Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

NUCLEAR PHYSICS

No need to decide

To test the validity of theoretical models, the predictions they make must be compared with experimental data. Instead of choosing one model out of many to describe mass measurements of zirconium, Bayesian statistics allows the averaging of a variety of models.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic representation of Bayesian model averaging.

References

  1. Goeppert Mayer, M. Phys. Rev. 78, 16–21 (1950).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wigner, E. P. Phys. Rev. 51, 106–119 (1937).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Satuła, W., Dean, D. J., Gary, J., Mizutori, S. & Nazarewicz, W. Phys. Lett. B 407, 103–109 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamaker, A. et al. Nat. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01395-w (2021).

  5. Hohenberg, P. & Kohn, W. Phys. Rev. 136, B864–B871 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Erler, J. et al. Nature 486, 509–512 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Neufcourt, L. et al. Phys. Rev. C 101, 044307 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bastos, L. & O’Hagan, A. Technometrics 51, 425–438 (2009).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Pastore, A. & Carnini, M. J. Phys. G 48, 084001 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frauendorf, S. & Macchiavelli, A. O. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 78, 24–90 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Pastore.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pastore, A. No need to decide. Nat. Phys. 17, 1283 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01443-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01443-5

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing