Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Quantum-size-tuned heterostructures enable efficient and stable inverted perovskite solar cells

Nature Photonics volume 16, pages 352–358 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The energy landscape of reduced-dimensional perovskites (RDPs) can be tailored by adjusting their layer width (n). Recently, two/three-dimensional (2D/3D) heterostructures containing n = 1 and 2 RDPs have produced perovskite solar cells (PSCs) with >25% power conversion efficiency (PCE). Unfortunately, this method does not translate to inverted PSCs due to electron blocking at the 2D/3D interface. Here we report a method to increase the layer width of RDPs in 2D/3D heterostructures to address this problem. We discover that bulkier organics form 2D heterostructures more slowly, resulting in wider RDPs; and that small modifications to ligand design induce preferential growth of n ≥ 3 RDPs. Leveraging these insights, we developed efficient inverted PSCs (with a certified quasi-steady-state PCE of 23.91%). Unencapsulated devices operate at room temperature and around 50% relative humidity for over 1,000 h without loss of PCE; and, when subjected to ISOS-L3 accelerated ageing, encapsulated devices retain 92% of initial PCE after 500 h.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Quasi-2D treatment and its effect on RDP distribution.
Fig. 2: Comparison of 2D and quasi-2D treatments using different 2D ligands.
Fig. 3: Formation of quasi-2D perovskite capping layers from density functional theory.
Fig. 4: Quantifying the conduction band offset of 2D and quasi-2D surface treatments.
Fig. 5: Carrier extraction and performance of quasi-2D-treated PSCs.

Data availability

Source data are provided with this paper. All the data supporting the findings of this study are available within this article and its Supplementary Information. Any additional information can be obtained from corresponding authors upon request.

References

  1. Yuan, M. et al. Perovskite energy funnels for efficient light-emitting diodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 872–877 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wei, M. et al. Ultrafast narrowband exciton routing within layered perovskite nanoplatelets enables low-loss luminescent solar concentrators. Nat. Energy 4, 197–205 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Proppe, A. H. et al. Synthetic control over quantum well width distribution and carrier migration in low-dimensional perovskite photovoltaics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 2890–2896 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Quan, L. N. et al. Ligand-stabilized reduced-dimensionality perovskites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 2649–2655 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jung, E. H. et al. Efficient, stable and scalable perovskite solar cells using poly(3-hexylthiophene). Nature 567, 511–515 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Min, H. et al. Efficient, stable solar cells by using inherent bandgap of α-phase formamidinium lead iodide. Science 366, 749–753 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeong, M. et al. Stable perovskite solar cells with efficiency exceeding 24.8% and 0.3-V voltage loss. Science 369, 1615–1620 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang, Q. et al. Surface passivation of perovskite film for efficient solar cells. Nat. Photonics 13, 460–466 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu, H. et al. Tailored amphiphilic molecular mitigators for stable perovskite solar cells with 23.5% efficiency. Adv. Mater. 32, 1907757 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, Y. et al. Ultrahydrophobic 3D/2D fluoroarene bilayer-based water-resistant perovskite solar cells with efficiencies exceeding 22%. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw2543 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, G. et al. Impact of strain relaxation on performance of α-formamidinium lead iodide perovskite solar cells. Science 370, 108–112 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeong, J. et al. Pseudo-halide anion engineering for α-FAPbI3 perovskite solar cells. Nature 592, 381–385 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Teale, S. et al. Dimensional mixing increases the efficiency of 2D/3D perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 5115–5119 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoo, J. J. et al. An interface stabilized perovskite solar cell with high stabilized efficiency and low voltage loss. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 2192–2199 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu, Y. et al. Hybrid perovskite/perovskite heterojunction solar cells. ACS Nano 10, 5999–6007 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Proppe, A. H. et al. Multication perovskite 2D/3D interfaces form via progressive dimensional reduction. Nat. Commun. 12, 3472 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jang, Y. W. et al. Intact 2D/3D halide junction perovskite solar cells via solid-phase in-plane growth. Nat. Energy 6, 63–71 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, T. et al. Stable and efficient 3D-2D perovskite-perovskite planar heterojunction solar cell without organic hole transport layer. Joule 2, 2706–2721 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bai, S. et al. Planar perovskite solar cells with long-term stability using ionic liquid additives. Nature 571, 245–250 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin, Y. H. et al. A piperidinium salt stabilizes efficient metal-halide perovskite solar cells. Science 369, 96–102 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zheng, X. et al. Managing grains and interfaces via ligand anchoring enables 22.3%-efficiency inverted perovskite solar cells. Nat. Energy 5, 131–140 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, S., Xiao, X., Gu, H. & Huang, J. Iodine reduction for reproducible and high-performance perovskite solar cells and modules. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe8130 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen, C. et al. Arylammonium-assisted reduction of the open-circuit voltage deficit in wide-bandgap perovskite solar cells: the role of suppressed ion migration. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 2560–2568 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bai, Y. et al. Dimensional engineering of a graded 3D–2D halide perovskite interface enables ultrahigh Voc enhanced stability in the p-i-n photovoltaics. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1701038 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Park, S. M., Abtahi, A., Boehm, A. M. & Graham, K. R. Surface ligands for methylammonium lead iodide films: surface coverage, energetics, and photovoltaic performance. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 799–806 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. La-Placa, M. G. et al. Vacuum-deposited 2D/3D perovskite heterojunctions. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 2893–2901 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao, T., Chueh, C.-C., Chen, Q., Rajagopal, A. & Jen, A. K.-Y. Defect passivation of organic–inorganic hybrid perovskites by diammonium iodide toward high-performance photovoltaic devices. ACS Energy Lett. 1, 757–763 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Proppe, A. H. et al. Photochemically cross-linked quantum well ligands for 2D/3D perovskite photovoltaics with improved photovoltage and stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 14180–14189 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mahmud, M. A. et al. Double‐sided surface passivation of 3D perovskite film for high‐efficiency mixed‐dimensional perovskite solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1907962 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Burgelman, M., Nollet, P. & Degrave, S. Modelling polycrystalline semiconductor solar cells. Thin Solid Films 361–362, 527–532 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou, L. et al. Highly efficient and stable planar perovskite solar cells with modulated diffusion passivation toward high power conversion efficiency and ultrahigh fill factor. Sol. RRL 3, 1900293 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cao, D. H., Stoumpos, C. C., Farha, O. K., Hupp, J. T. & Kanatzidis, M. G. 2D homologous perovskites as light-absorbing materials for solar cell applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 7843–7850 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ma, J. & Wang, L. W. Nanoscale charge localization induced by random orientations of organic molecules in hybrid perovskite CH3NH3PbI3. Nano Lett. 15, 248–253 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Quintero-Bermudez, R. et al. Compositional and orientational control in metal halide perovskites of reduced dimensionality. Nat. Mater. 17, 900–907 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hu, J. et al. Synthetic control over orientational degeneracy of spacer cations enhances solar cell efficiency in two-dimensional perovskites. Nat. Commun. 10, 1276 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Niu, T. et al. Interfacial engineering at the 2D/3D heterojunction for high-performance perovskite solar cells. Nano Lett. 19, 7181–7190 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gharibzadeh, S. et al. Record open‐circuit voltage wide‐bandgap perovskite solar cells utilizing 2D/3D perovskite heterostructure. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1803699 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Briggs, D. & Seah, M. P. (eds) Practical Surface Analysis. Auger and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy 2nd edn, Vol. 1 (Wiley, 1990).

  39. Boehm, A. M., Liu, T., Park, S. M., Abtahi, A. & Graham, K. R. Influence of surface ligands on energetics at FASnI3/C60 interfaces and their impact on photovoltaic performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 5209–5218 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yoshida, H. Near-ultraviolet inverse photoemission spectroscopy using ultra-low energy electrons. Chem. Phys. Lett. 539–540, 180–185 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Boehm, A. M., Wieser, J., Butrouna, K. & Graham, K. R. A new photon source for ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy of organic and other damage-prone materials. Org. Electron. 41, 9–16 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Endres, J. et al. Valence and conduction band densities of states of metal halide perovskites: a combined experimental–theoretical study. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 2722–2729 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. She, X. J. et al. A solvent-based surface cleaning and passivation technique for suppressing ionic defects in high-mobility perovskite field-effect transistors. Nat. Electron. 3, 694–703 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kirchartz, T., Márquez, J. A., Stolterfoht, M. & Unold, T. Photoluminescence‐based characterization of halide perovskites for photovoltaics. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1904134 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhou, M., Sarmiento, J. S., Fei, C. & Wang, H. Charge transfer and diffusion at the perovskite/PCBM interface probed by transient absorption and reflection. J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 22095–22103 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Proppe, A. H. et al. Spectrally resolved ultrafast exciton transfer in mixed perovskite quantum wells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 419–426 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Shao, Y., Yuan, Y. & Huang, J. Correlation of energy disorder and open-circuit voltage in hybrid perovskite solar cells. Nat. Energy 1, 15001 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen, W. et al. Efficient and stable large-area perovskite solar cells with inorganic charge extraction layers. Science 350, 944–948 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ma, F. et al. Nickel oxide for inverted structure perovskite solar cells. J. Energy Chem. 52, 393–411 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Boyd, C. C. et al. Overcoming redox reactions at perovskite–nickel oxide interfaces to boost voltages in perovskite solar cells. Joule 4, 1759–1775 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sutanto, A. A. et al. Dynamical evolution of the 2D/3D interface: a hidden driver behind perovskite solar cell instability. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 2343–2348 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Khenkin, M. V. et al. Consensus statement for stability assessment and reporting for perovskite photovoltaics based on ISOS procedures. Nat. Energy 5, 35–49 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Lu, H. et al. Vapor-assisted deposition of highly efficient, stable black-phase FAPbI3 perovskite solar cells. Science 370, eabb8985 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Chen, H. et al. Efficient and stable inverted perovskite solar cells incorporating secondary amines. Adv. Mater. 31, 1903559 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Chen, H. et al. Band alignment towards high-efficiency NiOx-based Sn-Pb mixed perovskite solar cells. Sci. China Mater. 64, 537–546 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Ilavsky, J. Nika: software for two-dimensional data reduction. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 45, 324–328 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Jiang, Z. GIXSGUI: a MATLAB toolbox for grazing-incidence X-ray scattering data visualization and reduction, and indexing of buried three-dimensional periodic nanostructured films. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 48, 917–926 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Sader, J. E. et al. Spring constant calibration of atomic force microscope cantilevers of arbitrary shape. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 103705 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. Sader, J. E., Lu, J. & Mulvaney, P. Effect of cantilever geometry on the optical lever sensitivities and thermal noise method of the atomic force microscope. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 113702 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was made possible by the US Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Research Grant (N00014-20-1-2572). This work was supported in part by the Ontario Research Fund-Research Excellence program (ORF7-Ministry of Research and Innovation, Ontario Research Fund-Research Excellence Round 7). We appreciate the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (beamline 14B and 16B) and X. Gao and Z. Su for their help with GIWAXS characterization. Z.N. is grateful for support by the National Key Research Program (2021YFA0715502, 2016YFA0204000) and the National Science Fund of China (61935016). S.M.P., H.R.A. and K.R.G. acknowledge the US Department of Energy under Grant DE-SC0018208 for supporting the UPS and IPES measurements. T.F. and T.C. acknowledge the Canadian Foundation for Innovation and the Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC) for KPFM measurements. F.L and Y.G. were funded by the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) Office of Sponsored Research (OSR) under Award No: OSR-CARF/CCF-3079 and OSR-2018-CRG7-3737.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yi Hou

    Present address: Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

  2. These authors contributed equally: Hao Chen, Sam Teale, Bin Chen, Yi Hou.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Edward S. Rogers Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Hao Chen, Sam Teale, Bin Chen, Yi Hou, Luke Grater, Tong Zhu, Koen Bertens, So Min Park, Mingyang Wei, Andrew K. Johnston, Eui Hyuk Jung, Chun Zhou, Andrew H. Proppe, Sjoerd Hoogland & Edward H. Sargent

  2. School of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China

    Hao Chen, Qilin Zhou, Kaimin Xu, Danni Yu, Congcong Han, Wenjia Zhou & Zhijun Ning

  3. Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

    So Min Park, Harindi R. Atapattu & Kenneth R. Graham

  4. KAUST Solar Center, Physical Sciences and Engineering Division (PSE), Materials Science and Engineering Program (MSE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    Yajun Gao & Frédéric Laquai

  5. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Teng Cui & Tobin Filleter

Authors
  1. Hao Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sam Teale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yi Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Luke Grater
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tong Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Koen Bertens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. So Min Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Harindi R. Atapattu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yajun Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Mingyang Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Andrew K. Johnston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Qilin Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Kaimin Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Danni Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Congcong Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Teng Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Eui Hyuk Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Chun Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Wenjia Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Andrew H. Proppe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Sjoerd Hoogland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Frédéric Laquai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Tobin Filleter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Kenneth R. Graham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Zhijun Ning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Edward H. Sargent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.C., S.T., B.C. and Y.H. conceived the idea. H.C., K.B., L.G. and S.T. prepared samples for characterization. S.M.P. and H.R.A. performed UPS and IPES measurements, and S.M.P., H.R.A., S.T. and K.R.G. analysed the data. S.T. performed the TA experiments and analysed the data with Y.G. and F.L. The in situ TA system for use in this paper was developed by S.T., A.K.J. and A.H.P. The in situ measurements were performed by S.T. who also analysed the data. T.Z. performed the DFT calculations and analysed the data. B.C. performed PLQY measurements and H.C. measured the PL lifetimes. M.W. carried out the transient photocurrent and photovoltage measurements and S.T. analysed the data. S.T. performed SCAPS simulations. S.T. collected the thin-film X-ray diffraction patterns. C.H. and D.Y. performed the GIWAXS experiments and obtained the SEM images. S.T. and B.C. analysed the data. The KPFM measurements were performed by T.C., and T.F. analysed the data. H.C. and W.Z. carried out the SCLC measurements and S.T. analysed the data. S.T. conducted the c-AFM measurements. H.C. fabricated all the devices for performance and certification, B.C. and S.H. helped with device certification. B.C. built the heated MPP-tracking station. Q.Z., K.X. and C.Z. carried out the UPS on bulk 2D films. Z.N. and E.H.S. supervised and funded the work. S.T. wrote the draft manuscript with input from B.C. and E.H.S. All authors contributed to the revision of the final paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhijun Ning or Edward H. Sargent.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Photonics thanks Mohammad Khaja Nazeeruddin, Ling Xu the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Text 1–6 and Figs. 1–46.

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Unprocessed UPS data for bulk 2D perovskite films.

Source Data Fig. 2

Unprocessed TA and in situ TA data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Coordinates from DFT calculations.

Source Data Fig. 4

Unprocessed IPES data from 2D/3D heterostructures.

Source Data Fig. 5

Normalized PL lifetimes and transient photocurrent data. Device J–V and stability data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Teale, S., Chen, B. et al. Quantum-size-tuned heterostructures enable efficient and stable inverted perovskite solar cells. Nat. Photon. 16, 352–358 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-022-00985-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-022-00985-1

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing