Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Single-component superconductivity in UTe2 at ambient pressure


The microscopic mechanism of Cooper pairing in a superconductor leaves its fingerprint on the symmetry of the order parameter. UTe2 has previously been inferred to have a multi-component order parameter, in part due to the apparent presence of a two-step superconducting transition in some samples. However, recent experimental observations in newer-generation samples have raised questions about this interpretation, pointing to the need for a direct probe of the order parameter symmetry. Here we use pulse-echo ultrasound to measure the elastic moduli of UTe2 in samples that exhibit both one and two superconducting transitions. We demonstrate the absence of thermodynamic discontinuities in the shear elastic moduli of both single- and double-transition samples, providing direct evidence that UTe2 has a single-component superconducting order parameter. We further show that superconductivity is highly sensitive to compression strain along the a and c axes but insensitive to strain along the b axis. This leads us to suggest a single-component, odd-parity order parameter—specifically the B2u order parameter—as most compatible with our data.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The influence of strain on one- and two-component superconductors.
Fig. 2: Relative change in elastic moduli through Tc for single-Tc UTe2.
Fig. 3: Relative change in elastic moduli through Tc for double-Tc UTe2.
Fig. 4: Relative change in compressional elastic moduli through Tc.
Fig. 5: Influence of compression strains on the crystal structure and Fermi surface of UTe2.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available via GitHub at (ref. 44) and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.


  1. Tsuei, C. C. & Kirtley, J. R. Pairing symmetry in cuprate superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 969–1016 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghosh, S. et al. Thermodynamic evidence for a two-component superconducting order parameter in Sr2RuO4. Nat. Phys. 17, 199–204 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rice, T. M. & Sigrist, M. Sr2RuO4: an electronic analogue of 3He? J. Phys. Condensed Matter 7, L643–L648 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mackenzie, A. P., Scaffidi, T., Hicks, C. W. & Maeno, Y. Even odder after twenty-three years: the superconducting order parameter puzzle of Sr2RuO4. npj Quantum Mater. 2, 40 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sato, M. & Ando, Y. Topological superconductors: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 076501 (2017).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Metz, T. et al. Point-node gap structure of the spin-triplet superconductor UTe2. Phys. Rev. B 100, 220504 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ran, S. et al. Nearly ferromagnetic spin-triplet superconductivity. Science 365, 684–687 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishihara, K. et al. Chiral superconductivity in UTe2 probed by anisotropic low-energy excitations. Nat. Commun. 14, 2966 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kittaka, S. et al. Orientation of point nodes and nonunitary triplet pairing tuned by the easy-axis magnetization in UTe2. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 032014 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aoki, D. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in heavy fermion UTe2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 88, 043702 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ran, S. et al. Extreme magnetic field-boosted superconductivity. Nat. Phys. 15, 1250–1254 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hayes, I. M. et al. Multicomponent superconducting order parameter in UTe2. Science 373, 797–801 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wei, D. S. et al. Interplay between magnetism and superconductivity in UTe2. Phys. Rev. B 105, 024521 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiao, L. et al. Chiral superconductivity in heavy-fermion metal UTe2. Nature 579, 523–527 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bae, S. et al. Anomalous normal fluid response in a chiral superconductor UTe2. Nat. Commun. 12, 2644 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosa, PriscilaF. S. et al. Single thermodynamic transition at 2 K in superconducting UTe2 single crystals. Commun. Mater. 3, 1–6 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas, S. M. et al. Spatially inhomogeneous superconductivity in UTe2. Phys. Rev. B 104, 224501 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Aoki, D. et al. Multiple superconducting phases and unusual enhancement of the upper critical field in UTe2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 89, 053705 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Braithwaite, D. et al. Multiple superconducting phases in a nearly ferromagnetic system. Commun. Phys. 2, 147 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ushida, K. et al. Lattice instability of UTe2 studied by ultrasonic measurements. JPS Conf. Proc. 38, 011021 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rehwald, W. The study of structural phase transitions by means of ultrasonic experiments. Adv. Phys. 22, 721–755 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shishidou, T., Suh, HanGyeol, Brydon, P. M. R., Weinert, M. & Agterberg, D. F. Topological band and superconductivity in UTe2. Phys. Rev. B 103, 104504 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi, H. C., Lee, S. H., & Yang, B.-J. Correlated normal state fermiology and topological superconductivity in UTe2. Preprint at (2023).

  24. Shaffer, D. & Chichinadze, D. V. Chiral superconductivity in UTe2 via emergent C4 symmetry and spin-orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. B 106, 014502 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sundar, S. et al. Ubiquitous spin freezing in the superconducting state of UTe2. Commun. Phys. 6, 24–34 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Girod, Clément et al. Thermodynamic and electrical transport properties of UTe2 under uniaxial stress. Phys. Rev. B 106, L121101 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Eaton, A. G. et al. Quasi-2D Fermi surface in the anomalous superconductor UTe2. Nat. Commun. 15, 223 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Aoki, D. et al. First observation of the de Haas–van Alphen effect and Fermi surfaces in the unconventional superconductor UTe2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 91, 083704 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Broyles, C. et al. Revealing a 3D Fermi surface pocket and electron-hole tunneling in UTe2 with quantum oscillations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 036501 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Matsumura, H. et al. Large reduction in the a-axis Knight shift on UTe2 with Tc = 2.1 K. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 92, 063701 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Iguchi, Y. et al. Microscopic imaging homogeneous and single phase superfluid density in UTe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 196003 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu, Y., Sheng, Y. & Yang, Yi-feng Quasi-two-dimensional Fermi surfaces and unitary spin-triplet pairing in the heavy fermion superconductor UTe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 217002 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fujibayashi, H. et al. Superconducting order parameter in UTe2 determined by Knight shift measurement. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 91, 043705 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Nakamine, G. et al. Anisotropic response of spin susceptibility in the superconducting state of UTe2 probed with 125Te-NMR measurement. Phys. Rev. B 103, L100503 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nakamine, G. et al. Inhomogeneous superconducting state probed by 125Te NMR on UTe2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 90, 064709 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Machida, K. Theory of spin-polarized superconductors—an analogue of superfluid 3He A-phase. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 89, 033702 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Machida, K. Nonunitary triplet superconductivity tuned by field-controlled magnetization: URhGe, UCoGe, and UTe2. Phys. Rev. B 104, 014514 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Nevidomskyy, A. H. Stability of a nonunitary triplet pairing on the border of magnetism in UTe2. Preprint at (2020).

  39. Ishizuka, J., Sumita, S., Daido, A. & Yanase, Y. Insulator–metal transition and topological superconductivity in UTe2 from a first-principles calculation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 217001 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hazra, T. & Volkov, P. Pair-Kondo effect: a mechanism for time-reversal broken superconductivity and finite-momentum pairing in UTe2. Preprint at (2022).

  41. Chang, Y.-Y. et al. Topological Kondo superconductors. Preprint at (2023).

  42. Ran, S. et al. Comparison of two different synthesis methods of single crystals of superconducting uranium ditelluride. J. Vis. Exp. (2021).

  43. Theuss, F. et al. Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy for irregularly shaped samples and its application to uranium ditelluride. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 066003 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Theuss, et al. 2024_single_component_superconductivity_in_UTe2_at_ambient_pressure. GitHub (2024).

Download references


We acknowledge helpful discussions with D. Agterberg and P. Brydon. We thank the Cornell LASSP Professional Machine Shop for their contributions to designing and fabricating equipment used in this study. A. Shragai, B.J.R. and F.T. acknowledge funding from the Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the United States Department of Energy under award number DE-SC0020143 (ultrasound experiments and analysis). N.P.B. and J.P. acknowledge support from the Department of Energy award number DE-SC-0019154 (sample characterization), the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s EPiQS Initiative through grant number GBMF9071 (materials synthesis), the National Science Foundation under grant number DMR-2105191 (sample preparation) and the Maryland Quantum Materials Center and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. B.J.R. and F.T. acknowledge use of the Cornell Center for Materials Research Shared Facilities which are supported through the NSF MRSEC programme (DMR-1719875). G.G. acknowledges support from the ANR grants STeP2 no ANR-22-EXES-0013 and QuantEx no ANR-23-CE30-0001-01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



B.J.R. conceived the experiment. I.M.H., S.R.S., Y.S.E. and A. Suarez grew and characterized the samples. F.T. and A. Shragai performed the sample preparation and transducer fabrication. F.T., A. Shragai and G.G. performed the ultrasound measurements. F.T. and B.J.R. performed the data analysis and mean-field calculations. T.S. performed density functional theory calculations. F.T. and B.J.R. wrote the paper with input from all other co-authors. J.P., N.P.B. and B.J.R. supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. J. Ramshaw.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Physics thanks Tatsuya Yanagisawa and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Raw Pulse-Echo Signal.

The raw signal from a sputtered ZnO shear transducer on sample S3 with sound propagation along the [010] and polarization along the [100] directions. The transducer exhibits both a compressional (blue lines) and a shear (red dashed lines) response. These correspond to sound modes determined by the elastic moduli c22 and c66, respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Comparison of different transducers.

Shown are Δc33/c33 for single Tc (S1, left) and two Tc (S3, right) samples. For each sample we compare the relative change in elastic modulus between measurements obtained with two different transducers. Both transducers excited sound along the [001] direction. However, for the data in red, the shear component of the transducer was polarized along [100] (additionally measuring c55), whereas for the data in blue, the shear component of the transducer was polarized along [010] (additionally measuring c44).

Extended Data Table 1 Pulse-echo ultrasound sample configurations

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–11, Discussion and Tables 1–3.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 2

Delta c/c for samples with one superconducting transition.

Source Data Fig. 3

Delta c/c for samples with one and two superconducting transitions.

Source Data Fig. 4

Delta c/c for compressional elastic moduli.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Theuss, F., Shragai, A., Grissonnanche, G. et al. Single-component superconductivity in UTe2 at ambient pressure. Nat. Phys. (2024).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing