Spin glasses, generally defined as disordered systems with randomized competing interactions1,2, are a widely investigated complex system. Theoretical models describing spin glasses are broadly used in other complex systems, such as those describing brain function3,4, error-correcting codes5 or stock-market dynamics6. This wide interest in spin glasses provides strong motivation to generate an artificial spin glass within the framework of artificial spin ice systems7,8,9. Here we present the experimental realization of an artificial spin glass consisting of dipolar coupled single-domain Ising-type nanomagnets arranged onto an interaction network that replicates the aspects of a Hopfield neural network10. Using cryogenic X-ray photoemission electron microscopy (XPEEM), we performed temperature-dependent imaging of thermally driven moment fluctuations within these networks and observed characteristic features of a two-dimensional Ising spin glass. Specifically, the temperature dependence of the spin glass correlation function follows a power-law trend predicted from theoretical models on two-dimensional spin glasses11. Furthermore, we observe clear signatures of the hard-to-observe rugged spin glass free energy1 in the form of sub-aging, out-of-equilibrium autocorrelations12 and a transition from stable to unstable dynamics1,13.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Nature Communications Open Access 11 October 2023
Nature Communications Open Access 14 September 2023
Communications Physics Open Access 23 May 2023
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
The code used in this study is available from the authors upon request.
Mydosh, J. A. Spin glasses: redux: an updated experimental/materials survey. Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 052501 (2015).
Binder, K. & Young, A. P. Spin glasses: experimental facts, theoretical concepts and open questions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 801–976 (1986).
Hudetz, A. G., Humphries, C. J. & Binder, J. R. Spin-glass model predicts metastable brain states that diminish in anesthesia. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8, 234 (2014).
Ezaki, T., Fonseca dos Reis, E., Watanabe, T., Sakaki, M. & Masuda, N. Closer to critical resting-state neural dynamics in individuals with higher fluid intelligence. Commun. Biol. 3, 52 (2020).
Sourlas, N. Spin-glass models as error-correcting codes. Nature 339, 693–695 (1989).
Maskawa, J. in Empirical Science of Financial Fluctuations, 153–158 (Springer, 2002).
Skjærvø, S. H., Marrows, C. H., Stamps, R. L. & Heyderman, L. J. Advances in artificial spin ice. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 13–28 (2020).
Saccone, M. et al. Elevated effective dimension in tree-like nanomagnetic Cayley structures. Nanoscale 12, 189–194 (2020).
Saccone, M. et al. Towards artificial Ising spin glasses: thermal ordering in randomized arrays of Ising-type nanomagnets. Phys. Rev. B 99, 224403 (2019).
Hopfield, J. J. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79, 2554–2558 (1982).
Rieger, H. et al. The critical exponents of the two-dimensional Ising spin glass revisited: exact ground-state calculations and Monte Carlo simulations. J. Phys. A 29, 3939–3950 (1996).
Kawashima, N. & Rieger, H. in Frustrated Spin Systems 491–596 (World Scientific, 2005).
Bray, A. J. & Moore, M. A. Chaotic nature of the spin-glass phase. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 57–60 (1987).
Wang, R. F. et al. Artificial spin ice in a geometrically frustrated lattice of nanoscale ferromagnetic islands. Nature 439, 303–306 (2006).
Farhan, A. et al. Exploring hyper-cubic energy landscapes in thermally active finite artificial spin-ice systems. Nat. Phys. 9, 375–382 (2013).
Canals, B. et al. Fragmentation of magnetism in artificial kagome dipolar spin ice. Nat. Commun. 7, 11446 (2016).
Gilbert, I. et al. Emergent ice rule and magnetic charge screening from vertex frustration in artificial spin ice. Nat. Phys. 10, 670–675 (2014).
Farhan, A. et al. Thermodynamics of emergent magnetic charge screening in artificial spin ice. Nat. Commun. 7, 12635 (2016).
Lao, Y. et al. Classical topological order in the kinetics of artificial spin ice. Nat. Phys. 14, 723–727 (2018).
Gilbert, I. et al. Emergent reduced dimensionality by vertex frustration in artificial spin ice. Nat. Phys. 12, 162–165 (2015).
Daqing, L., Kosmidis, K., Bunde, A. & Havlin, S. Dimension of spatially embedded networks. Nat. Phys. 7, 481–484 (2011).
Hartmann, A. K. & Young, A. P. Lower critical dimension of Ising spin glasses. Phys. Rev. B 64, 180404 (2001).
Farhan, A. et al. Emergent magnetic monopole dynamics in macroscopically degenerate artificial spin ice. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav6380 (2019).
Stöhr, J. et al. Element-specific magnetic microscopy with circularly polarized X-rays. Science 259, 658–661 (1993).
Berthier, L. & Biroli, G. Theoretical perspective on the glass transition and amorphous materials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 587–645 (2011).
Derrida, B. & Weisbuch, G. Dynamical phase transitions in 3-dimensional spin glasses. Europhys. Lett. 4, 657–662 (1987).
Sompolinsky, H. & Zippelius, A. Relaxational dynamics of the Edwards-Anderson model and the mean-field theory of spin-glasses. Phys. Rev. B 25, 6860–6875 (1982).
Rosenstein, M. T., Collins, J. J. & De Luca, C. J. A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. 65, 117–134 (1993).
Yucesoy, B., Machta, J. & Katzgraber, H. G. Correlations between the dynamics of parallel tempering and the free-energy landscape in spin glasses. Phys. Rev. E. 87, 012104 (2013).
Lucas, A. Ising formulations of many NP problem. Front. Phys. 2, 5 (2014).
Perrin, Y., Canals, B. & Rougemaille, N. Extensive degeneracy, Coulomb phase and magnetic monopoles in artificial square ice. Nature 540, 410–413 (2016).
May, A., Hunt, M., van den Berg, A., Hejazi, A. & Ladak, S. Realisation of a frustrated 3D magnetic nanowire lattice. Commun. Phys. 2, 13 (2019).
Li, Y. et al. Programmable ultralight magnets via orientational arrangement of ferromagnetic nanoparticles within aerogel hosts. ACS Nano 13, 13875–13883 (2019).
Farhan, A. et al. Geometrical frustration and planar triangular antiferromagnetism in quasi-three-dimensional artificial spin architecture. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 267203 (2020).
Lambson, B., Carlton, D. & Bokor, J. Exploring the thermodynamic limits of computation in integrated systems: magnetic memory, nanomagnetic logic and the Landauer limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 010604 (2011).
Zhang, X. et al. Understanding thermal annealing in artificial spin ice. APL Mater. 7, 111112 (2019).
Le Guyader, L. et al. Studying nanomagnets and magnetic heterostructures with X-ray PEEM at the Swiss Light Source. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 185, 371–380 (2012).
Sendetskyi, O. et al. Continuous magnetic phase transition in artificial square ice. Phys. Rev. B 99, 214430 (2019).
We thank A.P. Young for fruitful discussions on estimating the spin glass correlation function’s unbiased estimator. A.F. and K.H. acknowledge support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (projects nos. 174306 and 172774, respectively). Funding was also received from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 737093, FEMTOTERABYTE. S.v.D. acknowledges support from the Academy of Finland (project no. 316857). M.S. acknowledges the support of the Centre for Nonlinear Studies and Theory Division at Los Alamos (grants nos. PRD20190195 and LA-UR-21-27055). F.C. was also financed via DOE-LDRD grants nos. PRD20170660 and PRD20190195. Part of this project was performed at the SIM Beamline of the Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland. Samples were fabricated at the Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA. The Molecular Foundry is supported by the Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the US Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Physics thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Figs. 1–5. Supplementary Video captions 1–3.
XMCD image sequence of thermally-activated nanomagnetic Hopfield network recorded at 168 K.
XMCD image sequence of thermally-activated nanomagnetic Hopfield network recorded at 181 K.
Schematic representation of low- and high-temperature dynamics within free energy landscapes.
A high-resolution SEM image of the patterned nanomagnetic thin film.
High-resolution XMCD images that comprise Fig. 2.
The x and y coordinates, along with the error in y, that are plotted in Fig. 3.
The x and y coordinates, along with the error in y, that are plotted in Fig. 4.
About this article
Cite this article
Saccone, M., Caravelli, F., Hofhuis, K. et al. Direct observation of a dynamical glass transition in a nanomagnetic artificial Hopfield network. Nat. Phys. 18, 517–521 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01538-7
This article is cited by
Communications Physics (2023)
Nature Communications (2023)
Nature Communications (2023)
AAPPS Bulletin (2023)
Nature Physics (2022)