Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Theory of mechanochemical patterning and optimal migration in cell monolayers

Nature Physics volume 17, pages 267–274 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Collective cell migration offers a rich field of study for non-equilibrium physics and cellular biology, revealing phenomena such as glassy dynamics, pattern formation and active turbulence. However, how mechanical and chemical signalling are integrated at the cellular level to give rise to such collective behaviours remains unclear. We address this by focusing on the highly conserved phenomenon of spatiotemporal waves of density and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation, which appear both in vitro and in vivo during collective cell migration and wound healing. First, we propose a biophysical theory, backed by mechanical and optogenetic perturbation experiments, showing that patterns can be quantitatively explained by a mechanochemical coupling between active cellular tensions and the mechanosensitive ERK pathway. Next, we demonstrate how this biophysical mechanism can robustly induce long-ranged order and migration in a desired orientation, and we determine the theoretically optimal wavelength and period for inducing maximal migration towards free edges, which fits well with experimentally observed dynamics. We thereby provide a bridge between the biophysical origin of spatiotemporal instabilities and the design principles of robust and efficient long-ranged migration.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Observation and theory of spatiotemporal patterns in confluent cell monolayers.
Fig. 2: Parameter fitting using mechanical and optogenetic perturbation experiments.
Fig. 3: Response of active polar traction forces to an applied ERK wave and comparison with traction force data.
Fig. 4: The model predicts the spatiotemporal dynamics of expanding monolayers in a variety of experimental settings.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Raw movies for Figs. 1–4 are available at https://doi.org/10.24631/ssbd.repos.2020.07.002. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

All code used in this study is available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Friedl, P. & Gilmour, D. Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 445–457 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aragona, M. et al. Defining stem cell dynamics and migration during wound healing in mouse skin epidermis. Nat. Commun. 8, 14684 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Park, S. et al. Tissue-scale coordination of cellular behaviour promotes epidermal wound repair in live mice. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 155–163 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Krndija, D. et al. Active cell migration is critical for steady-state epithelial turnover in the gut. Science 365, 705–710 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Marchetti, M. C. et al. Hydrodynamics of soft active matter. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1143–1189 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Alert, R. & Trepat, X. Physical models of collective cell migration. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 77–101 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Poujade, M. et al. Collective migration of an epithelial monolayer in response to a model wound. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15988–15993 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Trepat, X. et al. Physical forces during collective cell migration. Nat. Phys. 5, 426–430 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Angelini, T. E. et al. Glass-like dynamics of collective cell migration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4714–4719 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Blanch-Mercader, C. et al. Turbulent dynamics of epithelial cell cultures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 208101 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Serra-Picamal, X. et al. Mechanical waves during tissue expansion. Nat. Phys. 8, 628–634 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zaritsky, A. et al. Propagating waves of directionality and coordination orchestrate collective cell migration. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003747 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rodriguez-Franco, P. et al. Long-lived force patterns and deformation waves at repulsive epithelial boundaries. Nat. Mater. 16, 1029–1037 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Notbohm, J. et al. Cellular contraction and polarization drive collective cellular motion. Biophys. J. 110, 2729–2738 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tlili, S. et al. Collective cell migration without proliferation: density determines cell velocity and wave velocity. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 172421 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Peyret, G. et al. Sustained oscillations of epithelial cell sheets. Biophys. J. 117, 464–478 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Petrolli, V. et al. Confinement-induced transition between wavelike collective cell migration modes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 168101 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Basan, M., Elgeti, J., Hannezo, E., Rappel, W. J. & Levine, H. Alignment of cellular motility forces with tissue flow as a mechanism for efficient wound healing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2452–2459 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Garcia, S. et al. Physics of active jamming during collective cellular motion in a monolayer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15314–15319 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Banerjee, S., Utuje, K. J. & Marchetti, M. C. Propagating stress waves during epithelial expansion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 228101 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yabunaka, S. & Marcq, P. Emergence of epithelial cell density waves. Soft Matter 13, 7046–7052 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Blanch-Mercader, C. & Casademunt, J. Hydrodynamic instabilities, waves and turbulence in spreading epithelia. Soft Matter 13, 6913–6928 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Harvey, C. D. et al. A genetically encoded fluorescent sensor of ERK activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 19264–19269 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Komatsu, N. et al. Development of an optimized backbone of FRET biosensors for kinases and GTPases. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 4647–4656 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Aoki, K. et al. Propagating wave of ERK activation orients collective cell migration. Dev. Cell 43, 305–317 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hiratsuka, T. et al. Intercellular propagation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation revealed by in vivo imaging of mouse skin. eLife 4, e05178 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hino, N. et al. ERK-mediated mechanochemical waves direct collective cell polarization. Dev. Cell 53, 646–660 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. de la Cova, C., Townley, R., Regot, S. & Greenwald, I. A real-time biosensor for ERK activity reveals signaling dynamics during C. elegans cell fate specification. Dev. Cell 42, 542–553 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moreno, E., Valon, L., Levillayer, F. & Levayer, R. Competition for space induces cell elimination through compaction-driven ERK downregulation. Curr. Biol. 29, 23–34 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson, H. E. et al. The spatiotemporal limits of developmental Erk signaling. Dev. Cell 40, 185–192 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Howard, J., Grill, S. W. & Bois, J. S. Turing’s next steps: the mechanochemical basis of morphogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 392–398 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hannezo, E. & Heisenberg, C. P. Mechanochemical feedback loops in development and disease. Cell 178, 12–25 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Szabo, B. et al. Phase transition in the collective migration of tissue cells: experiment and model. Phys. Rev. E 74, 061908 (2006).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Matsubayashi, Y., Ebisuya, M., Honjoh, S. & Nishida, E. ERK activation propagates in epithelial cell sheets and regulates their migration during wound healing. Curr. Biol. 14, 731–735 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hannezo, E., Prost, J. & Joanny, J. F. Theory of epithelial sheet morphology in three dimensions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 27–32 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Alt, S., Ganguly, P. & Salbreux, G. Vertex models: from cell mechanics to tissue morphogenesis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 372, 20150520 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fouchard, J. et al. Curling of epithelial monolayers reveals coupling between active bending and tissue tension. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9377–9383 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Heisenberg, C. P. & Bellaiche, Y. Forces in tissue morphogenesis and patterning. Cell 153, 948–962 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lin, S. Z., Li, B., Lan, G. & Feng, X. Q. Activation and synchronization of the oscillatory morphodynamics in multicellular monolayer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 8157–8162 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Das, T. et al. A molecular mechanotransduction pathway regulates collective migration of epithelial cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 276–287 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Weber, G. F., Bjerke, M. A. & DeSimone, D. W. A mechanoresponsive cadherin-keratin complex directs polarized protrusive behavior and collective cell migration. Dev. Cell 22, 104–115 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nakajima, A., Ishihara, S., Imoto, D. & Sawai, S. Rectified directional sensing in long-range cell migration. Nat. Commun. 5, 5367 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Xiong, Y., Huang, C. H., Iglesias, P. A. & Devreotes, P. N. Cells navigate with a local-excitation, global-inhibition-biased excitable network. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 17079–17086 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Anon, E. et al. Cell crawling mediates collective cell migration to close undamaged epithelial gaps. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 10891–10896 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Bui, J., Conway, D. E., Heise, R. L. & Weinberg, S. H. Mechanochemical coupling and junctional forces during collective cell migration. Biophys. J. 117, 170–183 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Recho, P., Hallou, A. & Hannezo, E. Theory of mechanochemical patterning in biphasic biological tissues. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 5344–5349 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Qin, X. et al. A biochemical network controlling basal myosin oscillation. Nat. Commun. 9, 1210 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bailles, A. et al. Genetic induction and mechanochemical propagation of a morphogenetic wave. Nature 572, 467–473 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Pinheiro, D. & Bellaiche, Y. Mechanical force-driven adherens junction remodeling and epithelial dynamics. Dev. Cell 47, 3–19 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hamouda, M. S., Labouesse, C. & Chalut, K. J. Nuclear mechanotransduction in stem cells. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 64, 97–104 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ogura, Y., Wen, F. L., Sami, M. M., Shibata, T. & Hayashi, S. A switch-like activation relay of EGFR-ERK signaling regulates a wave of cellular contractility for epithelial invagination. Dev. Cell 46, 162–172 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Aoki, K. et al. Stochastic ERK activation induced by noise and cell-to-cell propagation regulates cell density-dependent proliferation. Mol. Cell 52, 529–540 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Isomura, A. & Kageyama, R. Ultradian oscillations and pulses: coordinating cellular responses and cell fate decisions. Development 141, 3627–3636 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Naito, Y., Hino, K., Bono, H. & Ui-Tei, K. CRISPRdirect: software for designing CRISPR/Cas guide RNA with reduced off-target sites. Bioinformatics 31, 1120–1123 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank G. Tkacik and all of the members of the Hannezo and Hirashima groups for useful discussions, X. Trepat for help on traction force microscopy and M. Matsuda for use of the lab facility. E.H. acknowledges grants from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) (P 31639) and the European Research Council (851288). T.H. acknowledges a grant from JST, PRESTO (JPMJPR1949). This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 665385 (to D.B.), from JSPS KAKENHI grant no. 17J02107 (to N.H.) and from the SPIRITS 2018 of Kyoto University (to E.H. and T.H.).

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Daniel Boocock, Naoya Hino.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria

    Daniel Boocock, Natalia Ruzickova & Edouard Hannezo

  2. Laboratory of Bioimaging and Cell Signaling, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

    Naoya Hino

  3. Department of Pathology and Biology of Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

    Tsuyoshi Hirashima

  4. Japan Science and Technology Agency, PRESTO, Kyoto, Japan

    Tsuyoshi Hirashima

Authors
  1. Daniel Boocock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Naoya Hino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Natalia Ruzickova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tsuyoshi Hirashima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Edouard Hannezo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Supervision and project conceptualization: T.H. and E.H. Theory and simulations: D.B., N.R. and E.H. Data analysis: D.B., N.H., N.R., T.H. and E.H. Experiments: N.H. and T.H. Manuscript writing: D.B., T.H. and E.H., with input from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tsuyoshi Hirashima or Edouard Hannezo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Over-activation or inhibition of ERK causes loss of density waves.

a,b, DMSO controls showing WT behaviour of ERK (a) and density waves (b, visualized by x-strain rate analysis, see Methods for details). c,d, Drug treatments to overactivate ERK (TPA at 10 nM) or inactivate ERK (Trametinib at 200 nM) cause loss of density waves (as well as changes in traction forces, as shown in ref. 9), suggesting that ERK is a core part of the mechano-chemical instability and not just a downstream component.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Effect of varying parameters on simulated dynamics of confluent tissue.

a, Increasing the timescale of mechanical relaxation τr = ζ/k (i.e. the ratio of substrate friction to cell stiffness) shortens the wavelength of the instability without changing the period. Colours represent ERK activity. b, Increasing the ratio of mechano-chemical coupling constants α/β results in larger cell deformation without affecting the wavelength or period of the instability. All simulations use αβ = 1.2 × αβcrit. c) Waves of both ERK and density are suppressed by either inhibition or over-activation of ERK (See Eq. 10 in Methods).

Extended Data Fig. 3 Amplitude of oscillations and nonlinear behaviour of the model.

a, Distribution of oscillation amplitude in cell area in confluent tissue (quantified by the normalized standard deviations of area for time traces of individual tracked cells, n=3 experiments, with error bars showing standard deviation of frequencies between experiments, see Methods for details). Standard deviations were normalized by mean area for each cell to give a fractional deviation from the mean. Typical oscillations of 5 to 10 % are small enough to justify the use of a linear mechanical model. b, In 1D simulations, steady state amplitudes of ERK and cell length l, which are stabilised by non-linear terms, follow an expected power law dependence on the distance from the critical point \(\sim {\epsilon }_{\alpha \beta }^{1/2}={(\alpha \beta /\alpha {\beta }_{crit}-1)}^{1/2}\). c,d, The wavelength and period of the instability decrease gradually with distance from the critical point, although they both remain close to the predictions from linear stability (black dashed line) even at distances of around 1.5 × αβcrit.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Effect of different couplings on pattern formation.

a, Angular frequency ω as a function of wavevector q for the model presented in the main text (Eq. 4) for values of αβ at 1.4 × αβcrit (solid) and 0.6 × αβcrit (dashed), i.e. above and below the threshold for the instability. Positive values of the real part of ω (red) indicate instability whereas finite values of the imaginary part of ω (blue) indicate oscillations. b, Little changes qualitatively to this picture when we include diffusion of ERK at a realistic rate D = 1 cell2/min (solid lines; dashed lines D → 0). c, We can also account for the ERK desensitization (Eq. S24) seen in cell stretch (Fig. 2b) and optogenetic perturbation experiments (see [11]) (plotted τd = 30 min (yellow), 60 min (green) 90 min (red) and τd → ∞ (blue)). d, But for realistic timescales this has little effect on parameter estimates or on the dispersion relation governing emergent patterns (solid lines τd = 60 min, dashed lines τd → ∞). e, Similarly, incorporating Maxwellian visco-elasticity in the model (see section Section II E in the SI Text) has little effect on the dispersion relation for realistic viscoelastic timescales (τm = 60min).

Extended Data Fig. 5 Individual fits of repeats from cell stretch and optogenetic activation experiments.

a, Individual fits of the three independent repeats of cell stretch collectively fit in Fig. 2b. b-d, Individual fits of the three independent repeats for bulk displacement after ERK activation that were averaged and collectively fit in Fig. 2f. In d) displacements are distorted due to the coincidence of a natural contraction wave pre-existing the optogenetic activation of ERK which makes the data difficult to fit. We therefore left τr free but fixed αΔE = 0.5 using a steady-state assumption on Eq. 13 (see Methods) and observation of roughly 50% difference in final cell size either side of the optogenetic boundary.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Identifiability of τl and τr.

a-c, Least squares error in the fits of boundary displacement (see Methods for details) from the optogenetic ERK activation (each plot shows a fit to each of the n=3 individual experiments). d, Least squares error in the fit of bulk displacement averaged over the same independent repeats. τl was fixed to the values found in panels (a-c), and the free parameters τr and αΔE were fitted. Simple gradient descent finds unique values for both τl (a-c) and τr (d).

Extended Data Fig. 7 Net traction force in response to applied ERK waves for different model non- linearities.

Positive average traction forces represent net migration opposite to the direction of propagation of ERK waves. Spatial profiles of traction force (red curves) and polarity (grey curves) correspond to the points indicated in the contour plots. a, Sigmoidal γ(ERK) (coupling between polarity and gradients of stresses as a decreasing function of ERK) as in main text b) Sigmoidal traction force coefficient (decreasing function of ERK) c) Sigmoidal stiffness k(ERK) (increasing function of ERK) with active reference length d) Sigmoidal stiffness k(ERK) (increasing function of ERK) with active stress. All simulation were performed on equivalent dimensionless models with parameters τl = 120 min, τr = 10 min, τp = 15 min and γ0 = 0.1. We used a sigmoidal non-linearity of the form f(ERK) = 1/(1 + exp[± ERK]) with ± for either decreasing or increasing dependencies. For cases a) c) and d), profiles of polarity and traction forces are identical after a rescaling. In contrast, for case b), traction forces can be different from polarity due to the non-linearity. Then, average traction forces may be non-zero (red curve) but net polarity remains close to zero everywhere (grey curve), which is contrary to experimental findings (Fig. 3a). We use a lower estimate of τp = 15 min to show that cases a) and b) are distinguishable by their polarity profiles even in the limit τp → 0 where traction forces converge. See SI Text Section II F for further details on the different models.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Effect of ERK desensitization on optimal polarity.

a-b, ERK desensitization (Eq. S24) at realistic timescales (τd = 60 min) decreases average polarization/traction forces at long wavelengths and periods. The absolute optimum is little affected, moving from λ = 22 cells T = 312 min to λ = 19 cells T = 285 min. See SI Text Section I C for details on data points. (Note that b is a repeat of Fig. 3d in the main text.).

Extended Data Fig. 9 Unidirectional waves and long-range polar order require stress-polarity coupling and active migration.

a, In wild-type simulations (Eq. S14), emergent ERK/density waves orient away from the edge (left) and induce a counter polarization/active migration in the bulk (right). b, When stress-polarity coupling is weak (small γ, mirroring Merlin KO), ERK waves still emerge (left) but do not induce strong enough polarization/active migration to allow for unidirectional orientation and long-range polar order (right). c, Alternatively, when weak stress-polarity coupling is accompanied by strong leader cells (3 times stronger polarity at leading edge), ERK waves propagate towards the migrating front (left) and bulk polarity is established in the opposite direction (right). Note that a and b correspond to Fig. 4a and c of the main text. d, Waves with the same wavelength (p=0.7791, two-sample t-test) and period (p=0.7780, two-sample t-test) emerge in Merlin KOs and wild-type suggesting that active migration is not driving the instability. Error bars indicate standard deviation.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary theory.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

ERK activity in MDCK cells under a confluent condition. ERK activity propagates intercellularly with no preferred direction. The range of ERK activity is shown in Fig. 1a.

Supplementary Video 2

ERK activity (left) and traction force along the horizontal axis (right) during monolayer expansion. Unidirectional propagation is observed in ERK activity but not in traction force. The range of ERK activity and that of traction force is shown in Fig. 3f.

Supplementary Video 3

ERK activity in wild-type (WT, upper) and Merlin knockout (KO, bottom) MDCK cells during monolayer expansion at normal density. Unidirectional propagation is observed in the WT but not in the KO cells. The range of ERK activity is shown in Fig. 4c.

Supplementary Video 4

ERK activity in an expanding MDCK monolayer cultured at high density. An initial ‘tidal’ wave is followed by multiple unidirectional waves. The range of ERK activity is shown in Fig. 4b.

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boocock, D., Hino, N., Ruzickova, N. et al. Theory of mechanochemical patterning and optimal migration in cell monolayers. Nat. Phys. 17, 267–274 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-01037-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-01037-7

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing