Abstract
Inverse-designed silicon photonic metastructures offer an efficient platform to perform analogue computations with electromagnetic waves. However, due to computational difficulties, scaling up these metastructures to handle a large number of data channels is not trivial. Furthermore, a typical inverse-design procedure is limited to a small computational domain and therefore tends to employ resonant features to achieve its objectives. This results in structures that are narrow-bandwidth and highly sensitive to fabrication errors. Here we employ a two-dimensional (2D) inverse-design method based on the effective index approximation with a low-index contrast constraint. This results in compact amorphous lens systems that are generally feed-forward and low-resonance. We designed and experimentally demonstrated a vector–matrix product for a 2 × 2 matrix and a 3 × 3 matrix. We also designed a 10 × 10 matrix using the proposed 2D computational method. These examples demonstrate that these techniques have the potential to enable larger-scale wave-based analogue computing platforms.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data for Figs. 2–4 are available via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10083901 (ref. 39).
Code availability
All codes produced during this research are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Cordaro, A. et al. Solving integral equations in free-space with inverse-designed ultrathin optical metagratings. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 365–372 (2023).
Nikkhah, V., Tzarouchis, D. C., Hoorfar, A. & Engheta, N. Inverse-designed metastructures together with reconfigurable couplers to compute forward scattering. ACS Photonics 10, 977–985 (2022).
Silva, A. et al. Performing mathematical operations with metamaterials. Science 343, 160–163 (2014).
Mohammadi Estakhri, N., Edwards, B. & Engheta, N. Inverse-designed metastructures that solve equations. Science 363, 1333–1338 (2019).
Zhang, H. et al. An optical neural chip for implementing complex-valued neural network. Nat. Commun. 12, 457 (2021).
Camacho, M., Edwards, B. & Engheta, N. A single inverse-designed photonic structure that performs parallel computing. Nat. Commun. 12, 1466 (2021).
Fu, W. et al. Ultracompact meta-imagers for arbitrary all-optical convolution. Light Sci. Appl. 11, 62 (2022).
Pan, D. et al. Laplace metasurfaces for optical analog computing based on quasi-bound states in the continuum. Photon. Res. 9, 1758–1766 (2021).
Zangeneh-Nejad, F., Sounas, D. L., Alù, A. & Fleury, R. Analogue computing with metamaterials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 207–225 (2021).
Zhu, T. et al. Plasmonic computing of spatial differentiation. Nat. Commun. 8, 15391 (2017).
Pors, A., Nielsen, M. G. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Analog computing using reflective plasmonic metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 15, 791–797 (2015).
Wang, H. et al. Design of compact meta-crystal slab for general optical convolution. ACS Photonics 9, 1358–1365 (2022).
Choutagunta, K., Roberts, I., Miller, D. A. & Kahn, J. M. Adapting Mach–Zehnder mesh equalizers in direct-detection mode-division-multiplexed links. J. Light. Technol. 38, 723–735 (2019).
Knill, E., Laflamme, R. & Milburn, G. J. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature 409, 46–52 (2001).
Nikkhah, V., Mencagli, M. J. & Engheta, N. Reconfigurable nonlinear optical element using tunable couplers and inverse-designed structure. Nanophotonics 12, 3019–3027 (2023).
Wang, T. et al. An optical neural network using less than 1 photon per multiplication. Nat. Commun. 13, 123 (2022).
Shastri, B. J. et al. Photonics for artificial intelligence and neuromorphic computing. Nat. Photon. 15, 102–114 (2021).
Shen, Y. et al. Deep learning with coherent nanophotonic circuits. Nat. Photon. 11, 441–446 (2017).
Lin, X. et al. All-optical machine learning using diffractive deep neural networks. Science 361, 1004–1008 (2018).
Feldmann, J. et al. Parallel convolutional processing using an integrated photonic tensor core. Nature 589, 52–58 (2021).
Wang, H., Guo, C., Zhao, Z. & Fan, S. Compact incoherent image differentiation with nanophotonic structures. ACS Photonics 7, 338–343 (2020).
Zhu, T. et al. Topological optical differentiator. Nat. Commun. 12, 680 (2021).
Goh, H. & Alù, A. Nonlocal scatterer for compact wave-based analog computing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 073201 (2022).
Farhat, N. H. Photonic neural networks and learning machines. IEEE Expert 7, 63–72 (1992).
Wetzstein, G. et al. Inference in artificial intelligence with deep optics and photonics. Nature 588, 39–47 (2020).
Miller, D. A. Self-configuring universal linear optical component. Photon. Res. 1, 1–15 (2013).
Bogaerts, W. et al. Programmable photonic circuits. Nature 586, 207–216 (2020).
Clements, W. R., Humphreys, P. C., Metcalf, B. J., Kolthammer, W. S. & Walmsley, I. A. Optimal design for universal multiport interferometers. Optica 3, 1460–1465 (2016).
Tzarouchis, D. C., Mencagli, M. J., Edwards, B. & Engheta, N. Mathematical operations and equation solving with reconfigurable metadevices. Light Sci. Appl. 11, 263 (2022).
Bendsoe, M. P. & Sigmund, O. Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications (Springer, 2004).
Molesky, S. et al. Inverse design in nanophotonics. Nat. Photon. 12, 659–670 (2018).
Hughes, T. W., Minkov, M., Williamson, I. A. & Fan, S. Adjoint method and inverse design for nonlinear nanophotonic devices. ACS Photonics 5, 4781–4787 (2018).
Hammer, M. & Ivanova, O. V. Effective index approximations of photonic crystal slabs: a 2-to-1-D assessment. Opt. Quantum Electron. 41, 267–283 (2009).
Knox, R. & Toulios, P. Integrated circuits for the millimeter through optical frequency range. Proc. Symp. Submillimeter Waves 20, 497–515 (1970).
Chiang, K. S. Analysis of optical fibers by the effective-index method. Appl. Opt. 25, 348–354 (1986).
Hocker, G. B. & Burns, W. K. Mode dispersion in diffused channel waveguides by the effective index method. Appl. Opt. 16, 113–118 (1977).
Van De Velde, K., Thienpont, H. & Van Geen, R. Extending the effective index method for arbitrarily shaped inhomogeneous optical waveguides. J. Light. Technol. 6, 1153–1159 (1988).
COMSOL Multiphysics v. 5.6 (COMSOL; 2023); www.comsol.com
Nikkhah, V. et al. Replication data for ‘Inverse-designed low-index-contrast structures on silicon photonics platform for vector-matrix multiplication’ (Zenodo, 2023); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10083901
Acknowledgements
This work is supported in part by the US Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) grant no. FA9550-21-1-0312 (to N.E.) and in part by the US Office of Naval Research (ONR) grant no. N00014-19-1-2248 (to F. Aflatouni.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.E., F. Aflatouni. and B.E. conceived the idea, envisioned the experiments and supervised the project. V.N. conducted theoretical analysis, numerical simulations and inverse-design of the structures. A.P., F. Ashtiani. and B.E. prepared the designs for nanofabrication by the Advanced Micro Foundry (AMF) and designed the experiments. A.P. performed the experiments and collected data. All authors reviewed, studied and discussed the experimental and numerical simulation results, and discussed the main outcomes of the project. V.N. prepared the first draft of the main text and the Supplementary Information. All authors subsequently worked on the manuscript up to its completion for submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Photonics thanks Yannick Salamin and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–6, Discussion and Table 1.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Nikkhah, V., Pirmoradi, A., Ashtiani, F. et al. Inverse-designed low-index-contrast structures on a silicon photonics platform for vector–matrix multiplication. Nat. Photon. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-024-01394-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-024-01394-2
This article is cited by
-
Diffractive optical computing in free space
Nature Communications (2024)