Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

Reply to: Absence of evidence of superconductivity in sulfur hydride in optical reflectance experiments

The Original Article was published on 11 August 2022

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The raw and corrected data for three temperatures.

References

  1. Hirsch, J. E. & Marsiglio, F. Absence of evidence of superconductivity in sulfur hydride in optical reflectance experiments. Nat. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01693-x (2022).

  2. Capitani, F. et al. Spectroscopic evidence of a new energy scale for superconductivity in H3S. Nat. Phys. 13, 859–863 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Drozdov, A., Eremets, M., Troyan, I., Ksenofontov, V. & Shylin, S. Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride system. Nature 525, 73–76 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, Y., Hao, J., Liu, H., Li, Y. & Ma, Y. The metallization and superconductivity of dense hydrogen sulfide. J. Chem. Phys. 140, 174712 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carbotte, J. P., Nicol, E. J. & Timusk, T. Detecting superconductivity in the high pressure hydrides and metallic hydrogen from optical properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 047002 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.T., P.R. and E.J.N. wrote the answer. J.B.B. and P.R. treated the data and designed the figures. All authors verified the content.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to P. Roy or T. Timusk.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Physics thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roy, P., Brubach, JB., Capitani, F. et al. Reply to: Absence of evidence of superconductivity in sulfur hydride in optical reflectance experiments. Nat. Phys. 18, 1036–1037 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01694-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01694-w

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing