Physics is formulated in terms of timeless, axiomatic mathematics. A formulation on the basis of intuitionist mathematics, built on time-evolving processes, would offer a perspective that is closer to our experience of physical reality.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
The Open Past in an Indeterministic Physics
Foundations of Physics Open Access 26 November 2022
-
Indeterminism in physics and intuitionistic mathematics
Synthese Open Access 03 September 2021
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Left: INTERFOTO / Alamy Stock Photo; right: reprinted with permission from ref. 18, Springer
Change history
16 January 2020
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0794-z
References
Weyl, H. The Continuum (Dover, 1994).
Gödel, K. Collected Works Vol. IV (eds Feferman, S. et al.) p. 269 (Oxford Univ. Press, 1995).
Dolev, Y. Eur. J. Philos. Sci. 8, 455–469 (2018).
Darbour, J. The End of Time (Oxford Univ. Press, 2001).
Gisin, N. Erkenntnis https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-019-00165-8 (2019).
Posy, C. J. J. Philos. Logic 5, 91–132 (1976).
Posy, C. J. Mathematical Intuitionism (Cambridge Univ. Press, in the press).
Hilbert, D. in Philosophy of Mathematics (eds Benacerraf, P. & Putnam, H.) 183–201 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1984).
Ellis, G. F. R., Meissner, K. A. & Nicolai, H. Nat. Phys. 14, 770–772 (2018).
Born, M. Physics in My Generation (Springer, 1969).
Dowek, G. in Computer Science – Theory and Applications (eds Bulatov, A. A. & Shur, A. M.) 347–353 (Springer, 2013).
Chaitin, G. in Meta Math! Ch. 5 (Vintage, 2008).
Chatin, G. J. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0411418 (2004).
Borel, E. in From Brouwer to Hilbert (ed. Mancosu, P.) 296–300 (Oxford Univ. Press, 1998).
Iemhoff, R. Intuitionism in the philosophy of mathematics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition) https://go.nature.com/2E99Hqe (2019).
Gisin, N. Quantum Stud.: Math. Found. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40509-019-00211-8 (2019).
Palmer, T. N. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 463–471 (2019).
van Dalen, D. L.E.J. Brouwer – Topologist, Intuitionalist, Philosopher (Springer, 2013).
Brouwer, L. E. J. in Proc. 10th International Congress of Philosophy, vol. III (North-Holland, 1949).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gisin, N. Mathematical languages shape our understanding of time in physics. Nat. Phys. 16, 114–116 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0748-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0748-5
This article is cited by
-
The undecidable charge gap and the oil drop experiment
Pramana (2024)
-
Scientific value of the quantum tests of equivalence principle in light of Hilbert’s sixth problem
Pramana (2023)
-
The Open Past in an Indeterministic Physics
Foundations of Physics (2023)
-
Unprovability of first Maxwell’s equation in light of EPR’s completeness condition: a computational approach from logico-linguistic perspective
Pramana (2023)
-
Cauchy’s Logico-Linguistic Slip, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and a Semantic Dilemma Concerning “Quantum Gravity”
International Journal of Theoretical Physics (2022)
