Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A quantum complexity lower bound from differential geometry

Abstract

Differential geometry has long found applications in physics in general relativity and related areas. More recently, it was proposed by Nielsen that the tools of differential geometry, when applied to the unitary group, might be used to bound the complexity of quantum operations. The Bishop–Gromov bound—a cousin of the focusing lemmas used to prove the Penrose–Hawking black hole singularity theorems—is a differential geometry result that gives an upper bound on the rate of growth of the volume of geodesic balls in terms of the Ricci curvature. Here I apply the Bishop–Gromov bound to Nielsen’s complexity geometry to prove lower bounds on the quantum complexity of a typical unitary. For a broad class of models, the typical complexity is shown to be exponentially large in the number of qubits. This technique gives results that are tighter than all known lower bounds in the literature, as well as establishing lower bounds for a much broader class of complexity geometry metrics than has hitherto been bounded. This method thus realizes the original vision of Nielsen, which was to apply the tools of differential geometry to study quantum complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Diameter bounds for the cliff metric.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Nielsen, M. A. A geometric approach to quantum circuit lower bounds. Preprint at arXiv:quant-ph/0502070

  2. Nielsen, M. A., Dowling, M., Gu, M. & Doherty, A. C. Quantum computation as geometry. Science 311, 1133 (2006).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Nielsen, M. A., Dowling, M. R., Gu, M. & Doherty, A. C. Optimal control, geometry, and quantum computing. Phys. Rev. A 73, 062323 (2006).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dowling, M. R. & Nielsen, M. A. The geometry of quantum computation. Preprint at arXiv:quant-ph/0701004

  5. Gu, M., Doherty, A. & Nielsen, M. Quantum control via geometry: an explicit example. Phys. Rev. A 78, 032327 (2008).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bishop, R. A relation between volume, mean curvature, and diameter. Not. Am. Math. Soc. 10, 364 (1963).

  7. Nielsen, M. A. & Isaac, L. in Quantum Computation and Quantum Information Ch. 4 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).

  8. Brown, A. R. & Susskind, L. Complexity geometry of a single qubit. Phys. Rev. D 100, 046020 (2019).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Susskind, L. & Zhao, Y. Switchbacks and the bridge to nowhere. Preprint at arXiv:1408.2823 [hep-th].

  10. Brown, A. R., Susskind, L. & Zhao, Y. Quantum complexity and negative curvature. Phys. Rev. D 95, 045010 (2017).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Balasubramanian, V., Decross, M., Kar, A. & Parrikar, O. Quantum complexity of time evolution with chaotic Hamiltonians. J. High Energy Phys. 2020, 134 (2020).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Auzzi, R. et al. Geometry of quantum complexity. Phys. Rev. D 103, 106021 (2021).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Balasubramanian, V., DeCross, M., Kar, A., Li, Y. & Parrikar, O. Complexity growth in integrable and chaotic models. J. High Energy Phys. 2021, 11 (2021).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Bulchandani, V. B. & Sondhi, S. L. How smooth is quantum complexity?. J. High Energy Phys. 2021, 30 (2021).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu, Q. F. Sectional curvatures distribution of complexity geometry. J. High Energy Phys. 2022, 197 (2022).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Basteiro, P. et al. Quantum complexity as hydrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 106, 065016 (2022).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Jefferson, R. & Myers, R. C. Circuit complexity in quantum field theory. J. High Energy Phys. 10, 107 (2017).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Chapman, S., Heller, M. P., Marrochio, H. & Pastawski, F. Toward a definition of complexity for quantum field theory states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 121602 (2018).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Khan, R., Krishnan, C. & Sharma, S. Circuit complexity in fermionic field theory. Phys. Rev. D 98, 126001 (2018).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Hackl, L. & Myers, R. C. Circuit complexity for free fermions. J. High Energy Phys. 2018, 139 (2018).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Raychaudhuri, A. Relativistic cosmology 1. Phys. Rev. 98, 1123–1126 (1955).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Milnor, J. Curvatures of left invariant metrics on lie groups. Adv. Math. 21, 93–329 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Susskind, L. Computational complexity and black hole horizons. Fortsch. Phys. 64, 24–43 (2016).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Stanford, D. & Susskind, L. Complexity and shock wave geometries. Phys. Rev. D 90, 126007 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Brown, A. R., Roberts, D. A., Susskind, L., Swingle, B. & Zhao, Y. Holographic complexity equals bulk action? Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 191301 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Brown, A. R., Roberts, D. A., Susskind, L., Swingle, B. & Zhao, Y. Complexity, action, and black holes. Phys. Rev. D 93, 086006 (2016).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Brown, A. R. & Susskind, L. Second law of quantum complexity. Phys. Rev. D 97, 086015 (2018).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Brown, A. R., Freedman, M. H., Lin, H. W. & Susskind, L. Effective geometry, complexity, and universality. Preprint at arXiv:2111.12700 [hep-th].

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank H. Lin, L. Susskind and, in particular, M. Freedman.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam R. Brown.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Physics thanks Michal Heller, Lucas Hackl and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary discussion and calculations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, A.R. A quantum complexity lower bound from differential geometry. Nat. Phys. 19, 401–406 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01884-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01884-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics