Coherently driving a single quantum two-level system with dichromatic laser pulses

Abstract

The excitation of individual two-level quantum systems using an electromagnetic field is an elementary tool of quantum optics, with widespread applications across quantum technologies. The efficient excitation of a single two-level system usually requires the driving field to be at the same frequency as the transition between the two quantum levels. However, in solid-state implementations, the scattered laser light can dominate over the single photons emitted by the two-level system, imposing a challenge for single-photon sources. Here, we propose a background-free method for the coherent excitation and control of a two-level quantum system using a phase-locked dichromatic electromagnetic field with no spectral overlap with the optical transition. We demonstrate this method experimentally by stimulating single-photon emission from a single quantum dot embedded in a micropillar, reaching single-photon purity of 0.988(1) and indistinguishability of 0.962(6). The phase-coherent nature of our two-colour excitation scheme is demonstrated by the dependence of the resonance fluorescence intensity on the relative phase between the two pulses. Our two-colour excitation method represents an additional and useful tool for the study of atom–photon interaction, and the generation of spectrally isolated indistinguishable single photons.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Coherent driving of a single two-level system with dichromatic pulses.
Fig. 2: Generation of dichromatic pulses using a 4f optical system.
Fig. 3: Single-photon intensity as a function of the driving strength.
Fig. 4: Phase-dependent resonance fluorescence under dichromatic driving.
Fig. 5: Characterization of the single-photon source under two-colour excitation.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Rabi, I. I., Millman, S. & Kusch, P. The molecular beam resonance method for measuring nuclear magnetic moments. The magnetic moments of 3Li6, 3Li7 and 9F19. Phys. Rev. 55, 526–535 (1939).

  2. 2.

    Ramsey, N. F. A molecular beam resonance method with separated oscillating fields. Phys. Rev. 78, 695–699 (1950).

  3. 3.

    Autler, S. H. & Townes, C. H. Stark effect in rapidly varying fields. Phys. Rev. 100, 703–722 (1955).

  4. 4.

    Mollow, B. R. Power spectrum of light scattered by two-level systems. Phys. Rev. 188, 1969–1975 (1969).

  5. 5.

    Bennett, C. H. & DiVincenzo, D. P. Quantum information and computation. Nature 404, 247–255 (2000).

  6. 6.

    Leibfried, D., Blatt, R., Monroe, C. & Wineland, D. Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 281–324 (2003).

  7. 7.

    Bonadeo, N. H. et al. Coherent optical control of the quantum state of a single quantum dot. Science 282, 1473–1476 (1998).

  8. 8.

    Press, D., Ladd, T. D., Zhang, B. & Yamamoto, Y. Complete quantum control of a single quantum dot spin using ultrafast optical pulses. Nature 456, 218–221 (2008).

  9. 9.

    Lodahl, P., Mahmoodian, S. & Stobbe, S. Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 347–400 (2015).

  10. 10.

    Weber, J. R. et al. Quantum computing with defects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8513–8518 (2010).

  11. 11.

    Clarke, J. & Wilhelm, F. K. Superconducting quantum bits. Nature 453, 1031–1042 (2008).

  12. 12.

    Zrenner, A. et al. Coherent properties of a two-level system based on a quantum-dot photodiode. Nature 418, 612–214 (2002).

  13. 13.

    Stievater, T. H. et al. Rabi oscillations of excitons in single quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 133603 (2001).

  14. 14.

    Michler, P. et al. A quantum dot single-photon turnstile device. Science 290, 2282–2285 (2000).

  15. 15.

    Santori, C., Fattal, D., Vučković, J., Solomon, G. S. & Yamamoto, Y. Indistinguishable photons from a single-photon device. Nature 419, 594–597 (2002).

  16. 16.

    Muller, A. et al. Resonance fluorescence from a coherently driven semiconductor quantum dot in a cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 187402 (2007).

  17. 17.

    Vamivakas, A. N., Zhao, Y., Lu, C.-Y. & Atature, M. Spin-resolved quantum-dot resonance fluorescence. Nat. Phys. 5, 198–202 (2009).

  18. 18.

    He, Y.-M. et al. On-demand semiconductor single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 213–217 (2013).

  19. 19.

    Buckley, S., Rivoire, K. & Vučković, J. Engineered quantum dot single-photon sources. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 126503 (2012).

  20. 20.

    Senellart, P., Solomon, G. & White, A. High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 1026–1039 (2017).

  21. 21.

    Ding, X. et al. On-demand single photons with high extraction efficiency and near-unity indistinguishability from a resonantly driven quantum dot in a micropillar. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 020401 (2016).

  22. 22.

    Somaschi, N. et al. Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state. Nat. Photon. 10, 340–345 (2016).

  23. 23.

    Wang, H. et al. Near-transform-limited single photons from an efficient solid-state quantum emitter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 213601 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Aaronson, S. & Arkhipov, A. The computational complexity of linear optics. In Proc. 43rd Annu. ACM Symp. Theory of Computing 333–342 (ACM, 2011).

  25. 25.

    Kok, P. et al. Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 135–174 (2007).

  26. 26.

    Müller, M. et al. On-demand generation of indistinguishable polarization-entangled photon pairs. Nat. Photon. 8, 224–228 (2014).

  27. 27.

    Schweickert, L. et al. On-demand generation of background-free single photons from a solid-state source. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 093106 (2018).

  28. 28.

    Hanschke, L. et al. Quantum dot single-photon sources with ultra-low multi-photon probability. npj Quantum Inf. 4, 43 (2018).

  29. 29.

    Huber, T. et al. Measurement and modification of biexciton–exciton time correlations. Opt. Express 21, 9890–9898 (2013).

  30. 30.

    Wang, H. et al. On-demand semiconductor source of entangled photons which simultaneously has high fidelity, efficiency, and indistinguishability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 113602 (2019).

  31. 31.

    Htoon, H. et al. Interplay of Rabi oscillations and quantum interference in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 087401 (2002).

  32. 32.

    Grange, T. et al. Reducing phonon-induced decoherence in solid-state single-photon sources with cavity quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 253602 (2017).

  33. 33.

    Iles-Smith, J. et al. Phonon scattering inhibits simultaneous near-unity efficiency and indistinguishability in semiconductor single-photon sources. Nat. Photon. 11, 521–526 (2017).

  34. 34.

    Glässl, M., Barth, A. M. & Axt, V. M. Proposed robust and high-fidelity preparation of excitons and biexcitons in semiconductor quantum dots making active use of phonons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 147401 (2013).

  35. 35.

    Quilter, J. H. et al. Phonon-assisted population inversion of a single InGaAs/GaAs quantum dot by pulsed laser excitation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 137401 (2015).

  36. 36.

    Förstner, J. et al. Phonon-assisted damping of Rabi oscillations in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 127401 (2003).

  37. 37.

    Pan, J. W. et al. Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 777–838 (2012).

  38. 38.

    Humphreys, P. C. Deterministic delivery of remote entanglement on a quantum network. Nature 558, 268–273 (2018).

  39. 39.

    Ates, S. et al. Post-selected indistinguishable photons from the resonance fluorescence of a single quantum dot in a microcavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 167402 (2009).

  40. 40.

    He, Y.-M. et al. Polarized indistinguishable single photons from a quantum dot in an elliptical micropillar. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.10992 (2018).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Chinese Academy of Science, Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies, the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, the National Fundamental Research Program and the State of Bavaria supported this work. M.A. is supported by an ERC Consolidator Grant PHOENICS (no. 617985), and the EPSRC Quantum Technology Hub NQIT (EP/M013243/1). C.S. acknowledges support by the DFG within the project SCHN1376 5-1.

Author information

C.-Y.L. and J.-W.P. conceived the idea and designed the experiment. C.S. and S.H. grew the quantum dot samples. Y.-M.H., H.W., C.W., X.D., J.Q., Z.-C.D., S.C., J.-P.L., R.-Z.L. and C.-Y.L. performed the experiment. C.W., M.-C.C., M.A. and C.-Y.L. performed theoretical modelling and analysed the experimental data. C.-Y.L. wrote the paper with input from all authors. C.-Y.L. and J.-W.P. supervised the whole project.

Correspondence to Chao-Yang Lu or Jian-Wei Pan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark