Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Improved interspecies optical clock comparisons through differential spectroscopy

Nature Physics volume 19, pages 25–29 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Comparisons of high-accuracy optical atomic clocks1 are essential for precision tests of fundamental physics2, relativistic geodesy3,4,5 and the anticipated redefinition of the second by the International System of Units6. The scientific reach of these applications is restricted by the statistical precision of comparison measurements between clocks realized with different atomic species. The instability of individual clocks is limited by the finite coherence time of the optical local oscillator, which bounds the maximum atomic interrogation time. Here we experimentally demonstrate differential spectroscopy7, a comparison protocol that enables interrogating times beyond the optical local oscillator coherence time. By phase coherently linking a zero-dead-time8 Yb optical lattice clock with an Al+ single-ion clock via an optical frequency comb and performing synchronized Ramsey spectroscopy, we show an improvement in comparison instability relative to previous results9 of nearly an order of magnitude. This result represents one of the most stable interspecies clock comparisons to date.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Experimental overview.
Fig. 2: Differential spectroscopy clock comparison results for various TAl values for the single Yb ensemble case and varying the number of Yb clock interrogation cycles for the ZDT case.
Fig. 3: Fractional instability measured for a 36-h-long ZDT differential spectroscopy.
Fig. 4: One-second instability of various interspecies optical clock comparisons plotted by their measurement date.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the supporting data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Ludlow, A. D., Boyd, M. M., Ye, J., Peik, E. & Schmidt, P. O. Optical atomic clocks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 637 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Safronova, M. S. et al. Search for new physics with atoms and molecules. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025008 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. McGrew, W. F. Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level. Nature 564, 87–90 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grotti, J. Geodesy and metrology with a transportable optical clock. Nat. Phys. 14, 437–441 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Delva, P., Denker, H. & Lion, G. in Relativistic Geodesy: Foundations and Applications (eds. Puetzfeld, D. & Lammerzahl, C.) 25–86 (Springer, 2019).

  6. Riehle, F., Gill, P., Arias, F. & Robertsson, L. The CIPM list of recommended frequency standard values: guidelines and procedures. Metrologia 55, 188 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hume, D. B. & Leibrandt, D. R. Probing beyond the laser coherence time in optical clock comparisons. Phys. Rev. A 93, 032138 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schioppo, M. Ultrastable optical clock with two cold-atom ensembles. Nat. Photon. 11, 48–52 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Network, B. A. C. O. Frequency ratio measurements at 18-digit accuracy using an optical clock network. Nature 591, 564–569 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brewer, S. M. et al. 27Al+ quantum-logic clock with a systematic uncertainty below 10−18. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 033201 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bothwell, T. et al. JILA SrI optical lattice clock with uncertainty of 2.0 × 10−18. Metrologia 56, 065004 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, Y. et al. A liquid nitrogen-cooled Ca+ optical clock with systematic uncertainty of 3 × 10−18. Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 034041 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huntemann, N., Sanner, C., Lipphardt, B., Tamm, C. & Peik, E. Single-ion atomic clock with 3 × 10−18 systematic uncertainty. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 063001 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lange, R. et al. Improved limits for violations of local position invariance from atomic clock comparisons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 011102 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Derevianko, A. Atomic clocks and dark matter signatures. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 723, 012043 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kozlov, M. G., Safronova, M. S., Crespo López-Urrutia, J. R. & Schmidt, P. O. Highly charged ions: optical clocks and applications in fundamental physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045005 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chou, C. W. et al. Frequency-comb spectroscopy on pure quantum states of a single molecular ion. Science 367, 1458–1461 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Banerjee, A., Kim, H., Matsedonskyi, O., Perez, G. & Safronova, M. S. Probing the relaxed relaxion at the luminosity and precision frontiers. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 153 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leroux, I. D. et al. On-line estimation of local oscillator noise and optimisation of servo parameters in atomic clocks. Metrologia 54, 307 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bize, S. et al. Interrogation oscillator noise rejection in the comparison of atomic fountains. IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelectr., Freq. Control 47, 1253–1255 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Takamoto, M. Frequency ratios of Sr, Yb, and Hg based optical lattice clocks and their applications. C. R. Phys. 16, 489–498 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chwalla, M. et al. Precision spectroscopy with two correlated atoms. Appl. Phys. B 89, 483–488 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Clements, E. R. et al. Lifetime-limited interrogation of two independent 27Al+ clocks using correlation spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 243602 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Borregaard, J. & Sørensen, A. S. Efficient atomic clocks operated with several atomic ensembles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 090802 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kohlhaas, R. et al. Phase locking a clock oscillator to a coherent atomic ensemble. Phys. Rev. X 5, 021011 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bowden, W., Vianello, A., Hill, I. R., Schioppo, M. & Hobson, R. Improving the Q factor of an optical atomic clock using quantum nondemolition measurement. Phys. Rev. X 10, 041052 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dörscher, S. et al. Dynamical decoupling of laser phase noise in compound atomic clocks. Commun. Phys. 3, 185 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rosenband, T. Frequency ratio of Al+ and Hg+ single-ion optical clocks; metrology at the 17th decimal place. Science 319, 1808–1812 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nemitz, N. et al. Frequency ratio of Yb and Sr clocks with 5 × 10−17 uncertainty at 150 seconds averaging time. Nat. Photon. 10, 258–261 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dörscher, S. et al. Optical frequency ratio of a 171Yb+ single-ion clock and a 87Sr lattice clock. Metrologia 58, 015005 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schmidt, P. O. et al. Spectroscopy using quantum logic. Science 309, 749–752 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Leopardi, H. et al. Single-branch Er:fiber frequency comb for precision optical metrology with 10−18 fractional instability. Optica 4, 879–885 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Briles, T. C., Yost, D. C., Cingöz, A., Ye, J. & Schibli, T. R. Simple piezoelectric-actuated mirror with 180 kHz servo bandwidth. Opt. Express 18, 9739–9746 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dick, G. J., Prestage, J. D., Greenhall, C. A. & Maleki, L. In Proc. 22nd Annual Precise Time and Time Interval Systems and Applications Meeting 487–508 (NASA, 1990).

  35. Ma, L.-S., Jungner, P., Ye, J. & Hall, J. L. Delivering the same optical frequency at two places: accurate cancellation of phase noise introduced by an optical fiber or other time-varying path. Opt. Lett. 19, 1777–1779 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fortier, T. M., Bartels, A. & Diddams, S. A. Octave-spanning Ti:sapphire laser with a repetition rate >1 GHz for optical frequency measurements and comparisons. Opt. Lett. 31, 1011–1013 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Beloy, K. et al. Atomic clock with 1 × 10−18 room-temperature blackbody Stark uncertainty. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 260801 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. C. Brown and C.-W. Chou for their careful reading and feedback on this manuscript. We also acknowledge contributions from P. Rich, in carrying out a characterization of the magnetic field noise of the Yb system. This work was supported by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Atomic-Photonic Integration Program), the National Science Foundation Q-SEnSE Quantum Leap Challenge Institute (grant no. 2016244) and the Office of Naval Research (grant nos. N00014-18-1-2634 and N00014-20-1-2431). M.E.K. was supported by an appointment to the Intelligence Community Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Program at NIST administered by ORISE through an interagency agreement between the DOE and ODNI. H.L. was supported by the Department of Defense (DoD) through the National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship Program. The views, opinions and/or findings expressed are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official views or policies of the Department of Defense or the US government.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: May E. Kim, William F. McGrew, Nicholas V. Nardelli, Ethan R. Clements.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO, USA

    May E. Kim, William F. McGrew, Nicholas V. Nardelli, Ethan R. Clements, Youssef S. Hassan, Xiaogang Zhang, Jose L. Valencia, Holly Leopardi, David B. Hume, Tara M. Fortier, Andrew D. Ludlow & David R. Leibrandt

  2. Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA

    William F. McGrew, Nicholas V. Nardelli, Ethan R. Clements, Youssef S. Hassan, Xiaogang Zhang, Jose L. Valencia, Holly Leopardi, Andrew D. Ludlow & David R. Leibrandt

Authors
  1. May E. Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William F. McGrew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nicholas V. Nardelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ethan R. Clements
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Youssef S. Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaogang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jose L. Valencia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Holly Leopardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. David B. Hume
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Tara M. Fortier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Andrew D. Ludlow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. David R. Leibrandt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All the authors contributed to the design of the experiment, collection of data and revision of the manuscript. During the measurements, Al+ clock operation was conducted by E.R.C., D.B.H., M.E.K., D.R.L. and J.L.V. Yb clock operation was conducted by W.F.M., Y.S.H., X.Z. and A.D.L. Comb metrology laboratory operation was conducted by T.M.F., H.L. and N.V.N. Data analysis and preparation of the manuscript were performed by M.E.K., D.R.L., W.F.M. and N.V.N.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to David B. Hume, Tara M. Fortier, Andrew D. Ludlow or David R. Leibrandt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Physics thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Frequency comb optical path.

Optical paths surrounding the optical frequency comb portion of the experiment that enables coherent transfer of phase between the Yb and Al+ clocks.

Extended Data Fig. 2 An optimized zero-dead-time clock.

(a) The timing sequence for a ZDT clock with a variable delay between the π/2-pulses. Note that the length of each step is not to scale. (b) Displayed is the sensitivity function for a zero- dead-time sequence in which the Ramsey pulses of the two atomic systems are precisely overlapped (red) or offset from each other by 27.73% (green). The sensitivity functions have been vertically offset from each other for visual clarity. (c) The optimal delay is determined by calculating the one-second Dick instability for a variable delay between the two pulses. These calculations assume the OLO noise is flicker-frequency and at the level of 1.5 × 10-16. The blue line demonstrates that the Dick instability exhibits a sharply defined minimum. We emphasize that the Dick instability reported here would be added in quadrature with other sources of instability, such as atomic detection noise and quantum-projection noise, which under current conditions would limit the total clock instability at a level at least an order of magnitude higher than the calculated Dick instability. The red and green dots represent the conditions with overlapping Ramsey pulses and optimized timing, respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Instability added by phase-stabilized fibre network.

The Al+ clock OLO, which is locked to the Yb clock OLO through the Er/Yb:glass frequency comb, and the Yb clock OLO are compared with a Ti:Sapphire frequency comb. The top figure shows the histogram of the frequency noise, and the bottom shows the Allan deviation plot.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Results of the simulations that vary the noise sources in the operation of the ZDT di erential spectroscopy operation.

The top panel shows the contrast in the phase scan of the Al+ clock, and the bottom shows the Allan deviation plot for: when only the OLO noise is present (yellow line), when OLO and the magnetic field noise sources are present (orange line), and when OLO, magnetic field, and the fibre link noises are present (blue line). The green dashed line in the bottom panel indicates the QPN limit.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Example of the data analysis used to determine the long-averaging-time asymptotic Allan deviation.

This data set is Ramsey spectroscopy of the Al+ clock without any feedforward corrections from Yb, at a interrogation time of 454 ms. The top panel shows the time series of the measured Al+ transition frequency relative to the Yb stabilized OLO. The middle left panel shows the corresponding power spectral density of frequency noise, which is fit to the function \({S}_{w}/(1+{(f/{f}_{c})}^{2})\). The t residuals are shown at the bottom of this panel. The middle right panel shows χ2 as a function of the two t parameters. The red dotted line is a contour of constant \({\chi }^{2}=\min ({\chi }^{2})+1\), and the black dashed lines are the 68% confidence interval bounds for the fit parameter Sw. The bottom panel shows the Allan deviation of the frequency data (blue circles) and the long-averaging-time asymptotic Allan deviation corresponding to the Sw fit parameter (red line and shaded confidence interval).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, M.E., McGrew, W.F., Nardelli, N.V. et al. Improved interspecies optical clock comparisons through differential spectroscopy. Nat. Phys. 19, 25–29 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01794-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01794-7

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing