Demonstration of sub-3 ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector


Improvements in temporal resolution of single-photon detectors enable increased data rates and transmission distances for both classical and quantum optical communication systems, higher spatial resolution in laser ranging, and observation of shorter-lived fluorophores in biomedical imaging. In recent years, superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs) have emerged as the most efficient time-resolving single-photon-counting detectors available in the near-infrared, but understanding of the fundamental limits of timing resolution in these devices has been limited due to a lack of investigations into the timescales involved in the detection process. We introduce an experimental technique to probe the detection latency in SNSPDs and show that the key to achieving low timing jitter is the use of materials with low latency. By using a specialized niobium nitride SNSPD we demonstrate that the system temporal resolution can be as good as 2.6 ± 0.2 ps for visible wavelengths and 4.3 ± 0.2 ps at 1,550 nm.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Wavelength and bias current dependence of intrinsic detection latency and jitter as well as the effect of electrical noise jitter.
Fig. 2: Low-jitter SNSPD.
Fig. 3: Bias current dependence of the jitter, normalized PCR and relative detection latency.
Fig. 4: Wavelength dependence of the jitter.
Fig. 5: Few-photon scanning laser-ranging with sub-millimetre depth resolution.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Gol’tsman, G. N. et al. Picosecond superconducting single-photon optical detector. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 705–707 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Marsili, F. et al. Detecting single infrared photons with 93% system efficiency. Nat. Photon. 7, 210–214 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Reddy, D. V. et al. Exceeding 95% system efficiency within the telecom C-band in superconducting nanowire single photon detectors. In Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics FF1A.3 (OSA, 2019).

  4. 4.

    Vetter, A. et al. Cavity-enhanced and ultrafast superconducting single-photon detectors. Nano Lett. 16, 7085–7092 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wollman, E. E. et al. A kilopixel array of superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Opt. Express 27, 35279–35289 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Slichter, D. H. et al. UV-sensitive superconducting nanowire single photon detectors for integration in an ion trap. Opt. Express 25, 8705–8720 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wollman, E. E. et al. UV superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with high efficiency, low noise, and 4 K operating temperature. Opt. Express 25, 26792–26801 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Chen, L. et al. Mid-infrared laser-Induced fluorescence with nanosecond time resolution using a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector: new technology for molecular science. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 1400–1409 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Shalm, L. K. et al. Strong loophole-free test of local realism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250402 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Takesue, H. et al. Quantum key distribution over a 40-dB channel loss using superconducting single-photon detectors. Nat. Photon. 1, 343–348 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yin, H. L. et al. Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution over a 404 km optical fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190501 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Boaron, A. et al. Secure quantum key distribution over 421 km of optical fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 190502 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bussières, F. et al. Quantum teleportation from a telecom-wavelength photon to a solid-state quantum memory. Nat. Photon. 8, 775–778 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Takesue, H. et al. Quantum teleportation over 100 km of fiber using MoSi superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Optica 2, 832–835 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Valivarthi, R. et al. Quantum teleportation across a metropolitan fibre network. Nat. Photon. 10, 676–680 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    McCarthy, A. et al. Kilometre-range, high resolution depth imaging using 1560 nm wavelength single-photon detection. Opt. Express 21, 8904–8915 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Grein, M. E. et al. Design of a ground-based optical receiver for the lunar laser communications demonstration. In Int. Conf. Space Optical Systems and Applications 78–82 (IEEE, 2011).

  18. 18.

    Hadfield, R. H. Single-photon detectors for optical quantum information applications. Nat. Photon. 3, 696–705 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Becker, W. Advanced Time-Correlated Single Photon Counting Techniques (Springer, 2005).

  20. 20.

    Wu, J. et al. Improving the timing jitter of a superconducting nanowire single-photon detection system. Appl. Opt. 56, 2195–2200 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sidorova, M. et al. Physical mechanisms of timing jitter in photon detection by current-carrying superconducting nanowires. Phys. Rev. B 96, 184504 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Caloz, M. et al. High-detection efficiency and low-timing jitter with amorphous superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 061103 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sidorova, M. et al. Timing jitter in photon detection by straight superconducting nanowires: effect of magnetic field and photon flux. Phys. Rev. B 98, 134504 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zhao, Q.-Y. et al. Single-photon imager based on a superconducting nanowire delay line. Nat. Photon. 11, 247–251 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Calandri, N., Zhao, Q. Y., Zhu, D., Dane, A. & Berggren, K. K. Superconducting nanowire detector jitter limited by detector geometry. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 152601 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zhu, D. et al. Superconducting nanowire single-photon detector with integrated impedance-matching taper. Appl. Phys. Lett. 114, 042601 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Smirnov, K. V. et al. Rise time of voltage pulses in NbN superconducting single photon detectors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 052601 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Vodolazov, D. Yu. Single-photon detection by a dirty current-carrying superconducting strip based on the kinetic-equation approach. Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 034014 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Vodolazov, D. Yu. Minimal timing jitter in superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 014016 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Allmaras, J. P., Kozorezov, A. G., Korzh, B. A., Berggren, K. K. & Shaw, M. D. Intrinsic timing jitter and latency in superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 034062 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhang, J. et al. Time delay of resistive-state formation in superconducting stripes excited by single optical photons. Phys. Rev. B 67, 132508 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Cahall, C. et al. Multi-photon detection using a conventional superconducting nanowire single-photon detector. Optica 4, 1534–1535 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kozorezov, A. G. et al. Fano fluctuations in superconducting-nanowire single-photon detectors. Phys. Rev. B 96, 054507 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Dane, A. E. et al. Bias sputtered NbN and superconducting nanowire devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 122601 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Caloz, M. et al. Intrinsically-limited timing jitter in molybdenum silicide superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. J. Appl. Phys. 126, 164501 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wu, H., Gu, C., Cheng, Y. & Hu, X. Vortex-crossing-induced timing jitter of superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 062603 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Nolet, F. et al. Quenching circuit and SPAD integrated in CMOS 65 nm with 7.8 ps FWHM single photon timing resolution. Instruments 2, 19 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Amri, E., Boso, G., Korzh, B. & Zbinden, H. Temporal jitter in free-running InGaAs/InP single-photon avalanche detectors. Opt. Lett. 41, 5728–5731 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wang, X. et al. Oscilloscopic capture of greater-than-100 GHz, ultra-low power optical waveforms enabled by integrated electro-optic devices. J. Light. Technol. 38, 166–173 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ferrari, S., Schuck, C. & Pernice, W. Waveguide-integrated superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Nanophotonics 7, 1725–1758 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Pernice, W. H. P. et al. High-speed and high-efficiency travelling wave single-photon detectors embedded in nanophotonic circuits. Nat. Commun. 3, 1325 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Akhlaghi, M. K., Atikian, H., Eftekharian, A., Loncar, M. & Hamed Majedi, A. Reduced dark counts in optimized geometries for superconducting nanowire single photon detectors. Opt. Express 20, 23610–23616 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ho Eom, B., Day, P. K., LeDuc, H. G. & Zmuidzinas, J. A wideband, low-noise superconducting amplifier with high dynamic range. Nat. Phys. 8, 623–627 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    McCaughan, A. N. & Berggren, K. K. A superconducting-nanowire three-terminal electrothermal device. Nano Lett. 14, 5748–5753 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kerman, A., Yang, J., Molnar, R., Dauler, E. & Berggren, K. Electrothermal feedback in superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Phys. Rev. B 79, 100509 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Clem, J. R. & Berggren, K. K. Geometry-dependent critical currents in superconducting nanocircuits. Phys. Rev. B 84, 174510 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Frasca, S. et al. Determining the depairing current in superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Phys. Rev. B 100, 054520 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Part of the research was performed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Support for this work was provided in part by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Defense Sciences Office, through the Detect programme and the National Science Foundation under grant number ECCS-1509486. E.A.B., A.E.D., G.M.C. and J.P.A. acknowledge partial support from the NASA Space Technology Research Fellowship programme. E.R. acknowledges support from the MARC-U*STAR programme. D.Z. acknowledges support from the A*STAR National Science Scholarship. M.S., S.X. and C.P. acknowledge partial and N.S. full support from the Alliance for Quantum Technologies’ (AQT) Intelligent Quantum Networks and Technologies (INQNET) research programme. M.S., C.P. and S.X. acknowledge partial support from the Department of Energy, High Energy Physics QuantISED programme grant, QCCFP (Quantum Communication Channels for Fundamental Physics), award number DE-SC0019219. C.P. acknowledges partial support from the Fermilab’s Lederman Fellowship. We thank P. Day, B. Putnam, D. Santavicca, J. Breffke, W. Becker and W. Rippard for valuable discussions and loan of measurement equipment as well as JPL and Caltech staff for technical support. The use of trade names is intended to allow the measurements to be appropriately interpreted and does not imply endorsement by the US government, nor does it imply these are necessarily the best available for the purpose used here.

Author information




B.K. and Q.-Y.Z. conceived and designed the experiments. B.K., Q.-Y.Z., S.F., J.P.A., E.R., E.A.B., M.J.S., T.M.A., G.M., M.C., C.P., N.S., A.E.V., V.B.V., S.X., D.Z. and A.E.D. performed the experiments. B.K., S.F. and J.P.A. analysed the data. J.P.A. carried out the simulations. B.K., Q.-Y.Z., S.F., E.A.B., T.G., M.J.S., T.M.A., G.M., M.C., A.D.B., B.B., R.M.B., C.P., N.S., A.E.L., A.E.V., V.B.V., S.X., D.Z., A.E.D., E.E.W., G.M.C., J.P.A., J.D.R., P.D.H., K.L.S., R.P.M., M.S., S.W.N., F.M., A.G.K., M.D.S. and K.K.B. contributed materials/analysis tools. B.K., Q.-Y.Z., J.P.A. and M.D.S. wrote the paper with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Korzh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Temperature dependence of the jitter.

a,b, Jitter (a) and normalized photon count rate (b) as a function of bias current for the 80 nm-wide nanowire measured with 1550 nm light at different operating temperatures between 0.9 K and 4 K. At 4 K, a shift of about 5 ps in the timing jitter was measured in the 11–13 µA range. The switching current drops below 14 µA at 4 K due to the elevated temperature, making jitter measurements above this current impossible at this temperature. It was independently verified that the shape of the electrical pulse and the level of the amplifier noise were independent of the operating temperature. The presence of this reduction in the timing jitter at higher temperatures is an indication that the intrinsic jitter mechanism is being observed.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Experimental setup for relative latency and jitter characterization.

To investigate the photon energy dependence of jitter and detection latency, we used a 0.5 mm-long, periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN) second harmonic generation (SHG) crystal to frequency double a 1550 nm mode-locked laser (0.5 ps nominal pulse width) to 775 nm. After the crystal, the light was collimated and free-space coupled into the cryostat through a series of glass windows in the vacuum chamber and the heat shields at 40 K and 4 K, flood illuminating the device under test. The polarization of the light was orientated parallel to the nanowire (TE polarization). The optical intensity was controlled with a circular, metallic variable neutral-density filter. This configuration ensured that the converted 775 nm light and the unconverted 1550 nm light co-propagated via the same path through the optical setup. It was calculated that the 775 nm pulse was delayed by 1.1 ± 0.1 ps, relative to the 1550 nm light, due to chromatic dispersion in the optical elements after the SHG crystal. All detection latency results presented in this work have been corrected for this offset. After generation, filters were used to select the 1550 nm or 775 nm wavelength illumination. A synchronization signal was generated by splitting a fraction of the 1550 nm pump light with a fibre coupler and sending it onto a fast photodetector. We verified that the SNSPDs were operating in the single-photon detection regime by characterizing the detection rate as a function of incident optical power at different bias currents and operating in the range yielding linear dependence.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Relative latency and jitter measurements with WSi.

a, The PCR curves and b, corresponding relative latency between 775 nm and 1550 nm light detections for a 160 nm-wide WSi detector with the same design as the NbN detectors. The film thickness was 3.5 nm giving a critical temperature of 3.4 K and a room temperature sheet resistance of 422 Ω□-1. The depairing current (Idep) was estimated to be 14.1 μA by fabricating resonator devices, just as for NbN devices. A switching current of about 11.5 μA was achieved with the low jitter device, which is >0.8Idep. This means that the WSi and NbN devices are similar in terms of uniformity, since they achieve similar fractions of the depairing current. The relative latency increases from 12 ps to 80 ps when decreasing bias current from 0.78Idep to 0.43Idep, while the 120 nm-wide NbN device resulted in approximately 6 ps and 23 ps at comparable fractions of the depairing current. Due to the larger intrinsic latency in the WSi device, the resulting jitter is also larger as illustrated in c. At a bias current of 11.0 μA the jitter is 7.7 ps and 16.2 ps for 775 nm and 1550 nm light, respectively, while for the 120 nm NbN device the corresponding jitter is 4.5 ps (775 nm) and 7.7 ps (1550 nm) at the same fraction of the depairing current.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Slew rate independence on illumination wavelength.

SNSPD signal rising edge slope as a function of bias current for the 100 nm nanowire. Data for the 775 nm and 1550 nm illuminations show that the pulse signal pulse shape is independent of photon energy. The slope changes with bias current because the signal amplitude increases with the bias current flowing in the SNSPD.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Few-photon laser ranging demonstration.

Table-top few-photon laser ranging setup based on a 1064 nm mode-locked laser and a low jitter SNSPD. The scanner used coaxial alignment of the transmit and return beam, using a circulator based on a polarizing beam splitter and a quarter wave-plate.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Time of arrival histograms with a translating mirror.

By replacing the target with a translating mirror a, shows the resulting instrument response function fit with the mirror at different positions, demonstrating that an accurate time of arrival can be extracted. The full system jitter was 6.2 ps. The mirror position was swept and the laser pulse return time was extracted by using either the first b, 1000 detected photons or c, 20 detected photons. Using fewer photons increases the position uncertainty, however, millimetre accuracy is still possible even with 20 detected photons.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Notes 1–3, Figs. 1–4 and Table 1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korzh, B., Zhao, Q., Allmaras, J.P. et al. Demonstration of sub-3 ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector. Nat. Photonics 14, 250–255 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing