna, H. Rituximab-induced tumor progression: does it really happen? Med. Oncol. 21, 205–206 (2004).
Alexander, J. L., Gillespie, P. J. & Edelstyn, G. A. Serial bone scanning using technetium 99 m diphosphonate in patients undergoing cyclical combination chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. Clin. Nucl. Med. 1, 13 (1976).
Plotkin, D., Lechner, J. J., Jung, W. E. & Rosen, P. J. Tamoxifen flare in advanced breast cancer. JAMA 240, 2644–2646 (1978).
Clarysse, A. Hormone-induced tumor flare. Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol. 21, 545–547 (1985).
Vogel, C. L., Schoenfelder, J., Shemano, I., Hayes, D. F. & Gams, R. A. Worsening bone scan in the evaluation of antitumor response during hormonal therapy of breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 13, 1123–1128 (1995).
Pollen, J. J., Witztum, K. F. & Ashburn, W. L. The flare phenomenon on radionuclide bone scan in metastatic prostate cancer. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol 142, 773–776 (1984).
McNamara, M. A. & George, D. J. Pain, PSA flare, and bone scan response in a patient with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with radium-223, a case report. BMC Cancer 15, 371 (2015).
Coleman, R. E. et al. Bone scan flare predicts successful systemic therapy for bone metastases. J. Nuclear Med. 29, 1354–1359 (1988).
Schneider, J. A. et al. Flare on bone scintigraphy following Taxol chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. J. Nuclear Med. 35, 1748–1752 (1994).
Gillespie, P. J., Alexander, J. L. & Edelstyn, G. A. Changes in 87mSr concentractions in skeletal metastases in patients responding to cyclical combination chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 16, 191–193 (1975).
Lemieux, J., Guimond, J., Laberge, F., St-Pierre, C. & Cormier, Y. The bone scan flare phenomenon in non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin. Nucl. Med. 27, 486–489 (2002).
Amoroso, V. et al. Osteoblastic flare in a patient with advanced gastric cancer after treatment with pemetrexed and oxaliplatin: implications for response assessment with RECIST criteria. BMC Cancer 7, 205–204 (2007).
Chao, H.-S. et al. Bone scan flare phenomenon in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib. Clin. Nucl. Med. 34, 346–349 (2009).
Sugawara, Y. et al. Healing focal ‘flare’ phenomenon after radiotherapy in a bone metastasis from bladder cancer. Clin. Nucl. Med. 30, 672–673 (2005).
Sharma, P., Hu-Lieskovan, S., Wargo, J. A. & Ribas, A. Primary, adaptive, and acquired resistance to cancer immunotherapy. Cell 168, 707–723 (2017).
Syn, N. L., Teng, M. W. L., Mok, T. S. K. & Soo, R. A. De-novo and acquired resistance to immune checkpoint targeting. Lancet Oncol. 18, e731–e741 (2017).
Jenkins, R. W., Barbie, D. A. & Flaherty, K. T. Mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Br. J. Cancer 118, 9–16 (2018).
Ribas, A. Adaptive immune resistance: how cancer protects from immune attack. Cancer Discov. 5, 915–919 (2015).
Zaretsky, J. M. et al. Mutations associated with acquired resistance to PD-1 blockade in melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 819–829 (2016).
Pardoll, D. M. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 252–264 (2012).
Dunn, G. P., Bruce, A. T., Ikeda, H., Old, L. J. & Schreiber, R. D. Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape. Nat. Immunol. 3, 991–998 (2002).
Gershon, R. K. et al. Contrasuppression. A novel immunoregulatory activity. J. Exp. Med. 153, 1533–1546 (1981).
Barnaba, V. & Schinzari, V. Induction, control, and plasticity of Treg cells: The immune regulatory network revised? Eur. J. Immunol. 43, 318–322 (2013).
Lehner, T. Special regulatory T cell review: the resurgence of the concept of contrasuppression in immunoregulation. Immunology 123, 40–44 (2008).
Grinberg-Bleyer, Y. et al. Pathogenic T cells have a paradoxical protective effect in murine autoimmune diabetes by boosting Tregs. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 4558–4568 (2010).
Simpson, T. R. et al. Fc-dependent depletion of tumor-infiltrating regulatory T cells co-defines the efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 therapy against melanoma. J. Exp. Med. 210, 1695–1710 (2013).
Bulliard, Y. et al. Activating Fc γ receptors contribute to the antitumor activities of immunoregulatory receptor-targeting antibodies. J. Exp. Med. 210, 1685–1693 (2013).
Marabelle, A. et al. Depleting tumor-specific Tregs at a single site eradicates disseminated tumors. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 2447–2463 (2013).
Asano, T. et al. PD-1 modulates regulatory T cell homeostasis during low-dose IL-2 therapy. Blood 129, 2186–2197 (2017).
Montler, R. et al. OX40, PD-1 and CTLA-4 are selectively expressed on tumor-infiltrating T cells in head and neck cancer. Clin. Trans. Immunol. 5, e70 (2016).
Lowther, D. E. et al. PD-1 marks dysfunctional regulatory T cells in malignant gliomas. JCI Insight 1, 1–23 (2016).
Franceschini, D. et al. PD-L1 negatively regulates CD4+CD25+Foxp3+Tregs by limiting STAT-5 phosphorylation in patients chronically infected with HCV. J. Clin. Invest. 119, 551–564 (2009).
Peligero, C. et al. PD-L1 blockade differentially impacts regulatory T Cells from HIV-infected individuals depending on plasma viremia. PLOS Pathog. 11, e1005270 (2015).
Ellestad, K. K., Thangavelu, G., Ewen, C. L., Boon, L. & Anderson, C. C. PD-1 is not required for natural or peripherally induced regulatory T cells: Severe autoimmunity despite normal production of regulatory T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 44, 3560–3572 (2014).
Moorman, J. P. et al. Tim-3 pathway controls regulatory and effector T cell balance during hepatitis C virus infection. J. Immunol. 189, 755–766 (2012).
Wei, T. et al. Increased expression of immunosuppressive molecules on intratumoral and circulating regulatory T cells in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Am. J. Cancer Res. 5, 2190–2201 (2015).
De Simone, M. et al. Transcriptional landscape of human tissue lymphocytes unveils uniqueness of tumor- infiltrating T regulatory cells. Immunity 45, 1135–1147 (2016).
Karim, R. et al. Tumor-expressed B7-H1 and B7-DC in relation to PD-1+T-cell infiltration and survival of patients with cervical carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 6341–6347 (2009).
Skoulidis, F. et al. STK11/LKB1 co-mutations to predict for de novo resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 axis blockade in KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 35, 9016–9016 (2017).
Koyama, S. et al. STK11/LKB1 deficiency promotes neutrophil recruitment and proinflammatory cytokine production to suppress T cell activity in the lung tumor microenvironment. Cancer Res. 76, 999–1008 (2016).
Yang, K. et al. Homeostatic control of metabolic and functional fitness of Treg cells by LKB1 signalling. Nature 548, 602–606 (2017).
Fridman, W.-H., Pagès, F., Sautès-Fridman, C. & Galon, J. The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 298–306 (2012).
Rifa’i, M. et al. CD8+CD122+regulatory T cells recognize activated T cells via conventional MHC class I–αβTCR interaction and become IL-10-producing active regulatory cells. Int. Immunol. 20, 937–947 (2008).
Zozulya, A. L., Ortler, S., Fabry, Z., Sandor, M. & Wiendl, H. The level of B7 homologue 1 expression on brain DC is decisive for CD8 Treg cell recruitment into the CNS during EAE. Eur. J. Immunol. 39, 1536–1543 (2009).
Filaci, G. et al. CD8+CD28- T regulatory lymphocytes inhibiting T cell proliferative and cytotoxic functions infiltrate human cancers. J. Immunol. 179, 4323–4334 (2007).
Sage, P. T., Francisco, L. M., Carman, C. V. & Sharpe, A. H. The receptor PD-1 controls follicular regulatory T cells in the lymph nodes and blood. Nat. Immunol. 14, 152–161 (2012).
Cully, M. Autoimmunity: LKB1 helps Treg cells battle exhaustion. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 592–593 (2017).
Odorizzi, P. M., Pauken, K. E., Paley, M. A., Sharpe, A. & Wherry, E. J. Genetic absence of PD-1 promotes accumulation of terminally differentiated exhausted CD8+T cells. J. Exp. Med. 212, 1125–1137 (2015).
Huang, R.-Y., Francois, A., McGray, A. R., Miliotto, A. & Odunsi, K. Compensatory upregulation of PD-1, LAG-3, and CTLA-4 limits the efficacy of single-agent checkpoint blockade in metastatic ovarian cancer. Oncoimmunology 6, e1249561 (2017).
Koyama, S. et al. Adaptive resistance to therapeutic PD-1 blockade is associated with upregulation of alternative immune checkpoints. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–9 (2016).
Kahan, S. M., Wherry, E. J. & Zajac, A. J. T cell exhaustion during persistent viral infections. Virology 479–480, 180–193 (2015).
Pentcheva-Hoang, T., Egen, J. G., Wojnoonski, K. & Allison, J. P. B7-1 and B7-2 selectively recruit CTLA-4 and CD28 to the immunological synapse. Immunity 21, 401–413 (2004).
Karunarathne, D. S. et al. Programmed death-1 ligand 2-mediated regulation of the PD-L1 to PD-1 axis is essential for establishing CD4(+) T cell immunity. Immunity 45, 333–345 (2016).
Keir, M. E., Butte, M. J., Freeman, G. J. & Sharpe, A. H. PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 26, 677–704 (2008).
Kuipers, H. et al. Contribution of the PD-1 ligands/PD-1 signaling pathway to dendritic cell-mediated CD4+T cell activation. Eur. J. Immunol. 36, 2472–2482 (2006).
Lamichhane, P. et al. IL-10 release upon PD-1 blockade sustains immunosuppression in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 77, 6667–6678 (2017).
Sun, Z. et al. IL10 and PD-1 cooperate to limit the activity of tumor-specific CD8+T cells. Cancer Res. 75, 1635–1644 (2015).
Wu, X. et al. Angiopoietin-2 as a biomarker and target for immune checkpoint therapy. Cancer Immunol. Res. 5, 17–28 (2017).
Mantovani, A. & Sica, A. Macrophages, innate immunity and cancer: balance, tolerance, and diversity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 22, 231–237 (2010).
Hugo, W. et al. Genomic and transcriptomic features of response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma. Cell 165, 35–44 (2016).
Peng, W. et al. PD-1 blockade enhances T cell migration to tumors by elevating IFN-γ inducible chemokines. Cancer Res. 72, 5209–5218 (2012).
Mandai, M. et al. Dual faces of IFNγ in cancer progression: a role of PD-L1 induction in the determination of pro- and antitumor immunity. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 2329–2334 (2016).
Huang, B. et al. Gr-1+CD115+immature myeloid suppressor cells mediate the development of tumor-induced T regulatory cells and T cell anergy in tumor-bearing host. Cancer Res. 66, 1123–1131 (2006).
Baban, B. et al. IDO activates regulatory T cells and blocks their conversion into Th17-like T cells. J. Immunol. 183, 2475–2483 (2009).
Spranger, S. et al. Up-regulation of PD-L1, IDO, and T(regs) in the melanoma tumor microenvironment is driven by CD8(+) T cells. Sci. Transl Med. 5, 200ra116 (2013).
Gao, J. et al. Loss of IFN-γ pathway genes in tumor cells as a mechanism of resistance to anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Cell 167, 397–404.e9 (2016).
Benci, J. L. et al. Tumor interferon signaling regulates a multigenic resistance program to immune checkpoint blockade. Cell 167, 1540–1554.e12 (2016).
Sakai, S. et al. CD4 T cell-derived IFN-γ plays a minimal role in control of pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and must be actively repressed by PD-1 to prevent lethal disease. PLOS Pathog. 12, e1005667 (2016).
Lázár-Molnár, E. et al. Programmed death-1 (PD-1)-deficient mice are extraordinarily sensitive to tuberculosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 13402–13407 (2010).
McAlees, J. W. et al. Differential control of CD4 +T cell subsets by the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in a mouse model of allergic asthma. Eur. J. Immunol. 45, 1019–1029 (2015).
Dulos, J. et al. PD-1 blockade augments Th1 and Th17 and suppresses Th2 responses in peripheral blood from patients with prostate and advanced melanoma cancer. J. Immunother. 35, 169–178 (2012).
Akbay, E. A. et al. Interleukin-17A promotes lung tumor progression through neutrophil attraction to tumor sites and mediating resistance to PD-1 blockade. J. Thorac. Oncol. 12, 1268–1279 (2017).
Kargl, J. et al. Neutrophils dominate the immune cell composition in non-small cell lung cancer. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–11 (2017).
Fielding, C. A. et al. IL-6 regulates neutrophil trafficking during acute inflammation via STAT3. J. Immunol. 181, 2189–2195 (2008).
Miossec, P. & Kolls, J. K. Targeting IL-17 and TH17 cells in chronic inflammation. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 11, 763–776 (2012).
Koenen, H. J. P. M. et al. Human CD25highFoxp3pos regulatory T cells differentiate into IL-17-producing cells. Blood 112, 2340–2352 (2008).
Wartewig, T. et al. PD-1 is a haploinsufficient suppressor of T cell lymphomagenesis. Nature 552, 121–125 (2017).
Ludin, A. & Zon, L. I. Cancer immunotherapy: the dark side of PD-1 receptor inhibition. Nature 552, 41–42 (2017).
Kleffel, S. et al. Melanoma cell-intrinsic PD-1 receptor functions promote tumor growth. 162, 1242–1256 (2015).
Coelho, M. A. et al. Oncogenic RAS signaling promotes tumor immunoresistance by stabilizing PD-L1 mRNA. Immunity 47, 1083–1099.e6 (2017).
Dong, Z.-Y. et al. Potential predictive value of TP53 and KRAS mutation status for response to PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 3012–3024 (2017).
Casey, S. C. et al. MYC regulates the antitumor immune response through CD47 and PD-L1. Science 352, 227–231 (2016).
Bourcier, C. et al. Constitutive ERK activity induces downregulation of tristetraprolin, a major protein controlling interleukin8/CXCL8 mRNA stability in melanoma cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 301, C609–618 (2011).
Akbay, E. A. et al. Activation of the PD-1 pathway contributes to immune escape in EGFR-driven lung tumors. Cancer Discov. 3, 1355–1363 (2013).
Plimack, E. R. et al. Safety and activity of pembrolizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (KEYNOTE-012): a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1b study. Lancet Oncol. 18, 212–220 (2017).
Ettinger, D. S. et al. NCCN guidelines insights: non-small cell lung cancer, version 4.2016. J. Natl Compr. Canc. Netw. 14, 255–264 (2016).
Topalian, S. L. et al. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti–PD-1 antibody in cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 2443–2454 (2012).
Nishino, M., Ramaiya, N. H., Hatabu, H. & Hodi, F. S. Monitoring immune-checkpoint blockade: response evaluation and biomarker development. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 14, 655–668 (2017).
Rizvi, N. A. et al. Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science 348, 124–128 (2015).
Tumeh, P. C. et al. PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance. Nature 515, 568–571 (2014).
Mlecnik, B. et al. Integrative analyses of colorectal cancer show immunoscore is a stronger predictor of patient survival than microsatellite instability. Immunity 44, 698–711 (2016).
Dijkstra, K. K., Voabil, P., Schumacher, T. N. & Voest, E. E. Genomics- and transcriptomics-based patient selection for cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. JAMA Oncol. 2, 1490–1495 (2016).
Topalian, S. L., Taube, J. M., Anders, R. A. & Pardoll, D. M. Mechanism-driven biomarkers to guide immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 275–287 (2016).
Hasegawa, T., Uno, H. & Wei, L.-J. Nivolumab in nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 374, 492–493 (2016).
Uno, H. et al. Moving beyond the hazard ratio in quantifying the between-group difference in survival analysis. J. Clin. Oncol. 32, 2380–2385 (2014).
A’Hern, R. P. Restricted mean survival time: an obligatory end point for time-to-event analysis in cancer trials? J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 3474–3476 (2016).
Penault-Llorca, F. et al. Ki67 expression and docetaxel efficacy in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 2809–2815 (2009).
Bergers, G. & Benjamin, L. E. Tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 401–410 (2003).
Motzer, R. J. et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 1277–1290 (2018).
Karagiannis, G. S. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy induces breast cancer metastasis through a TMEM-mediated mechanism. Sci. Transl Med. 9, eaan0026 (2017).
Gilbert, L. A. & Hemann, M. T. DNA damage-mediated induction of a chemoresistant niche. Cell 143, 355–366 (2010).
Fridman, W. H., Zitvogel, L., Fridman, C. S. & Kroemer, G. The immune contexture in cancer prognosis and treatment. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 14, 717–734 (2017).
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to N. Chaput, S. Ammari, A. Hollebecque and S. Postel-Vinay (all at Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France) for helpful discussions. S.C. receives funding support from the Philanthropia Fondation.
Reviewer information
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology thanks A. Goodman, M. A. Postow and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors made substantial contributions to all aspects of manuscript preparation.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
S.C. has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, BMS, Janssen, MSD, Novartis and Roche. B.B. has received institutional grants for clinical and translational research from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Inivata, Lilly, Loxo, OncoMed, Onxeo, OSE Pharma, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, Sanofi-Aventis and Servier. J-.C.S. has received honoraria from MedImmune/AstraZeneca, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Servier and Tarveda, and became a full-time employee of Medimmune/AstraZeneca after this article was commissioned. C.F. became a full-time employee of Medimmune/AstraZeneca after this article was commissioned. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
RELATED LINKS
TumourGrowthRate: https://github.com/chferte/TumorGrowthRate/blob/master/TGR_calculator.R
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Champiat, S., Ferrara, R., Massard, C. et al. Hyperprogressive disease: recognizing a novel pattern to improve patient management. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 15, 748–762 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-018-0111-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-018-0111-2
This article is cited by
-
Regulatory cells and the effect of cancer immunotherapy
Molecular Cancer (2023)
-
Cellular senescence affects energy metabolism, immune infiltration and immunotherapeutic response in hepatocellular carcinoma
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
A comprehensive regulatory and industry review of modeling and simulation practices in oncology clinical drug development
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics (2023)
-
Postoperative hyperprogression disease of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after curative resection: a retrospective cohort study
BMC Cancer (2022)
-
Therapeutic targets and biomarkers of tumor immunotherapy: response versus non-response
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2022)