Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Plasmaspheric hiss waves generate a reversed energy spectrum of radiation belt electrons

Nature Physics volume 15, pages 367–372 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Highly energetic electrons are trapped in the magnetic field of Earth’s radiation belts. The physical mechanisms driving the dynamics of the Van Allen belts can be understood from the electron’s energy spectrum, which is believed to be steeply falling with increasing energy. This view has been prevalent for the past 60 years since the energy spectra were first measured. Here, we report the observation of a reversed energy spectrum with abundant high-energy and fewer low-energy electrons spanning from hundreds of keV to around two MeV in electron energy in data collected with NASA’s Van Allen Probes. We find that this spectrum dominates inside the plasmasphere—a dense cold plasma region co-rotating with the Earth. Using two-dimensional Fokker–Planck diffusion simulations with a time-dependent, data-driven model of hiss waves in the plasmasphere, we demonstrate that the formation of the reversed spectrum is explained by the scattering of hiss waves. The results have important implications for understanding the distributions of charged particles and wave–particle interactions in magnetized plasmas throughout the solar system and beyond.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Radiation belt electron fluxes and energy spectra during the 17 March 2015 storm.
Fig. 2: Statistics of bump-on-tail (BOT) electron energy spectrum during 2015.
Fig. 3: Properties of plasmaspheric hiss waves during the 17 March 2015 storm.
Fig. 4: Comparison of Fokker–Planck simulation results with observations.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The particle data analysed during the current study are available from the ECT Science Operations and Data Center (http://www.rbsp-ect.lanl.gov). The field data are available from the EMFISIS Data Center (https://emfisis.physics.uiowa.edu/). Solar wind data and geomagnetic indices are available from OMNIWeb (http://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/).

References

  1. Pizzella, G., Laughlin, C. D. & O’Brien, B. J. Note on the electron energy spectrum in the inner Van Allen Belt. J. Geophys. Res. 67, 3281–3287 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Imhof, W. L. & Smith, R. V. Energy spectrum of electrons at low altitudes. J. Geophys. Res. 70, 2129–2134 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Summers, D., Tang, R. & Thorne, R. M. Limit on stably trapped particle fluxes in planetary magnetospheres. J. Geophys. Res. 114, A10210 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mauk, B. H. et al. Science objectives and rationale for the Radiation Belt Storm Probes mission. Space Sci. Rev. 179, 3–27 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baker, D. N. et al. Highly relativistic radiation belt electron acceleration, transport, and loss: Large solar storm events of March and June 2015. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 121, 6647–6660 (2016).

  6. Blake, J. B. et al. The Magnetic Electron Ion Spectrometer (MagEIS) instruments aboard the Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) spacecraft. Space Sci. Rev. 179, 383–421 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baker, D. N. et al. The Relativistic Electron-Proton Telescope (REPT) instrument on board the Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) spacecraft: Characterization of Earth’s radiation belt high-energy particle populations. Space Sci. Rev. 179, 337–381 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hudson, M. K. et al. Simulated prompt acceleration of Multi-MeV electrons by the 17 March 2015 interplanetary shock. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 122, 10036–10046 (2017).

  9. Krall, N. A. & Trivelpiece, A. W. Principles of Plasma Physics 458–463 (McGraw-Hill, San Francisco, 1973).

  10. Boyd, T. M. J. & Sanderson, J. J. Physics of Plasma 268–274 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2003).

  11. Vampola, A. L. Natural variations in the geomagnetically trapped electron population. In Proceedings of the National Symposium on Natural and Manmade Radiation in Space. NASA TM X-2440 (ed. Warman, E. A.) 539–547 (NASA, Washington D.C, 1972).

  12. Vakulov, P. V., Kovrygina, L. M., Mineev, Iu. V. & Tverskaia, L. V. Dynamics of the outer belt of energetic electrons during moderate magnetic disturbances. Geomagnetizm I Aeronomiia 15, 1028–1032 (1975).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. West, H. I. Jr., Buck, R. M. & Davidson, G. T. The dynamics of energetic electrons in the Earth’s outer radiation belt during 1968 as observed by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s spectrometer on Ogo 5. J. Geophys. Res. 86, 2111–2142 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reeves, G. D. et al. Energy-dependent dynamics of keV to MeV electrons in the inner zone, outer zone, and slot regions. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 121, 397–412 (2016).

  15. Lyons, L. R., Thorne, R. M. & Kennel, C. F. Pitch-angle diffusion of radiation belt electrons within the plasmasphere. J. Geophys. Res. 77, 3455–3474 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Meredith, N. P., Horne, R. B., Glauert, S. A. & Anderson, R. R. Slot region electron loss timescales due to plasmaspheric hiss and lightning-generated whistlers. J. Geophys. Res. 112, A08214 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ni, B., Bortnik, J., Thorne, R. M., Ma, Q. & Chen, L. Resonant scattering and resultant pitch angle evolution of relativistic electrons by plasmaspheric hiss. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 118, 7740–7751 (2013).

  18. Ripoll, J.-F. et al. Reproducing the observed energy-dependent structure of Earth’s electron radiation belts during storm recovery with an event-specific diffusion model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 5616–5625 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ripoll, J.-F. et al. Effects of whistler mode hiss waves in March 2013. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 122, 7433–7462 (2017).

  20. Ma, Q. et al. Characteristic energy range of electron scattering due to plasmaspheric hiss. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 121, 11737–11749 (2016).

  21. Kletzing, C. A. et al. The Electric and Magnetic Field Instrument Suite and Integrated Science (EMFISIS) on RBSP. Space Sci. Rev. 179, 127–181 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Summers, D., Ni, B. & Meredith, N. P. Timescales for radiation belt electron acceleration and loss due to resonant wave-particle interactions: 2. Evaluation for VLF chorus, ELF hiss, and electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves. J. Geophys. Res. 112, A04207 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shprits, Y. Y., Li, W. & Thorne, R. M. Controlling effect of the pitch angle scattering rates near the edge of the loss cone on electron lifetimes. J. Geophys. Res. 111, A12206 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schulz, M. & Lanzerotti, L. Particle Diffusion in the Radiation Belts (Springer, New York, 1974).

  25. Ni, B., Hua, M., Zhou, R., Yi, J. & Fu, S. Competition between outer zone electron scattering by plasmaspheric hiss and magnetosonic waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 3465–3474 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lenchek, A., Singer, S. & Wentworth, R. Geomagnetically trapped electrons from cosmic ray albedo neutrons. J. Geophys. Res. 66, 4027–4046 (1961).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Funsten, H. O. et al. Helium, Oxygen, Proton, and Electron (HOPE) mass spectrometer for the Radiation Belt Storm Probes Mission. Space Sci. Rev. 179, 423–484 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Elkington, S. R., Hudson, M. K. & Chan, A. A. Acceleration of relativistic electrons via drift-resonant interaction with toroidal-mode Pc-5 ULF oscillations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 3273–3276 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Barker, A. B., Li., X. & Selesnick, R. S. Modeling the radiation belt electrons with radial diffusion driven by the solar wind. Space Weather 3, S10003 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Thorne, R. M. Radiation belt dynamics: The importance of wave–particle interactions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L22107 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu, X. et al. Dynamic plasmapause model based on THEMIS measurements. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 120, 10543–10556 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by RBSP-ECT funding through JHU/APL contract 967399 (under prime NASA contract NAS5-01072), by the NSFC grants 41674163, 41474141, 41574160 and 41204120, by the Chinese Thousand Youth Talents Program, and by the Hubei Province Natural Science Excellent Youth Foundation (2016CFA044). We thank the Van Allen Probes REPT, MagEIS, HOPE and EMFISIS Science Teams for providing the particle and wave data. We also thank the NSSDC OMNIWeb for the use of solar wind and geomagnetic index data.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: H. Zhao, B. Ni.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA

    H. Zhao, X. Li, D. N. Baker & Z. Xiang

  2. School of Electronic Information, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

    B. Ni, W. Zhang, Z. Xiang & X. Gu

  3. Air Force Research Laboratory, Kirtland Air Force Base, Albuquerque, NM, USA

    W. R. Johnston

  4. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

    A. N. Jaynes

  5. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA

    S. G. Kanekal

  6. Space Sciences Department, Aerospace Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    J. B. Blake & S. G. Claudepierre

  7. Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

    M. A. Temerin

  8. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA

    H. O. Funsten & G. D. Reeves

  9. New Mexico Consortium, Los Alamos, NM, USA

    G. D. Reeves & A. J. Boyd

Authors
  1. H. Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Ni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. X. Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. N. Baker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. W. R. Johnston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. W. Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Z. Xiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. X. Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. A. N. Jaynes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. S. G. Kanekal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. J. B. Blake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. S. G. Claudepierre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. M. A. Temerin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. H. O. Funsten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. G. D. Reeves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. A. J. Boyd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.Z. led the study, performed the data analysis of the bump-on-tail energy spectrum and wrote the manuscript. B.N. initialized the concept of hiss wave scattering, led the simulations and their quantitative comparisons with observations, and contributed to writing of the manuscript through reviews and edits. X.L. and D.N.B. supervised the study and contributed to writing of the manuscript through reviews and edits. W.R.J. initialized the concept of bump-on-tail energy spectrum, helped with data analysis, and contributed to writing of the manuscript through reviews and edits. W.Z. conducted the Fokker–Planck simulation runs to investigate the hiss-induced electron dynamics and produced the majority of Figs. 3 and 4. Z.X. provided the wave information to establish the data-driven, time-dependent hiss wave model and helped produce Fig. 3. X.G. helped analyse the simulation results and compare them with observations. A.N.J., S.G.K., J.B.B., S.G.C., M.A.T., H.O.F., G.D.R. and A.J.B. contributed to writing of the manuscript through reviews and edits.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to H. Zhao or B. Ni.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary methods and supplementary figures

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, H., Ni, B., Li, X. et al. Plasmaspheric hiss waves generate a reversed energy spectrum of radiation belt electrons. Nat. Phys. 15, 367–372 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0391-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0391-6

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing