Strain-tunable magnetism at oxide domain walls


Applying stress to a ferroelastic material results in a nonlinear strain response as domains of different orientations mechanically switch. The ability to write, erase and move domain walls between such ferroelastic domains suggests a method for making nanoelectronics where the domain wall is the device. However, little is known about the magnetic properties of such domain walls. A fascinating model system is SrTiO3, where the ferroelastic domain walls display strain-tunable polarity and enhanced conductivity. Here, we reveal a long-range magnetic order with modulations along the ferroelastic domain walls in SrTiO3 and SrTiO3-based heterointerfaces, which manifests itself as a striped pattern in scanning superconducting quantum interference device maps of the magnetic landscape. In conducting interfaces, the magnetism is coupled to itinerant electrons with clear signatures in magnetotransport measurements. The magnetic state is also coupled dynamically to the lattice and can be reversibly tuned by applying local external forces. This study raises the possibility of designing nanoscale devices based on domain walls where strain-tunable ferroelectric, ferroelastic and ferromagnetic orders may coexist.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Scanning SQUID maps of striped magnetic order.
Fig. 2: Anomalous Hall effect.
Fig. 3: Pressure-dependent magnetic signal.
Fig. 4: Coupling between lattice, spin and charge.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Haeni, J. H. et al. Room-temperature ferroelectricity in strained SrTiO3. Nature 430, 758–761 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jalan, B., Allen, S. J., Beltz, G. E., Moetakef, P. & Stemmer, S. Enhancing the electron mobility of SrTiO3 with strain. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 132102 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pai, Y.-Y., Tylan-Tyler, A., Irvin, P. & Levy, J. Physics of SrTiO3-based heterostructures and nanostructures: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 036503 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Rimai, L. Electron paramagnetic resonance of trivalent gadolinium ions in strontium and barium titanates. Phys. Rev. 127, 702–710 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cowley, R. A. Lattice dynamics and phase transitions of strontium titanate. Phys. Rev. 134, A981–A997 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Heidemann, A. & Wettengel, H. Die Messung der Gitterparameteränderung von SrTiO3. Z. Phys. Hadrons Nucl. 258, 429–438 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lytle, F. W. X-ray diffractometry of low-temperature phase transformations in strontium titanate. J. Appl. Phys. 35, 2212–2215 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kalisky, B. et al. Locally enhanced conductivity due to the tetragonal domain structure in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterointerfaces. Nat. Mater. 12, 1091–1095 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Honig, M. et al. Local electrostatic imaging of striped domain order in LaAlO3/SrTiO3. Nat. Mater. 12, 1112–1118 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Erlich, Z. et al. Optical study of tetragonal domains in LaAlO3/SrTiO3. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 28, 1017–1020 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Frenkel, Y. et al. Anisotropic transport at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface explained by microscopic imaging of channel-flow over SrTiO3 domains. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 12514–12519 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chang, T. S. Domain structure of SrTiO3 under uniaxial stresses. J. Appl. Phys. 43, 3591–3595 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sidoruk, J. et al. Quantitative determination of domain distribution in SrTiO3—competing effects of applied electric field and mechanical stress. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 235903 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Brinkman, A. et al. Magnetic effects at the interface between non-magnetic oxides. Nat. Mater. 6, 493–496 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kalisky, B. et al. Critical thickness for ferromagnetism in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 3, 922 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kalisky, B. et al. Scanning probe manipulation of magnetism at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterointerface. Nano Lett. 12, 4055–4059 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bert, J. A. et al. Direct imaging of the coexistence of ferromagnetism and superconductivity at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Nat. Phys. 7, 767–771 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Li, L., Richter, C., Mannhart, J. & Ashoori, R. C. Coexistence of magnetic order and two-dimensional superconductivity at LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interfaces. Nat. Phys. 7, 762–766 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cheng, G. et al. Electron pairing without superconductivity. Nature 521, 196–199 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Pai, Y.-Y. et al. One-dimensional nature of pairing and superconductivity at the SrTiO3/LaAlO3 interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 147001 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Pai, Y.-Y., Tylan-Tyler, A., Irvin, P. & Levy, J. LaAlO3/SrTiO3: a tale of two magnetisms. Preprint at (2016).

  22. 22.

    Banerjee, S., Erten, O. & Randeria, M. Ferromagnetic exchange, spin-orbit coupling and spiral magnetism at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Nat. Phys. 9, 626–630 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Pavlenko, N., Kopp, T., Tsymbal, E. Y., Sawatzky, G. A. & Mannhart, J. Magnetic and superconducting phases at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface: the role of interfacial Ti 3d electrons. Phys. Rev. B 85, 020407 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bi, F. et al. Room-temperature electronically-controlled ferromagnetism at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Nat. Commun. 5, 5019 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ariando et al. Electronic phase separation at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Nat. Commun. 2, 188 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hu, H.-L. et al. Subtle interplay between localized magnetic moments and itinerant electrons in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterostructures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 13630–13636 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Joshua, A., Ruhman, J., Pecker, S., Altman, E. & Ilani, S. Gate-tunable polarized phase of two-dimensional electrons at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9633–9638 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Seri, S., Schultz, M. & Klein, L. Interplay between sheet resistance increase and magnetotransport properties in LaAlO3/SrTiO3. Phys. Rev. B 86, 085118 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gunkel, F. et al. Defect control of conventional and anomalous electron transport at complex oxide interfaces. Phys. Rev. X 6, 031035 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ben Shalom, M. et al. Anisotropic magnetotransport at the SrTiO3/LaAlO3 interface. Phys. Rev. B 80, 140403 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wang, X. et al. Magnetoresistance of two-dimensional and three-dimensional electron gas in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterostructures: influence of magnetic ordering, interface scattering, and dimensionality. Phys. Rev. B 84, 075312 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Salman, Z. et al. Nature of weak magnetism in SrTiO3/LaAlO3 multilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 257207 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lee, J.-S. et al. Titanium dxy ferromagnetism at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Nat. Mater. 12, 703–706 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wijnands, T. Scanning Superconducting Quantum Interference Device Microscopy: Sensitive Mapping of Magnetic Flux on Thin Films. PhD thesis, Univ. Twente (2013).

  35. 35.

    Fitzsimmons, M. R. et al. Upper limit to magnetism in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 217201 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Christensen, D. V. et al. Electron mobility in γ-Al2O3/SrTiO3. Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 054004 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Neville, R. C., Hoeneisen, B. & Mead, C. A. Permittivity of strontium titanate. J. Appl. Phys. 43, 2124–2131 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Rowley, S. E. et al. Ferroelectric quantum criticality. Nat. Phys. 10, 367–372 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Scott, J. F., Salje, E. K. H. & Carpenter, M. A. Domain wall damping and elastic softening in SrTiO3: evidence for polar twin walls. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 187601 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Frenkel, Y. et al. Imaging and tuning polarity at SrTiO3 domain walls. Nat. Mater. 16, 1203–1208 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Joshua, A., Pecker, S., Ruhman, J., Altman, E. & Ilani, S. A universal critical density underlying the physics of electrons at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Nat. Commun. 3, 1129 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Nagaosa, N., Sinova, J., Onoda, S., MacDonald, A. H. & Ong, N. P. Anomalous Hall effect. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539–1592 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Cao, Y. et al. Anomalous orbital structure in a spinel–perovskite interface. npj Quantum Mater. 1, 16009 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Yazdi-Rizi, M. et al. Infrared ellipsometry study of the confined electrons in a high-mobility γ-Al2O3/SrTiO3 heterostructure. Europhys. Lett. 113, 47005 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Pippard, A. B. Magnetoresistance in Metals (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1989).

  46. 46.

    Coey, J. M. D., Venkatesan, M. & Stamenov, P. Surface magnetism of strontium titanate. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 28, 485001 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Chen, Y. Z. et al. A high-mobility two-dimensional electron gas at the spinel/perovskite interface of γ-Al2O3/SrTiO3. Nat. Commun. 4, 1371 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Christensen, D. V. et al. Controlling the carrier density of SrTiO3-based heterostructures with annealing. Adv. Electron. Mater. 3, 1700026 (2017).

  49. 49.

    Gunkel, F. et al. Thermodynamic ground states of complex oxide heterointerfaces. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 1086–1092 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Schütz, P. et al. Microscopic origin of the mobility enhancement at a spinel/perovskite oxide heterointerface revealed by photoemission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 96, 161409 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge useful discussions with R. Claessen and P. Schütz from the University of Würzburg, J. Levy from Pittsburgh University and Y. Zhang and Y. Gan from the Technical University of Denmark. In addition, we thank C. Bernhard and M. Yazdi for insight into the temperature dependence of the carrier density extracted by infrared ellipsometry. D.V.C. and N.P. were supported by the NICE project, which has received funding from the Independent Research Fund Denmark, grant no. 6111-00145B. L.K. acknowledges support by the Israel Science Foundation founded by the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities (533/15). Y.F. and B.K. were supported by European Research Council grant no. ERC-2014-STG-639792, Israeli Science Foundation grant no. ISF-1281/17, and the QuantERA ERA-NET Cofund in Quantum Technologies (project no. 731473). Y.W.X., Z.Y.C., Y.H. and H.Y.H. acknowledge support from the Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering, under contract no. DE-AC02-76SF00515 (LAO/STO synthesis), and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s EPiQS Initiative through grant GBMF4415 (LAO/STO transport characterization).

Author information




D.V.C., Y.F., N.P. and B.K. initiated this work. D.V.C. performed the transport measurements and prepared the GAO/STO samples. Y.W.X., Z.Y.C., Y.H. and H.Y.H. prepared the LAO/STO samples. D.V.C., Y.F. and B.K. performed the scanning SQUID measurements. D.V.C. and Y.F. performed data analysis. D.V.C., Y.F., A.S., Y.Z.C., L.K., N.P. and B.K. interpreted the data. D.V.C. wrote the manuscript with Y.F. and input from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to N. Pryds or B. Kalisky.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1–13; Supplementary References 1–21

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Christensen, D.V., Frenkel, Y., Chen, Y.Z. et al. Strain-tunable magnetism at oxide domain walls. Nat. Phys. 15, 269–274 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing