Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Echo in a single vibrationally excited molecule

Nature Physics volume 16, pages 328–333 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Echoes occur in many physical systems, typically in inhomogeneously broadened ensembles of nonlinear objects. They are often used to eliminate the effects of dephasing caused by interactions with the environment as well as to enable the observation of proper, inherent object properties. Here, we report the experimental observation of quantum wave-packet echoes in a single, isolated molecule. The entire dephasing–rephasing cycle occurs without any inhomogeneous spread of molecular properties, or any interaction with the environment, and offers a way to probe the internal coherent dynamics of single molecules. In our experiments, we impulsively excite a vibrational wave packet in an anharmonic molecular potential and observe its oscillations and eventual dispersion with time. A second, delayed pulse gives rise to an echo—a partial recovery of the initial coherent oscillations. The vibrational dynamics of single molecules is visualized by a time-delayed probe pulse dissociating them, one at a time. Two mechanisms for the echo formation are discussed: a.c. Stark-induced molecular potential shaking and creation of a depletion-induced ‘hole’ in the nuclear spatial distribution. The single-molecule wave-packet echoes may lead to the development of new tools for probing ultrafast intramolecular processes in various molecules.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Classical phase space dynamics.
Fig. 2: Experimental set-up.
Fig. 3: KER distribution build-up.
Fig. 4: KER distribution and yield of the \({{\rm{Ar}}}_{2}\left(1,0\right)\) channel as a function of the probe delay in the presence of a kick pulse.
Fig. 5: Quantum mechanical simulations of the echo dynamics.
Fig. 6: KER distributions as a function of probe delay.

Data availability

The data represented in Figs. 1, 2b and 3–6 are available through the figshare depository at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.10252619.v1. All other data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Hahn, E. L. Spin echoes. Phys. Rev. 80, 580–594 (1950).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Hahn, E. L. Free nuclear induction. Phys. Today 6, 4 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kurnit, N. A., Abella, I. D. & Hartmann, S. R. Observation of a photon echo. Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 567–568 (1964).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mukamel, S. Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy (Oxford Univ. Press, 1995).

  5. Chebotayev, V. P. & Dubetsky, B. Ya. A classical model of the photon echo. Appl. Phys. B 31, 45–52 (1983).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hill, R. M. & Kaplan, D. E. Cyclotron resonance echo. Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 1062–1063 (1965).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gould, R. W., O’Neil, T. M. & Malmberg, J. H. Plasma wave echo. Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 219–222 (1967).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bulatov, A., Kuklov, A., Vugmeister, B. E. & Rabitz, H. Echo in optical lattices: stimulated revival of breathing oscillations. Phys. Rev. A 57, 3788–3792 (1998).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Buchkremer, F. B. J., Dumke, R., Levsen, H., Birkl, G. & Ertmer, W. Wave packet echoes in the motion of trapped atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3121–3124 (2000).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Herrera, M., Antonsen, T. M., Ott, E. & Fishman, S. Echoes and revival echoes in systems of anharmonically confined atoms. Phys. Rev. A 86, 023613 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meunier, T. et al. Rabi oscillations revival induced by time reversal: a test of mesoscopic quantum coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 010401 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stupakov, G. Echo Effect in Hadron Colliders SSC Report SSCL-579 (SSCL, 1992).

  13. Spentzouris, L. K., Ostiguy, J.-F. & Colestock, P. L. Direct measurement of diffusion rates in high energy synchrotrons using longitudinal beam echoes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 620–623 (1996).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stupakov, G. V. in Handbook of Accelerator Physics and Engineering 2nd edn (ed. Chau, A. W. et al.) Ch. 2.3.13, 121–123 (World Scientific, 2013).

  15. Sen, T. & Li, Y. S. Nonlinear theory of transverse beam echoes. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 21, 021002 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Karras, G. et al. Orientation and alignment echoes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 153601 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Karras, G. et al. Experimental observation of fractional echoes. Phys. Rev. A 94, 033404 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin, K. et al. Echoes in space and time. Phys. Rev. X 6, 041056 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lu, J. et al. Nonlinear two-dimensional terahertz photon echo and rotational spectroscopy in the gas phase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 11800–11805 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenberg, D., Damari, R., Kallush, S. & Fleischer, S. Rotational echoes: rephasing of centrifugal distortion in laser-induced molecular alignment. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 5128–5135 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rosenberg, D., Damari, R. & Fleischer, S. Echo spectroscopy in multilevel quantum-mechanical rotors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 234101 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Eberly, J. H., Narozhny, N. B. & Sanchez-Mondragon, J. J. Periodic spontaneous collapse and revival in a simple quantum model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1323–1326 (1980).

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Parker, J. & Stroud, C. R. Coherence and decay of Rydberg wave packets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 716–719 (1986).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Averbukh, I. Sh. & Perelman, N. F. Fractional revivals: universality in the long-term evolution of quantum wave packets beyond the correspondence principle dynamics. Phys. Lett. A 139, 449–453 (1989).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Robinett, R. W. Quantum wave packet revivals. Phys. Rep. 392, 1–119 (2004).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Moerner, W. E. & Kador, L. Optical detection and spectroscopy of single molecules in a solid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2535–2538 (1989).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Orrit, M. & Bernard, J. Single pentacene molecules detected by fluorescence excitation in a p-terphenyl crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2716–2719 (1990).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Guenther, T. et al. Coherent nonlinear optical response of single quantum dots studied by ultrafast near-field spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 057401 (2002).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Unold, T., Mueller, K., Lienau, C., Elsaesser, T. & Wieck, A. D. Optical Stark effect in a quantum dot: ultrafast control of single exciton polarizations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 157401 (2004).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Brinks, D. et al. Visualizing and controlling vibrational wave packets of single molecules. Nature 465, 905–908 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Brinks, D. et al. Ultrafast dynamics of single molecules. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 2476–2491 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liebel, M., Toninelli, C. & Van Hulst, N. Room-temperature ultrafast nonlinear spectroscopy of a single molecule. Nat. Photon. 12, 45–49 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bach, R., Pope, D., Liou, Sy-H. & Batelaan, H. Controlled double-slit electron diffraction. N. J. Phys. 15, 033018 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Aspect, A. & Grangier, P. in The First Single Photon Sources and Single Photon Interference Experiments 3–23 (Springer International, 2019).

  35. Dörner, R. et al. Cold target recoil ion momentum spectroscopy: a ‘momentum microscope’ to view atomic collision dynamics. Phys. Rep. 330, 95–192 (2000).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ullrich, J. et al. Recoil-ion and electron momentum spectroscopy: reaction-microscopes. Rep. Prog. Phys. 66, 1463 (2003).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. De, S. et al. Following dynamic nuclear wave packets in N2, O2 and CO with few-cycle infrared pulses. Phys. Rev. A 84, 043410 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bocharova, I. A. et al. Time-resolved Coulomb-explosion imaging of nuclear wave-packet dynamics induced in diatomic molecules by intense few-cycle laser pulses. Phys. Rev. A 83, 013417 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lynden-Bell, D. Statistical mechanics of violent relaxation in stellar systems. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 136, 101–121 (1967).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lichtenberg, A. J. Phase-Space Dynamics of Particles (Wiley Series in Plasma Physics, Wiley, 1969).

  41. Banin, U., Bartana, A., Ruhman, S. & Kosloff, R. Impulsive excitation of coherent vibrational motion ground surface dynamics induced by intense short pulses. J. Chem. Phys. 101, 8461–8481 (1994).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wüest, A. & Merkt, F. Potential energy curves of diatomic molecular ions from high-resolution photoelectron spectroscopy. I. The first six electronic states of Ar2 +. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 638–646 (2004).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Cybulski, S. M. & Toczyłowski, R. R. Ground state potential energy curves for He2, Ne2, Ar2, He–Ne, He–Ar and Ne–Ar: a coupled-cluster study. J. Chem. Phys. 111, 10520–10528 (1999).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu, J. et al. Steering the nuclear motion in singly ionized argon dimers with mutually detuned laser pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 033005 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Wrachtrup, J., von Borczyskowski, C., Bernard, J., Brown, R. & Orrit, M. Hahn echo experiments on a single triplet electron spin. Chem. Phys. Lett. 245, 262–267 (1995).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Koppens, F. H. L., Nowack, K. C. & Vandersypen, L. M. K. Spin echo of a single electron spin in a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 236802 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Press, D. et al. Ultrafast optical spin echo in a single quantum dot. Nat. Photon. 4, 367–370 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Dong, H. & Fleming, G. R. Three-pulse photon echo of finite numbers of molecules: single-molecule traces. J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 11318–11325 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schmidt, B. E. et al. Poor man’s source for sub 7 fs: a simple route to ultrashort laser pulses and their full characterization. Opt. Express 16, 18910–18921 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. Garraway, B. M. & Suominen, K. A. Wave-packet dynamics: new physics and chemistry in femto-time. Rep. Prog. Phys. 58, 365 (1995).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Magrakvelidze, M. & Thumm, U. Dissociation dynamics of noble-gas dimers in intense two-color IR laser fields. Phys. Rev. A 88, 013413 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Gadea, F. X. & Paidarová, I. Ab initio calculations for Ar2 +, He2 + and He3 +, of interest for the modelling of ionic rare-gas clusters. Chem. Phys. 209, 281–290 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge useful discussions with D. Oron, D. Raanan and G. Stupakov. This work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2018YFA0306303), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants nos. 11425416, 11834004, 61690224, 11621404 and 11761141004), the 111 Project of China (grant no. B12024), the Israel Science Foundation (grant no. 746/15), the ICORE programme ‘Circle of Light’, ISF-NSFC (grant no. 2520/17) and Projects from Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (19JC1412200). I.A. acknowledges support as the Patricia Elman Bildner Professorial Chair, and acknowledges the hospitality extended to him by the UBC Department of Physics & Astronomy during a sabbatical stay. This research was made possible, in part, by the historic generosity of the Harold Perlman Family.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Junjie Qiang, Ilia Tutunnikov.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China

    Junjie Qiang, Peifen Lu, Kang Lin, Wenbin Zhang, Fenghao Sun, Yehiam Prior & Jian Wu

  2. AMOS and Department of Chemical and Biological Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel

    Ilia Tutunnikov, Yehiam Prior & Ilya Sh. Averbukh

  3. AMOS and Department of Physics of Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel

    Yaron Silberberg

  4. Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China

    Jian Wu

Authors
  1. Junjie Qiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ilia Tutunnikov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peifen Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kang Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wenbin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fenghao Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yaron Silberberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yehiam Prior
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ilya Sh. Averbukh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jian Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.W., I.A., Y.P., Y.S., J.Q. and I.T. conceived the idea and initiated the study. J.Q., P.L., K.L., W.Z. and F.S. designed and carried out the experiments. I.T. and J.Q. performed the simulations. J.Q., I.T., K.L., J.W., I.A. and Y.P. contributed to the data analysis and writing the manuscript. J.W., I.A. and Y.P. supervised and guided the work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yehiam Prior, Ilya Sh. Averbukh or Jian Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Physics thanks Stefanie Gräfe and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Magnified parts of Figs. 3d and 4b.

a, Yield without the kick pulse. b, Yield with the kick pulse. Both curves represent the yield of ion fragments with KER in the range \(0.7\ {\rm{eV}}\ \le \ {\rm{KER}}\ \le \ 1.6\ {\rm{eV}}\).

Supplementary information

Supplementary Video 1

Gradual build-up (from single-molecule events) of the kinetic energy release (KER) distribution of molecular fragments as a function of the probe delay following excitation by a pump pulse. By the end of the movie there is a total of 2.0 million events.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiang, J., Tutunnikov, I., Lu, P. et al. Echo in a single vibrationally excited molecule. Nat. Phys. 16, 328–333 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0762-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0762-7

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing