Abstract
Spectromicroscopy techniques with fast electrons can quantitatively measure the optical response of excitations with unrivalled spatial resolution. However, owing to their inherently scalar nature, electron waves cannot access the polarization-related quantities. Despite promising attempts based on the conversion of concepts originating from singular optics (such as vortex beams), the definition of an optical polarization analogue for fast electrons has remained an open question. Here we establish such an analogue using the dipole transition vector of the electron between two well-chosen singular wave states. We show that electron energy loss spectroscopy allows the direct measurement of the polarized electromagnetic local density of states. In particular, in the case of circular polarization, it directly measures the local optical spin density. This work establishes electron energy loss spectroscopy as a quantitative technique to tackle fundamental issues in nano-optics, such as super-chirality, local polarization of dark excitations or polarization singularities at the nanoscale.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Source data are available for this paper. All other data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Akkermans, E. & Montanbaux, G. Mesoscopic Physics of Electrons and Photons (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010); https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618833
Tonomura, A., Endo, J., Matsuda, T., Kawasaki, T. & Ezawa, H. Demonstration of single electron buildup of an interference pattern. Am. J. Phys. 57, 117–120 (1989).
Bach, R., Pope, D., Liou, S.-H. & Batelaan, H. Controlled double-slit electron diffraction. New J. Phys. 15, 033018 (2013).
Crommie, M. F., Lutz, C. P. & Eigler, D. M. Confinement of electrons to quantum corrals on a metal surface. Science 262, 218–220 (1993).
Colas des Francs, G. et al. Optical analogy to electronic quantum corrals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4950–4953 (2001).
Anderson, P. W. Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices. Phys. Rev. 109, 1492–1505 (1958).
Wiersma, D. S., Bartolini, P., Lagendijk, A. D. & Righini, R. Localization of light in a disordered medium. Nature 390, 671–673 (1997).
Rose, H. H. Geometrical Charged-Particle Optics (Springer Series in Optical Sciences, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013).
Scherzer, O. The theoretical resolution limit of the electron microscope. J. Appl. Phys. 20, 20–29 (1949).
Haider, M. et al. Electron microscopy image enhanced. Nature 392, 768–769 (1998).
Gabor, D. A new microscopic principle. Nature 161, 777–778 (1948).
Bliokh, K. Y., Bliokh, Y. P., Savel’ev, S. & Nori, F. Semiclassical dynamics of electron wave packet states with phase vortices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 190404 (2007).
Uchida, M. & Tonomura, A. Generation of electron beams carrying orbital angular momentum. Nature 464, 737–739 (2010).
Verbeeck, J., Tian, H. & Schattschneider, P. Production and application of electron vortex beams. Nature 467, 301–304 (2010).
McMorran, B. J. et al. Electron vortex beams with high quanta of orbital angular momentum. Science 331, 192–195 (2011).
Nye, J. F. & Berry, M. V. Dislocations in wave trains. Proc. R. Soc. A 336, 165–190 (1974).
Allen, L., Beijersbergen, M. W., Spreeuw, R. J. C. & Woerdman, J. P. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre–Gaussian laser modes. Phys. Rev. A 45, 8185–8189 (1992).
García De Abajo, F. J., Estrada, H. & Meseguer, F. Diacritical study of light, electrons and sound scattering by particles and holes. New J. Phys. 11, 1–10 (2009).
Losquin, A. et al. Unveiling nanometer scale extinction and scattering phenomena through combined electron energy loss spectroscopy and cathodoluminescence measurements. Nano Lett. 15, 1229–1237 (2015).
García de Abajo, F. J. & Kociak, M. Probing the photonic local density of states with electron energy loss spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 106804 (2008).
Nicoletti, O. et al. Three-dimensional imaging of localized surface plasmon resonances of metal nanoparticles. Nature 502, 80–84 (2013).
Losquin, A. & Kociak, M. Link between cathodoluminescence and electron energy loss spectroscopy and the radiative and full electromagnetic local density of states. ACS Photon. 2, 1619–1627 (2015).
Coles, M. M. & Andrews, D. L. Chirality and angular momentum in optical radiation. Phys. Rev. A 85, 063810 (2012).
Collins, J. T. et al. Chirality and chiroptical effects in metal nanostructures: fundamentals and current trends. Adv. Opt. Mater. 5, 1700182 (2017).
Tullius, R. et al. ‘Superchiral’ spectroscopy: detection of protein higher order hierarchical structure with chiral plasmonic nanostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 8380–8383 (2015).
Schäferling, M., Dregely, D., Hentschel, M. & Giessen, H. Tailoring enhanced optical chirality: design principles for chiral plasmonic nanostructures. Phys. Rev. X 2, 031010 (2012).
Asenjo-Garcia, A. & García De Abajo, F. J. Dichroism in the interaction between vortex electron beams, plasmons, and molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 1–5 (2014).
Guzzinati, G. et al. Probing the symmetry of the potential of localized surface plasmon resonances with phase-shaped electron beams. Nat. Commun. 8, 14999 (2017).
Lourenço-Martins, H., Lubk, A. & Kociak, M. Bridging nano-optics and condensed matter formalisms in a unified description of inelastic scattering of relativistic electron beams. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.02773 (2020).
Schattschneider, P., Löffler, S., Stöger-Pollach, M. & Verbeeck, J. Is magnetic chiral dichroism feasible with electron vortices? Ultramicroscopy 136, 81–85 (2014).
Ugarte, D. & Ducati, C. Controlling multipolar surface plasmon excitation through the azimuthal phase structure of electron vortex beams. Phys. Rev. B 93, 1–9 (2016).
Zanfrognini, M. et al. Orbital angular momentum and energy loss characterization of plasmonic excitations in metallic nanostructures in TEM. ACS Photon. 6, 620–627 (2019).
Ouyang, F. & Isaacson, M. Surface plasmon excitation of objects with arbitrary shape and dielectric constant. Phil. Mag. B 60, 481–492 (1989).
Boudarham, G. & Kociak, M. Modal decompositions of the local electromagnetic density of states and spatially resolved electron energy loss probability in terms of geometric modes. Phys. Rev. B 85, 245447 (2012).
Hohenester, U. Simulating electron energy loss spectroscopy with the MNPBEM toolbox. Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1177–1187 (2014).
García de Abajo, F. J. Optical excitations in electron microscopy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 209–275 (2010).
Schattschneider, P., Stöger-Pollach, M. & Verbeeck, J. Novel vortex generator and mode converter for electron beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 084801 (2012).
Verbeeck, J. et al. Demonstration of a 2 × 2 programmable phase plate for electrons. Ultramicroscopy 190, 58–65 (2018).
Grillo, V. et al. Measuring the orbital angular momentum spectrum of an electron beam. Nat. Commun. 8, 15536 (2017).
Pozzi, G. et al. Design of electrostatic phase elements for sorting the orbital angular momentum of electrons. Ultramicroscopy 208, 112861 (2020).
Colas des Francs, G., Girard, C., Weeber, J. C. & Dereux, A. Relationship between scanning near-field optical images and local density of photonic states. Chem. Phys. Lett. 345, 512–516 (2001).
Yin, X., Schäferling, M., Metzger, B. & Giessen, H. Interpreting chiral nanophotonic spectra: the plasmonic Born–Kuhn model. Nano Lett. 13, 6238–6243 (2013).
Lu, X. et al. Circular dichroism from single plasmonic nanostructures with extrinsic chirality. Nanoscale 6, 14244–14253 (2014).
Harvey, T. R. Probing chirality with inelastic electron-light scattering. Nano Lett. 20, 4377–4383 (2020).
Pham, A. et al. Chiral optical local density of states in a spiral plasmonic cavity. Phys. Rev. A 94, 053850 (2016).
Pham, A., Zhao, A., Genet, C. & Drezet, A. Optical chirality density and flux measured in the local density of states of spiral plasmonic structures. Phys. Rev. A 98, 1–9 (2018).
Novotny, L. & Hecht, B. Principles of Nano-Optics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006).
Krehl, J. et al. Spectral field mapping in plasmonic nanostructures with nanometer resolution. Nat. Commun. 9, 4207 (2018).
Burresi, M. et al. Observation of polarization singularities at the nanoscale. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 033902 (2009).
Rotenberg, N., Feber, B., Visser, T. D. & Kuipers, L. Tracking nanoscale electric and magnetic singularities through three-dimensional space. Optica 2, 540–546 (2015).
Kim, S. M. & Gbur, G. Angular momentum conservation in partially coherent wave fields. Phys. Rev. A 86, 043814 (2012).
Bliokh, K. Y. & Nori, F. Characterizing optical chirality. Phys. Rev. A 83, 021803 (2011).
Cameron, R. P., Barnett, S. M. & Yao, A. M. Optical helicity, optical spin and related quantities in electromagnetic theory. New J. Phys. 14, 053050 (2012).
Bliokh, K. Y., Bekshaev, A. Y. & Nori, F. Dual electromagnetism: helicity, spin, momentum and angular momentum. New J. Phys. 15, 033026 (2013).
Gómez-Medina, R., Yamamoto, N., Nakano, M. & García de Abajo, F. J. Mapping plasmons in nanoantennas via cathodoluminescence. New J. Phys. 10, 105009 (2008).
Osorio, C. I., Coenen, T., Brenny, B. J. M., Polman, A. & Koenderink, A. F. Angle-resolved cathodoluminescence imaging polarimetry. ACS Photon. 3, 147–154 (2016).
Polman, A., Kociak, M. & García de Abajo, F. J. Electron-beam spectroscopy for nanophotonics. Nat. Mater. 18, 1158–1171 (2019).
Yurtsever, A. & Zewail, A. H. Direct visualization of near-fields in nanoplasmonics and nanophotonics. Nano Lett. 12, 3334–3338 (2012).
Bliokh, K. Y. et al. Theory and applications of free-electron vortex states. Phys. Rep. 690, 1–70 (2017).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge J. Verbeeck for introduction to this field and thank J. Verbeeck, D. Ugarte, F. Houdellier and G. Guzzinati for insightful discussions. H.L.-M. thanks T. R. Harvey for insightful discussions. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 823717-ESTEEM3 and no. 101017720-EBEAM, from the French state managed by the National Agency for Research under the programme of future investment EQUIPEX TEMPOS-CHROMATEM with the reference ANR-10-EQPX-50 and ANR-17-CE24-0039 (2D-CHIRAL).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.K. and H.L.-M. developed the theory. H.L.-M. wrote the simulation codes and performed the numerical simulations. M.K., H.L.-M. and D.G. developed the analogy between the Bloch and Poincaré spheres. All the authors discussed the results and contributed to the writing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Physics thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Examples of transitions between higher order HG states possessing a non-zero OPA.
Transitions a and b possess a dipole moment along the x direction and therefore measure Ex(ω, qz). Transitions c and d possess a dipole moment along the y direction and therefore measure Ey(ω, qz).
Extended Data Fig. 2 Illustration of the effect of the summation over the final states.
a, Wavefunction ψi and plasmonic potential ϕm of the four first modes m of a 100nm * 15nm silver nano-antenna. The relative position and scale of the wavefunction and potential are respected. Scales bar is 50 nm. b, pEELS spectrum as a function of the collection angle. The peaks of the four modes shown in a. are marked with arrows. Below θω, the second and fourth peak are suppressed due to the selection rule reminiscent of formula (184) of the SI. Above θω,all the peaks are present and the resulting spectrum is essentially classical.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Material
Supplementary discussion and extended demonstrations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lourenço-Martins, H., Gérard, D. & Kociak, M. Optical polarization analogue in free electron beams. Nat. Phys. 17, 598–603 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01163-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01163-w
This article is cited by
-
Polarization out of the vortex
Nature Physics (2021)