Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Epidemiology and management of aortic disease: aortic aneurysms and acute aortic syndromes

Nature Reviews Cardiology volume 18, pages 331–348 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The aorta is the ‘greatest artery’, through which oxygenated blood is delivered from the left ventricle to end organs with each cardiac cycle (200 million litres of blood transported in an average lifetime). The aorta can be affected by a wide spectrum of acute factors (such as cocaine use, weight lifting and trauma) and chronic acquired and/or genetic conditions (such as systemic arterial hypertension and phaeochromocytoma), which variously lead to increased aortic wall stress. The medial layer of the aorta can also be subject to abnormalities (such as Marfan syndrome, bicuspid aortic valve, inflammatory vasculitis, atherosclerosis and infections). Despite important advances in diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, data derived from registries and population-based studies highlight that the burden of aortic diseases remains high. Therefore, specific resources need to be allocated to design and implement preventive strategies (healthy lifestyles, modifications to cardiovascular risk factors, and educational and screening programmes) at individual and community levels. In this Review, we discuss the epidemiology, management and outcomes of the most common aortic diseases, namely, aortic aneurysms and acute aortic syndromes.

Key points

  • The aorta can be affected by various congenital and acquired diseases, either acutely or chronically, and involving the thoracic and/or abdominal components.

  • Despite remarkable progress in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, the global burden of aortic diseases remains high.

  • Designing and implementing prevention and screening programmes at the individual and population levels are required.

  • Advances in genetics, proteomics and imaging might allow more precise diagnosis, prevention and treatment in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The structure and anatomy of the aorta.
Fig. 2: Imaging of aortic aneurysms.
Fig. 3: Effect of aortic aneurysm size on the risk of complications.
Fig. 4: Acute aortic syndromes.
Fig. 5: Imaging of acute aortic syndromes.
Fig. 6: Classification schemes for aortic dissection.
Fig. 7: Aortic dissections in the UK.
Fig. 8: Aortic dissection: management and mortality over time in the IRAD.
Fig. 9: Traumatic aortic pseudoaneurysm.

References

  1. Braverman, A. C. & Schermerhorn, M. in Braunwald’s Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine 11th edn Ch. 63 (eds Zipes, D. P., Libby, P., Bonow, R. O., Mann, D. L. & Tomaselli, G. F.) 1295–1337 (Elsevier, 2018).

  2. Erbel, R. et al. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur. Heart J. 35, 2873–2926 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hiratzka, L. F. et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation 121, e266–e369 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bossone, E., LaBounty, T. M. & Eagle, K. A. Acute aortic syndromes: diagnosis and management, an update. Eur. Heart J. 39, 739–749d (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, C. C. et al. Oral fluoroquinolone and the risk of aortic dissection. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 72, 1369–1378 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sampson, U. K. A. et al. Global and regional burden of aortic dissection and aneurysms: mortality trends in 21 world regions, 1990 to 2010. Glob. Heart 9, 171–180.e10 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Evangelista, A. et al. Insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection: a 20-year experience of collaborative clinical research. Circulation 137, 1846–1860 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pape, L. A. et al. Aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm is not a good predictor of type A aortic dissection: observations from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Circulation 116, 1120–1127 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuzmik, G. A., Sang, A. X. & Elefteriades, J. A. Natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysms. J. Vasc. Surg. 56, 565–571 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Leading causes of death and injury. CDC https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/LeadingCauses.html (2020).

  11. Riambau, V. et al. Editor’s choice — Management of descending thoracic aorta diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 53, 4–52 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chaikof, E. L. et al. The society for vascular surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J. Vasc. Surg. 67, 2–77.e2 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wanhainen, A. et al. Editor’s choice — European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 57, 8–93 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Elefteriades, J. A. & Rizzo, J. A. in Acute Aortic Disease 1st edn. Ch. 5 (ed. Elefteriades, J.) 89–98 (CRC, 2007).

  15. Isselbacher, E. M. Thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation 111, 816–828 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bickerstaff, L. K. et al. Thoracic aortic aneurysms: a population-based study. Surgery 92, 1103–1108 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Clouse, W. D. et al. Improved prognosis of thoracic aortic aneurysms: a population-based study. JAMA 280, 1926–1929 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Svensjö, S., Bengtsson, H. & Bergqvist, D. Thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm and dissection: an investigation based on autopsy. Br. J. Surg. 83, 68–71 (1996).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Olsson, C., Thelin, S., Ståhle, E., Ekbom, A. & Granath, F. Thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection: increasing prevalence and improved outcomes reported in a nationwide population-based study of more than 14,000 cases from 1987 to 2002. Circulation 114, 2611–2618 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Davies, R. R. et al. Novel measurement of relative aortic size predicts rupture of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 81, 169–177 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Elefteriades, J. A. Natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysms: indications for surgery, and surgical versus nonsurgical risks. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 74, S1877–S1880 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Boczar, K. E. et al. Sex differences in thoracic aortic aneurysm growth. Hypertension 73, 190–196 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cheung, K. et al. Thoracic aortic aneurysm growth: role of sex and aneurysm etiology. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 6, e003792 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Juvonen, T. et al. Prospective study of the natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 63, 1533–1545 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Davies, R. R. et al. Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on size. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 73, 17–27 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nienaber, C. A. et al. Gender-related differences in acute aortic dissection. Circulation 109, 3014–3021 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McClure, R. S. et al. Epidemiology and management of thoracic aortic dissections and thoracic aortic aneurysms in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 155, 2254–2264.e4 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Albornoz, G. et al. Familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections–incidence, modes of inheritance, and phenotypic patterns. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 82, 1400–1405 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Coady, M. A. et al. Familial patterns of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Arch. Surg. 134, 361–367 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hoffjan, S. et al. Three novel mutations in the ACTA2 gene in German patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 19, 520–524 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Laukka, D. et al. Prevalence of thoracic aortic aneurysms and dilatations in patients with intracranial aneurysms. J. Vasc. Surg. 70, 1801–1808 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bossone, E. et al. Aortitis. Vascul. Pharmacol. 80, 1–10 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tajima, Y. et al. Oral steroid use and abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion — positive association. Circ. J. 81, 1774–1782 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pillay, B., Ramdial, P. K. & Naidoo, D. P. HIV-associated large-vessel vasculopathy: a review of the current and emerging clinicopathological spectrum in vascular surgical practice. Cardiovasc. J. Afr. 26, 70–81 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Chang, J.-M., Lameen, H. & Skinner, G. C. Multiple large vessel aneurysmal formation in HIV-infected patients. SA J. Radiol. 21, 1186 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Meel, R., & Gonçalves, R. in Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection Ch. 4 (ed. Shuhaiber, J.) (IntechOpen, 2019).

  37. Avdic, T. et al. Reduced long-term risk of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a nationwide observational study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 7, e007618 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. LeMaire, S. A. & Russel, L. Epidemiology of thoracic aortic dissection. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 8, 103–113 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Patel, K., Zafar, M. A., Ziganshin, B. A. & Elefteriades, J. A. Diabetes mellitus: is it protective against aneurysm? A narrative review. Cardiology 141, 107–122 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Piepoli, M. F. et al. 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur. Heart J. 37, 2315–2381 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Golledge, J. et al. Editor’s choice – Metformin prescription is associated with a reduction in the combined incidence of surgical repair and rupture related mortality in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 57, 94–101 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Itoga, N. K. et al. Metformin prescription status and abdominal aortic aneurysm disease progression in the U.S. veteran population. J. Vasc. Surg. 69, 710–716.e3 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang, Y. et al. Gene expression signature in peripheral blood detects thoracic aortic aneurysm. PLoS ONE 2, e1050 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Swerdlow, N. J., Wu, W. W. & Schermerhorn, M. L. Open and endovascular management of aortic aneurysms. Circ. Res. 124, 647–661 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Suzuki, T. et al. Biomarkers of aortic diseases. Am. Heart J. 165, 15–25 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Saliba, E., Sia, Y., Dore, A. & El Hamamsy, I. The ascending aortic aneurysm: when to intervene? Int. J. Cardiol. Heart Vasc. 6, 91–100 (2015).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Loeys, B. L. et al. Aneurysm syndromes caused by mutations in the TGF-β receptor. N. Engl. J. Med. 355, 788–798 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Coady, M. A. et al. What is the appropriate size criterion for resection of thoracic aortic aneurysms? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 113, 476–491 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tsilimparis, N. et al. International experience with endovascular therapy of the ascending aorta with a dedicated endograft. J. Vasc. Surg. 63, 1476–1482 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Muetterties, C. E., Menon, R. & Wheatley, G. H. 3rd. A systematic review of primary endovascular repair of the ascending aorta. J. Vasc. Surg. 67, 332–342 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Matsumura, J. S. et al. International controlled clinical trial of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair with the Zenith TX2 endovascular graft: 1-year results. J. Vasc. Surg. 47, 247–257 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gopaldas, R. R. et al. Superior nationwide outcomes of endovascular versus open repair for isolated descending thoracic aortic aneurysm in 11,669 patients. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 140, 1001–1010 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study Group. Multicentre aneurysm screening study (MASS): cost effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms based on four year results from randomised controlled trial. BMJ 325, 1135 (2002).

  54. Clouse, W. D. et al. Acute aortic dissection: population-based incidence compared with degenerative aortic aneurysm rupture. Mayo Clin. Proc. 79, 176–180 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Mészáros, I. et al. Epidemiology and clinicopathology of aortic dissection. Chest 117, 1271–1278 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Howard, D. P. et al. Population-based study of incidence and outcome of acute aortic dissection and premorbid risk factor control: 10-year results from the Oxford Vascular Study. Circulation 127, 2031–2037 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Howard, D. P., Sideso, E., Handa, A. & Rothwell, P. M. Incidence, risk factors, outcome and projected future burden of acute aortic dissection. Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg. 3, 278–284 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Acosta, S. & Gottsäter, A. Stable population-based incidence of acute type A and B aortic dissection. Scand. Cardiovasc. J. 53, 274–279 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. DeMartino, R. R. et al. Population-based assessment of the incidence of aortic dissection, intramural hematoma and penetrating ulcer, and its associated mortality from 1995 to 2015. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 11, e004689 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Sampson, U. K. et al. Estimation of global and regional incidence and prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms 1990 to 2010. Glob. Heart 9, 159–170 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wanhainen, A. et al. Outcome of the Swedish nationwide abdominal aortic aneurysm screening program. Circulation 134, 1141–1148 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Jacomelli, J. AAA screening annual data published for 2017 to 2018. Public Health England https://phescreening.blog.gov.uk/2019/01/31/aaa-screening-annual-data-published-for-2018-to-2018/ (2019).

  63. Kent, K. C. et al. Analysis of risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a cohort of more than 3 million individuals. J. Vasc. Surg. 52, 539–548 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Svensjö, S. et al. Low prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65-year-old Swedish men indicates a change in the epidemiology of the disease. Circulation 124, 1118–1123 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Tang, W. et al. Lifetime risk and risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a 24-year prospective study: the ARIC study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities). Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 36, 2468–2477 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Wagenhäuser, M. U. et al. Chronic nicotine exposure induces murine aortic remodeling and stiffness segmentation–implications for abdominal aortic aneurysm susceptibility. Front. Physiol. 9, 1459 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Lederle, F. A. et al. Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Ann. Intern. Med. 126, 441–449 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Golledge, J. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: update on pathogenesis and medical treatments. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 16, 225–242 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Golledge, J., Clancy, P., Jamrozik, K. & Norman, P. E. Obesity, adipokines, and abdominal aortic aneurysm: Health in Men study. Circulation 116, 2275–2279 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Eckstein, H. H. & Maegdefessel, L. Linking obesity with abdominal aortic aneurysm development. Eur. Heart J. 41, 2469–2471 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: diagnosis and management. NICE https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG156 (2020).

  72. Powell, J. T. & Wanhainen, A. Analysis of the differences between the ESVS 2019 and NICE 2020 guidelines for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 60, 7–15 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Greenhalgh, R. M., Brown, L. C., Kwong, G. P., Powell, J. T. & Thompson, S. G. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 364, 843–848 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Prinssen, M. et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N. Engl. J. Med. 351, 1607–1618 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Lederle, F. A. et al. Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. JAMA 302, 1535–1542 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Becquemin, J. P. et al. A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patients. J. Vasc. Surg. 53, 1167–1173.e1 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Paravastu, S. C. et al. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1, CD004178 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Schermerhorn, M. L. et al. Endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the Medicare population. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 464–474 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Stather, P. W. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the early and late outcomes of open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br. J. Surg. 100, 863–872 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Giannopoulos, S., Kokkinidis, D. G. & Armstrong, E. J. Long term outcomes of endovascular vs open surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Cardiovasc. Revasc. Med. 21, 1253–1259 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Antoniou, G. A., Antoniou, S. A. & Torella, F. Editor’s choice – endovascular vs. open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: systematic review and meta-analysis of updated peri-operative and long term data of randomised controlled trials. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 59, 385–397 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Kontopodis, N. et al. Meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of outcomes of endovascular and open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 59, 399–410 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Czerny, M. et al. Current options and recommendations for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch: an expert consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic surgery (EACTS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 55, 133–162 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Smedberg, C., Steuer, J., Leander, K. & Hultgren, R. Sex differences and temporal trends in aortic dissection: a population-based study of incidence, treatment strategies, and outcome in Swedish patients during 15 years. Eur. Heart J. 41, 2430–2438 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Pape, L. A. et al. Presentation, diagnosis, and outcomes of acute aortic dissection: 17-year trends from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 66, 350–358 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Mussa, F. F. et al. Acute aortic dissection and intramural hematoma: a systematic review. JAMA 316, 754–763 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Mehta, R. H. et al. Acute type A aortic dissection in the elderly: clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes in the current era. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 40, 685–692 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Bossone, E. et al. Acute aortic dissection in blacks: insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. Am. J. Med. 126, 909–915 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Jabara, J. et al. Body mass index and acute aortic dissection [abstract]. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 69, 2049 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Landenhed, M. et al. Risk profiles for aortic dissection and ruptured or surgically treated aneurysms: a prospective cohort study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 4, e001513 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Williams, B. et al. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur. Heart J. 39, 3021–3104 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Dean, J. H. et al. Cocaine-related aortic dissection: lessons from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. Am. J. Med. 127, 878–885 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Baumgartner, H. et al. ESC guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010). Eur. Heart J. 31, 2915–2957 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Judge, D. P. & Dietz, H. C. Marfan’s syndrome. Lancet 366, 1965–1976 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Milleron, O. et al. Pathogenic FBN1 genetic variation and aortic dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 75, 843–853 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. de Beaufort, H. W. et al. Aortic dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome based on the IRAD data. Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg. 6, 633–641 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Isselbacher, E. M. et al. Recurrent aortic dissection: observations from the International Registry of Aortic Dissection. Circulation 134, 1013–1024 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Michelena, H. I. et al. Bicuspid aortic valve: identifying knowledge gaps and rising to the challenge from the International Bicuspid Aortic Valve Consortium (BAVCon). Circulation 129, 2691–2704 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Di Eusanio, M. et al. Characteristics of acute aortic dissection in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: insights from the IRAD registry [abstract]. Circulation 128, A15913 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Núñez-Gil, I. J. et al. Incidence, management, and immediate- and long-term outcomes after iatrogenic aortic dissection during diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures. Circulation 131, 2114–2119 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Hagan, P. G. et al. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA 283, 897–903 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Elefteriades, J. A. & Ziganshin, B. A. Gratitude to the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection from the aortic community. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 66, 359–362 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Goldstein, S. A. et al. Multimodality imaging of diseases of the thoracic aorta in adults: from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging: endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 28, 119–182 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Tadros, R. O. et al. Optimal treatment of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: JACC review topic of the week. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 74, 1494–1504 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Nienaber, C. A. et al. Randomized comparison of strategies for type B aortic dissection: the INvestigation of STEnt Grafts in Aortic Dissection (INSTEAD) trial. Circulation 120, 2519–2528 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Nienaber, C. A. et al. Endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection: long-term results of the randomized investigation of stent grafts in aortic dissection trial. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 6, 407–416 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Mussa, F. F., Coselli, J. S. & Eagle, K. A. Feasibility of a proposed randomized trial in patients with uncomplicated descending thoracic aortic dissection: results of worldwide survey. Am. Heart J. 181, 137–144 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Sundt, T. M. Intramural hematoma and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of the aorta. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 83, S835–S841 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Evangelista, A. et al. Interdisciplinary expert consensus on management of type B intramural haematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 47, 209–217 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Evangelista, A. et al. Intramural hematoma and penetrating ulcer in the descending aorta: differences and similarities. Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg. 8, 456–470 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Harris, K. M. et al. Acute aortic intramural hematoma: an analysis from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. Circulation 126, S91–S96 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Evangelista, A. et al. Acute intramural hematoma of the aorta: a mystery in evolution. Circulation 111, 1063–1070 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Nienaber, C. A. & Eagle, K. A. Aortic dissection: new frontiers in diagnosis and management: Part I: from etiology to diagnostic strategies. Circulation 108, 628–635 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Song, J. K. Update in acute aortic syndrome: intramural hematoma and incomplete dissection as new disease entities. J. Cardiol. 64, 153–161 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Song, J. K. et al. Different clinical features of aortic intramural hematoma versus dissection involving the ascending aorta. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 37, 1604–1610 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Jánosi, R. A. et al. Thoracic endovascular repair of complicated penetrating aortic ulcer: an 11-year single-center experience. J. Endovasc. Ther. 23, 150–159 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Moro, H., Hayashi, J. & Sogawa, M. Surgical management of the ruptured aortic arch. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 67, 593–594 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Parmley, L. F., Mattingly, T. W., Manion, W. C. & Jahnke, E. J. Jr. Nonpenetrating traumatic injury of the aorta. Circulation 17, 1086–1101 (1958).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Richens, D., Kotidis, K., Neale, M., Oakley, C. & Fails, A. Rupture of the aorta following road traffic accidents in the United Kingdom 1992-1999. The results of the co-operative crash injury study. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 23, 143–148 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Heneghan, R. E. et al. Call for a new classification system and treatment strategy in blunt aortic injury. J. Vasc. Surg. 64, 171–176 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Harky, A. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular versus open surgical repair for the traumatic ruptured thoracic aorta. J. Vasc. Surg. 71, 270–282 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Mach, F. et al. 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur. Heart J. 41, 111–188 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Salata, K. et al. Statins reduce abdominal aortic aneurysm growth, rupture, and perioperative mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 7, e008657 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Bhave, N. M. & Eagle, K. A. A tear in the fabric: unravelling gender differences in aortic dissection. Eur. Heart J. 41, 2439–2441 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Chaddha, A. et al. Cardiology patient page. Activity recommendations for postaortic dissection patients. Circulation 130, e140–e142 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Chaddha, A. et al. Survivors of aortic dissection: activity, mental health, and sexual function. Clin. Cardiol. 38, 652–659 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Chaddha, A. et al. Exercise and physical activity for the post-aortic dissection patient: the clinician’s conundrum. Clin. Cardiol. 38, 647–651 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Chaddha, A. et al. Medication adherence patterns in aortic dissection survivors. Indian J. Med. Res. 147, 183–188 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, A. Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy

    Eduardo Bossone

  2. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Kim A. Eagle

Authors
  1. Eduardo Bossone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kim A. Eagle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Both authors discussed the content of the article, and E.B. wrote the manuscript. Both authors reviewed and edited the article before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo Bossone.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Cardiology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bossone, E., Eagle, K.A. Epidemiology and management of aortic disease: aortic aneurysms and acute aortic syndromes. Nat Rev Cardiol 18, 331–348 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-020-00472-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-020-00472-6

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing