Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Evidence for suprathermal ion distribution in burning plasmas

Abstract

At the National Ignition Facility, inertial confinement fusion experiments aim to burn and ignite a hydrogen plasma to generate a net source of energy through the fusion of deuterium and tritium ions. The energy deposited by α-particles released from the deuterium–tritium fusion reaction plays the central role in heating the fuel to achieve a sustained thermonuclear burn. In the hydrodynamic picture, α-heating increases the temperature of the plasma, leading to increased reactivity because the mean ion kinetic energy increases. Therefore, the ion temperature is related to the mean ion kinetic energy. Here we use the moments of the neutron spectrum to study the relationship between the ion temperature (measured by the variance in the neutron kinetic energy spectrum) and the ion mean kinetic energy (measured by the shift in the mean neutron energy). We observe a departure from the relationship expected for plasmas where the ion relative kinetic energy distribution is Maxwell–Boltzmann, when the plasma begins to burn. Understanding the cause of this departure from hydrodynamic behaviour could be important for achieving robust and reproducible ignition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Indirect-drive inertial confinement fusion.
Fig. 2: Neutron spectra recorded by a single line-of-sight QCD nToF detector.
Fig. 3: Interdependence of isotropic velocity (viso) and ion temperature (Tion).
Fig. 4: Relation between the measured neutron yield (YDT) and isotropic velocity (viso).
Fig. 5: Neutron spectra generated by different DT ion distribution functions.

Data availability

Raw data were generated at the National Ignition Facility and are not available to the general public. Derived experimental data supporting the findings of this study shown in Figs. 3 and 4, but not in Table 1 are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The simulation codes used in this manuscript are not available to the general public.

References

  1. Lindl, J. Development of the indirect drive approach to inertial confinement fusion and the target physics basis for ignition and gain. Phys. Plasmas 2, 3933–4024 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Christopherson, A. R. et al. Theory of alpha heating in inertial fusion: alpha-heating metrics and the onset of the burning-plasma regime. Phys. Plasmas 25, 072704 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zylstra, A. B. et al. Burning plasma achieved in inertial fusion. Nature 601, 542–548 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kritcher, A. L. et al. Design of inertial fusion implosions reaching the burning plasma regime. Nat. Phys. 18, 251–258 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brysk, H. Fusion neutron energies and spectra. Plasma Phys. 15, 611–617 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ballabio, L., Källane, J. & Gorini, G. Relativistic calculation of fusion product spectra for thermonuclear plasmas. Nucl. Fusion 38, 1723–1735 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Appelbe, B. & Chittenden, J. Relativistically correct DD and DT neutron spectra. High Energy Density Phys. 11, 30–35 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Munro, D. H. Interpreting inertial fusion neutron spectra. Nucl. Fusion 56, 036001 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gamow, G. Nuclear energy sources and stellar evolution. Phys. Rev. 53, 595–604 (1938).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore, A. S. et al. The five line-of-sight neutron time-of-flight (nToF) suite on the National Ignition Facility (NIF). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92, 023516 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jarrott, L. C. et al. Thermal temperature measurements of inertial fusion implosions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 085001 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hatarik, R. et al. Analysis of the neutron time-of-flight spectra from inertial confinement fusion experiments. J. Appl. Phys. 118, 184502 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaffney, J. A. et al. Making inertial confinement fusion models more predictive. Phys. Plasmas 26, 082704 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Clark, D. S. et al. Three-dimensional modeling and hydrodynamic scaling of National Ignition Facility implosions. Phys. Plasmas 26, 050601 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ross, J. S. et al. Experiments conducted in the burning plasma regime with inertial fusion implosions. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.04640 (2021).

  16. Rinderknecht, H. G. et al. Azimuthal drive asymmetry in inertial confinement fusion implosions on the National Ignition Facility. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 145002 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Peigney, B. E., Larroche, O. & Tikhonchuk, V. Ion kinetic effects on the ignition and burn of inertial confinement fusion targets: a multi-scale approach. Phys. Plasmas 21, 122709 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sadler, J. D. et al. Kinetic simulations of fusion ignition with hot-spot ablator mix. Phys. Rev. E 100, 033206 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Appelbe, B., Sherlock, M., El-Amiri, O., Walsh, C. & Chittenden, J. Modification of classical electron transport due to collisions between electrons and fast ions. Phys. Plasmas 26, 102704 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sherlock, M. & Rose, S. The persistence of Maxwellian D and T distributions during burn in inertial confinement fusion. High Energy Density Phys. 5, 27–30 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hartouni, E. P. et al. Optimal choice of multiple line-of-sight measurements determining plasma hotspot velocity at the National Ignition Facility. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92, 023513 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moore, A. S. et al. A fused silica Cherenkov radiator for high precision time-of-flight measurement of DT γ and neutron spectra (invited). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89, 10I120 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Spears, B. K. et al. Mode 1 drive asymmetry in inertial confinement fusion implosions on the National Ignition Facility. Phys. Plasmas 21, 042702 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hatarik, R. et al. A new neutron time-of-flight detector to measure the MeV neutron spectrum at the National Ignition Facility. Plasma Fusion Res. 9, 4404104 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Grim, G. P. et al. The 27.3 meter neutron time-of-flight system for the National Ignition Facility. In Penetrating Radiation Systems and Applications XIV (eds. Grim, G. P. & Barber, H. B.) 8854, 70–81 (SPIE, 2013).

  26. Clancy, T. J. et al. Engineering architecture of the neutron time-of-flight (nToF) diagnostic suite at the National Ignition Facility. In Target Diagnostics Physics and Engineering for Inertial Confinement Fusion III (eds. Bell, P. M. & Grim, G. P.) 9211, 92110A (SPIE, 2014).

  27. Caggiano, J. A. et al. Design of a north pole neutron time-of-flight (NTOF) system at NIF. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 717, 012087 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Meaney, K. D. et al. Total fusion yield measurements using deuterium–tritium gamma rays. Phys. Plasmas 28, 102702 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Crilly, A. et al. Constraints on ion velocity distributions from fusion product spectroscopy. Nucl. Fusion 62, 126015 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge many discussions with our colleagues O. Landen, P. Patel, L. Divol, P. Springer and C. Cerjan. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security for the US Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, under contract no. DE-AC52- 07NA27344. This Article (LLNL-JRNL-824268) was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the US government. Neither the US government nor Lawrence Livermore National Security, nor any of their employees make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represent that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the US government or Lawrence Livermore National Security and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.P.H.: neutron diagnostics, wrote sections of paper. A.S.M.: neutron diagnostics, wrote sections of paper. A.J.C.: theory. B.D.A. theory. P.A.A.: hohlraum physics. K.L.B.: hybrid ‘shot RI’ (shot responsible individual). D.T.C.: hybrid shot RI. D.S.C.: high-resolution 3D simulations. T.D.: hybrid shot RI. M.J.E.: nToF diagnostics. J.E.F.: simulation methods. M.G.J.: neutron diagnostics. G.P.G.: neutron diagnostics development. R.H.: neutron diagnostics development and analysis code. J.J.: neutron diagnostics deployment and operations. S.M.K.: neutron diagnostics deployment and operations. J.K.: neutron diagnostics development. A.L.K.: hybrid-E design lead. K.D.M.: γ-ray diagnostics. J.L.M.: high-resolution 3D simulations. D.H.M.: theory methodology. R.C.N.: post-shot simulations. A.E.P.: hybrid and I-Raum shot RI. J.E.R.: N201101 and N210207 experimentalist and shot RI. H.F.R.: original I-Raum design lead. J.S.R.: I-Raum experimental lead and N201122 shot RI. D.J.S.: neutron diagnostics. S.M.S.: HYDRA details. B.K.S.: simulations lead. C.V.Y.: present I-Raum design lead. A.B.Z.: hybrid-E experimental lead.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to E. P. Hartouni, A. S. Moore or A. J. Crilly.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Physics thanks Alessio Morace, Peter Norreys and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hartouni, E.P., Moore, A.S., Crilly, A.J. et al. Evidence for suprathermal ion distribution in burning plasmas. Nat. Phys. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01809-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01809-3

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing