Abstract
Superradiance is the anomalous radiance describing coherent photon emission from a gas. It plays a crucial role in atomic physics, quantum mechanics and astrophysics. Because the intensity of superradiant light beams is proportional to the number of particles squared, superradiance is also at the core of today’s most powerful light sources. Superradiant emission is intuitively expected when the distance between lightemitting particles is much smaller than the photon wavelength. Here, we break this assumption by predicting a never considered superradiance effect that holds even when the particle number per wavelength vanishes. We discover that a bunch of relativistic charged particles arranged in certain ways can generate an optical shock along the Vavilov–Cherenkov angle in vacuum, thereby concentrating broadband radiation in any spectral region into single light bullets. The process leaves clear experimental signatures, and we illustrate it in the form of a previously unrecognized nonlinear superradiant Thomson scattering. This concept may enable new forms of superradiant emission in advanced light sources, atomic physics systems, and unlock coherent emission in plasma accelerators.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our bestvalue onlineaccess subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Data availability
All data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source Data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
All computer codes supporting the findings of this study are fully documented within the paper and its references. Reasonable requests for access to the codes should be directed to J.V. on behalf of the Osiris consortium.
Change history
17 May 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567021012575
References
Gross, M. & Haroche, S. Superradiance: an essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission. Phys. Rep. 93, 301–396 (1982).
Dicke, R. Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes. Phys. Rev. 93, 99–110 (1954).
Rehler, N. E. & Eberly, J. H. Superradiance. Phys. Rev. A 3, 1735–1751 (1971).
Skribanowitz, N., Herman, I. P., MacGillivray, J. C. & Feld, M. S. Observation of Dicke superradiance in optically pumped HF gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 309–312 (1973).
Scully, M. O. & Svidzinsky, A. A. The super of superradiance. Science 325, 1510–1511 (2009).
Scully, M. O., Fry, E. S., Raymond Ooi, C. H. & Wódkiewicz, K. Directed spontaneous emission from an extended ensemble of N atoms: timing is everything. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 010501 (2006).
Brito, R., Cardoso, V. & Pani, P. Superradiance 906 (Lecture Notes in Physics, SpringerVerlag, 2015).
Madey, J. Stimulated emission of Bremsstrahlung in a periodic magnetic field. J. Appl. Phys. 42, 1906–1913 (1971).
Bonifacio, R., McNeil, B. W. J. & Pierini, P. Superradiance in the highgain freeelectron laser. Phys. Rev. A 40, 4467–4475 (1989).
Bonifacio, R., De Salvo, L., Pierini, P., Piovella, N. & Pellegrini, C. Spectrum, temporal structure and fluctuations in a highgain freeelectron laser starting from noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 70–73 (1994).
Bonifacio, R., Pellegrini, C. & Narducci, L. Collective instabilities and highgain regime in a free electron laser. Opt. Commun. 50, 373–378 (1984).
Gover, A. et al. Superradiant and stimulatedsuperradiant emission of bunched electron beams. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035003 (2019).
Gover, A. Superradiant and stimulatedsuperradiant emission in prebunched electronbeam radiators. I. Formulation. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 8, 030701 (2005).
Cherenkov, P. A. Visible luminescence of pure liquids under the influence of γradiation. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 2, 451–454 (1934).
Tamm, I. E. & Frank, I. M. Coherent inmedium fastelectron radiation. Dokl. Akad. Nauk USSR 14, 109–114 (1937).
Vieira, J., Mendonça, J. T. & Quéré, F. Optical control of the topology of laserplasma accelerators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 054801 (2018).
Kinkaid, B. A short period helical wiggler as an improved source of synchrotron radiation. J. Appl. Phys. 48, 2684–2691 (1977).
Chen, S. Y., Maksimchuk, A. & Umstadter, D. Experimental observation of relativistic nonlinear Thomson scattering. Nature 396, 653–655 (1998).
Ta Phuoc, K. et al. Alloptical compton gammaray source. Nat. Photon. 6, 308–311 (2012).
Yan, W. et al. Highorder multiphoton Thomson scattering. Nat. Photon. 11, 514–520 (2017).
Vranic, M., Martins, J. L., Vieira, J., Fonseca, R. A. & Silva, L. O. Alloptical radiation reaction at 10^{21} W/cm^{2}. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 134801 (2014).
Cole, J. M. et al. Experimental evidence of radiation reaction in the collision of a highintensity laser pulse with a laserwakefield accelerated electron beam. Phys. Rev. X 8, 011020 (2018).
Poder, K. et al. Experimental signatures of the quantum nature of radiation reaction in the field of an ultraintense laser. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031004 (2018).
Vranic, M., Grismayer, T., Fonseca, R. A. & Silva, L. O. Quantum radiation reaction in headon laserelectron beam interaction. New J. Phys. 18, 073035 (2016).
Esarey, E., Ride, S. K. & Sprangle, P. Nonlinear Thomson scattering of intense laser pulses from beams and plasmas. Phys. Rev. E 48, 3003–3021 (2002).
Zhao, L. et al. Terahertz oscilloscope for recording time information of ultrashort electron beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 144801 (2019).
Froula, D. H. et al. Spatiotemporal control of laser intensity. Nat. Photon. 12, 262–265 (2018).
SainteMarie, A., Gobert, O. & Quéré, F. Controlling the velocity of ultrashort light pulses in vacuum through spatiotemporal couplings. Optica 4, 1298–1304 (2017).
Weingartner, R. et al. Ultralow emittance electron beams from a laserwakefield accelerator. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 15, 111302 (2012).
Prat, E. et al. Generation and characterization of intense ultralowemittance electron beams for compact Xray freeelectron lasers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 234801 (2019).
Borrelli, S. et al. Generation and measurement of submicrometer relativistic electron beams. Commun. Phys. 1, 52 (2018).
Lu, W., Huang, C., Zhou, M., Mori, W. B. & Katsouleas, T. Nonlinear theory for relativistic plasma wakefields in the blowout regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 165002 (2006).
Tajima, T. & Dawson, J. M. Laser electron accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 267–270 (1979).
Shaw, J. L. et al. Role of direct laser acceleration of electrons in a laser wakefield accelerator with ionization injection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 064801 (2017).
Zhang, X., Khudik, V. N. & Shvets, G. Synergistic laserwakefield and directlaser acceleration in the plasmabubble regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 184801 (2015).
Cipiccia, S. et al. Gammarays from harmonically resonant betatron oscillations in a plasma wake. Nat. Phys. 7, 867–871 (2011).
Ayllon, R., Mendonça, J. T., Gisbert, A. T., Piovella, N. & Robb, G. R. M. Multimode collective scattering of light in free space by a cold atomic gas. Phys. Rev. A 100, 023630 (2019).
van Steenbergen, A., Gallardo, J., Sandweiss, J. & Fang, J.M. Observation of energy gain at the BNL inverse freeelectronlaser accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2690 (1996).
Duris, J. et al. Highquality electron beams from a helical inverse freeelectron laser accelerator. Nat. Commun. 5, 4928 (2014).
Jackson, J. D. Classical Electrodynamics 3rd edn (Wiley, 2001).
Fonseca, R. A. et al. OSIRIS: A Threedimensional, Fully Relativistic Particle in Cell Code for Modeling Plasma Based Accelerators Vol. 2331, 342–351 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 2002).
Fonseca, R. A. et al. Exploiting multiscale parallelism for large scale numerical modelling of laser wakefield accelerators. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 55, 124011 (2013).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge stimulating discussions with A. Gover, who provided a significant contribution towards the clarification of the concept. We also acknowledge use of Marenostrum at the Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Piz Daint in Switzerland and SuperMUC at the Leibniz Research Center in Munich, Germany, under PRACE awards. This work was partially supported by the EU Accelerator Research and Innovation for European Science and Society (EU ARIES) under grant agreement no. 730871 (H2020INFRAIA20161) and by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 871124 (LaserlabEurope). J.V. and M.P. acknowledge the support of FCT (Portugal) grants no. SFRH/IF/01635/2015 and PD/BD/150411/2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to all aspects of this work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Physics thanks Avraham Gover and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 The role of the bunch transverse size on generalised superradiance.
(ac), show the timeintegrated radiation profile from copropagating nonlinear Thomson scattering in a spherical detector in the far field. The angular coordinates in the spherical detectors are θ and φ. The colour scale is normalised to the maximum intensity in the left and right sides of each frame. The left side of each frame represents the radiation for a single electron, where most of the radiation is directed into an angle φ_{w} = a_{0}/γ ≃ 0.0447rad. Here, a_{0} = eA/m_{e}c^{2} ≃ 4.47 is the normalised laser vector potential at the radial position of the particle and γ = 100 is the particle relativistic factor. The right side of each frame represents the radiation from the modulated electron bunch. The Vavilov–Cherenkov angle corresponds, in this case, to the angle of maximum emission for a single electron, φ_{w}. In (a) the bunch transverse size is δr_{β} = 3.1c/ω_{0} and ω_{0} is the laser frequency. In (b), δr_{β} = 1.0c/ω_{0}, and in (c) δr_{β} = 0.31c/ω_{0}. The right panels show that the integrated angular radiation profile becomes sharper as the bunch transverse size decreases. This is a result of superradiant emission in generalised superradiance. d, shows the temporal intensity profile of the superradiant light bursts. The different lines were obtained by integrating the spatiotemporal radiation profiles along any of the angular coordinates. Each line was normalised to its corresponding peak intensity. Each curve corresponds to the right half of panels (ac), where black is for δr_{β} = 3.1c/ω_{0}, yellow corresponds to δr_{β} = 1c/ω_{0} and red to δr_{β} = 0.3c/ω_{0}.
Extended Data Fig. 2 The role of the bunch divergence (or emittance) on generalised superradiance.
The figure shows the timeintegrated radiation profile from copropagating nonlinear Thomson scattering in a spherical detector in the far field. The angular coordinates in the spherical detectors are θ and φ. The colour scale is normalised to the maximum intensity in the left and right sides of each frame. The left side of each frame represents the radiation for a single particle, where most of the radiation is directed into an angle φ_{w} = a_{0}/γ ≃ 0.047, where a_{0} = eA/m_{e}c^{2} ≃ 4.47 is the normalised laser vector potential at the position of the particle and γ = 100 is the particle relativistic factor. The right side of each frame represents the radiation from the modulated electron bunch. The Vavilov–Cherenkov angle φ_{VC} ≃ 0.06rad is higher than φ_{w}. Color scales were normalised to the peak values in all plots. In (a) δp_{⊥} = 1.0m_{e}c and in (b) δp_{⊥} = 0.1m_{e}c, where δp_{⊥} corresponds to the bunch transverse momentum spread. As a result of generalised superradiance, both frames (a) and (b) show that the maximum emission angle for the bunch does not coincide with the singleparticle maximum emission angle, even though individual bunch particles in the right side of each frame execute the same trajectory as the single particle (shown in the left side). The timeintegrated radiation profile becomes sharper for lower δp_{⊥}, approaching the ideal case of a zero emittance bunch with δp_{⊥} = 0.
Extended Data Fig. 3 The role of the bunch energy spread on generalised superradiance.
The role of the bunch energy spread on generalised superradiance. ab, show the timeintegrated radiation profile from copropagating nonlinear Thomson scattering in a spherical detector in the far field. The angular coordinates in the spherical detectors are θ and φ. The colour scale is normalised to the maximum intensity in the left and right sides of each frame. The left side of each frame represents the radiation for a single particle, where most of the radiation is directed into an angle φ_{w} = a_{0}/γ ≃ 0.047, where a_{0} = eA/m_{e}c^{2} ≃ 4.47 is the normalised laser vector potential at the position of the particle and γ = 100 is the particle relativistic factor. The right side of each frame represents the radiation from the modulated electron bunch. The Vavilov–Cherenkov angle φ_{VC} ≃ 0.06rad is higher than φ_{w}. Color scales were normalised to the peak values in all plots. In (a), δp_{∥} = 10.0m_{e}c, and in (b) δp_{∥} = 1.0m_{e}c, where δp_{∥} is the bunch longitudinal momentum spread. As a result of generalised superradiance, both frames (a) and (b) show that the maximum emission angle for the bunch does not coincide with the single particle maximum emission angle, even though individual bunch particles in the right side of each frame execute the same trajectory as the single particle (shown in the left side). The timeintegrated radiation profile becomes sharper for lower δp_{∥}, approaching the ideal case of a zero energyspread bunch with δp_{∥} = 0. c, shows the temporal intensity profile of the superradiant light bursts. The different lines were obtained by integrating the spatiotemporal radiation profiles along any of the angular coordinates. Each line was normalised to its corresponding peak intensity. Each curve then corresponds to the right half of frames (ab), where black corresponds to δp_{∥} = 10m_{e}c, and red to δp_{∥} = 1m_{e}c. The dashed black line is a scaled version of the solid black curve. Although the peak intensity is higher for δp_{∥} = 1m_{e}c than for δp_{∥} = 10m_{e}c, the duration of the superradiant light pulse remains identical in both cases. This indicates robustness of generalised superradiance to large (10% in this case) bunch energy spreads.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Generalised superradiance in the context of spontaneous undulator radiation theory.
Generalised superradiance in the context of spontaneous undulator radiation theory. The figure shows the spectral linewidth functions of a single electron [F(ω), in red] and of the electron bunch [\({F}^{\prime}(\omega )\), in black] as a function of the emitted frequency ω. (ab), illustrate an example of generalised superradiance with unmatched linewidth functions. The red line shows the spectral linewidth function of a long electron bunch with duration σ_{t}. The spectral width of the function \({F}^{\prime}(\omega )\) is Δω = 2/σ_{t}. The bunch is transversely modulated at a frequency ω_{m}, and the bunch spectral function is maximum at frequencies ω = nω_{m}. The black line represents the spectral linewidth function of a single electron bunch, F(ω). The corresponding spectral width of F(ω) is Δω = ω_{n}/(nN_{w}), where N_{w} is the number of electron oscillations during the interaction length. The single electron resonant emission frequency is ω = ω_{n}. Here, the bunch and single electron linewidth functions are not matched, ω_{n} ≠ nω_{m}. As a result, emission will not be in a superradiant regime. c, Example of regular superradiance. The red line illustrates the spectral linewidth of a short electron bunch where σ_{t} ≲ 1/ω_{n}. The bunch spectral linewidth functionthus overlaps with the single electron spectral linewidth. d, Illustration of generalised superradiance with matched linewidth functions. Here the bunch modulation respects nω_{m} = ω_{n}. Emission will be in a superradiant regime even though the bunch is long such that σ_{t} ≫ 1/ω_{n}.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–5, Discussion and Tables 1 and 2.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 2e
Numerical data used to generate Fig. 2e.
Source Data Fig. 3df
Numerical data used to generate Fig. 3d–f.
Source Data Fig. 4
Numerical data used to generate Fig. 4a and the yellow squares in Fig. 4b.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1d
Numerical data used to generate Extended Data Fig. 1d.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3c
Numerical data used to generate Extended Data Fig. 3c.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vieira, J., Pardal, M., Mendonça, J.T. et al. Generalized superradiance for producing broadband coherent radiation with transversely modulated arbitrarily diluted bunches. Nat. Phys. 17, 99–104 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s4156702009955
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s4156702009955
This article is cited by

Coherence and superradiance from a plasmabased quasiparticle accelerator
Nature Photonics (2023)