Morphology selection kinetics of crystallization in a sphere


Crystallization under geometrical confinement is of fundamental importance in condensed matter physics, biophysics and material science. Even the influence of the simplest geometry, a sphere, on crystallization remains far from well understood, thereby making morphology control of the final superstructures challenging. Here, we employ charged colloids encapsulated in an emulsion droplet as a model system to access the crystallization kinetics at the single-particle level. We find rapid formation of ‘skin’ layers with an icosahedral arrangement of defects under the geometrical frustration effect, followed by interior ordering and slow ripening. The final morphologies are determined by dynamical interplay between the system-independent skin layer formation and the system-dependent structural transformation towards the most stable solid far from the surface. We reveal the crucial role of kinetics in morphological selection under a geometrical constraint, besides the thermodynamics, which may shed new light on the structural design of nanoscale crystals.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Illustration of the structural orders of crystallized colloidal droplets.
Fig. 2: Crystallization kinetics towards ico- and fcc-type organizations.
Fig. 3: Morphology control mechanism of crystallization in a droplet.

Data availability

Data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are available for this paper.

Code availability

The computer codes used in this paper are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Irvine, W. T., Vitelli, V. & Chaikin, P. M. Pleats in crystals on curved surfaces. Nature 468, 947–951 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Meng, G., Paulose, J., Nelson, D. R. & Manoharan, V. N. Elastic instability of a crystal growing on a curved surface. Science 343, 634–637 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Teich, E. G., van Anders, G., Klotsa, D., Dshemuchadse, J. & Glotzer, S. C. Clusters of polyhedra in spherical confinement. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E669–E678 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bowick, M. J. & Giomi, L. Two-dimensional matter: order, curvature and defects. Adv. Phys. 58, 449–563 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lidmar, J., Mirny, L. & Nelson, D. R. Virus shapes and buckling transitions in spherical shells. Phys. Rev. E 68, 051910 (2003).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Roos, W., Bruinsma, R. & Wuite, G. Physical virology. Nat. Phys. 6, 733–743 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Xia, Y., Xiong, Y., Lim, B. & Skrabalak, S. E. Shape-controlled synthesis of metal nanocrystals: simple chemistry meets complex physics? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 60–103 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Langille, M. R., Zhang, J., Personick, M. L., Li, S. & Mirkin, C. A. Stepwise evolution of spherical seeds into 20-fold twinned icosahedra. Science 337, 954–957 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Vogel, N. et al. Color from hierarchy: diverse optical properties of micron-sized spherical colloidal assemblies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 10845–10850 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Caspar, D. L. & Klug, A. Physical principles in the construction of regular viruses. In Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology Vol. 27, 1–24 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1962).

  11. 11.

    Lipowsky, P., Bowick, M. J., Meinke, J. H., Nelson, D. R. & Bausch, A. R. Direct visualization of dislocation dynamics in grain-boundary scars. Nat. Mater. 4, 407–411 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bausch, A. et al. Grain boundary scars and spherical crystallography. Science 299, 1716–1718 (2003).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Guerra, R. E., Kelleher, C. P., Hollingsworth, A. D. & Chaikin, P. M. Freezing on a sphere. Nature 554, 346–350 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    De Nijs, B. et al. Entropy-driven formation of large icosahedral colloidal clusters by spherical confinement. Nat. Mater. 14, 56–60 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gasser, U., Weeks, E. R., Schofield, A., Pusey, P. & Weitz, D. Real-space imaging of nucleation and growth in colloidal crystallization. Science 292, 258–262 (2001).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    de Villeneuve, V. W. et al. Colloidal hard-sphere crystal growth frustrated by large spherical impurities. Science 309, 1231–1233 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Tan, P., Xu, N. & Xu, L. Visualizing kinetic pathways of homogeneous nucleation in colloidal crystallization. Nat. Phys. 10, 73–79 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Arai, S. & Tanaka, H. Surface-assisted single-crystal formation of charged colloids. Nat. Phys. 13, 503–509 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wang, Z., Wang, F., Peng, Y., Zheng, Z. & Han, Y. Imaging the homogeneous nucleation during the melting of superheated colloidal crystals. Science 338, 87–90 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Peng, Y., Wang, Z., Alsayed, A. M., Yodh, A. G. & Han, Y. Melting of colloidal crystal films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 205703 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Alsayed, A. M., Islam, M. F., Zhang, J., Collings, P. J. & Yodh, A. G. Premelting at defects within bulk colloidal crystals. Science 309, 1207–1210 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Li, B. et al. Modes of surface premelting in colloidal crystals composed of attractive particles. Nature 531, 485–488 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Yang, Y. et al. Scalable assembly of crystalline binary nanocrystal superparticles and their enhanced magnetic and electrochemical properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 15038–15047 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wang, D. et al. Interplay between spherical confinement and particle shape on the self-assembly of rounded cubes. Nat. Commun. 9, 2228 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Yao, Z. & de la Cruz, M. O. Topological defects in flat geometry: the role of density inhomogeneity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 115503 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Leunissen, M. E., Van Blaaderen, A., Hollingsworth, A. D., Sullivan, M. T. & Chaikin, P. M. Electrostatics at the oil–water interface, stability, and order in emulsions and colloids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 2585–2590 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Alexander, S. & McTague, J. Should all crystals be BCC? Landau theory of solidification and crystal nucleation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 702 (1978).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lechner, W., Dellago, C. & Bolhuis, P. G. Role of the prestructured surface cloud in crystal nucleation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 085701 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tóth, G. I., Pusztai, T., Tegze, G., Tóth, G. & Gránásy, L. Amorphous nucleation precursor in highly nonequilibrium fluids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 175702 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Desgranges, C. & Delhommelle, J. Insights into the molecular mechanism underlying polymorph selection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 15104–15105 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Desgranges, C. & Delhommelle, J. Controlling polymorphism during the crystallization of an atomic fluid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 235502 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Russo, J. & Tanaka, H. The microscopic pathway to crystallization in supercooled liquids. Sci. Rep. 2, 505 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Russo, J. & Tanaka, H. Selection mechanism of polymorphs in the crystal nucleation of the Gaussian core model. Soft Matter 8, 4206–4215 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Russo, J. & Tanaka, H. Crystal nucleation as the ordering of multiple order parameters. J. Chem. Phys. 145, 211801 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Tsurusawa, H., Russo, J., Leocmach, M. & Tanaka, H. Formation of porous crystals via viscoelastic phase separation. Nat. Mater. 16, 1022–1028 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Steinhardt, P. J., Nelson, D. R. & Ronchetti, M. Bond-orientational order in liquids and glasses. Phys. Rev. B 28, 784 (1983).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lechner, W. & Dellago, C. Accurate determination of crystal structures based on averaged local bond order parameters. J. Chem. Phys. 129, 114707 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kuo, K. Mackay, anti-Mackay, double-Mackay, pseudo-Mackay, and related icosahedral shell clusters. Struct. Chem. 13, 221–230 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Hofmeister, H. Forty years study of fivefold twinned structures in small particles and thin films. Cryst. Res. Technol. 33, 3–25 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Cacciuto, A., Auer, S. & Frenkel, D. Onset of heterogeneous crystal nucleation in colloidal suspensions. Nature 428, 404–406 (2004).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Sandomirski, K. et al. Heterogeneous crystallization of hard and soft spheres near flat and curved walls. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 223, 439–454 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Allahyarov, E., Sandomirski, K., Egelhaaf, S. & Löwen, H. Crystallization seeds favour crystallization only during initial growth. Nat. Commun. 6, 7110 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Yao, Z. Command of collective dynamics by topological defects in spherical crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 228002 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bohlein, T., Mikhael, J. & Bechinger, C. Observation of kinks and antikinks in colloidal monolayers driven across ordered surfaces. Nat. Mater. 11, 126–130 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lacava, J., Born, P. & Kraus, T. Nanoparticle clusters with Lennard–Jones geometries. Nano Lett. 12, 3279–3282 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Meng, G., Arkus, N., Brenner, M. P. & Manoharan, V. N. The free-energy landscape of clusters of attractive hard spheres. Science 327, 560–563 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Marino, E., Kodger, T. E., Wegdam, G. H. & Schall, P. Revealing driving forces in quantum dot supercrystal assembly. Adv. Mater. 30, 1803433 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ou, Z., Wang, Z., Luo, B., Luijten, E. & Chen, Q. Kinetic pathways of crystallization at the nanoscale. Nat. Mater. 19, 450–455 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Walden, P. Organic solvents and ionization media. III. Interior friction and its relation to conductivity. Z. Phys. Chem. 55, 207–249 (1906).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Royall, C., Leunissen, M. & Van Blaaderen, A. A new colloidal model system to study long-range interactions quantitatively in real space. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 15, 3581–3596 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Garnett, J. M. XII. Colours in metal glasses and in metallic films. Philos. Trans. Ser. A Math. Phys. 203, 385–420 (1904).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 11774059, 11734014, 11504052 and 16Z103010253) and the Shanghai Rising Star programme (grant no. 16QA1400600). H. Tanaka acknowledges Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (JP18H03675) and Specially Promoted Research (JP25000002 and JP20H05619) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). Z.Y. thanks the support from the Student Innovation Center at Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

Author information




Y.C. performed the experiments and Z.Y. carried out the numerical simulations. All authors contributed to the data analysis. P.T. and H. Tanaka supervised the project and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hajime Tanaka or Peng Tan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Confocal raw images and the rotational motion of emulsion droplets.

a, ICO type, FCC type and BCC type final structure corresponding to Fig. 1 of the main text. Images are captured by the 40X objective with 1.3 NA (Numeric Aperture) and 0.24 mm working distance. The image distortions caused by the drift is small in the x-z plane at a z scanning speed 10μm/s. b, Typical rotational drift as a function of r/R0 during the ICO-type structure formation, which corresponds to Supplementary Movie 1. c, The rotation drift as a function of r/R0 in the FCC-type system, which corresponds to Supplementary Movie 2. The droplets rotate as a whole very slowly, probably due to the flow of the surrounding fluid.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Experimental details and histograms of the final structures at various κσ.

a, Illustration of the experimental procedure of the sample preparations. Initial κσ of each samples is controlled by vibrating CHB solvent with an ultrasonicator. The equilibrium κσ of each sample, which produces the three final structures shown in the main text, is adjusted by the volume ratio between water and glycerol. The condition R0/a and the colloid volume fraction ϕ, where we find the three final structures, is illustrated in b for global icosahedral organizations, in c for single-crystal FCC core organizations and in d for single-crystal BCC core organizations. e, Histogram for κσ ~ 3.2 with a volume ratio of water:glycerol=2.5:7.5. The ICO-type final structure dominates in a range of geometric constraint 6.3 < R0/a < 17.8. f, Histogram for κσ ~ 3.0 with a volume ratio of water:glycerol=3:7. The ICO-type final structure dominates in a range 6.7 < R0/a < 17.6. Small amounts of FCC-type appear in a range of 10.0 < R0/a < 14.7. g, Histogram for κσ ~ 2.5 with a volume ratio of water:glycerol=4:6. FCC single crystal is the most favorable structure in a range of 9.6 < R0/a < 22.7. No complete ICO is observed. h, Histogram for κσ ~ 2.2 with a volume ratio of water:glycerol=1:1. BCC single crystal and polycrystal dominate.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Structural order identification and distortions in the system.

a, Illustration of the identified BCC solids using the q4q8 bond orientational order parameter map and the bond orientational order diagram. b, Illustration of the identified HCP and FCC solids using the same approach as in a. c, \({\overline{q}}_{4}\)-\({\overline{q}}_{6}\) distribution map of the initial crystallization taking place in the curved shell layers. The colours represents the scaled distance to the sphere center, r/R0. d, The radial distribution function of BCC solid at κσ ~ 3.0 and the real-space illustration of the local structure. The distorted BCC 110 plane is close to a hexagonal layer. The blue and green spheres represent the upper and lower layers, respectively. e, f, The radial distribution function of FCC and HCP solid at κσ ~ 3.0 and the real-space illustration of the local structures. We note that the distortion is small.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Lattice mismatch in systems with and without image-charge effect.

a, Lattice-constant mismatch from the droplet centre to the surface as a function of r/R0 for the three morphologies in our emulsion systems. A particle layer (S0) is tightly bound to the surface due to the image-charge effect. Large-lattice mismatch is observed between S0 and the first shell layer (L1). b, Lattice-constant mismatch measured in a round glass capillary tube with a diameter of 50 μm, in which the image-charge effect is negligibly small.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Change of the crystalline structure and lattice-constant mismatch caused by the long-range interaction in simulations.

a, Configuration (cross-section) of FCC crystals under geometric constraint at various κσ. Particles are propelled to the surface as the decrease of κσ. b, Configuration (cross-sectional view) of BCC crystals under geometric constraint at various κσ. We find a similar trend of the surface densification. c, Lattice-constant mismatch from the centre to surface as a function of r/R0 at various κσ for FCC crystal under spherical constraint in simulations. Decrease of κσ causes the propagation of the lattice mismatch from S0 to the inside. d, Lattice-constant mismatch for FCC crystal under spherical constraint in simulations. We find a similar trend as in FCC system.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Macky and anti-Macky organizations in our systems.

a, Dependence of the number ratio of particles with HCP-type and FCC-type local orders, nHCP/nFCC, on r/R0. b, Illustration of the HCP layer rightly covering the icosahedral core in our system. c, Illustration of the icosahedral core in our system. It is composed of FCC tetrahedron grains, HCP twinning boundaries, and 5-fold disclination chains.

Extended Data Fig. 7 The BCC-to-RHCP conversion.

The sliding motion of BCC 110 plane mainly occurs along a relatively flat plane, which creates FCC and HCP layers perpendicular to the surface at κσ ~ 3.0.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Layering of the shell caused by the surface.

The shell and surface have a similar spherical geometry independent of their lattice-constant mismatch during the whole crystallization process, as shown by the cross-section view of six different samples.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Lattice mismatch and structural correspondence between the surface and shell.

a, Illustration of strong anchoring of the surface defects with defective structures on the shell when the lattice-constant mismatch is small (6.5%). b-d, Illustration of the reduction of structural order correspondences between the shell and surface as the lattice-constant mismatch becomes more significant. As shown in b-d, a larger sphere has a weaker structural order correspondence between the shell and surface.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Competing of 5-fold twinning with single-twinning in FCC system.

The core of the configuration has only one 5-fold twinning axis. a, Top view. b, Side view.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Video 1

Cross-section view of structural evolutions towards ICO type at the nucleation and growth stage. The red spheres indicate FCC solid, the orange spheres indicate HCP solid, the blue spheres indicate BCC solid, and the small green spheres are liquid particles.

Supplementary Video 2

Cross-section view of structural evolutions towards FCC type at the nucleation and growth stage. The red spheres indicate FCC solid, the orange spheres indicate HCP solid, the blue spheres indicate BCC solid, and the small green spheres are liquid particles.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

3D configurations of colloidal particles.

Source Data Fig. 2

Time sequential configurations.

Source Data Fig. 3

3D configurations of colloidal particles.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Yao, Z., Tang, S. et al. Morphology selection kinetics of crystallization in a sphere. Nat. Phys. (2020).

Download citation


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing