Article | Published:

Experimental evidence for ultrafast intermolecular relaxation processes in hydrated biomolecules

Nature Physicsvolume 14pages10621066 (2018) | Download Citation


Cell and gene damage caused by ionizing radiation has been studied for many years. It is accepted that DNA lesions (single- and double-strand breaks, for example) are induced by secondary species such as radicals, ions and the abundant low-energy secondary electrons generated by the primary radiation. Particularly harmful are dense ionization clusters of several ionization processes within a volume typical for the biomolecular system. Here we report the observation of a damage mechanism in the form of a non-local autoionizing process called intermolecular Coulombic decay (ICD). It directly involves DNA constituents or other organic molecules in an aqueous environment. The products are two energetic ions and three reactive secondary electrons that can cause further damage in their vicinity. Hydrogen-bonded complexes that consist of one tetrahydrofuran (THF) molecule—a surrogate of deoxyribose in the DNA backbone—and one water molecule are used as a model system. After electron impact ionization of the water molecule in the inner-valence shell the vacancy is filled by an outer-valence electron. The released energy is transferred across the hydrogen bridge and leads to ionization of the neighbouring THF molecule. This energy transfer from water to THF is faster than the otherwise occurring intermolecular proton transfer. The signature of the ICD reaction is identified in triple-coincidence measurements of both ions and one of the final state electrons. These results could improve the understanding of radiation damage in biological tissue.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Cederbaum, L. S., Zobeley, J. & Tarantelli, F. Giant intermolecular decay and fragmentation of clusters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4778–4781 (1997).

  2. 2.

    Öhrwall, G. et al. Femtosecond interatomic Coulombic decay in free neon clusters: Large lifetime differences between surface and bulk. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 173401 (2004).

  3. 3.

    Schnorr, K. et al. Time-resolved measurement of interatomic Coulombic decay in Ne2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 093402 (2013).

  4. 4.

    Trinter, F. et al. Evolution of interatomic Coulombic decay in the time domain. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 093401 (2013).

  5. 5.

    Marburger, S., Kugeler, O., Hergenhahn, U. & Möller, T. Experimental evidence for interatomic Coulombic decay in Ne clusters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 203401 (2003).

  6. 6.

    Jahnke, T. et al. Experimental observation of interatomic Coulombic decay in neon dimers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 163401 (2004).

  7. 7.

    O’Keeffe, P. et al. The role of the partner atom and resonant excitation energy in interatomic Coulombic decay in rare gas dimers. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 1797–1801 (2013).

  8. 8.

    Trinter, F. et al. Resonant Auger decay driving intermolecular Coulombic decay in molecular dimers. Nature 505, 664–666 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Iskandar, W. et al. Interatomic Coulombic decay as a new source of low energy electrons in slow ion-dimer collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 033201 (2015).

  10. 10.

    Nagaya, al. Interatomic Coulombic decay cascades in multiply excited neon clusters. Nat. Commun. 7, 13477 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Jahnke, T. et al. Ultrafast energy transfer between water molecules. Nat. Phys. 6, 139–142 (2010).

  12. 12.

    Mucke, M. et al. A hitherto unrecognized source of low-energy electrons in water. Nat. Phys. 6, 143–146 (2010).

  13. 13.

    Aziz, E. F., Ottosson, N., Faubel, M., Hertel, I. V. & Winter, B. Interaction between liquid water and hydroxide revealed by core-hole de-excitation. Nature 455, 89–91 (2008).

  14. 14.

    Thürmer, S. et al. On the nature and origin of dicationic, charge-separated species formed in liquid water on X-ray irradiation. Nat. Chem. 5, 590–596 (2013).

  15. 15.

    Boudaïffa, B., Cloutier, P., Hunting, D., Huels, M., & Sanche, L. Resonant formation of DNA strand breaks by low-energy (3 to 20 eV) electrons. Science 287, 1658–1660 2000).

  16. 16.

    Alizadeh, E. & Sanche, L. Precursors of solvated electrons in radiobiological physics and chemistry. Chem. Rev. 112, 5578–5602 (2012).

  17. 17.

    Alizadeh, E., Orlando, T. M. & Sanche, L. Biomolecular damage induced by ionizing radiation: The direct and indirect effects of low-energy electrons on DNA. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 66, 379–398 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Hergenhahn, U. Interatomic and intermolecular Coulombic decay: The early years. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 184, 78–90 (2011).

  19. 19.

    Jahnke., T. Interatomic and intermolecular Coulombic decay: the coming of age story. J. Phys. B 48, 082001 (2015).

  20. 20.

    Stoychev, S. D., Kuleff, A. I., & Cederbaum, L. S. Intermolecular Coulombic decay in small biochemically relevant hydrogen-bonded systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 6817–6824 2011).

  21. 21.

    Auffinger, P., & Westhof, E. Water and ion binding around RNA and DNA (C,G) oligomers. J. Mol. Biol. 300, 1113–1131 2000).

  22. 22.

    Pimblott, S. M. & LaVerne, J. A. Production of low-energy electrons by ionizing radiation. Rad. Phys. Chem. 76, 1244–1247 (2007).

  23. 23.

    Ren, X. et al. An (e, 2e + ion) study of low-energy electron-impact ionization and fragmentation of tetrahydrofuran with high mass and energy resolutions. J. Chem. Phys. 141, 134314 (2014).

  24. 24.

    Ullrich, J. et al. Recoil-ion and electron momentum spectroscopy: reaction-microscopes. Rep. Prog. Phys. 66, 1463 (2003).

  25. 25.

    Ren, X., Jabbour Al Maalouf, E., Dorn, A. & Denifl, S. Direct evidence of two interatomic relaxation mechanisms in argon dimers ionized by electron impact. Nat. Commun. 7, 11093 (2016).

  26. 26.

    Fuss, M. et al. Electron-scattering cross sections for collisions with tetrahydrofuran from 50 to 5000 eV. Phys. Rev. A. 80, 052709 (2009).

  27. 27.

    Collin, J. E. & Conde-Caprace, G. Ionization and dissociation of cyclic ethers by electron impact. Int. J. Mass. Spec. Ion. Phys. 1, 213 (1968).

  28. 28.

    Mayer, P. M. et al. Does tetrahydrofuran ring open upon ionization and dissociation? A TPES and TPEPICO investigation. J. Phys. Chem. A 113, 10923 (2009).

  29. 29.

    Yukikazu, I. & Mason, N. Cross sections for electron collisions with water molecules. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Dat. 34, 1 (2005).

  30. 30.

    Ning, C. G. et al. Experimental and theoretical electron momentum spectroscopic study of the valence electronic structure of tetrahydrofuran under pseudorotation. J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 11078–11087 (2008).

  31. 31.

    Montenegro, E., Scully, S., Wyer, J. A., Senthil, V. & Shah, M. Evaporation, fission and auto-dissociation of doubly charged water. J. Elec. Spec. Rel. Phen. 155, 81–85 (2007).

  32. 32.

    Tan, K. H., Brion, C. E., van der Leeuw, Ph. E. & van der Wiel, M. J. Absolute oscillator strengths (10-60 eV) for the photoabsorption, photoionisation and fragmentation of H2O. Chem. Phys. 29, 299–309 (1978).

Download references


We thank A. I. Kuleff and L. S. Cederbaum as well as W. Y. Baek, V. Dangendorf and H. Rabus for stimulating discussions. X.R. is grateful for support from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) project no. RE 2966/3-1 and from the Thousand Youth Talents Program in China. E.W. acknowledges a fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. A.D.S and A.B.T. acknowledge the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (grant no. 4.1671.2017/4.6). K.G. acknowledges financial support from DFG (FOR 1789).

Author information


  1. Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Germany

    • Xueguang Ren
    • , Enliang Wang
    •  & Alexander Dorn
  2. School of Science, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China

    • Xueguang Ren
  3. Laboratory of Quantum Chemistry, Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk, Russia

    • Anna D. Skitnevskaya
    •  & Alexander B. Trofimov
  4. Favorsky’s Institute of Chemistry, SB RAS, Irkutsk, Russia

    • Alexander B. Trofimov
  5. Theoretische Chemie, Physikalisch-Chemisches Institut, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    • Kirill Gokhberg


  1. Search for Xueguang Ren in:

  2. Search for Enliang Wang in:

  3. Search for Anna D. Skitnevskaya in:

  4. Search for Alexander B. Trofimov in:

  5. Search for Kirill Gokhberg in:

  6. Search for Alexander Dorn in:


X.R. and A.D. conceived, designed and performed the experiments, and analysed the data. E.W., X.R. and A.D. carried out the molecular dynamics simulations. A.D.S, A.B.T. and K.G. conducted the calculations for ionization potentials. X.R., A.D.S. and A.D. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xueguang Ren or Alexander Dorn.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figs. 1–3, Supplementary References

About this article

Publication history