Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

The role of basic plasmas studies in the quest for fusion power

Efforts to demonstrate the feasibility of fusion power can benefit from studies of fundamental questions in plasma physics carried out in simplified devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The TORPEX device.
Fig. 2: Blob formation mechanism.
Fig. 3: Numerical code validation.

References

  1. ITER Physics Basis Editors et al. Nucl. Fusion 39, 2137–2174 (1999).

  2. Zohm, H. et al. Nucl. Fusion 53, 073019 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stangeby, P. C. The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices (Institute of Physics Publishing, 2000).

  4. Fasoli, A. et al. Nucl. Fusion 47, S264–S284 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Experiments at the Frontier of Fundamental Plasma Physics Special issue of the J. Plasma Phys. Vol. 81 (2015).

  6. Yamada, M., Kulsrud, R. & Ji, H. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 603–664 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pierre, T., Leclert, G. & Braun, F. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 58, 6–11 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsukuma, M. et al. Phys. Lett. A 314, 163–167 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bohlin, H. et al. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 023501 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Krause, N., Lechte, C., Stöber, J. & Stroth, U. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73, 3474–3481 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tynan, G. et al. Phys. Plasmas 11, 5195–5203 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fattorini, L. et al. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 54, 085017 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Trasarti-Battistoni, R., Draghi, D., Riccardi, C. & Roman, H. Phys. Plasmas 9, 3369–3377 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fasoli, A. et al. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 52, 124020 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Furno, I. et al. J. Plasma Phys. 81, 345810301 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zweben, S. J. Phys. Fluids 28, 974–982 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Furno, I. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 055004 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Theiler, C. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 065001 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Avino, F. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 105001 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Theiler, C. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 065005 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Labit, B. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 255002 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gustafson, K. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 035006 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bovet, A. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 225001 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gantenbein, G. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1242–1245 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Poli, E. et al. Nucl. Fusion 55, 013023 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sysoeva, E. V. et al. Nucl. Fusion 55, 033016 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chellai, O. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 105001 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chellaï, O. et al. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 61, 014001 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fasoli, A. et al. Nat. Phys. 12, 411–423 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ricci, P. et al. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 54, 124047 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ricci, P. et al. Phys. Plasmas 18, 032109 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Riva, F. et al. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 58, 044005 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Stegmeir, A. et al. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 60, 035005 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dudson, B. D. et al. Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 1467–1480 (2009).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Nielsen, A. H. et al. Phys. Lett. A 379, 3097–3101 (2015).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Tamain, P. et al. Contrib. Plasma Phys. 54, 555–559 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ambrogio Fasoli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fasoli, A., Furno, I. & Ricci, P. The role of basic plasmas studies in the quest for fusion power. Nat. Phys. 15, 872–875 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0622-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0622-5

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing