Squeezed light—light with quantum noise lower than shot noise in some quadratures and higher in others—can be used to improve the sensitivity of precision measurements. In particular, squeezed light sources based on nonlinear optical crystals are being used to improve the sensitivity of gravitational wave detectors. In optomechanical squeezers, the radiation-pressure-driven interaction of a coherent light field with a mechanical oscillator induces correlations between the amplitude and phase quadratures of the light, which induce the squeezing. However, thermally driven fluctuations of the mechanical oscillator’s position make it difficult to observe the quantum correlations at room temperature and at low frequencies. Here, we present a measurement of optomechanically squeezed light, performed at room temperature in a broad band near the audio-frequency regions relevant to gravitational wave detectors. We observe sub-Poissonian quantum noise in a frequency band of 30–70 kHz with a maximum reduction of 0.7 ± 0.1 dB below shot noise at 45 kHz. We present two independent methods of measuring this squeezing, one of which does not rely on the calibration of shot noise.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Source Data are provided with this paper. All other data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are referenced under https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3694290.
All code that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study is referenced under https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3694290. It can be downloaded from GitLab at https://git.ligo.org/nancy.aggarwal/room-temperature-optomechanical-squeezing.git and from GitHub at https://github.com/nancy-aggarwal/room-temperature-optomechanical-squeezing_github.git.
Caves, C. M. Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer. Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693–1708 (1981).
Caves, C. M. Quantum-mechanical radiation-pressure fluctuations in an interferometer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 75–79 (1980).
Gerry, C., Knight, P. & Knight, P. L. Introductory Quantum Optics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).
Kimble, H. J., Levin, Y., Matsko, A. B., Thorne, K. S. & Vyatchanin, S. P. Conversion of conventional gravitational-wave interferometers into quantum nondemolition interferometers by modifying their input and/or output optics. Phys. Rev. D 65, 022002 (2001).
LIGO Scientific Collaboration et al. Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light. Nat. Photon. 7, 613–619 (2013).
Grote, H. et al. First long-term application of squeezed states of light in a gravitational-wave observatory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 181101 (2013).
Wu, L.-A., Kimble, H. J., Hall, J. L. & Wu, H. Generation of squeezed states by parametric down conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2520–2523 (1987).
Schnabel, R., Mavalvala, N., McClelland, D. E. & Lam, P. K. Quantum metrology for gravitational wave astronomy. Nat. Commun. 1, 121 (2010).
Schnabel, R. Squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers. Phys. Rep. 684, 1–51 (2017).
Aspelmeyer, M., Kippenberg, T. J. & Marquardt, F. Cavity optomechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391–1452 (2014).
Mancini, S. & Tombesi, P. Quantum noise reduction by radiation pressure. Phys. Rev. A 49, 4055–4065 (1994).
Fabre, C. et al. Quantum-noise reduction using a cavity with a movable mirror. Phys. Rev. A 49, 1337–1343 (1994).
Harms, J. et al. Squeezed-input, optical-spring, signal-recycled gravitational-wave detectors. Phys. Rev. D 68, 042001 (2003).
Corbitt, T. et al. Squeezed-state source using radiation-pressure-induced rigidity. Phys. Rev. A 73, 023801 (2006).
Brooks, D. W. C. et al. Non-classical light generated by quantum-noise-driven cavity optomechanics. Nature 488, 476–480 (2012).
Safavi-Naeini, A. H. et al. Squeezed light from a silicon micromechanical resonator. Nature 500, 185–189 (2013).
Purdy, T. P., Yu, P.-L. L., Peterson, R. W., Kampel, N. S. & Regal, C. A. Strong optomechanical squeezing of light. Phys. Rev. X 3, 031012 (2013).
Sudhir, V. et al. Appearance and disappearance of quantum correlations in measurement-based feedback control of a mechanical oscillator. Phys. Rev. X 7, 011001 (2017).
Ockeloen-Korppi, C. F., Damskägg, E., Paraoanu, G. S., Massel, F. & Sillanpää, M. A. Revealing hidden quantum correlations in an electromechanical measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 243601 (2018).
Barzanjeh, S. et al. Stationary entangled radiation from micromechanical motion. Nature 570, 480–483 (2019).
Saulson, P. R. Thermal noise in mechanical experiments. Phys. Rev. D 42, 2437–2445 (1990).
Cole, G. D., Gröblacher, S., Gugler, K., Gigan, S. & Aspelmeyer, M. Monocrystalline AlxGa1 − xAs heterostructures for high-reflectivity high-Q micromechanical resonators in the megahertz regime. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 261108 (2008).
Cole, G. D. Cavity optomechanics with low-noise crystalline mirrors. In Proceedings of SPIE 8458, Optics, Photonics, Optical Trapping and Optical Micromanipulation IX 845807 (SPIE, 2012).
Cole, G. D. et al. High-performance near- and mid-infrared crystalline coatings. Optica 3, 647–656 (2016).
Singh, R., Cole, G. D., Cripe, J. & Corbitt, T. Stable optical trap from a single optical field utilizing birefringence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 213604 (2016).
Cripe, J. et al. Measurement of quantum back action in the audio band at room temperature. Nature 568, 364–367 (2019).
Corbitt, T. et al. An all-optical trap for a gram-scale mirror. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 150802 (2007).
Corbitt, T. et al. Optical dilution and feedback cooling of a gram-scale oscillator to 6.9 mK. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 160801 (2007).
Cripe, J. et al. Radiation-pressure-mediated control of an optomechanical cavity. Phys. Rev. A 97, 013827 (2018).
Wiseman, H. M. Squashed states of light: theory and applications to quantum spectroscopy. J. Opt. B 1, 459 (1999).
Aggarwal, N. Data and analysis behind the publication ‘Room temperature optomechanical squeezing’ (Zenodo, 2020); https://zenodo.org/record/3694290
Corbitt, T., Chen, Y. & Mavalvala, N. Mathematical framework for simulation of quantum fields in complex interferometers using the two-photon formalism. Phys. Rev. A 72, 013818 (2005).
Cripe, J. et al. Quantum back action cancellation in the audio band. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.10028.pdf (2018).
Bartley, T. J. et al. Direct observation of sub-binomial light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 173602 (2013).
Kimble, H. J., Dagenais, M. & Mandel, L. Photon antibunching in resonance fluorescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 691–695 (1977).
McCuller, L. Effect of Squeezing on the OMC DCPD Cross Correlation LIGO-T1800110-v1 (2018); https://dcc.ligo.org
Krivitsky, L. A. et al. Correlation measurement of squeezed light. Phys. Rev. A 79, 033828 (2009).
Heidmann, A. et al. Observation of quantum noise reduction on twin laser beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2555–2557 (1987).
Nielsen, W. H. P., Tsaturyan, Y., Møller, C. B., Polzik, E. S. & Schliesser, A. Multimode optomechanical system in the quantum regime. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 62–66 (2017).
Hsiang, J.-T. & Hu, B.-L. Quantum thermodynamics at strong coupling: operator thermodynamic functions and relations. Entropy 20, 423 (2018).
Hakim, V. & Ambegaokar, V. Quantum theory of a free particle interacting with a linearly dissipative environment. Phys. Rev. A 32, 423–434 (1985).
de Lépinay, L. M., Pigeau, B., Besga, B. & Arcizet, O. Eigenmode orthogonality breaking and anomalous dynamics in multimode nano-optomechanical systems under non-reciprocal coupling. Nat. Commun. 9, 1401 (2018).
Purdy, T. P. et al. Optomechanical Raman-ratio thermometry. Phys. Rev. A 92, 031802 (2015).
Purdy, T. P., Grutter, K. E., Srinivasan, K. & Taylor, J. M. Quantum correlations from a room-temperature optomechanical cavity. Science 356, 1265–1268 (2017).
Spohn, H. & Lebowitz, J. L. Irreversible Thermodynamics for Quantum Systems Weakly Coupled to Thermal Reservoirs 109–142 (Wiley, 2007).
Smith, A. et al. Verification of the quantum nonequilibrium work relation in the presence of decoherence. New J. Phys. 20, 013008 (2018).
Ashida, Y., Saito, K. & Ueda, M. Thermalization and heating dynamics in open generic many-body systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 170402 (2018).
Milburn, G. J. Decoherence and the conditions for the classical control of quantum systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 370, 4469–4486 (2012).
Kafri, D., Taylor, J. M. & Milburn, G. J. A classical channel model for gravitational decoherence. New J. Phys. 16, 065020 (2014).
Diósi, L. Gravitation and quantum-mechanical localization of macro-objects. Phys. Lett. A 105, 199–202 (1984).
Penrose, R. On gravity’s role in quantum state reduction. Gen. Relat. Gravit. 28, 581–600 (1996).
Marshall, W., Simon, C., Penrose, R. & Bouwmeester, D. Towards quantum superpositions of a mirror. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 130401 (2003).
Oelker, E. et al. Ultra-low phase noise squeezed vacuum source for gravitational wave detectors. Optica 3, 682–685 (2016).
This work was supported by National Science Foundation grants PHY-1707840, PHY-1404245, PHY-1806634 and PHY-1150531. We are particularly grateful to V. Sudhir, L. McCuller and M.J. Yap for valuable discussions and for their detailed comments on this manuscript. The microresonator manufacturing was carried out at the UCSB Nanofabrication Facility. We also thank MathWorks for their computing support.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review statement Nature Physics thanks Ryutaro Takahashi, Andre Xuereb and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended Data Fig. 1 Expected squeezing with lower detection loss and in the absence of technical noises.
The differential phase noise masks the squeezing at low frequencies, whereas the noise injected by the cavity feedback electronics degrades the high frequency side of the correlations. Once these technical noises have been suppressed, and the optical losses have been lowered, we would expect to see about 1.5 dB of squeezing from this system. This limit comes from a combination of escape efficiency and thermal noise (N. Aggarwal et al., in preparation).
Extended Data Fig. 2 Noise budget: contributing noise sources compared to the measurement as a function of quadrature, averaged over a 1 kHz bin.
Note that a 20 dB offset has been added to the differential phase noise in order to be visible on the same axis. Measured noise is shown in orange. Also shown are the contributions from quantum noise (with excess loss) in purple, thermal noise in red, differential phase noise in brown, and cavity-feedback noise in pink. The quadrature sum of all these contributions is shown in dashed green. All noises are relative to shot noise and are shown in dBs.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Noise budget: contributing noise sources compared to the measurement as a function of frequency at the squeezing quadrature, 12∘.
Measured noise is shown in orange. Also shown are the contributions from quantum noise (with excess loss) in purple, thermal noise in red, differential phase noise in brown, and cavity-feedback noise in pink. The quadrature sum of all these contributions is shown in dashed green. All noises are relative to shot noise and are shown in dBs.
Since we always keep the total detected power on PDsqz constant (and just change the local oscillator (LO) power to change the measurement quadrature), the relative dark noise and classical laser intensity noise can just be scaled to that power.
Extended Data Fig. 5 A phasor diagram showing how the tunable homodyne detector selects the measurement quadrature.
The sum of the local oscillator (LO) field (blue) and the signal field (red) selects the quadrature that is being measured (green). In the entire manuscript, we report this angle θs as the measurement quadrature. We determine the quadrature by knowing the power in all the three fields, and the visibility. The dashed green circle represents a contour of constant detection power. In order to keep the shot noise reference unchanged, we choose to always lock PDsqz with a constant total detected power, and vary the LO power to change the measurement quadrature. This has the effect of changing the angle θ of the LO.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Measurement of the open loop transfer function of the homodyne locking loop around the squeezing frequency band.
Since this loop is designed only to suppress large path length fluctuations between the local oscillator and the signal at low frequencies (< 1 kHz), this loop has close to zero gain at our measurement frequencies.
Data for Fig. 2: contains shot-noise measurement, shot-noise average, total measured noise and total budgeted noise as a function of frequency, and shows the total noise dips as low as 0.7 dB below shot noise between 30 kHz and 60 kHz.
Data for Fig. 3: contains total measured and budgeted noise as a function of frequency and measurement quadrature. Data for each panel comprise 15 columns each, panel a being the first 15 columns and panel b the last 15 columns. In each dataset, the first column is measurement frequency and the rest are measurement quadratures.
Data for Fig. 4: normalized correlation factor C, shot-noise-calibrated squeezing and correlation-calibrated squeezing, all as a function of frequency.
About this article
Cite this article
Aggarwal, N., Cullen, T.J., Cripe, J. et al. Room-temperature optomechanical squeezing. Nat. Phys. 16, 784–788 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0877-x
Nature Physics (2020)