Correspondence | Published:

Insights on cancer resistance in vertebrates: reptiles as a parallel system to mammals

Nature Reviews Cancervolume 18page525 (2018) | Download Citation

The Opinion article, ‘Mechanisms of cancer resistance in long-lived mammals’ (Nat. Rev. Cancer. (2018))1, highlights how long-lived and large-bodied organisms are a natural resource for investigating the molecular mechanisms that underlie non-transmissible cancer resistance and increased tumour suppression in mammals. Although there are evolutionary advantages to long life spans and large body sizes2,3, there is also greater risk of accumulating genotoxic and cytotoxic damage as a consequence of living longer and having more cells. Thus, long-lived and large-bodied organisms are theoretically at an increased risk of genomic instability and cancer4. Consistent with this increased risk, there is a strong positive correlation between body size and cancer incidence within species such as dogs5 and humans6. Evidently, however, long-lived and large-bodied organisms do exist — thus they likely have evolved mechanisms for reducing their risk of developing cancer1,7,8,9.

The ideal study system in which to explore these questions is one in which a long-lived, large-bodied lineage is phylogenetically deeply nested within a clade with normal life spans and body sizes. Thus far, most studies on the evolution of augmented cancer resistance have focused on mammals such as long-lived naked mole-rats1 and large-bodied elephants10. While mammals are without a doubt an excellent model system, reptiles also pose numerous advantages for studying cancer resistance because of their huge diversity in longevity, body size11, ecology, habitat type, physiology and metabolic rates — all factors influencing mechanisms of cancer protection and tumour repression1,4. These factors also vary with respect to environmental temperature12, a concern considering current climate change. Even within closely related species, reptiles also exhibit large differences in body size, resting metabolic rate and longevity. For example, giant Galápagos tortoises can weigh up to 100 times more and live 3–5 times longer than their closest living relative, the Chaco tortoise, from which they diverged around 3–4 million years ago13. The presence of larger, long-lived species that are nested deeply within clades with much smaller, shorter-lived species permits the use of evolutionary comparative genomics approaches to discern potentially causal molecular and genetic changes associated with cancer protection and tumour suppression from other unrelated differences among species. We therefore suggest that reptiles are an ideal parallel system to mammals in which to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the ecological, molecular and evolutionary influences on cancer susceptibility or resistance. While data on mechanisms of cancer protection, tumour suppression and incidence of benign and malignant cancer are accumulating mostly for mammals and more recently for birds9, other vertebrates have not been similarly investigated. Specifically, although cancer occurrence has been recorded in reptiles14, comparative prevalence data on cancer across reptiles with different life spans and body sizes are currently lacking. This overall lack of comparative oncological data, including incidence of cancer, cancer type and mortality rates, on diverse animals currently represents an important gap toward understanding cancer susceptibility and protection4,14,15.


  1. 1.

    Seluanov, A., Gladyshev, V. N., Vijg, J. & Gorbunova, V. Mechanisms of cancer resistance in long-lived mammals. Nat. Rev. Cancer (2018).

  2. 2.

    Blanckenhorn, W. U. The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? Q. Rev. Biol. 75, 385–407 (2000).

  3. 3.

    Hone, D. W. E. & Benton, M. J. The evolution of large size: how does Cope’s rule work? Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 4–6 (2005).

  4. 4.

    Harris, V. K., Schiffman, J. D. & Boddy, A. M. in Ecology and Evolution of Cancer (eds Ujvari, B., Roche, B. & Thomas, F.) 99–110 (Academic Press, 2017).

  5. 5.

    Dobson, J. M. Breed-predispositions to cancer in pedigree dogs. ISRN Vet. Sci. 2013, 941275 (2013).

  6. 6.

    Green, J. et al. Height and cancer incidence in the Million Women Study: prospective cohort, and meta-analysis of prospective studies of height and total cancer risk. Lancet Oncol. 12, 785–794 (2011).

  7. 7.

    Peto, R., Roe, F. J., Lee, P. N., Levy, L. & Clack, J. Cancer and ageing in mice and men. Br. J. Cancer 32, 411–426 (1975).

  8. 8.

    Leroi, A. M., Koufopanou, V. & Burt, A. Cancer selection. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 226–231 (2003).

  9. 9.

    Møller, A. P., Erritzøe, J. & Soler, J. J. Life history, immunity, Peto’s paradox and tumours in birds. J. Evol. Biol. 30, 960–967 (2017).

  10. 10.

    Sulak, M. et al. TP53 copy number expansion is associated with the evolution of increased body size and an enhanced DNA damage response in elephants. eLife 5, e11994 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Allen, W. L., Street, S. E. & Capellini, I. Fast life history traits promote invasion success in amphibians and reptiles. Ecol. Lett. 20, 222–230 (2017).

  12. 12.

    White, C. R., Phillips, N. F. & Seymour, R. S. The scaling and temperature dependence of vertebrate metabolism. Biol. Lett. 2, 125–127 (2006).

  13. 13.

    Poulakakis, N., Russello, M., Geist, D. & Caccone, A. Unravelling the peculiarities of island life: vicariance, dispersal and the diversification of the extinct and extant giant Galápagos tortoises. Mol. Ecol. 21, 160–173 (2012).

  14. 14.

    Madsen, T. et al. in Ecology and Evolution of Cancer (eds Ujvari, B., Roche, B. & Thomas, F.) 11–46 (Academic Press, 2017).

  15. 15.

    Roche, B., Møller, A. P., DeGregori, J. & Thomas, F. in Ecology and Evolution of Cancer (eds Ujvari, B., Roche, B. & Thomas, F.) 181–191 (Academic Press, 2017).

Download references


The authors are thankful to Isabella Capellini for sharing the dataset on life history traits in reptiles published in Ref.11.

Author information


  1. University of South Alabama, Department of Biology, Mobile, AL, USA

    • Ylenia Chiari
    •  & Scott Glaberman
  2. University of Chicago, Department of Human Genetics & Department of Organismal Biology & Anatomy, Chicago, IL, USA

    • Vincent J. Lynch


  1. Search for Ylenia Chiari in:

  2. Search for Scott Glaberman in:

  3. Search for Vincent J. Lynch in:


Y.C. researched the data for the article. S.G. and V.J.L. contributed substantially to discussion of the article’s content. Y.C., S.G. and V.J.L. contributed equally to writing the article and reviewing and editing the article before submission.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ylenia Chiari.

About this article

Publication history



Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing