## Abstract

Tin adatoms on a Si(111) substrate with a one-third monolayer coverage form a two-dimensional triangular lattice with one unpaired electron per site. These electrons order into an antiferromagnetic Mott-insulating state, but doping the Sn layer with holes creates a two-dimensional conductor that becomes superconducting at low temperatures. Although the pairing symmetry of the superconducting state is currently unknown, the combination of repulsive interactions and frustration inherent in the triangular adatom lattice opens up the possibility of a chiral order parameter. Here we study the superconducting state of Sn/Si(111) using scanning tunnelling microscopy, scanning tunnelling spectroscopy and quasiparticle interference imaging. We find evidence for a doping-dependent superconducting critical temperature with a fully gapped order parameter, the presence of time-reversal symmetry breaking and a strong enhancement in zero-bias conductance near the edges of the superconducting domains. Although each individual piece of evidence could have a more mundane interpretation, our combined results suggest the possibility that Sn/Si(111) is an unconventional chiral *d*-wave superconductor.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

## Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

$29.99 per month

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$209.00 per year

only $17.42 per issue

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

## Data availability

The data supporting this study are available via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7249821.

## Code availability

The DCA++ code used for this project is available via GitHub at https://github.com/CompFUSE/DCA. The QUANTUM ESPRESSO code can be obtained from https://www.quantum-espresso.org/. The FIREBALL code is available via GitHub at https://github.com/fireball-QMD. Codes for performing the QPI and edge-state calculations are available via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7249821.

## References

Bardeen, J., Cooper, L. N. & Schrieffer, J. R. Theory of superconductivity.

*Phys. Rev.***108**, 1175–1204 (1957).Kohn, W. & Luttinger, J. M. New mechanism for superconductivity.

*Phys. Rev. Lett.***15**, 524–526 (1965).Scalipino, D. J. A common thread: the pairing interaction for unconventional superconductors.

*Rev. Mod. Phys.***84**, 1383–1417 (2012).Tsuei, C. C. & Kirtley, J. R. Pairing symmetry in cuprate superconductors.

*Rev. Mod. Phys.***72**, 969–1016 (2000).Read, N. & Green, D. Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum Hall effect.

*Phys. Rev. B***61**, 10267–10297 (2000).Joynt, R. & Taillefer, L. The superconducting phases of UPt

_{3}.*Rev. Mod. Phys.***74**, 235–294 (2002).Nandkishore, R., Levitov, L. S. & Chubukov, A. V. Chiral superconductivity from repulsive interactions in doped graphene.

*Nat. Phys.***8**, 158–163 (2012).Kallin, C. Chiral

*p*-wave order in Sr_{2}RuO_{4}.*Rep. Prog. Phys.***75**, 042501 (2012).Black-Schaffer, A. M. Edge properties and Majorana fermions in the proposed chiral

*d*-wave superconducting state of doped graphene.*Phys. Rev. Lett.***109**, 197001 (2012).Kiesel, M. L., Platt, C., Hanke, W. & Thomale, R. Model evidence of an anisotropic chiral

*d*+ i*d*-wave pairing state for the water-intercalated Na_{x}CoO_{2}⋅*y*H_{2}O superconductor.*Phys. Rev. Lett.***111**, 097001 (2013).Black-Schaffer, A. M. & Honerkamp, C. Chiral

*d*-wave superconductivity in doped graphene.*J. Phys. Condens. Matter***26**, 423201 (2014).Kallin, C. & Berlinsky, J. Chiral superconductors.

*Rep. Prog. Phys.***79**, 054502 (2016).Mackenzie, A. P., Scaffidi, T., Hicks, C. W. & Maeno, Y. Even odder after twenty-three years: the superconducting order parameter puzzle of Sr

_{2}RuO_{4}.*npj Quantum Mater.***2**, 40 (2017).Pustogow, A. et al. Constraints on the superconducting order parameter in Sr

_{2}RuO_{4}from oxygen-17 nuclear magnetic resonance.*Nature***574**, 72–75 (2019).Jiao, L. et al. Chiral superconductivity in heavy-fermion metal UTe

_{2}.*Nature***579**, 523–527 (2020).Wu, X. et al. Superconductivity in a hole-doped Mott-insulating triangular adatom layer on a silicon surface.

*Phys. Rev. Lett.***125**, 117001 (2020).Schuwalow, S., Grieger, D. & Lechermann, F. Realistic modeling of the electronic structure and the effect of correlations for Sn/Si(111) and Sn/Ge(111) surfaces.

*Phys. Rev. B***82**, 035116 (2010).Li, G. et al. Magnetic order in a frustrated two-dimensional atom lattice at a semiconductor surface.

*Nat. Commun.***4**, 1620 (2013).Ming, F. et al. Realization of a hole-doped Mott insulator on a triangular silicon lattice.

*Phys. Rev. Lett.***119**, 266802 (2017).Lee, P. A., Nagaosa, N. & Wen, X.-G. Doping a Mott insulator: physics of high-temperature superconductivity.

*Rev. Mod. Phys.***78**, 17–85 (2006).Cao, X. et al. Chiral

*d*-wave superconductivity in a triangular surface lattice mediated by long-range interaction.*Phys. Rev. B***97**, 155145 (2018).Wolf, S., Di Sante, D., Schwemmer, T., Thomale, R. & Rachel, S. Triplet superconductivity from nonlocal Coulomb repulsion in an atomic Sn layer deposited onto a Si(111) substrate.

*Phys. Rev. Lett.***128**, 167002 (2022).Zahedifar, M. & Kratzer, P. Phonon-induced electronic relaxation in a strongly correlated system: the Sn/Si(111) (\(\sqrt{3}\times \sqrt{3}\)) adlayer revisited.

*Phys. Rev. B***100**, 125427 (2019).Howald, C., Eisaki, H., Kaneko, N. & Kapitulnik, A. Coexistence of periodic modulation of quasiparticle states and superconductivity in Bi

_{2}Sr_{2}CaCu_{2}O_{8+δ}.*Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA***100**, 9705–9709 (2003).Vershinin, M. et al. Local ordering in the pseudogap state of the high-

*T*_{c}superconductor Bi_{2}Sr_{2}CaCu_{2}O_{8+δ}.*Science***303**, 1995–1998 (2004).Dynes, R. C., Narayanamurti, V. & Garno, J. P. Direct measurement of quasiparticle-lifetime broadening in a strong-coupled superconductor.

*Phys. Rev. Lett.***41**, 1509–1512 (1978).Petersen, L., Hofmann, P., Plummer, E. W. & Besenbacher, F. Fourier transform–STM: determining the surface Fermi contour.

*J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom.***109**, 97–115 (2000).Yu, L. Bound state in superconductors with paramagnetic impurities.

*Acta Phys. Sin.***21**, 75 (1965).Shiba, H. Classical spins in superconductors.

*Prog. Theor. Phys.***40**, 435–451 (1968).Rusinov, A. I. Superconductivity near a paramagnetic impurity.

*JETP Lett.***9**, 85–87 (1969).Ménard, G. C. et al. Coherent long-range magnetic bound states in a superconductor.

*Nat. Phys.***11**, 1013–1016 (2015).Kim, H., Rózsa, L., Schreyer, D., Simon, E. & Wiesendanger, R. Long-range focusing of magnetic bound states in superconducting lanthanum.

*Nat. Commun.***11**, 4573 (2020).Wang, Q. -H. & Wang, Z. D. Impurity and interface bound states in \({d}_{{x}^{2}-{y}^{2}}\pm \mathrm{i}{d}_{xy}\) and

*p*_{x}± i*p*_{y}superconductors.*Phys. Rev. B***69**, 092502 (2004).Mashkoori, M., Bjornson, K. & Black-Schaffer, A. M. Impurity bound states in fully gapped

*d*-wave superconductors with subdominant order parameters.*Sci. Rep.***7**, 44107 (2017).Anderson, P. W. Theory of dirty superconductors.

*J. Phys. Chem. Solids***11**, 26–30 (1959).Maier, T. A., Jarrell, M. S. & Scalapino, D. J. Structure of the pairing interaction in the two-dimensional Hubbard model.

*Phys. Rev. Lett.***96**, 047005 (2006).Hähner, U. R. et al. DCA++: a software framework to solve correlated electron problems with modern quantum cluster methods.

*Comp. Phys. Commun.***246**, 106709 (2020).Chen, K. S. et al. Unconventional superconductivity on the triangular lattice Hubbard model.

*Phys. Rev. B***88**, 041103(R) (2013).Huang, Y. & Sheng, D. N. Topological chiral and nematic superconductivity by doping Mott insulators on triangular lattice.

*Phys. Rev. X***12**, 031009 (2022).Volovik, G. E. On edge states in superconductors with time inversion symmetry breaking.

*JETP Lett.***66**, 522–527 (1997).Laughlin, R. B. Magnetic induction of \({d}_{{x}^{2}-{y}^{2}}+\mathrm{i}{d}_{xy}\) order in high-

*T*_{c}superconductors.*Phys. Rev. Lett.***80**, 5188–5191 (1998).Senthil, T., Marston, J. B. & Fisher, M. P. A. Spin quantum Hall effect in unconventional superconductors.

*Phys. Rev. B***60**, 4245–4254 (1999).Ming, F. F. et al. Hidden phase in a two-dimensional Sn layer stabilized by modulation hole doping.

*Nat. Commun.***8**, 14721 (2017).De Gennes, P. G. Boundary effects in superconductors.

*Rev. Mod. Phys.***36**, 225–237 (1964).Duke, C. B. Semiconductor surface reconstruction: the structural chemistry of two-dimensional surface compounds.

*Chem. Rev.***96**, 1237 (1996).Zhou, S. & Wang, Z. Nodal

*d*+ i*d*pairing and topological phases on the triangular lattice of Na_{x}CoO_{2}⋅*y*H_{2}O: evidence for an unconventional superconducting state.*Phys. Rev. Lett.***100**, 217002 (2008).Giannozzi, P. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials.

*J. Phys.: Condens. Matter***21**, 395502 (2009).Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple.

*Phys. Rev. Lett.***77**, 3865–3868 (1996).Goedecker, S., Teter, M. & Hutter, J. Separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials.

*Phys. Rev. B***54**, 1703–1710 (1996).Hartwigsen, C., Goedecker, S. & Hutter, J. Relativistic separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials from H to Rn.

*Phys. Rev. B***58**, 3641–3662 (1998).Pérez, R., Ortega, J. E. & Flores, F. Surface soft phonon and the (\(\sqrt{3}\times \sqrt{3}\)) ↔ (3 × 3) phase transition in Sn/Ge(1111) and Sn/Si(111).

*Phys. Rev. Lett.***86**, 4891–4894 (2001).Monkhorst, M. J. & Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations.

*Phys. Rev. B***13**, 5188–5192 (1976).Blanco, J. M. et al. First-principles simulations of STM images: from tunneling to the contact regime.

*Phys. Rev. B***70**, 085405 (2004).Lewis, J. P. et al. Advances and applications in the FIREBALL ab initio tight-binding molecular-dynamics formalism.

*Phys. Status Solidi B***248**, 1989–2007 (2011).González, C. et al. Formation of atom wires on vicinal silicon.

*Phys. Rev. Lett.***93**, 126106 (2004).Ming, F., Smith, T. S., Johnston, S., Snijders, P. C. & Weitering, H. H. Zero-bias anomaly in nanoscale hole-doped Mott insulators on a triangular silicon surface.

*Phys. Rev. B***97**, 075403 (2018).

## Acknowledgements

We thank C. D. Batista, P. J. Hirschfeld, P. Kent, A. Tennant and R. Zhang for fruitful discussions. The experimental work and QPI calculations were supported by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (ref no. 2021A1515012034) and by the Office of Naval Research under grant no. N00014-18-1-2675. F.M. acknowledges support from the NSFC (no. 12174456) and the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (grant no. 2020B1515020009). C.G. acknowledges financial support from the Community of Madrid through the project NANOMAGCOST CM-PS2018/NMT-4321 and the computer resources at Centro de Computación Científica at UAM (project Biofast) as well as Altamira, with the technical support provided by the Instituto de Física de Cantabria (IFCA) via project QHS-2021-3-0005. J.O. acknowledges financial support by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through grants MAT2017-88258-R and CEX2018-000805-M (María de Maeztu Programme for Units of Excellence in R&D). The DCA calculations were supported by the Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Advanced Scientific Computing Research, and Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering. This research also used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725.

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Contributions

F.M. and X.W. contributed equally to this work. F.M., X.W., C.C. and K.D.W. prepared the samples and performed the STM experiments. P.M. and T.A.M. performed the DCA calculations. J.S. and J.W.F.V. performed the edge-state calculations. C.G. and J.O. performed the DFT calculations and STM image simulations. S.J. performed the QPI calculations. S.J. and H.H.W. conceived and supervised the project and wrote the manuscript with input from all the authors.

### Corresponding authors

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

## Peer review

### Peer review information

*Nature Physics* thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

## Additional information

**Publisher’s note** Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Extended data

### Extended Data Fig. 1 Spectral features of the (\(\sqrt{3}\times \sqrt{3}\))-Sn surface grown on two different Si wafers and estimates of the hole concentration.

**a** *d**I*/*d**V* spectrum of the *p* = 0.08 surface at 0.5 K, featuring the lower Hubbard band, quasi-particle peak, and upper Hubbard band (LHB/QPP/UHB). **b** *d**I*/*d**V*/(*I*/*V*) spectrum obtained from the spectrum in panel a, fitted with six Gaussian peaks. From the fitting, we find that the area under the QPP represents 16.1 % of the total spectrum, excluding the peak on the far left which represents the contribution of the silicon valance band. This area fraction converts to a hole doping level of 8.05 %, i,e, *p* = 0.08; See Ref. ^{18} for more details. **c** *d**I*/*d**V*/(*I*/*V*) spectrum of the (\(\sqrt{3}\times \sqrt{3}\))-Sn surface (0.5 K), subject to the same fitting analysis as in **b**. The area fraction of the QPP is 12.1 %, which corresponds to hole doping level of 6.05 % (*p* = 0.06). Gaussians are used only for the purpose of spectral area determination.

### Extended Data Fig. 2 Tunneling spectroscopy of the superconducting state.

**a** STM image (*V*_{s} = − 2 V, *I*_{t} = 0.01 nA) of the *p* = 0.08 surface with neighbouring (competing) (\(\sqrt{3}\times \sqrt{3}\))-Sn and (\(2\sqrt{3}\times 2\sqrt{3}\))-Sn domains. The former is superconducting while the latter is semiconducting. **b**-**e** STM tunneling spectra of the superconducting phase for *p* = 0.08. **b**, Field dependent *d**I*/*d**V* spectra measured at 0.5 K. **c** Temperature dependent *d**I*/*d**V* spectra measured in zero B-field. **d** Zero bias conductance (ZBC) extracted from panel **b**. The ZBC increases with the B field and saturates at ~ 13 T. **e** ZBC extracted from normalized *d**I*/*d**V* (most of the data are shown in Fig. 1e). The ZBC increases with the temperature and saturates around 7.8 K. **f**-**k** Tunneling spectra from the *p* = 0.06 surface. **f** Field dependent *d**I*/*d**V* spectra measured at 0.5 K. **g** Temperature dependent *d**I*/*d**V* spectra measured in zero B-field. **h** Temperature dependent *d**I*/*d**V* spectra measured in at 15 T. **i**, *d**I*/*d**V* spectra normalized by dividing the spectra in panel **g** with the corresponding spectra in panel **h** (same temperature), except for the 0.5 K and 2.0 K data in panel **g**, for which we used the 3.0 K data in panel **h** so as to avoid division by the very small signal at zero bias. Note the persistence of the gap feature up to 9 K. **j** ZBC extracted from panel f. The ZBC increases with the B-field and does not saturate at 15 T. **k** ZBC extracted from panel **i**. The ZBC increases with temperature and saturates around 9 K. The normal state spectra in **b** and **c** exhibit minor suppression of the conductance near zero bias, which is due to the slow dissipation of the tunneling charge from the surface into the bulk, see Ref. ^{56} for more details. Such effect becomes more significant for the *p* = 0.06 sample in panel **f**-**g**.

### Extended Data Fig. 3 Fitting of the tunneling spectra.

To fit the full *T*-dependence, we performed a Dynes-like fit of the *d**I*/*d**V* spectra while adopting an angular-dependent gap function Δ(*θ*) as parameterized in Ref. ^{16}. (The results obtained using this approach are consistent with those obtained by fitting the full momentum-dependence Green’s function in the superconducting state, see Fig. 2.) **a**-**c** Fitting results for the *p* = 0.08 system, assuming *s*-wave and \({d}_{{x}^{2}+{y}^{2}}+{{{\rm{i}}}}{d}_{xy}\) order parameters. The *s*-wave and \({d}_{{x}^{2}+{y}^{2}}+{{{\rm{i}}}}{d}_{xy}\)-wave fits only reveal minor differences. **d** Extracted values of Δ_{0} as a function of temperature. **e** The corresponding temperature dependence of the broadening parameter Λ. Error bars in **d** and **e** are estimated in a way similar to Ref. ^{16}.

### Extended Data Fig. 4 Experimental QPI results.

**a**-**e** QPI data and processing procedures. **a** STM image (*V*_{s} = 0.1 V, *I*_{t} = 0.1 nA) of a (\(\sqrt{3}\times \sqrt{3}\))-Sn surface (*p* = 0.1) with several surface defects appearing as dark spots. **b** Corresponding *d**I*/*d**V* image at *T* = 0.5 K. The bright star-like features are centered at the defect locations in panel **a**. **c** The power spectrum of panel **b**, symmetrized and rotated in panel **d**. The central region is subsequently suppressed to enhance the high frequency features, as shown in panel **e** [see Ref. ^{18} for more details]. **f**-**h** show 4, 3, and 2 sets of QPI results obtained from (\(\sqrt{3}\times \sqrt{3}\))-Sn surfaces for *p*=0.1, 0.08, and 0.06, respectively. Each column shows QPI images obtained in a fixed spatial region but with different biases, as indicated on the left. The measurement temperatures are labeled above each column, and data are shown for temperatures above and below *T*_{c}. The central flower leafs only appear when the sample is in superconducting state and when the measurement bias is within the superconducting gap (within ± 1.5 mV, ± 2.2 mV, and ± 3.6 mV, in **f**, **g**, and **h**, respectively). These QPI images are enclosed by the dashed red rectangles. Panel **f** shows QPI results obtained at *T*=5 K (slightly larger than *T*_{c}=4.7 K for this sample), or at 0.5 K in an 8 T B-field (*H*_{2c}=3 T). These data have a significantly reduced flower leaf feature, which could come from superconducting fluctuations. In panel **g**, the “0.5 K \({( < {T}_{c})}^{* }\)” data are QPI results obtained from a sample with interstitial Sn adatoms, deposited at 120 K. The presence of interstitial Sn considerably enhances the flower-leaf features at the center of the Brillouin zone.

### Extended Data Fig. 5 Simulated QPI spectra for different gap symmetries and scattering centers.

The top and bottom rows show results for nonmagnetic (\(\hat{V}={V}_{0}{\hat{\tau }}_{3}\)) and magnetic (\(\hat{V}={V}_{0}{\hat{\tau }}_{0}\)) scatterers, respectively, with *V*_{0} = 100 meV. Results are shown in the superconducting state assuming s-wave (left column), chiral *p* + i*p* (middle column), and *d* + i*d* (right column) order parameters. The spectra are calculated at a bias voltage of 1 meV. In each case, the magnitude of the gap Δ_{0} and smearing parameter *δ* are obtained from fits of the *d**I*/*d**V* spectra shown in Fig. 2**a** (see Methods). Note the absence of the central flower-leaf feature for non-magnetic scattering combined with the s-wave order parameter.

### Extended Data Fig. 6 Experimental and simulated STM images of the substitutional Si and interstitial Sn adatom defects.

**a**-**d** Experimental (*I*_{t} = 0.1 nA) and simulated STM images for the substitutional Si defect. The Si atom is invisible in filled state images, indicating that there are no occupied dangling bond states to tunneling from. The Si atom is visible in empty state images, but the atom appears to be dim due to its smaller covalent radius. **e**-**h** Experimental STM images (*I*_{t} = 0.1 nA) of the interstitial Sn adatom defect center. Panel **e** reveals three very bright adatoms that are part of the regular (\(\sqrt{3}\times \sqrt{3}\))-Sn lattice. The interstitial Sn atom is located at the center of this cluster and cannot be imaged within the accessible bias range, as the adatom moves at higher biases. **i**-**l** Simulated STM images. Note the slightly increased brightness of the Sn atoms indicated by the blue arrows in panel **g**. This subtle effect is captured by the theory simulation in panel **k**. **m** (9 × 9) supercell used in the DFT calculations for the interstitial Sn adatom defect. Sn adatom and Si substrate atoms are shown in green and gold, respectively. The interstitial Sn atom is placed near the center of the (9 × 9) unit cell, as indicated by the red arrow. **n** Experimental *d**I*/*d**V* spectra recorded on top of the interstitial adatom (red) and far away from the interstitial location (blue). The latter reveals the characteristic LHB/QPP/UHB features (see Extended Data Fig. 1). The strong peak at about -0.35 eV corresponds to the triangular adatom feature in panels **a**, **e**. It is captured by the DFT calculation (black line). The peak at +1.25 eV in the theoretical DOS mainly consists of the (empty) 5*p* orbitals of the interstitial adatom. Simulated images at this bias indeed visualize this atom (not shown), but it cannot be imaged at this tunneling bias.

### Extended Data Fig. 7 Tunneling spectra (0.5 K) measured at defect locations on the superconducting (\(\sqrt{3}\times \sqrt{3}\))-Sn surface (p=0.08) and corresponding QPI data.

**a** STM image (*V*_{s} = 0.02 V, *I*_{t} = 0.1 nA) showing several intrinsic surface defects. S1, S2 and S3 are substitutional Si defects and V1 is a Sn vacancy, as judged by the appearance of a hole for a wide range of positive and negative tunneling biases (images at other biases are not shown). Defects with unknown structures are labelled On, with *n* = 1 − 6. **b** Tunneling spectra of the V1 and On defects in panel **a**. **c** Tunneling spectra of the interstitial Sn adatom defects A1, A2, and A3; see Supplementary Fig.. All defects produce a pair of in-gap states. The substitutional Si defects (S1, S2, and S3) exhibit a well defined double-peak structure at ± 0.6 meV. Interstitial Sn adatoms (A1 and A2) also possess a double peak structure, but with smaller energy splitting ( ± 0.2 meV). The A3 defect appears to have a single (unresolved) peak structure. **d** STM image (*V*_{s} = − 0.5 V, *I*_{t} = 0.1 nA) of a the (\(\sqrt{3}\times \sqrt{3}\))-Sn surface with interstitial Sn defects (indicated by arrows) and other intrinsic defects, mostly substitutional Si or adatom vacancies. **e** Corresponding *d**I*/*d**V* image obtained at a sample bias of *V*_{s} = − 0.4 mV. The interstitial Sn defects produce the strongest scattering features in the real space conductance maps, as compared to those of other intrinsic defects. **f**,**g** compares the QPI spectra from the same (\(\sqrt{3}\times \sqrt{3}\))-Sn surface with and without adsorbed Sn defects. *I*_{FC} represents averaged scattering intensities for the segment of the Fermi contour enclosed by the magenta rectangle, while the averaged intensity for the flower leaf features near the center of the Brillouin zone (enclosed by the red rectangle) is represented in units of *I*_{FC}. The relative scattering intensity of the flower leaf feature is strongest for the surface with the interstitial Sn adatoms defects.

### Extended Data Fig. 8 The leading (degenerate) eigenvectors of the Bethe-Salpeter equation for the triangular lattice Hubbard model.

**a**, **b** The momentum space structure of the leading eigenvectors, which show a pairing symmetry consistent with \({d}_{{x}^{2}-{y}^{2}}+{{{\rm{i}}}}{d}_{xy}\) pairing. The size and color of the dots indicate the magnitude and sign of the eigenvector at the momentum points of the 3 × 3 cluster. The green hexagon shows the boundaries of the first Brillouin zone. **c** The doping dependence of the leading eigenvalues at an inverse temperature of *β* = 8/*t*_{1}.

### Extended Data Fig. 9 Magnetic vortices of the superconducting (\(\sqrt{3}\times \sqrt{3}\))-Sn surface observed at 0.5 K.

**a**-**e** Magnetic vortices for the *p* = 0.08 sample. **a** Topographic STM image. **b**, **c** *d**I*/*d**V* maps obtained with a tunneling bias inside the superconducting gap with a B-field of 1 T and 3 T, respectively. **d** *d**I*/*d**V* spectra measured along the line crossing a magnetic vortex in panel **c**. **e** ZBC obtained from panel **d** with an exponential fit for determining the superconducting coherence length *ξ*. **f**-**i** Magnetic vortices for the *p* = 0.06 sample. **f** Topographic image. **g** *d**I*/*d**V* map obtained with a tunneling bias inside the superconducting gap with a B-field of 4 T. This sample exhibits a very low zero bias *d**I*/*d**V* signal, presumably due to the very high series resistance of this lightly doped sample at 0.5 K. Therefore the vortex features are only resolved away from zero bias. **h** *d**I*/*d**V* spectra measured along the line crossing a magnetic vortex in panel **g**. **i** *d**I*/*d**V* (- 1.5 mV) along the line indicated in panel **g** with an exponential fit for determining the superconducting coherence length.

### Extended Data Fig. 10 Electronic band dispersion for a chiral d-wave superconductor in the presence of edges.

Results were obtained by considering a mean-field \({d}_{{x}^{2}-{y}^{2}}+{{{\rm{i}}}}{d}_{xy}\) order parameter on a triangular lattice. The edge state spectrum is obtained by solving the tight-binding Hamiltonian on a cylinder, with open boundary conditions along the *y*-direction and periodic boundary conditions along the *x*-direction. Momentum *k*_{x} remains a good quantum number and the resulting spectrum is shown here for a system of 400 chains (labeled by *n*) stacked in the y direction and a *k*-mesh of 400 points. To clearly show the edge states here we computed the spectrum for Δ_{0} = 1.5 meV. As expected for a chiral *d*-wave superconductor with Chern number *C* = ± 2, two chiral linearly dispersing in-gap states exist on each edge.

## Supplementary information

### Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–3 and Notes 1–4.

## Source data

### Source Data Fig. 1

Source data for Fig. 1c,e–g.

### Source Data Fig. 2

Source data for Fig. 2a.

### Source Data Fig. 4

Source data for Fig. 4a,f–j.

## Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Ming, F., Wu, X., Chen, C. *et al.* Evidence for chiral superconductivity on a silicon surface.
*Nat. Phys.* (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01889-1

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01889-1