The function of the mammalian heart depends on the interplay between different cardiac cell types. The deployment of these cells, with precise spatiotemporal regulation, is also important during development to establish the heart structure. In this Review, we discuss the diverse origins of cardiac cell types and the lineage relationships between cells of a given type that contribute to different parts of the heart. The emerging lineage tree shows the progression of cell fate diversification, with patterning cues preceding cell type segregation, as well as points of convergence, with overlapping lineages contributing to a given tissue. Several cell lineage markers have been identified. However, caution is required with genetic-tracing experiments in comparison with clonal analyses. Genetic studies on cell populations provided insights into the mechanisms for lineage decisions. In the past 3 years, results of single-cell transcriptomics are beginning to reveal cell heterogeneity and early developmental trajectories. Equating this information with the in vivo location of cells and their lineage history is a current challenge. Characterization of the progenitor cells that form the heart and of the gene regulatory networks that control their deployment is of major importance for understanding the origin of congenital heart malformations and for producing cardiac tissue for use in regenerative medicine.
Clonal analysis shows that two myocardial cell lineages, which segregate early at gastrulation, form the heart, with cell sublineages contributing to the arterial and venous poles, with early left–right delineation.
The origin and cell fate choices of non-myocardial progenitors, such as those that give rise to cardiac interstitial fibroblasts or the coronary vasculature, are now clearer.
Overlapping cell sources provide potential for compensatory mechanisms, and thus developmental robustness, a process that is just beginning to be characterized.
As the heart begins to form, cardiac progenitors are located in the first and second heart fields, with characteristic and diverse gene expression patterns marking their cardiac contributions, which correspond to the first and second myocardial lineages.
Gene regulatory networks, governed by transcription factors, cofactors and chromatin modifications, in which non-coding RNAs also participate, control the deployment of cardiac progenitor cells during cardiogenesis.
Single-cell analyses have identified early cardiac progenitor cell types, providing new insights into cell heterogeneity and developmental trajectories of cardiac cells as the heart develops.
Access optionsAccess options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $17.75 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Galli, D. et al. Atrial myocardium derives from the posterior region of the second heart field, which acquires left-right identity as Pitx2c is expressed. Development 135, 1157–1167 (2008).
Kelly, R. G., Brown, N. A. & Buckingham, M. E. The arterial pole of the mouse heart forms from Fgf10-expressing cells in pharyngeal mesoderm. Dev. Cell 1, 435–440 (2001).
Zaffran, S., Kelly, R. G., Meilhac, S. M., Buckingham, M. E. & Brown, N. A. Right ventricular myocardium derives from the anterior heart field. Circ. Res. 95, 261–268 (2004).
Le Garrec, J. F. et al. A predictive model of asymmetric morphogenesis from 3D reconstructions of mouse heart looping dynamics. Elife 6, e28951 (2017).
Meilhac, S. M., Esner, M., Kerszberg, M., Moss, J. E. & Buckingham, M. E. Oriented clonal cell growth in the developing mouse myocardium underlies cardiac morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 164, 97–109 (2004).
Christoffels, V. M. et al. Chamber formation and morphogenesis in the developing mammalian heart. Dev. Biol. 223, 266–278 (2000).
Hoffman, J. I. & Kaplan, S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 39, 1890–1900 (2002).
de la Cruz, M., Sanchez-Gomez, C. & Palomino, M. The primitive cardiac regions in the straight heart tube (stage 9-) and their anatomical expression in the mature heart: an experimental study in the chick embryo. J. Anat. 165, 121–131 (1989).
Garcia-Martinez, V. & Schoenwolf, G. C. Primitive-streak origin of the cardiovascular system in avian embryos. Dev. Biol. 159, 706–719 (1993).
Mikawa, T., Borisov, A., Brown, A. M. & Fischman, D. A. Clonal analysis of cardiac morphogenesis in the chicken embryo using a replication-defective retrovirus: I. Formation of the ventricular myocardium. Dev. Dyn. 193, 11–23 (1992).
Rawles, M. E. The heart-forming areas of the early chick blastoderm. Physiol. Zool. 16, 22–42 (1943).
Redkar, A., Montgomery, M. & Litvin, J. Fate map of early avian cardiac progenitor cells. Development 128, 2269–2279 (2001).
Stalsberg, H. The origin of heart asymmetry: right and left contributions to the early chick embryo heart. Dev. Biol. 19, 109–127 (1969).
Waldo, K. L., Lo, C. W. & Kirby, M. L. Connexin 43 expression reflects neural crest patterns during cardiovascular development. Dev. Biol. 208, 307–323 (1999).
Buckingham, M., Biben, C. & Lawson, K. in Genetic Control of Heart Development (eds Olson, E. N., Harvey, R. P., Schulz, R. A. & Altman, J. S.) 31–33 (Strasbourg : HFSP Pub, 1997).
Lawson, K. A. & Pedersen, R. A. Cell fate, morphogenetic movement and population kinetics of embryonic endoderm at the time of germ layer formation in the mouse. Development 101, 627–652 (1987).
Tzouanacou, E., Wegener, A., Wymeersch, F. J., Wilson, V. & Nicolas, J. F. Redefining the progression of lineage segregations during mammalian embryogenesis by clonal analysis. Dev. Cell 17, 365–376 (2009).
Kinder, S. J. et al. The orderly allocation of mesodermal cells to the extraembryonic structures and the anteroposterior axis during gastrulation of the mouse embryo. Development 126, 4691–4701 (1999).
Ivanovitch, K., Temino, S. & Torres, M. Live imaging of heart tube development in mouse reveals alternating phases of cardiac differentiation and morphogenesis. Elife 6, e30668 (2017).
Kaufman, M. H. & Navaratnam, V. Early differentiation of the heart in mouse embryos. J. Anat. 133, 235–246 (1981).
Tam, P. P., Parameswaran, M., Kinder, S. J. & Weinberger, R. P. The allocation of epiblast cells to the embryonic heart and other mesodermal lineages: the role of ingression and tissue movement during gastrulation. Development 124, 1631–1642 (1997).
Meilhac, S. M., Esner, M., Kelly, R. G., Nicolas, J. F. & Buckingham, M. E. The clonal origin of myocardial cells in different regions of the embryonic mouse heart. Dev. Cell 6, 685–698 (2004).
Ragni, C. V. et al. Amotl1 mediates sequestration of the Hippo effector Yap1 downstream of Fat4 to restrict heart growth. Nat. Commun. 8, 14582 (2017).
Saga, Y. et al. MesP1 is expressed in the heart precursor cells and required for the formation of a single heart tube. Development 126, 3437–3447 (1999).
Buckingham, M. E. & Meilhac, S. M. Tracing cells for tracking cell lineage and clonal behavior. Dev. Cell 21, 394–409 (2011).
Lescroart, F. et al. Early lineage restriction in temporally distinct populations of Mesp1 progenitors during mammalian heart development. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 829–840 (2014).
Chabab, S. et al. Uncovering the number and clonal dynamics of Mesp1 progenitors during heart morphogenesis. Cell Rep. 14, 1–10 (2016).
Zong, H., Espinosa, J. S., Su, H. H., Muzumdar, M. D. & Luo, L. Mosaic analysis with double markers in mice. Cell 121, 479–492 (2005).
Devine, W. P., Wythe, J. D., George, M., Koshiba-Takeuchi, K. & Bruneau, B. G. Early patterning and specification of cardiac progenitors in gastrulating mesoderm. Elife 3, e03848 (2014).
Franco, D. et al. Left and right ventricular contributions to the formation of the interventricular septum in the mouse heart. Dev. Biol. 294, 366–375 (2006).
Buckingham, M. Gene regulatory networks and cell lineages that underlie the formation of skeletal muscle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5830–5837 (2017).
Lescroart, F. et al. Clonal analysis reveals common lineage relationships between head muscles and second heart field derivatives in the mouse embryo. Development 137, 3269–3279 (2010).
Lescroart, F. et al. Clonal analysis reveals a common origin between nonsomite-derived neck muscles and heart myocardium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1446–1451 (2015).
Lescroart, F., Mohun, T., Meilhac, S. M., Bennett, M. & Buckingham, M. Lineage tree for the venous pole of the heart: clonal analysis clarifies controversial genealogy based on genetic tracing. Circ. Res. 111, 1313–1322 (2012).
Dominguez, J. N., Meilhac, S. M., Bland, Y. S., Buckingham, M. E. & Brown, N. A. Asymmetric fate of the posterior part of the second heart field results in unexpected left/right contributions to both poles of the heart. Circ. Res. 111, 1323–1335 (2012).
Bajolle, F. et al. Conotruncal defects associated with anomalous pulmonary venous connections. Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. 102, 105–110 (2009).
Meilhac, S. M. et al. A retrospective clonal analysis of the myocardium reveals two phases of clonal growth in the developing mouse heart. Development 130, 3877–3889 (2003).
Del Monte-Nieto, G. et al. Control of cardiac jelly dynamics by NOTCH1 and NRG1 defines the building plan for trabeculation. Nature 557, 439–445 (2018).
Tian, X. et al. Identification of a hybrid myocardial zone in the mammalian heart after birth. Nat. Commun. 8, 87 (2017).
Miquerol, L. et al. Resolving cell lineage contributions to the ventricular conduction system with a Cx40-GFP allele: a dual contribution of the first and second heart fields. Dev. Dyn. 242, 665–677 (2013).
Miquerol, L. et al. Biphasic development of the mammalian ventricular conduction system. Circ. Res. 107, 153–161 (2010).
Bardot, E. et al. Foxa2 identifies a cardiac progenitor population with ventricular differentiation potential. Nat. Commun. 8, 14428 (2017).
Ang, S. L. et al. The formation and maintenance of the definitive endoderm lineage in the mouse: involvement of HNF3/forkhead proteins. Development 119, 1301–1315 (1993).
Kinder, S. J. et al. The organizer of the mouse gastrula is composed of a dynamic population of progenitor cells for the axial mesoderm. Development 128, 3623–3634 (2001).
Park, E. J. et al. System for tamoxifen-inducible expression of cre-recombinase from the Foxa2 locus in mice. Dev. Dyn. 237, 447–453 (2008).
Verzi, M. P., McCulley, D. J., De Val, S., Dodou, E. & Black, B. L. The right ventricle, outflow tract, and ventricular septum comprise a restricted expression domain within the secondary/anterior heart field. Dev. Biol. 287, 134–145 (2005).
Buckingham, M., Meilhac, S. & Zaffran, S. Building the mammalian heart from two sources of myocardial cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 826–835 (2005).
Bruneau, B. G. et al. Chamber-specific cardiac expression of Tbx5 and heart defects in Holt-Oram syndrome. Dev. Biol. 211, 100–108 (1999).
Rana, M. S. et al. Tbx1 coordinates addition of posterior second heart field progenitor cells to the arterial and venous poles of the heart. Circ. Res. 115, 790–799 (2014).
Vincentz, J. W., Toolan, K. P., Zhang, W. & Firulli, A. B. Hand factor ablation causes defective left ventricular chamber development and compromised adult cardiac function. PLOS Genet. 13, e1006922 (2017).
Barnes, R. M., Firulli, B. A., Conway, S. J., Vincentz, J. W. & Firulli, A. B. Analysis of the Hand1 cell lineage reveals novel contributions to cardiovascular, neural crest, extra-embryonic, and lateral mesoderm derivatives. Dev. Dyn. 239, 3086–3097 (2010).
Liang, X. et al. HCN4 dynamically marks the first heart field and conduction system precursors. Circ. Res. 113, 399–407 (2013).
Spater, D. et al. A HCN4+ cardiomyogenic progenitor derived from the first heart field and human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 1098–1106 (2013).
Fujii, M. et al. Sfrp5 identifies murine cardiac progenitors for all myocardial structures except for the right ventricle. Nat. Commun. 8, 14664 (2017).
Watanabe, Y. et al. Role of mesodermal FGF8 and FGF10 overlaps in the development of the arterial pole of the heart and pharyngeal arch arteries. Circ. Res. 106, 495–503 (2010).
Cai, C. L. et al. Isl1 identifies a cardiac progenitor population that proliferates prior to differentiation and contributes a majority of cells to the heart. Dev. Cell 5, 877–889 (2003).
Engleka, K. A. et al. Islet1 derivatives in the heart are of both neural crest and second heart field origin. Circ. Res. 110, 922–926 (2012).
Ma, Q., Zhou, B. & Pu, W. T. Reassessment of Isl1 and Nkx2-5 cardiac fate maps using a Gata4-based reporter of Cre activity. Dev. Biol. 323, 98–104 (2008).
Sun, Y. et al. Islet 1 is expressed in distinct cardiovascular lineages, including pacemaker and coronary vascular cells. Dev. Biol. 304, 286–296 (2007).
Prall, O. W. et al. An Nkx2-5/Bmp2/Smad1 negative feedback loop controls heart progenitor specification and proliferation. Cell 128, 947–959 (2007).
Stanley, E. G. et al. Efficient Cre-mediated deletion in cardiac progenitor cells conferred by a 3’UTR-ires-Cre allele of the homeobox gene Nkx2-5. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 46, 431–439 (2002).
Seo, S. & Kume, T. Forkhead transcription factors, Foxc1 and Foxc2, are required for the morphogenesis of the cardiac outflow tract. Dev. Biol. 296, 421–436 (2006).
Zhou, Z. et al. Temporally distinct Six2-positive second heart field progenitors regulate mammalian heart development and disease. Cell Rep. 18, 1019–1032 (2017).
Baldini, A., Fulcoli, F. G. & Illingworth, E. Tbx1: transcriptional and developmental functions. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 122, 223–243 (2017).
Theveniau-Ruissy, M. et al. The del22q11.2 candidate gene Tbx1 controls regional outflow tract identity and coronary artery patterning. Circ. Res. 103, 142–148 (2008).
Huynh, T., Chen, L., Terrell, P. & Baldini, A. A fate map of Tbx1 expressing cells reveals heterogeneity in the second cardiac field. Genesis 45, 470–475 (2007).
Bajolle, F. et al. Myocardium at the base of the aorta and pulmonary trunk is prefigured in the outflow tract of the heart and in subdomains of the second heart field. Dev. Biol. 313, 25–34 (2008).
Kelly, R. G. & Papaioannou, V. E. Visualization of outflow tract development in the absence of Tbx1 using an FgF10 enhancer trap transgene. Dev. Dyn. 236, 821–828 (2007).
Cortes, C., Francou, A., De Bono, C. & Kelly, R. G. Epithelial properties of the second heart field. Circ. Res. 122, 142–154 (2018).
Zhou, L. et al. Tbx5 and Osr1 interact to regulate posterior second heart field cell cycle progression for cardiac septation. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 85, 1–12 (2015).
Tian, Y. et al. Characterization and in vivo pharmacological rescue of a Wnt2-Gata6 pathway required for cardiac inflow tract development. Dev. Cell 18, 275–287 (2010).
Christoffels, V. M. et al. Formation of the venous pole of the heart from an Nkx2-5-negative precursor population requires Tbx18. Circ. Res. 98, 1555–1563 (2006).
Mommersteeg, M. T. et al. The sinus venosus progenitors separate and diversify from the first and second heart fields early in development. Cardiovasc. Res. 87, 92–101 (2010).
Bertrand, N. et al. Hox genes define distinct progenitor sub-domains within the second heart field. Dev. Biol. 353, 266–274 (2011).
Furtado, M. B., Biben, C., Shiratori, H., Hamada, H. & Harvey, R. P. Characterization of Pitx2c expression in the mouse heart using a reporter transgene. Dev. Dyn. 240, 195–203 (2011).
Bajolle, F. et al. Rotation of the myocardial wall of the outflow tract is implicated in the normal positioning of the great arteries. Circ. Res. 98, 421–428 (2006).
Liu, C. et al. Pitx2c patterns anterior myocardium and aortic arch vessels and is required for local cell movement into atrioventricular cushions. Development 129, 5081–5091 (2002).
Dyer, L. A. & Kirby, M. L. The role of secondary heart field in cardiac development. Dev. Biol. 336, 137–144 (2009).
Kelly, R. G., Buckingham, M. E. & Moorman, A. F. Heart fields and cardiac morphogenesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 4, a015750 (2014).
Vincent, S. D. & Buckingham, M. E. How to make a heart: the origin and regulation of cardiac progenitor cells. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 90, 1–41 (2010).
Jain, R. et al. HEART DEVELOPMENT. Integration of Bmp and Wnt signaling by Hopx specifies commitment of cardiomyoblasts. Science 348, aaa6071(2015).
Kang, J., Nathan, E., Xu, S. M., Tzahor, E. & Black, B. L. Isl1 is a direct transcriptional target of Forkhead transcription factors in second-heart-field-derived mesoderm. Dev. Biol. 334, 513–522 (2009).
Kappen, C. & Salbaum, J. M. Identification of regulatory elements in the Isl1 gene locus. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 53, 935–946 (2009).
Dodou, E., Verzi, M. P., Anderson, J. P., Xu, S. M. & Black, B. L. Mef2c is a direct transcriptional target of ISL1 and GATA factors in the anterior heart field during mouse embryonic development. Development 131, 3931–3942 (2004).
Watanabe, Y. et al. Fibroblast growth factor 10 gene regulation in the second heart field by Tbx1, Nkx2-5, and Islet1 reveals a genetic switch for down-regulation in the myocardium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 18273–18280 (2012).
Guo, C. et al. A Tbx1-Six1/Eya1-Fgf8 genetic pathway controls mammalian cardiovascular and craniofacial morphogenesis. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 1585–1595 (2011).
Yuan, X. et al. Disruption of spatiotemporal hypoxic signaling causes congenital heart disease in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 2235–2248 (2017).
Liberatore, C. M., Searcy-Schrick, R. D., Vincent, E. B. & Yutzey, K. E. Nkx-2.5 gene induction in mice is mediated by a Smad consensus regulatory region. Dev. Biol. 244, 243–256 (2002).
Lien, C. L., McAnally, J., Richardson, J. A. & Olson, E. N. Cardiac-specific activity of an Nkx2-5 enhancer requires an evolutionarily conserved Smad binding site. Dev. Biol. 244, 257–266 (2002).
von Both, I. et al. Foxh1 is essential for development of the anterior heart field. Dev. Cell 7, 331–345 (2004).
Dorn, T. et al. Direct nkx2-5 transcriptional repression of isl1 controls cardiomyocyte subtype identity. Stem Cells 33, 1113–1129 (2015).
Xie, L. et al. Tbx5-hedgehog molecular networks are essential in the second heart field for atrial septation. Dev. Cell 23, 280–291 (2012).
Snarr, B. S., Wirrig, E. E., Phelps, A. L., Trusk, T. C. & Wessels, A. A spatiotemporal evaluation of the contribution of the dorsal mesenchymal protrusion to cardiac development. Dev. Dyn. 236, 1287–1294 (2007).
Snarr, B. S. et al. Isl1 expression at the venous pole identifies a novel role for the second heart field in cardiac development. Circ. Res. 101, 971–974 (2007).
Goddeeris, M. M. et al. Intracardiac septation requires hedgehog-dependent cellular contributions from outside the heart. Development 135, 1887–1895 (2008).
Hoffmann, A. D., Peterson, M. A., Friedland-Little, J. M., Anderson, S. A. & Moskowitz, I. P. Sonic hedgehog is required in pulmonary endoderm for atrial septation. Development 136, 1761–1770 (2009).
Hoffmann, A. D. et al. Foxf genes integrate tbx5 and hedgehog pathways in the second heart field for cardiac septation. PLOS Genet. 10, e1004604 (2014).
Zhou, L. et al. Gata4 potentiates second heart field proliferation and Hedgehog signaling for cardiac septation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E1422–E1431 (2017).
Durocher, D., Charron, F., Warren, R., Schwartz, R. J. & Nemer, M. The cardiac transcription factors Nkx2-5 and GATA-4 are mutual cofactors. EMBO J. 16, 5687–5696 (1997).
Garg, V. et al. GATA4 mutations cause human congenital heart defects and reveal an interaction with TBX5. Nature 424, 443–447 (2003).
Maitra, M. et al. Interaction of Gata4 and Gata6 with Tbx5 is critical for normal cardiac development. Dev. Biol. 326, 368–377 (2009).
Ang, Y. S. et al. Disease model of GATA4 mutation reveals transcription factor cooperativity in human cardiogenesis. Cell 167, 1734–1749.e22 (2016).
Luna-Zurita, L. et al. Complex interdependence regulates heterotypic transcription factor distribution and coordinates cardiogenesis. Cell 164, 999–1014 (2016).
Bouveret, R. et al. NKX2-5 mutations causative for congenital heart disease retain functionality and are directed to hundreds of targets. Elife 4, e06942 (2015).
Witzel, H. R. et al. The LIM protein Ajuba restricts the second heart field progenitor pool by regulating Isl1 activity. Dev. Cell 23, 58–70 (2012).
Caputo, L. et al. The Isl1/Ldb1 complex orchestrates genome-wide chromatin organization to instruct differentiation of multipotent cardiac progenitors. Cell Stem Cell 17, 287–299 (2015).
Stoller, J. Z. et al. Ash2l interacts with Tbx1 and is required during early embryogenesis. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood) 235, 569–576 (2010).
Fulcoli, F. G. et al. Rebalancing gene haploinsufficiency in vivo by targeting chromatin. Nat. Commun. 7, 11688 (2016).
Chen, L. et al. Transcriptional control in cardiac progenitors: Tbx1 interacts with the BAF chromatin remodeling complex and regulates Wnt5a. PLOS Genet. 8, e1002571 (2012).
Takeuchi, J. K. & Bruneau, B. G. Directed transdifferentiation of mouse mesoderm to heart tissue by defined factors. Nature 459, 708–711 (2009).
Poleshko, A. et al. Genome-nuclear lamina interactions regulate cardiac stem cell lineage restriction. Cell 171, 573–587.e14 (2017).
Klattenhoff, C. A. et al. Braveheart, a long noncoding RNA required for cardiovascular lineage commitment. Cell 152, 570–583 (2013).
Xue, Z. et al. A G-rich motif in the lncRNA braveheart interacts with a zinc-finger transcription factor to specify the cardiovascular lineage. Mol. Cell 64, 37–50 (2016).
Grote, P. et al. The tissue-specific lncRNA Fendrr is an essential regulator of heart and body wall development in the mouse. Dev. Cell 24, 206–214 (2013).
Epstein, J. A. et al. Migration of cardiac neural crest cells in Splotch embryos. Development 127, 1869–1878 (2000).
Jiang, X., Rowitch, D. H., Soriano, P., McMahon, A. P. & Sucov, H. M. Fate of the mammalian cardiac neural crest. Development 127, 1607–1616 (2000).
Kimura, K., Ieda, M. & Fukuda, K. Development, maturation, and transdifferentiation of cardiac sympathetic nerves. Circ. Res. 110, 325–336 (2012).
Saga, Y., Kitajima, S. & Miyagawa-Tomita, S. Mesp1 expression is the earliest sign of cardiovascular development. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 10, 345–352 (2000).
Kattman, S. J., Huber, T. L. & Keller, G. M. Multipotent flk-1+ cardiovascular progenitor cells give rise to the cardiomyocyte, endothelial, and vascular smooth muscle lineages. Dev. Cell 11, 723–732 (2006).
Moretti, A. et al. Multipotent embryonic isl1+ progenitor cells lead to cardiac, smooth muscle, and endothelial cell diversification. Cell 127, 1151–1165 (2006).
Wu, S. M. et al. Developmental origin of a bipotential myocardial and smooth muscle cell precursor in the mammalian heart. Cell 127, 1137–1150 (2006).
Nakano, A., Nakano, H., Smith, K. A. & Palpant, N. J. The developmental origins and lineage contributions of endocardial endothelium. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1863, 1937–1947 (2016).
Ema, M., Takahashi, S. & Rossant, J. Deletion of the selection cassette, but not cis-acting elements, in targeted Flk1-lacZ allele reveals Flk1 expression in multipotent mesodermal progenitors. Blood 107, 111–117 (2006).
Motoike, T., Markham, D. W., Rossant, J. & Sato, T. N. Evidence for novel fate of Flk1+ progenitor: contribution to muscle lineage. Genesis 35, 153–159 (2003).
de la Pompa, J. L. et al. Role of the NF-ATc transcription factor in morphogenesis of cardiac valves and septum. Nature 392, 182–186 (1998).
Misfeldt, A. M. et al. Endocardial cells are a distinct endothelial lineage derived from Flk1+ multipotent cardiovascular progenitors. Dev. Biol. 333, 78–89 (2009).
Wu, B. et al. Nfatc1 coordinates valve endocardial cell lineage development required for heart valve formation. Circ. Res. 109, 183–192 (2011).
Nakano, H. et al. Haemogenic endocardium contributes to transient definitive haematopoiesis. Nat. Commun. 4, 1564 (2013).
Peterkin, T., Gibson, A. & Patient, R. Common genetic control of haemangioblast and cardiac development in zebrafish. Development 136, 1465–1474 (2009).
Schulte, I., Schlueter, J., Abu-Issa, R., Brand, T. & Manner, J. Morphological and molecular left-right asymmetries in the development of the proepicardium: a comparative analysis on mouse and chick embryos. Dev. Dyn. 236, 684–695 (2007).
Wessels, A. et al. Epicardially derived fibroblasts preferentially contribute to the parietal leaflets of the atrioventricular valves in the murine heart. Dev. Biol. 366, 111–124 (2012).
Zhou, B., von Gise, A., Ma, Q., Rivera-Feliciano, J. & Pu, W. T. Nkx2-5- and Isl1-expressing cardiac progenitors contribute to proepicardium. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 375, 450–453 (2008).
Cai, C. L. et al. A myocardial lineage derives from Tbx18 epicardial cells. Nature 454, 104–108 (2008).
Zhou, B. et al. Epicardial progenitors contribute to the cardiomyocyte lineage in the developing heart. Nature 454, 109–113 (2008).
Christoffels, V. M. et al. Tbx18 and the fate of epicardial progenitors. Nature 458, E9–E10 (2009).
Rudat, C. & Kispert, A. Wt1 and epicardial fate mapping. Circ. Res. 111, 165–169 (2012).
Martinez-Estrada, O. M. et al. Wt1 is required for cardiovascular progenitor cell formation through transcriptional control of Snail and E-cadherin. Nat. Genet. 42, 89–93 (2010).
Villa Del Campo, C. et al. Myc overexpression enhances of epicardial contribution to the developing heart and promotes extensive expansion of the cardiomyocyte population. Sci. Rep. 6, 35366 (2016).
Ivey, M. J. & Tallquist, M. D. Defining the cardiac fibroblast. Circ. J. 80, 2269–2276 (2016).
Kolditz, D. P. et al. Epicardium-derived cells in development of annulus fibrosis and persistence of accessory pathways. Circulation 117, 1508–1517 (2008).
Zhou, B., von Gise, A., Ma, Q., Hu, Y. W. & Pu, W. T. Genetic fate mapping demonstrates contribution of epicardium-derived cells to the annulus fibrosis of the mammalian heart. Dev. Biol. 338, 251–261 (2010).
Ali, S. R. et al. Developmental heterogeneity of cardiac fibroblasts does not predict pathological proliferation and activation. Circ. Res. 115, 625–635 (2014).
Moore-Morris, T. et al. Resident fibroblast lineages mediate pressure overload-induced cardiac fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 2921–2934 (2014).
Acharya, A. et al. The bHLH transcription factor Tcf21 is required for lineage-specific EMT of cardiac fibroblast progenitors. Development 139, 2139–2149 (2012).
Kanisicak, O. et al. Genetic lineage tracing defines myofibroblast origin and function in the injured heart. Nat. Commun. 7, 12260 (2016).
Lie-Venema, H. et al. Origin, fate, and function of epicardium-derived cells (EPDCs) in normal and abnormal cardiac development. ScientificWorldJournal 7, 1777–1798 (2007).
Chen, Q. et al. Endothelial cells are progenitors of cardiac pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells. Nat. Commun. 7, 12422 (2016).
Mikawa, T. & Fischman, D. A. Retroviral analysis of cardiac morphogenesis: discontinuous formation of coronary vessels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 9504–9508 (1992).
Sharma, B., Chang, A. & Red-Horse, K. Coronary artery development: progenitor cells and differentiation pathways. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 79, 1–19 (2017).
Tian, X., Pu, W. T. & Zhou, B. Cellular origin and developmental program of coronary angiogenesis. Circ. Res. 116, 515–530 (2015).
Red-Horse, K., Ueno, H., Weissman, I. L. & Krasnow, M. A. Coronary arteries form by developmental reprogramming of venous cells. Nature 464, 549–553 (2010).
Chen, H. I. et al. The sinus venosus contributes to coronary vasculature through VEGFC-stimulated angiogenesis. Development 141, 4500–4512 (2014).
Katz, T. C. et al. Distinct compartments of the proepicardial organ give rise to coronary vascular endothelial cells. Dev. Cell 22, 639–650 (2012).
Lavine, K. J. et al. Fibroblast growth factor signals regulate a wave of Hedgehog activation that is essential for coronary vascular development. Genes Dev. 20, 1651–1666 (2006).
Tian, X. et al. Subepicardial endothelial cells invade the embryonic ventricle wall to form coronary arteries. Cell Res. 23, 1075–1090 (2013).
Sharma, B. et al. Alternative progenitor cells compensate to rebuild the coronary vasculature in Elabela- and Apj-deficient hearts. Dev. Cell 42, 655–666.e3 (2017).
Wu, B. et al. Endocardial cells form the coronary arteries by angiogenesis through myocardial-endocardial VEGF signaling. Cell 151, 1083–1096 (2012).
Zhang, Z. & Zhou, B. Accelerated coronary angiogenesis by vegfr1-knockout endocardial cells. PLOS One 8, e70570 (2013).
Zhang, H. et al. Endocardium minimally contributes to coronary endothelium in the embryonic ventricular free walls. Circ. Res. 118, 1880–1893 (2016).
Cano, E. et al. Extracardiac septum transversum/proepicardial endothelial cells pattern embryonic coronary arterio-venous connections. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 656–661 (2016).
Klotz, L. et al. Cardiac lymphatics are heterogeneous in origin and respond to injury. Nature 522, 62–67 (2015).
Ulvmar, M. H., Martinez-Corral, I., Stanczuk, L. & Makinen, T. Pdgfrb-Cre targets lymphatic endothelial cells of both venous and non-venous origins. Genesis 54, 350–358 (2016).
Bernanke, D. H. & Markwald, R. R. Migratory behavior of cardiac cushion tissue cells in a collagen-lattice culture system. Dev. Biol. 91, 235–245 (1982).
Markwald, R. R., Fitzharris, T. P. & Manasek, F. J. Structural development of endocardial cushions. Am. J. Anat. 148, 85–119 (1977).
Mjaatvedt, C. H., Lepera, R. C. & Markwald, R. R. Myocardial specificity for initiating endothelial-mesenchymal cell transition in embryonic chick heart correlates with a particulate distribution of fibronectin. Dev. Biol. 119, 59–67 (1987).
Ma, L., Lu, M. F., Schwartz, R. J. & Martin, J. F. Bmp2 is essential for cardiac cushion epithelial-mesenchymal transition and myocardial patterning. Development 132, 5601–5611 (2005).
de Lange, F. J. et al. Lineage and morphogenetic analysis of the cardiac valves. Circ. Res. 95, 645–654 (2004).
Waldo, K. et al. A novel role for cardiac neural crest in heart development. J. Clin. Invest. 103, 1499–1507 (1999).
Odelin, G. et al. Krox20 defines a subpopulation of cardiac neural crest cells contributing to arterial valves and bicuspid aortic valve. Development 145, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.151944 (2018).
Lincoln, J., Alfieri, C. M. & Yutzey, K. E. Development of heart valve leaflets and supporting apparatus in chicken and mouse embryos. Dev. Dyn. 230, 239–250 (2004).
Eley, L. et al. A novel source of arterial valve cells linked to bicuspid aortic valve without raphe in mice. Elife 7, e34110 (2018).
Mifflin, J. J., Dupuis, L. E., Alcala, N. E., Russell, L. G. & Kern, C. B. Intercalated cushion cells within the cardiac outflow tract are derived from the myocardial troponin T type 2 (Tnnt2) Cre lineage. Dev. Dyn. 247, 1005–1017 (2018).
Ferdous, A. et al. Nkx2-5 transactivates the Ets-related protein 71 gene and specifies an endothelial/endocardial fate in the developing embryo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 814–819 (2009).
Rasmussen, T. L. et al. ER71 directs mesodermal fate decisions during embryogenesis. Development 138, 4801–4812 (2011).
He, Z., Grunewald, M., Dor, Y. & Keshet, E. VEGF regulates relative allocation of Isl1(+) cardiac progenitors to myocardial and endocardial lineages. Mech. Dev. 142, 40–49 (2016).
Rentschler, S. et al. Myocardial Notch signaling reprograms cardiomyocytes to a conduction-like phenotype. Circulation 126, 1058–1066 (2012).
Mellgren, A. M. et al. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta signaling is required for efficient epicardial cell migration and development of two distinct coronary vascular smooth muscle cell populations. Circ. Res. 103, 1393–1401 (2008).
Smith, C. L., Baek, S. T., Sung, C. Y. & Tallquist, M. D. Epicardial-derived cell epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and fate specification require PDGF receptor signaling. Circ. Res. 108, e15–e26 (2011).
Braitsch, C. M., Combs, M. D., Quaggin, S. E. & Yutzey, K. E. Pod1/Tcf21 is regulated by retinoic acid signaling and inhibits differentiation of epicardium-derived cells into smooth muscle in the developing heart. Dev. Biol. 368, 345–357 (2012).
DeLaughter, D. M. et al. Single-cell resolution of temporal gene expression during heart development. Dev. Cell 39, 480–490 (2016).
Li, G. et al. Transcriptomic profiling maps anatomically patterned subpopulations among single embryonic cardiac cells. Dev. Cell 39, 491–507 (2016).
Jia, G. et al. Single-cell transcriptional regulations and accessible chromatin landscape of cell fate decisions in early heart development. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/210930 (2017).
Lescroart, F. et al. Defining the earliest step of cardiovascular lineage segregation by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 359, 1177–1181 (2018).
Kitajima, S., Takagi, A., Inoue, T. & Saga, Y. MesP1 and MesP2 are essential for the development of cardiac mesoderm. Development 127, 3215–3226 (2000).
Chiapparo, G. et al. Mesp1 controls the speed, polarity, and directionality of cardiovascular progenitor migration. J. Cell Biol. 213, 463–477 (2016).
Lindsley, R. C. et al. Mesp1 coordinately regulates cardiovascular fate restriction and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in differentiating ESCs. Cell Stem Cell 3, 55–68 (2008).
Bondue, A. et al. Mesp1 acts as a master regulator of multipotent cardiovascular progenitor specification. Cell Stem Cell 3, 69–84 (2008).
Bondue, A. et al. Defining the earliest step of cardiovascular progenitor specification during embryonic stem cell differentiation. J. Cell Biol. 192, 751–765 (2011).
David, R. et al. MesP1 drives vertebrate cardiovascular differentiation through Dkk-1-mediated blockade of Wnt-signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 338–345 (2008).
Downs, K. M. & Davies, T. Staging of gastrulating mouse embryos by morphological landmarks in the dissecting microscope. Development 118, 1255–1266 (1993).
Spanjaard, B. & Junker, J. P. Methods for lineage tracing on the organism-wide level. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 49, 16–21 (2017).
Meilhac, S. M., Lescroart, F., Blanpain, C. & Buckingham, M. E. Cardiac cell lineages that form the heart. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 4, a013888 (2014).
Moore-Morris, T., Cattaneo, P., Puceat, M. & Evans, S. M. Origins of cardiac fibroblasts. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 91, 1–5 (2016).
Work in the group of S.M.M. is supported by the Institut Imagine, the Institut Pasteur, INSERM and the Université Paris Descartes. M.E.B. acknowledges support from the Institut Pasteur and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS; UMR 3738). The authors thank R. Kelly (Institut de Biologie du Développement de Marseille, France) and S. Zaffran and F. Lescroart (Marseille Medical Genetics, France) for helpful comments on the manuscript.
About this article
Nature Reviews Cardiology (2018)