Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Continuous force and displacement measurement below the standard quantum limit

Abstract

Quantum mechanics dictates that the precision of physical measurements must always comply with certain noise constraints. In the case of interferometric displacement measurements, these restrictions impose a standard quantum limit (SQL), which optimally balances the precision of a measurement with its unwanted backaction1. To go beyond this limit, one must devise more sophisticated measurement techniques, which either ‘evade’ the backaction of the measurement2 or achieve clever cancellation of the unwanted noise at the detector3,4. In the half-century since the SQL was established, systems ranging from LIGO5 to ultracold atoms6 and nanomechanical devices7,8 have pushed displacement measurements towards this limit, and a variety of sub-SQL techniques have been tested in proof-of-principle experiments9,10,11,12,13. However, so far, no experimental system has successfully demonstrated an interferometric displacement measurement with sensitivity (including all relevant noise sources—thermal, backaction and imprecision) below the SQL. Here, we exploit strong quantum correlations in an ultracoherent optomechanical system to demonstrate off-resonant force and displacement sensitivity reaching 1.5 dB below the SQL. This achieves an outstanding goal in mechanical quantum sensing and further enhances the prospects of using such devices for state-of-the-art force sensing applications.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Measuring beyond the SQL.
Fig. 2: Measuring displacement below the SQL.
Fig. 3: Opening broadband regions of sub-SQL sensitivity.
Fig. 4: Quantum-enhanced force sensing beyond the SQL.

Data availability

Source data for Figs. 2–4 are available in the UCPH ERDA repository (https://doi.org/10.17894/ucph.8f3edcdf-d030-49e0-93de-8b7fdccdfd8e). The remaining data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. 1.

    Braginsky, V. B. Classical and quantum restrictions on the detection of weak disturbances of a macroscopic oscillator. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 26, 831–834 (1968).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Braginsky, V., Vorontsov, Y. & Thorne, K. Quantum nondemolition measurements. Science 209, 547–557 (1980).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Unruh, W. In Quantum Optics, Experimental Gravitation, and Measurement Theory (eds Meystre, P. & Scully, M. O.) 647 (Plenum, 1982).

  4. 4.

    Vyatchanin, S. P. & Zubova, E. A. Quantum variation measurement of a force. Phys. Lett. A 201, 269–274 (1995).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration. A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit. Nat. Phys. 201, 962–965 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Schreppler, S. et al. Optically measuring force near the standard quantum limit. Science 344, 1486–1489 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    LaHaye, M. D., Buu, O., Camarota, B. & Schwab, K. C. Approaching the quantum limit of a nanomechanical resonator. Science 304, 74–77 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rossi, M., Mason, D., Chen, J., Tsaturyan, Y. & Schliesser, A. Measurement-based quantum control of mechanical motion. Nature 563, 53–58 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kampel, N. S. et al. Improving broadband displacement detection with quantum correlations. Phys. Rev. X 7, 021008 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Suh, J. et al. Mechanically detecting and avoiding the quantum fluctuations of a microwave field. Science 344, 1262–1265 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wollman, E. E. et al. Quantum squeezing of motion in a mechanical resonator. Science 349, 952–955 (2015).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lecocq, F., Clark, J. B., Simmonds, R. W., Aumentado, J. & Teufel, J. D. Quantum nondemolition measurement of a nonclassical state of a massive object. Phys. Rev. X 5, 041037 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sudhir, V. et al. Quantum correlations of light from a room-temperature mechanical oscillator. Phys. Rev. X 7, 031055 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Clerk, A. A., Devoret, M. H., Girvin, S. M., Marquardt, F. & Schoelkopf, R. J. Introduction to quantum noise, measurement and amplification. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155–1208 (2010).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Aspelmeyer, M., Kippenberg, T. J. & Marquardt, F. Cavity optomechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391–1452 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Braginsky, V. B., Khalili, F. Y. & Thorne, K. S. Quantum Measurement (Cambridge University Press, 1992).

  17. 17.

    Bowen, W. P. & Milburn, G. J. Quantum Optomechanics (CRC Press, 2016).

  18. 18.

    Kimble, H. J., Levin, Y., Matsko, A. B., Thorne, K. S. & Vyatchanin, S. P. Conversion of conventional gravitational-wave interferometers into quantum nondemolition interferometers by modifying their input and/or output optics. Phys. Rev. D 65, 022002 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Corbitt, T. & Mavalvala, N. Quantum noise in gravitational-wave interferometers. J. Opt. B 6, S675 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Purdue, P. & Chen, Y. Practical speed meter designs for quantum nondemolition gravitational-wave interferometers. Phys. Rev. D 66, 122004 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Thorne, K. S., Drever, R. W., Caves, C. M., Zimmermann, M. & Sandberg, V. D. Quantum nondemolition measurements of harmonic oscillators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 667–671 (1978).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Braginskiĭ, V. B., Vorontsov, Y. I. & Khalili, F. Y. Optimal quantum measurements in detectors of gravitation radiation. Sov. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. 27, 276 (1978).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ockeloen-Korppi, C. F. et al. Quantum backaction evading measurement of collective mechanical modes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 140401 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Møller, C. B. et al. Quantum back-action-evading measurement of motion in a negative mass reference frame. Nature 547, 191–195 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Arcizet, O., Briant, T., Heidmann, A. & Pinard, M. Beating quantum limits in an optomechanical sensor by cavity detuning. Phys. Rev. A 73, 033819 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Caves, C. M. Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer. Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693–1708 (1981).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Brooks, D. W. C. et al. Non-classical light generated by quantum-noise-driven cavity optomechanics. Nature 488, 476–480 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Safavi-Naeini, A. H. et al. Squeezed light from a silicon micromechanical resonator. Nature 500, 185–189 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Purdy, T. P., Yu, P.-L., Peterson, R. W., Kampel, N. S. & Regal, C. A. Strong optomechanical squeezing of light. Phys. Rev. X 3, 031012 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S. & Maccone, L. Quantum enhanced measurement: beating the standard quantum limit. Science 306, 1330–1336 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Tsaturyan, Y., Barg, A., Polzik, E. S. & Schliesser, A. Ultracoherent nanomechanical resonators via soft clamping and dissipation dilution. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 776–783 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Clerk, A. A. Quantum-limited position detection and amplification: a linear response perspective. Phys. Rev. B 70, 1–9 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Buchmann, L. F., Schreppler, S., Kohler, J., Spethmann, N. & Stamper-Kurn, D. M. Complex squeezing and force measurement beyond the standard quantum limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 030801 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Habibi, H., Zeuthen, E., Ghanaatshoar, M. & Hammerer, K. Quantum feedback cooling of a mechanical oscillator using variational measurements: tweaking Heisenberg’s microscope. J. Opt. 18, 084004 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Poggio, M. & Degen, C. L. Force-detected nuclear magnetic resonance: recent advances and future challenges. Nanotechnology 21, 342001 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge input from J. Appel regarding photodetector design. This work was supported by funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (European Research Council project Q-CEOM, grant agreement no. 638765 and FET proactive project HOT, grant agreement no. 732894).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.M., J.C. and M.R. built the set-up and performed the experiments, analysed the data and, together with A.S., discussed the results and wrote the paper. Y.T. designed and fabricated the membrane resonators. A.S. supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Schliesser.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mason, D., Chen, J., Rossi, M. et al. Continuous force and displacement measurement below the standard quantum limit. Nat. Phys. 15, 745–749 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0533-5

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing