Kibble–Zurek universality in a strongly interacting Fermi superfluid

Abstract

The Kibble–Zurek mechanism describes the spontaneous formation of topological defects in a system crossing a continuous phase transition1,2. Its central premise is the notion of universality, which states that the characteristic scaling exponent describing the dependence of the defect density on the quench rate is determined by the underlying symmetries of the system. Whether this universality can be extended to strongly interacting systems, such as a unitary Fermi gas, is an open question that has recently drawn attention in the context of holographic theories3,4. Here, we report the observation of the Kibble–Zurek universality in a strongly interacting Fermi superfluid. As the microscopic nature of superfluidity is tuned from Bose–Einstein condensation of tightly bound molecules to Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer superfluidity of long-range fermion pairs, the thermal quench formation of vortices reveals a constant scaling exponent arising from the U(1) gauge symmetry of the system. In rapid quenches, destructive vortex collisions lead to the saturation of vortex densities, the values of which can be universally scaled by the interaction-dependent area of the vortex cores. This work paves the way for precision studies of non-equilibrium dynamics in a highly tunable, strongly correlated many-fermion system5,6.

Access options

from\$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

The data supporting this manuscript are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

References

1. 1.

Kibble, T. W. Topology of cosmic domains and strings. J. Phys. A 9, 1387–1398 (1976).

2. 2.

Zurek, W. H. Cosmological experiments in superfluid helium? Nature 317, 505–508 (1985).

3. 3.

Sonner, J., del Campo, A. & Zurek, W. H. Universal far-from-equilibrium dynamics of a holographic superconductor. Nat. Commun. 6, 8406 (2015).

4. 4.

Chesler, P. M., García-García, A. M. & Liu, H. Defect formation beyond Kibble-Zurek mechanism and holography. Phys. Rev. X 5, 021015 (2015).

5. 5.

Bulgac, A., Luo, Y. L., Magierski, P., Roche, K. J. & Yu, Y. Real-time dynamics of quantized vortices in a unitary Fermi superfluid. Science 332, 1288–1291 (2011).

6. 6.

Adams, A., Carr, L. D., Schäfer, T., Steinberg, P. & Thomas, J. E. Strongly correlated quantum fluids: ultracold quantum gases, quantum chromodynamic plasmas and holographic duality. New J. Phys. 14, 115009 (2012).

7. 7.

Hohenberg, P. C. & Halperin, B. I. Theory of dynamic critical phenomena. Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 435–479 (1977).

8. 8.

Chuang, I., Durrer, R., Turok, N. & Yurke, B. Cosmology in the laboratory: defect dynamics in liquid crystals. Science 251, 1336–1342 (1991).

9. 9.

Hendry, P. C., Lawson, N. S., Lee, R. A. M., McClintock, P. V. E. & Williams, C. D. H. Generation of defects in superfluid 4He as an analogue of the formation of cosmic strings. Nature 368, 315–317 (1994).

10. 10.

Bäuerle, C., Bunkov, Y. M., Fisher, S. N., Godfrin, H. & Pickett, G. R. Laboratory simulation of cosmic string formation in the early Universe using superfluid 3He. Nature 382, 332–334 (1996).

11. 11.

Ruutu, V. M. H. et al. Vortex formation in neutron-irradiated superfluid 3He as an analogue of cosmological defect formation. Nature 382, 334–336 (1996).

12. 12.

Pyka, K. et al. Topological defect formation and spontaneous symmetry breaking in ion Coulomb crystals. Nat. Commun. 4, 2291 (2013).

13. 13.

Ulm, S. et al. Observation of the Kibble–Zurek scaling law for defect formation in ion crystals. Nat. Commun. 4, 2290 (2013).

14. 14.

Ejtemaee, S. & Haljan, P. C. Spontaneous nucleation and dynamics of kink defects in zigzag arrays of trapped ions. Phys. Rev. A 87, 051401 (2013).

15. 15.

Weiler, C. N. et al. Spontaneous vortices in the formation of Bose-Einstein condensates. Nature 455, 948–951 (2008).

16. 16.

Lamporesi, G., Donadello, S., Serafini, S., Dalfovo, F. & Ferrari, G. Spontaneous creation of Kibble-Zurek solitons in a Bose-Einstein condensate. Nat. Phys. 9, 656–660 (2013).

17. 17.

Corman, L. et al. Quench-induced supercurrents in an annular Bose gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 135302 (2014).

18. 18.

Navon, N., Gaunt, A. L., Smith, R. P. & Hadzibabic, Z. Critical dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking in a homogeneous Bose gas. Science 347, 167–170 (2015).

19. 19.

Giorgini, S., Pitaevskii, L. P. & Stringari, S. Theory of ultracold atomic Fermi gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1215–1274 (2008).

20. 20.

Zwerger, W. (ed.) Lecture Notes in Physics: The BCSBEC Crossover and the Unitary Fermi Gas Vol. 836 (Springer, 2011).

21. 21.

Nozières, P. & Schmitt-Rink, S. Bose condensation in an attractive fermion gas: from weak to strong coupling superconductivity. J. Low. Temp. Phys. 59, 195–211 (1985).

22. 22.

Regal, C. A., Greiner, M. & Jin, D. S. Observation of resonance condensation of fermionic atom pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 040403 (2004).

23. 23.

Chen, Q., Regal, C. A., Greiner, M., Jin, D. S. & Levin, K. Understanding the superfluid phase diagram in trapped Fermi gases. Phys. Rev. A 73, 041601 (2006).

24. 24.

Miller, D. E. et al. Critical velocity for superfluid flow across the BEC-BCS crossover. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 070402 (2007).

25. 25.

Weimer, W. et al. Critical velocity in the BEC-BCS crossover. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 095301 (2015).

26. 26.

Park, J. W., Ko, B. & Shin, Y. Critical vortex shedding in a strongly interacting fermionic superfluid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 225301 (2018).

27. 27.

Heiselberg, H. Fermi systems with long scattering lengths. Phys. Rev. A 63, 043606 (2001).

28. 28.

del Campo, A., Retzker, A. & Plenio, M. B. The inhomogeneous Kibble–Zurek mechanism: vortex nucleation during Bose–Einstein condensation. New J. Phys. 13, 083022 (2011).

29. 29.

Donadello, S. et al. Creation and counting of defects in a temperature-quenched Bose-Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. A 94, 023628 (2016).

30. 30.

Liu, I. K. et al. Dynamical equilibration across a quenched phase transition in a trapped quantum gas. Comm. Phys. 1, 24 (2018).

31. 31.

Donner, T. et al. Critical behavior of a trapped interacting Bose gas. Science 315, 1556–1558 (2007).

32. 32.

Taylor, E. Critical behavior in trapped strongly interacting Fermi gases. Phys. Rev. A 80, 023612 (2009).

33. 33.

Debelhoir, T. & Dupuis, N. Critical region of the superfluid transition in the BCS-BEC crossover. Phys. Rev. A 93, 023642 (2016).

34. 34.

Gehm, M. E., Hemmer, S. L., O’Hara, K. M. & Thomas, J. E. Unitarity-limited elastic collision rate in a harmonically trapped Fermi gas. Phys. Rev. A 68, 011603 (2003).

35. 35.

Jelić, A. & Cugliandolo, L. F. Quench dynamics of the 2d XY model. J. Stat. Mech. 2011, P02032 (2011).

36. 36.

Zwierlein, M. W., Schirotzek, A., Schunck, C. H. & Ketterle, W. Vortices and superfluidity in a strongly interacting Fermi gas. Nature 435, 1047–1051 (2005).

Acknowledgements

We thank A. del Campo for discussions. This work was supported by the Institute for Basic Science in Korea (grant no. IBS-R009-D1) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (grant no. NRF-2018R1A2B3003373). J.W.P. acknowledges support from the POSCO Science Fellowship of the POSCO TJ Park Foundation.

Author information

J.W.P. and Y.S. conceived the idea. B.K. and J.W.P. performed the experiment and data analysis. J.W.P. and B.K. wrote the manuscript, and all authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. J.W.P. and Y.S. supervised the project.

Correspondence to Jee Woo Park or Y. Shin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review information: Nature Physics thanks Nikolaos Proukakis and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figs. 1–5, refs. 1–5 and text.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions