Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Coherently amplified ultrafast imaging using a free-electron interferometer

Abstract

Accessing the low-energy non-equilibrium dynamics of materials and their polaritons with simultaneous high spatial and temporal resolution has been a bold frontier of electron microscopy in recent years. One of the main challenges lies in the ability to retrieve extremely weak signals and simultaneously disentangling the amplitude and phase information. Here we present free-electron Ramsey imaging—a microscopy approach based on light-induced electron modulation that enables the coherent amplification of optical near fields in electron imaging. We provide simultaneous time-, space- and phase-resolved measurements of a micro-drum made from a hexagonal boron nitride membrane, visualizing the sub-cycle dynamics of two-dimensional polariton wavepackets therein. The phase-resolved measurement reveals vortex–anti-vortex singularities on the polariton wavefronts, together with an intriguing phenomenon of a travelling wave mimicking the amplitude profile of a standing wave. Our experiments show a 20-fold coherent amplification of the near-field signal compared with conventional electron near-field imaging, resolving peak field intensities in the order of a few watts per square centimetre, corresponding to field amplitudes of a few kilovolts per metre. As a result, our work paves the way for the spatiotemporal electron microscopy of biological specimens and quantum materials, exciting yet delicate samples that are currently difficult to investigate.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: FERI: utilizing electron modulation for coherently amplified imaging of optical near fields.
Fig. 2: Time- and phase-resolved imaging of polariton wavepackets.
Fig. 3: Intrinsic phonon-polariton properties extracted via FERI: direct measurement of the polariton phase velocity and identification of a vortex–anti-vortex pair.
Fig. 4: Prospects of FERI for precision measurements of weak fields, and comparison between classical and quantum regimes.
Fig. 5: UTEM setup and PELM integration.
Fig. 6: Optimization procedure used in FERI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the key data that support the findings of this study are included in the article and its Supplementary Information. Further datasets and raw measurements are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. García De Abajo, F. J. Optical excitations in electron microscopy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 209–275 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Polman, A., Kociak, M. & García de Abajo, F. J. Electron-beam spectroscopy for nanophotonics. Nat. Mater. 18, 1158–1171 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Charles Roques-Carmes, S. E. et al. Free-electron–light interactions in nanophotonics. Appl. Phys. Rev. 10, 011303 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gover, A. et al. Superradiant and stimulated-superradiant emission of bunched electron beams. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 35003 (2019).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Shiloh, R. et al. Miniature light-driven nanophotonic electron acceleration and control. Adv. Opt. Photonics 14, 862–932 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schönenberger, N. et al. Generation and characterization of attosecond microbunched electron pulse trains via dielectric laser acceleration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 264803 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Black, D. S. et al. Net acceleration and direct measurement of attosecond electron pulses in a silicon dielectric laser accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 264802 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Barwick, B., Flannigan, D. J. & Zewail, A. H. Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy. Nature 462, 902–906 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Piazza, L. et al. Simultaneous observation of the quantization and the interference pattern of a plasmonic near-field. Nat. Commun. 6, 6407 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, K. et al. Coherent interaction between free electrons and a photonic cavity. Nature 582, 50–54 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kfir, O. et al. Controlling free electrons with optical whispering-gallery modes. Nature 582, 46–49 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kurman, Y. et al. Spatiotemporal imaging of 2D polariton wave packet dynamics using free electrons. Science 372, 1181–1186 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Madan, I. et al. Holographic imaging of electromagnetic fields via electron-light quantum interference. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav8358 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurman, Y. et al. Dynamics of optical vortices in van der Waals materials. Optica 10, 612–618 (2023).

  15. Yannai, M. et al. Ultrafast electron microscopy of nanoscale charge dynamics in semiconductors. ACS Nano 17, 3645–3656 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Madan, I. et al. Charge dynamics electron microscopy: nanoscale imaging of femtosecond plasma dynamics. ACS Nano 17, 3657–3665 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Feist, A. et al. Quantum coherent optical phase modulation in an ultrafast transmission electron microscope. Nature 521, 200–203 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Priebe, K. E. et al. Attosecond electron pulse trains and quantum state reconstruction in ultrafast transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Photon. 11, 793–797 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Karnieli, A., Rivera, N., Arie, A. & Kaminer, I. The coherence of light is fundamentally tied to the quantum coherence of the emitting particle. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf8096 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Echternkamp, K. E., Feist, A., Schäfer, S. & Ropers, C. Ramsey-type phase control of free-electron beams. Nat. Phys. 12, 1000–1004 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ryabov, A. & Baum, P. Electron microscopy of electromagnetic waveforms. Science 353, 374–377 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Morimoto, Y. & Baum, P. Diffraction and microscopy with attosecond electron pulse trains. Nat. Phys. 14, 252–256 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ryabov, A., Thurner, J. W., Nabben, D., Tsarev, M. V. & Baum, P. Attosecond metrology in a continuous-beam transmission electron microscope. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb1393 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nabben, D., Kuttruff, J., Stolz, L., Ryabov, A. & Baum, P. Attosecond electron microscopy of sub-cycle optical dynamics. Nature 619, 63–67 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramsey, N. F. A molecular beam resonance method with separated oscillating fields. Phys. Rev. 78, 695–699 (1950).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Qiu, D. et al. Recent advances in 2D superconductors. Adv. Mater. 33, 2006124 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cremons, D. R., Plemmons, D. A. & Flannigan, D. J. Femtosecond electron imaging of defect-modulated phonon dynamics. Nat. Commun. 7, 11230 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, Y. & Flannigan, D. J. Imaging nanometer phonon softening at crystal surface steps with 4D ultrafast electron microscopy. Nano Lett. 21, 7332–7338 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Basov, D. N., Fogler, M. M. & Garcia de Abajo, F. J. Polaritons in van der Waals materials. Science 354, aag1992 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Caldwell, J. D. et al. Sub-diffractional volume-confined polaritons in the natural hyperbolic material hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Commun. 5, 5221 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Li, P. et al. Hyperbolic phonon-polaritons in boron nitride for near-field optical imaging and focusing. Nat. Commun. 6, 7507 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vered, Y. & Bucher, I. Experimental multimode traveling waves identification in an acoustic waveguide. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 153, 107515 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ramsey, N. Molecular Beams (Oxford Univ. Press, 1956).

  34. Ip, E., Lau, A. P., Barros, D. J. & Kahn, J. M. Coherent detection in optical fiber systems. Opt. Express 16, 753–791 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bucher, T. et al. Free-electron Ramsey-type interferometry for enhanced amplitude and phase imaging of nearfields. Sci. Adv. 9, eadi5729 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ostrovsky, E., Cohen, K., Tsesses, S., Gjonaj, B. & Bartal, G. Nanoscale control over optical singularities. Optica 5, 283–288 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. García De Abajo, F. J., Asenjo-Garcia, A. & Kociak, M. Multiphoton absorption and emission by interaction of swift electrons with evanescent light fields. Nano Lett. 10, 1859–1863 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Park, S. T., Lin, M. & Zewail, A. H. Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy (PINEM): theoretical and experimental. New J. Phys. 12, 123028 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Davis, T. J. et al. Ultrafast vector imaging of plasmonic skyrmion dynamics with deep subwavelength resolution. Science 368, eaba6415 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yao, Z. et al. Nanoimaging and nanospectroscopy of polaritons with time resolved s-SNOM. Adv. Opt. Mater. 8, 1901042 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nishida, J. et al. Ultrafast infrared nano-imaging of far-from-equilibrium carrier and vibrational dynamics. Nat. Commun. 13, 1083 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lundeberg, M. B. et al. Tuning quantum nonlocal effects in graphene plasmonics. Science 357, 187–191 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Yuan, Z. et al. Extremely confined acoustic phonon polaritons in monolayer-hBN/metal heterostructures for strong light-matter interactions. ACS Photonics 7, 2610–2617 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sheinfux, H. H. et al. High-quality nanocavities through multimodal confinement of hyperbolic polaritons in hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Mater. 23, 499–505 (2024).

  45. Iyikanat, F., Konečná, A. & De Abajo, F. J. G. Nonlinear tunable vibrational response in hexagonal boron nitride. ACS Nano 15, 13415–13426 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Flannigan, D. J., Barwick, B. & Zewail, A. H. Biological imaging with 4D ultrafast electron microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9933–9937 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Egerton, R. F. Radiation damage to organic and inorganic specimens in the TEM. Micron 119, 72–87 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Basov, D. N., Averitt, R. D. & Hsieh, D. Towards properties on demand in quantum materials. Nat. Mater. 16, 1077–1088 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Liu, X. & Hersam, M. C. 2D materials for quantum information science. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 669–684 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kfir, O. Entanglements of electrons and cavity photons in the strong-coupling regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 103602 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Di Giulio, V., Kociak, M. & de Abajo, F. J. G. Probing quantum optical excitations with fast electrons. Optica 6, 1524–1534 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Di Giulio, V. & Javier García de Abajo, F. Electron diffraction by vacuum fluctuations. New J. Phys. 22, 103057 (2020).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  53. Adiv, Y. et al. Observation of 2D Cherenkov radiation. Phys. Rev. X. 13, 011002 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhao, Z., Sun, X. Q. & Fan, S. Quantum entanglement and modulation enhancement of free-electron-bound-electron interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 233402 (2021).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  55. Lanin, A. A., Voronin, A. A., Fedotov, A. B. & Zheltikov, A. M. Time-domain spectroscopy in the mid-infrared. Sci. Rep. 4, 6670 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Wu, Y. et al. Enhanced thermal conduction by surface phonon-polaritons. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb4461 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. Karnieli, A. et al. Quantum sensing of strongly coupled light-matter systems using free electrons. Sci. Adv. 9, eadd2349 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Liu, S. et al. Single crystal growth of millimeter-sized monoisotopic hexagonal boron nitride. Chem. Mater. 30, 6222–6225 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. Soille, P. Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications 49–88 (Springer, 1999).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work, especially the development and installation of the PELM, are part of the SMART-electron project that has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 964591. Measurements were conducted in the UTEM laboratory (I.K.) in the electron microscopy centre (MIKA) in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Technion. We acknowledge the Hellen Diller Quantum Center for supporting this research. The experimental effort is funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, through grant GBMF11473 to I.K. A.N. acknowledges funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) through project P500PT_214469. S.T. acknowledges generous support from the Adams fellowship of the Israeli Academy of Science and Humanities; the Yad Hanadiv foundation through the Rothschild fellowship; the VATAT-Quantum fellowship by the Israel Council for Higher Education; the Helen Diller Quantum Center post-doctoral fellowship; and the Viterbi fellowship of the Technion—Israel Institute of Technology. F.H.L.K. acknowledges support from the government of Spain (PID2019-106875GB-I00; Severo Ochoa CEX2019-000910-S [MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033], PCI2021-122020-2A funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033), the “European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR (PRTR-C17.I1), Fundació Cellex, Fundació Mir-Puig, and Generalitat de Catalunya (CERCA, AGAUR, 2021 SGR 01443)”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

These authors contributed equally: T.B., H.N., H.H.S. and R.R. The sample fabrication was done by H.H.S. The hBN crystals were grown by E.J. and J.H.E. The measurements were performed by H.N., A.N., R.D., Y.A. and M.Y. The theory was developed by R.R., T.B., Q.Y. and J.C. The data analysis was performed by T.B. and R.R. The design and installation of the PELM in the electron microscope was performed by R.D., S.T.P., D.J.M. and G.M.V. The experiment was designed by T.B., H.H.S., H.N., A.N., S.T., Y.A., M.Y., R.D. and I.K. The work was supervised by F.C., G.B., F.H.L.K, G.M.V. and I.K. All authors contributed substantially to the analysis, discussion and writing of this work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hanan Herzig Sheinfux or Ido Kaminer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Photonics thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Reference non-uniformity correction.

(a) Energy filtered measurement with light induced only on the reference interaction. (b,c) Amplitude reconstruction for weak \({g}_{s}\) without (b) and with (c) correction. All the images are normalized to be between 0 and 1 such that the features are visible.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Phonon-polariton amplitude and phase reconstruction for different illumination intensities compared to conventional PINEM imaging.

Data acquired using three different average interaction strengths over the entire image: \(\left|{g}_{s}\right|\approx 0.4,\,0.8,\,1.4\), top to bottom, respectively. (a) conventional PINEM amplitude imaging for the three different interaction strengths and for different energy filtering (10 eV slit width, cutoff energy is marked at the bottom of each image), acquired for the same time-delay. (b) FERI amplitude imaging for the same electron dose on the sample. As predicted by theory (Fig. 4 of the main text), the largest amplification is seen for the weakest interaction strength. The right column shows FERI phase images for the different interaction strengths.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Sample images.

(a,b) TEM images of the investigated hBN flake. The experimental results shown in the main text could be reproduced in different windows of the flake, however, the highlighted window (b) gave the best coupling efficiency and thus strongest signal. (c) Electron diffraction pattern of the hBN flake highlighted in (b), confirming that the whole flake is mono-crystalline. (d) Optical microscope image of the investigated hBN flake. Different colors correspond to different hBN thicknesses and are formed due to optical interference in the hBN and substrate. The investigated window shows a uniform thickness.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Image post-processing revealing the phonon-polaritons properties.

(a) The relative phase scan produces the FERI tilted raw measurements which are used to reconstruct the amplitude and phase (b). (c1-4) The process for the ellipse estimation: (c1) convert the amplitude reconstructed image to black and white by thresholding. (c2-3) perform morphological image processing59. (c4) estimate the ellipse equation through connected component analysis. (d) Perform an affine transformation on the reconstructed images using the inverse of the estimated ellipse equation.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Sections 1–4.

Supplementary Video 1

Phonon-polariton PINEM delay scan in the hBN micro-drum. Each frame in this video corresponds to an energy-filtered electron image. The delay between the laser pulse impinging on the sample and the electron probe pulse is increased for each frame by 50 fs. This allows us to construct the time evolution of the phonon-polariton dynamics, showcasing the ‘hopping’ effect discussed in the main text.

Supplementary Video 2

Phonon-polariton PINEM delay scan in the hBN micro-drum. Each frame in this video corresponds to an energy-filtered electron image. The delay between the laser pulse impinging on the sample and the electron probe pulse is increased for each frame by 10 fs. This allows us to construct the time evolution of the phonon-polariton dynamics, showcasing the ‘hopping’ effect discussed in the main text.

Supplementary Video 3

FERI phase scans of phonon polaritons in the hBN micro-drum. Each frame in this video corresponds to an energy-filtered electron image. The video is a scan over the sample–reference relative phase for gs,max = 1.4 using sub-cycle delay steps, allowing one to reconstruct the phase of the field at the sample. The reconstruction is based on the FERI optimization expression discussed in Methods.

Supplementary Video 4

FERI phase scans of phonon polaritons in the hBN micro-drum. Each frame in this video corresponds to an energy-filtered electron image. The video is a scan over the sample–reference relative phase for gs,max = 0.8 using sub-cycle delay steps, allowing one to reconstruct the phase of the field at the sample. The reconstruction is based on the FERI optimization expression discussed in Methods.

Supplementary Video 5

FERI phase scans of phonon polaritons in the hBN micro-drum. Each frame in this video corresponds to an energy-filtered electron image. The video is a scan over the sample–reference relative phase for gs,max = 0.4 using sub-cycle delay steps, allowing one to reconstruct the phase of the field at the sample. The reconstruction is based on the FERI optimization expression discussed in Methods.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bucher, T., Nahari, H., Herzig Sheinfux, H. et al. Coherently amplified ultrafast imaging using a free-electron interferometer. Nat. Photon. 18, 809–815 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-024-01451-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-024-01451-w

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing