Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Women’s work

Academic chemistry is haemorrhaging talented female researchers. However, a barrage of new initiatives aims to stem the flood.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Women in academic chemistry.


  1. Royal Society of Chemistry. Diversity landscape of the chemical sciences. RSC (2018).

  2. National Science Foundation. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: data tables. NSF (2017).

  3. Open Chemistry Collaborative in Diversity Equity. Demographics data: gender 2014–15. OXIDE (2019).

  4. Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker. Juniorprofessur statt habilitation? [German]. GDCh (2017).

  5. Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker. Statistik der chemiestudiengänge 2017: eine umfrage der GDCh zu chemiestudiengängen an universitäten und hochschulen in Deutschland [German]. GDCh (2018).

  6. The Royal Australian Chemical Institute. Women in the science research workforce. raci (2019).

  7. Royal Society of Chemistry. Breaking the barriers: women’s retention and progression in the chemical sciences. RSC (2018).

  8. Ma, Y. et al. Women who win prizes get less money and prestige. Nature 565, 287–288 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Sexual harassment of women: climate, culture, and consequences in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine (2018). National Academies (2018).

  10. The Gender Equality Taskforce. Accelerating gender equality in Irish higher education institutions: gender action plan 2018–2020. HEA (2018).

  11. Grogan, K. E. How the entire scientific community can confront gender bias in the workplace. Nat. Eco. Evol. 3, 3–6 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Valian, V. Two Nobels for women - why so slow? Nature 562, 165 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. The Royal Society of Edinburgh. Tapping all our talents review 2018: women in STEM. RSE (2018).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Peplow.

Additional information

Related links

Kimberly Woznack:

Randall Peterson:

Michelle Coote:

Polly Arnold:

Cathleen Crudden:

National Science Foundation’s (NSF’s) ADVANCE program:

Dorothy Hodgkin fellowships:

Daphne Jackson Trust:

Jihong Yu:

Diversify Chemistry:

Equal opportunities commission at the German Chemical Society (GDCh):

Lesley Yellowlees:

Karen Salt:

Inclusion Matters programme:

Athena SWAN (Scientific Women’s Academic Network):

SEA Change:

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peplow, M. Women’s work. Nat Rev Chem 3, 283–286 (2019).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing