Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Ultrafast manipulation of the weakly bound helium dimer


Controlling the interactions between atoms with external fields opened up new branches in physics ranging from strongly correlated atomic systems to ideal Bose1 and Fermi2 gases and Efimov physics3,4. Such control usually prepares samples that are stationary or evolve adiabatically in time. In contrast, in molecular physics, external ultrashort laser fields are used to create anisotropic potentials that launch ultrafast rotational wave packets and align molecules in free space5. Here we combine these two regimes of ultrafast times and low energies. We apply a short laser pulse to the helium dimer, a weakly bound and highly delocalized single bound state quantum system. The laser field locally tunes the interaction between two helium atoms, imparting an angular momentum of 2 and evoking an initially confined dissociative wave packet. We record a video of the density and phase of this wave packet as it propagates from small to large internuclear distances. At large internuclear distances, where the interaction between atoms is negligible, the wave packet is essentially free. This work paves the way for future tomography of wave-packet dynamics and provides the technique for studying exotic and otherwise hardly accessible quantum systems, such as halo and Efimov states.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Field-induced interatomic potential of He2.
Fig. 2: Temporal evolution of field-induced alignment.
Fig. 3: Time evolution of the dissociative wave packet in He2 after the laser ‘kick’.
Fig. 4: Schematic of radial response of the highly delocalized single-state helium dimer to a strong laser field (pump).

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All experimental data has been archived at the Goethe-University of Frankfurt am Main and is available upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.


  1. Anderson, M. H., Ensher, J. R., Matthews, M. R., Wieman, C. E. & Cornell, E. A. Observation of Bose–Einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor. Science 269, 198–201 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. DeMarco, B., Bohn, J. L., Burke, J. P., Holland, M. & Jin, D. S. Measurement of p-wave threshold law using evaporatively cooled fermionic atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4208–4211 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Efimov, V. Energy levels arising from resonant two-body forces in a three-body system. Phys. Lett. B 33, 563–564 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kraemer, T. et al. Evidence for Efimov quantum states in an ultracold gas of caesium atoms. Nature 440, 315–318 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stapelfeldt, H. & Seideman, T. Colloquium: Aligning molecules with strong laser pulses. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 543–557 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chin, C., Grimm, R., Julienne, P. & Tiesinga, E. Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225–1286 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kotochigova, S. Controlling interactions between highly magnetic atoms with Feshbach resonances. Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 093901 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kurizki, G., Mazets, I. E., O’Dell, D. H. J. & Schleich, W. P. Bose–Einstein condensates with laser-induced dipole–dipole interactions beyond the mean-field approach. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 18, 961–974 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cencek, W. et al. Effects of adiabatic, relativistic, and quantum electrodynamics interactions on the pair potential and thermophysical properties of helium. J. Chem. Phys. 136, 224303 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zeller, S. et al. Imaging the He2 quantum halo state using a free electron laser. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 14651–14655 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedrich, B., Gupta, M. & Herschbach, D. Probing weakly-bound species with nonresonant light: dissociation of He2 induced by rotational hybridization. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 63, 1089–1093 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lemeshko, M. & Friedrich, B. Probing weakly bound molecules with nonresonant light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 053003 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wei, Q., Kais, S., Yasuike, T. & Herschbach, D. Pendular alignment and strong chemical binding are induced in helium dimer molecules by intense laser fields. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E9058–E9066 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guan, Q. & Blume, D. Electric-field-induced helium–helium resonances. Phys. Rev. A 99, 033416 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lemeshko, M. & Friedrich, B. Fine-tuning molecular energy levels by nonresonant laser pulses. J. Phys. Chem. A 114, 9848–9854 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aganoglu, R., Lemeshko, M., Friedrich, B., González-Férez, R. & Koch, C. Controlling a diatomic shape resonance with non-resonant light. Preprint at (2011).

  17. Lemeshko, M. Shaping interactions between polar molecules with far-off-resonant light. Phys. Rev. A 83, 051402 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. González-Férez, R. & Koch, C. P. Enhancing photoassociation rates by nonresonant-light control of shape resonances. Phys. Rev. A 86, 063420 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lemeshko, M., Krems, R. V., Doyle, J. M. & Kais, S. Manipulation of molecules with electromagnetic fields. Mol. Phys. 111, 1648–1682 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tomza, M. et al. Interatomic potentials, electric properties and spectroscopy of the ground and excited states of the Rb2 molecule: ab initio calculations and effect of a non-resonant field. Mol. Phys. 111, 1781–1797 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Crubellier, A., González-Férez, R., Koch, C. P. & Luc-Koenig, E. Asymptotic model for shape resonance control of diatomics by intense non-resonant light: universality in the single-channel approximation. New J. Phys. 17, 045020 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Balanarayan, P. & Moiseyev, N. Strong chemical bond of stable He2 in strong linearly polarized laser fields. Phys. Rev. A 85, 032516 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nielsen, E., Fedorov, D. V. & Jensen, A. S. Efimov states in external fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2844–2847 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schöllkopf, W. & Toennies, J. P. Nondestructive mass selection of small van der Waals clusters. Science 266, 1345–1348 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Maroulis, G., Makris, C., Hohm, U. & Goebel, D. Electrooptical properties and molecular polarization of iodine, I2. J. Phys. Chem. A 101, 953–956 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ullrich, J. et al. Recoil-ion and electron momentum spectroscopy: reaction-microscopes. Rep. Prog. Phys. 66, 1463 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jagutzki, O. et al. Multiple hit readout of a microchannel plate detector with a three-layer delay-line anode. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 49, 2477–2483 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Christian, J. F., Broers, B., Hoogenraad, J. H., van der Zande, W. J. & Noordam, L. D. Rubidium electronic wavepackets probed by a phase-sensitive pump-probe technique. Opt. Commun. 103, 79–84 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kunitski, M. et al. Double-slit photoelectron interference in strong-field ionization of the neon dimer. Nat. Commun. 10, 1 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yudkin, Y., Elbaz, R., Giannakeas, P., Greene, C. H. & Khaykovich, L. Coherent superposition of Feshbach dimers and Efimov trimers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 200402 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank B. Friedrich for inspiring this work over many years and M. Lemeshko for many helpful discussions and calculations. The experimental work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). This work used the OU Supercomputing Center for Education and Research (OSCER) at the University of Oklahoma. Q.G. and D.B. acknowledge support by the US National Science Foundation (grant no. PHY-1806259).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



M.K., H.M., J.H., S.E., S.Z., A.K., M.S., L.P.H.S. and T.J. contributed to the experiment. M.K. and R.D. analysed the experimental data. Q.G. and D.B. developed the theory. Q.G. performed the calculations. All authors contributed to the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Maksim Kunitski or Reinhard Dörner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Physics thanks Daniel Rolles and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–21 and Discussion.

Supplementary Video 1

The video shows the field-induced temporal evolution of the change of the probability density \(|\Psi_{\text{obs}}(\vec{R},t)|^{2}-|\Psi_{\text{GS}}(R)|^{2}\) of He2 as a \((R_{\parallel},R_{\perp})\) projection in cylindrical coordinates. \(R_{\parallel}\) and \(R_{\perp}\) are the parallel and perpendicular components of the internuclear distance vector \(\vec{R}\) with respect to the laser field polarization. Left: original experimental data. Right: the same as on the left but after applying a low-pass filter in Fourier space.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 2

Panels b and c.

Source Data Fig. 3

Panels a and b.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kunitski, M., Guan, Q., Maschkiwitz, H. et al. Ultrafast manipulation of the weakly bound helium dimer. Nat. Phys. 17, 174–178 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing