Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Why competition is bad for science

Bibliometric evaluation causes competition and stalls scientific progress. We need to abandon it and encourage collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Mazin, I. Nat. Phys. 18, 367–368 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Piller, C. Blots on a field? Science (21 July 2022);

  3. Sylvain Lesné, who found Aβ*56, accused of image manipulation. Alzforum (22 July 2022);

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakub Železný.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Železný, J. Why competition is bad for science. Nat. Phys. 19, 300 (2023).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing