Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Coupled polarization and nanodomain evolution underpins large electromechanical responses in relaxors

Nature Physics volume 18, pages 1502–1509 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Understanding the evolution and role of nanoscale polar structures during polarization rotation in relaxor ferroelectrics is a long-standing challenge in materials science and condensed-matter physics. These nanoscale polar structures are characterized by polar nanodomains, which are believed to play a key role in enabling the large susceptibilities of relaxors. Using epitaxial strain, we stabilize the intermediate step during polarization rotation in epitaxial films of a prototypical relaxor and study the co-evolution of polarization and polar nanodomains. Our multimodal approach allows for a detailed examination of correlations between polarization and polar nanodomains; illuminates the effect of local chemistry, strain and electric field on their co-evolution; and reveals the underappreciated role of strain in enabling the large electromechanical coupling in relaxors. As the strain increases, the competition between chemistry-driven disorder and strain-driven order of the polar units intensifies, which is manifested in the coexistence of inclined and elongated polar nanodomains in the intermediate step of polarization rotation. Our findings establish that structural transitions between polar nanodomain configurations underpins the polarization rotation and large electromechanical coupling of relaxors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Reciprocal-space characterizations of the –0.75% heterostructures.
Fig. 2: Real-space characterizations of the –0.75% heterostructures.
Fig. 3: In operando μXRD under applied electric field.
Fig. 4: Analysis of in operando μXRD under applied electric field.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the Article and its Supplementary Information. Additional data are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Custom Python scripts used to analyse the STEM images are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Park, S.-E. & Shrout, T. R. Ultrahigh strain and piezoelectric behavior in relaxor based ferroelectric single crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 82, 1804–1811 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fu, H. & Cohen, R. E. Polarization rotation mechanism for ultrahigh electromechanical response in single-crystal piezoelectrics. Nature 403, 281–283 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bai, F. et al. X-ray and neutron diffraction investigations of the structural phase transformation sequence under electric field in 0.7Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)-0.3PbTiO3 crystal. J. Appl. Phys. 96, 1620–1627 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kutnjak, Z., Petzelt, J. & Blinc, R. The giant electromechanical response in ferroelectric relaxors as a critical phenomenon. Nature 441, 956–959 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Noheda, B. et al. Polarization rotation via a monoclinic phase in the piezoelectric 92% PbZn1/3Nb2/3O3-8% PbTiO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3891–3894 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wall, S. et al. Ultrafast disordering of vanadium dimers in photoexcited VO2. Science 362, 572–576 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu, G., Wen, J., Stock, C. & Gehring, P. M. Phase instability induced by polar nanoregions in a relaxor ferroelectric system. Nat. Mater. 7, 562–566 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, F. et al. The origin of ultrahigh piezoelectricity in relaxor-ferroelectric solid solution crystals. Nat. Commun. 7, 13807 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jin, Y. M., Wang, Y. U., Khachaturyan, A. G., Li, J. F. & Viehland, D. Adaptive ferroelectric states in systems with low domain wall energy: tetragonal microdomains. J. Appl. Phys. 94, 3629–3640 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Otoničar, M. et al. Connecting the multiscale structure with macroscopic response of relaxor ferroelectrics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2006823 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Manley, M., Lynn, J., Abernathy, D. & Specht, E. Phonon localization drives polar nanoregions in a relaxor ferroelectric. Nat. Commun. 5, 3683 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Manley, M. E. et al. Giant electromechanical coupling of relaxor ferroelectrics controlled by polar nanoregion vibrations. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501814 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, Y. et al. Morphotropic relaxor boundary in a relaxor system showing enhancement of electrostrain and dielectric permittivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 137601 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Welberry, T. R. Diffuse scattering and Monte Carlo studies of relaxor ferroelectrics. Metall. Mater. Trans. 39, 3170–3178 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goossens, D. Diffuse scattering from lead-containing ferroelectric perovskite oxides. ISRN Mater. Sci. 2013, 107178 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bosak, A., Chernyshov, D., Vakhrushev, S. & Krisch, M. Diffuse scattering in relaxor ferroelectrics: true three-dimensional mapping, experimental artefacts and modelling. Acta Crystallogr. A Found. Adv. 68, 117–123 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Paściak, M., Wołcyrz, M. & Pietraszko, A. Interpretation of the diffuse scattering in Pb-based relaxor ferroelectrics in terms of three-dimensional nanodomains of the 〈110〉-directed relative interdomain atomic shifts. Phys. Rev. B 76, 014117 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim, J. et al. Epitaxial strain control of relaxor ferroelectric phase evolution. Adv. Mater. 31, 1901060 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu, G., Zhong, Z., Hiraka, H. & Shirane, G. Three-dimensional mapping of diffuse scattering in Pb(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3-xPbTiO3. Phys. Rev. B 70, 174109 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Takenaka, H., Grinberg, I., Liu, S. & Rappe, A. M. Slush-like polar structures in single-crystal relaxors. Nature 546, 391–395 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Krogstad, M. J. et al. The relation of local order to material properties in relaxor ferroelectrics. Nat. Mater. 17, 718–724 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis, M., Damjanovic, D. & Setter, N. Electric-field-, temperature-, and stress-induced phase transitions in relaxor ferroelectric single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 73, 014115 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sato, Y., Hirayama, T. & Ikuhara, Y. Real-time direct observations of polarization reversal in a piezoelectric crystal: Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3 studied via in situ electrical biasing transmission electron microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 187601 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar, A. et al. Atomic-resolution electron microscopy of nanoscale local structure in lead-based relaxor ferroelectrics. Nat. Mater. 20, 62–67 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim, J. et al. Frequency-dependent suppression of field-induced polarization rotation in relaxor ferroelectric thin films. Matter 4, 2367–2377 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Guo, R. et al. Origin of the high piezoelectric response in PbZr1−xTixO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5423–5426 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Davis, M. Picturing the elephant: giant piezoelectric activity and the monoclinic phases of relaxor-ferroelectric single crystals. J. Electroceram. 19, 25–47 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ohwada, K. et al. Neutron diffraction study of the irreversible R–MA–MC phase transition in single crystal Pb[(Zn1/3Nb2/3)1–xTix]O3. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 70, 2778–2783 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wen, J., Xu, G., Stock, C. & Gehring, P. M. Response of polar nanoregions in 68%Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-32%PbTiO3 to a [001] electric field. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 082901 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Prosandeev, S., Wang, D. & Bellaiche, L. Properties of epitaxial films made of relaxor ferroelectrics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 247602 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Li, F., Zhang, S., Damjanovic, D., Chen, L. & Shrout, T. R. Local structural heterogeneity and electromechanical responses of ferroelectrics: learning from relaxor ferroelectrics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1801504 (2018).

  32. Nahas, Y. et al. Inverse transition of labyrinthine domain patterns in ferroelectric thin films. Nature 577, 47–51 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kisi, E. H., Piltz, R. O., Forrester, J. S. & Howard, C. J. The giant piezoelectric effect: electric field induced monoclinic phase or piezoelectric distortion of the rhombohedral parent? J. Phys. Condens. Matter 15, 3631 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Janolin, P.-E., Dkhil, B., Davis, M., Damjanovic, D. & Setter, N. Uniaxial-stress induced phase transitions in [001]C-poled 0.955Pb(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3–0.045PbTiO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 152907 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Li, F. et al. Giant piezoelectricity of Sm-doped Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3 single crystals. Science 364, 264–268 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Matsuura, M. et al. Composition dependence of the diffuse scattering in the relaxor ferroelectric compound (1−x)Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3−xPbTiO3(0 ≤ x ≤ 0.40). Phys. Rev. B 74, 144107 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Paull, O. et al. Anisotropic epitaxial stabilization of a low-symmetry ferroelectric with enhanced electromechanical response. Nat. Mater. 21, 74–80 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sang, X. & LeBeau, J. M. Revolving scanning transmission electron microscopy: correcting sample drift distortion without prior knowledge. Ultramicroscopy 138, 28–35 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. LeBeau, J. M., Findlay, S. D., Allen, L. J. & Stemmer, S. Position averaged convergent beam electron diffraction: theory and applications. Ultramicroscopy 110, 118–125 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

J.K. acknowledges support from the Army Research Office under grant W911NF-21-1-0118. J.M.L. and A.K. acknowledge support for this work from the John Chipman Career Development Professorship and the NVIDIA Corporation for supplying a Titan Xp graphics processing unit for STEM image simulations. A.F. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation under grant DMR-2102895. Z.T. acknowledges support from the Army Research Office under grant W911NF-21-1-0126. A.M.R. acknowledges support from the Office of Naval Research under grant N00014-20-1-2701. Y.Q. acknowledges the center for 3D Ferroelectric Microelectronics (3DFeM), an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences under Award No. DE-SC0021118, including the extension of bond-valence molecular dynamics modeling to thin films. Y.Q., H.T., A.M.R., J.M.L. and L.W.M. also acknowledge support from the Army Research Laboratory via the Collaborative for Hierarchical Agile and Responsive Materials (CHARM) under cooperative agreement W911NF-19-2-0119. Use of the Advanced Photon Source, an Office of Science User Facility operated for the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, by Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), was supported by the US DOE under contract no. DE-AC02-06CH11357. The authors acknowledge computational support from the High-Performance Computing Modernization Office (HPCMO) of the US Department of Defense (DOD) and National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a US Department of Energy, Office of Science User Facility located at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, operated under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. This work was performed in part at the Center for Nanoscale Systems (CNS), a member of the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN) and part of Harvard University, supported by the National Science Foundation under award no. ECS-0335765. This work was performed in part in the MIT.nano Characterization Facilities.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Jieun Kim, Abinash Kumar, Yubo Qi.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Jieun Kim, Abel Fernandez, Zishen Tian & Lane W. Martin

  2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Abinash Kumar & James M. LeBeau

  3. Department of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Yubo Qi & Andrew M. Rappe

  4. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA

    Hiroyuki Takenaka

  5. Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA

    Philip J. Ryan & Jong-Woo Kim

  6. Department of Physics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA

    Derek Meyers

  7. Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Abel Fernandez & Lane W. Martin

Authors
  1. Jieun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abinash Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yubo Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hiroyuki Takenaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Philip J. Ryan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Derek Meyers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jong-Woo Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Abel Fernandez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Zishen Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Andrew M. Rappe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. James M. LeBeau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Lane W. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.K. and L.W.M. conceived this study. J.K. synthesized the films and performed the structural characterizations. J.K., A.F. and Z.T. fabricated the devices for in operando synchrotron diffraction. J.K. and D.M. performed the synchrotron diffraction measurements. A.K. and J.M.L. performed the STEM studies. Y.Q., H.T. and A.M.R. performed the molecular dynamics simulation studies. P.J.R. and J.-W.K. developed the in operando synchrotron diffraction setup. J.K., D.M., Z.T., P.J.R. and J.-W.K. performed the in operando synchrotron diffraction measurements. J.K. and A.K. wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. J.K., A.K., Y.Q., H.T., A.M.R., J.M.L. and L.W.M. revised the manuscript. All the authors discussed the results and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lane W. Martin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Physics thanks Dawei Wang and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–9 and refs. 1–4.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 3

Electric-field-dependent XRD data.

Source Data Fig. 4

XRD fitting results and electric-field-dependent XRD data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J., Kumar, A., Qi, Y. et al. Coupled polarization and nanodomain evolution underpins large electromechanical responses in relaxors. Nat. Phys. 18, 1502–1509 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01773-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01773-y

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing