Abstract
Distributed quantum metrology can enhance the sensitivity for sensing spatially distributed parameters beyond the classical limits. Here we demonstrate distributed quantum phase estimation with discrete variables to achieve Heisenberg limit phase measurements. Based on parallel entanglement in modes and particles, we demonstrate distributed quantum sensing for both individual phase shifts and an averaged phase shift, with an error reduction up to 1.4 dB and 2.7 dB below the shot-noise limit. Furthermore, we demonstrate a combined strategy with parallel mode entanglement and multiple passes of the phase shifter in each mode. In particular, our experiment uses six entangled photons with each photon passing the phase shifter up to six times, and achieves a total number of photon passes N = 21 at an error reduction up to 4.7 dB below the shot-noise limit. Our research provides a faithful verification of the benefit of entanglement and coherence for distributed quantum sensing in general quantum networks.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Code availability
The code used for modelling the data is available from F.X. on reasonable request.
References
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S. & Maccone, L. Quantum-enhanced measurements: beating the standard quantum limit. Science 306, 1330–1336 (2004).
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S. & Maccone, L. Advances in quantum metrology. Nat. Photon. 5, 222–229 (2011).
Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F. & Cappellaro, P. Quantum sensing. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017).
Braun, D. et al. Quantum-enhanced measurements without entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035006 (2018).
Kok, P., Lee, H. & Dowling, J. P. Creation of large-photon-number path entanglement conditioned on photodetection. Phys. Rev. A 65, 052104 (2002).
Walther, P. et al. De Broglie wavelength of a non-local four-photon state. Nature 429, 158–161 (2004).
Mitchell, M. W., Lundeen, J. S. & Steinberg, A. M. Super-resolving phase measurements with a multiphoton entangled state. Nature 429, 161–164 (2004).
Nagata, T., Okamoto, R., O’Brien, J. L., Sasaki, K. & Takeuchi, S. Beating the standard quantum limit with four-entangled photons. Science 316, 726–729 (2007).
Resch, K. J. et al. Time-reversal and super-resolving phase measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 223601 (2007).
Higgins, B. L., Berry, D. W., Bartlett, S. D., Wiseman, H. M. & Pryde, G. J. Entanglement-free Heisenberg-limited phase estimation. Nature 450, 393–396 (2007).
Gao, W.-B. et al. Experimental demonstration of a hyper-entangled ten-qubit Schrödinger cat state. Nat. Phys. 6, 331–335 (2010).
Bell, B. et al. Multicolor quantum metrology with entangled photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 093603 (2013).
Slussarenko, S. et al. Unconditional violation of the shot-noise limit in photonic quantum metrology. Nat. Photon. 11, 700–703 (2017).
Schnabel, R., Mavalvala, N., McClelland, D. E. & Lam, P. K. Quantum metrology for gravitational wave astronomy. Nat. Commun. 1, 121 (2010).
Aasi, J. et al. Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light. Nat. Photon. 7, 613–619 (2013).
Humphreys, P. C., Barbieri, M., Datta, A. & Walmsley, I. A. Quantum enhanced multiple phase estimation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 070403 (2013).
Pérez-Delgado, C. A., Pearce, M. E. & Kok, P. Fundamental limits of classical and quantum imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 123601 (2012).
Polino, E., Valeri, M., Spagnolo, N. & Sciarrino, F. Photonic quantum metrology. AVS Quant. Sci. 2, 024703 (2020).
Komar, P. et al. A quantum network of clocks. Nat. Phys. 10, 582–587 (2014).
Chen, J.-Y., Pandurangan, G. & Xu, D. Robust computation of aggregates in wireless sensor networks: Distributed randomized algorithms and analysis. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 17, 987–1000 (2006).
Dimakis, A. D. G., Sarwate, A. D. & Wainwright, M. J. Geographic gossip: efficient averaging for sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 56, 1205–1216 (2008).
Zhuang, Q., Zhang, Z. & Shapiro, J. H. Distributed quantum sensing using continuous-variable multipartite entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 97, 032329 (2018).
Guo, X. et al. Distributed quantum sensing in a continuous-variable entangled network. Nat. Phys. 16, 281–284 (2020).
Xia, Y. et al. Demonstration of a reconfigurable entangled radio-frequency photonic sensor network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 150502 (2020).
Ge, W., Jacobs, K., Eldredge, Z., Gorshkov, A. V. & Foss-Feig, M. Distributed quantum metrology with linear networks and separable inputs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 043604 (2018).
Proctor, T. J., Knott, P. A. & Dunningham, J. A. Multiparameter estimation in networked quantum sensors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 080501 (2018).
Gessner, M., Pezzè, L. & Smerzi, A. Sensitivity bounds for multiparameter quantum metrology. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 130503 (2018).
Oh, C., Lee, C., Lie, S. H. & Jeong, H. Optimal distributed quantum sensing using Gaussian states. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023030 (2020).
Juffmann, T., Klopfer, B. B., Frankort, T. L., Haslinger, P. & Kasevich, M. A. Multi-pass microscopy. Nat. Commun. 7, 12858 (2016).
Hou, Z. et al. Control-enhanced sequential scheme for general quantum parameter estimation at the Heisenberg limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 040501 (2019).
Xiang, G.-Y., Higgins, B. L., Berry, D., Wiseman, H. M. & Pryde, G. Entanglement-enhanced measurement of a completely unknown optical phase. Nat. Photon. 5, 43–47 (2011).
Berni, A. A. et al. Ab initio quantum-enhanced optical phase estimation using real-time feedback control. Nat. Photon. 9, 577–581 (2015).
Daryanoosh, S., Slussarenko, S., Berry, D. W., Wiseman, H. M. & Pryde, G. J. Experimental optical phase measurement approaching the exact Heisenberg limit. Nat. Commun. 9, 4606 (2018).
Helstrom, C. W. Quantum detection and estimation theory. J. Stat. Phys. 1, 231–252 (1969).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development (R&D) Plan of China (2018YFB0504300 and 2018YFA0306501), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11425417, 61771443 and U1738140), the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (2019SHZDZX01), the Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Shanghai Science and Technology Development Funds (18JC1414700).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
F.X., Y.-A.C. and J.-W.P. conceived the research and designed the experiments. L.-Z.L., F.X. and Y.-A.C. designed and characterized the multiphoton optical circuits. L.-Z.L., Z.-D.L., R.Z., X.-F.Y., Y.-Y.F., L.L. and N.-L.L carried out the experiments. L.-Z.L., R.Z. and Y.-A.C. analysed the data. Y.-Z.Z. and F.X. performed the theory calculations. L.-Z.L., Y.-Z.Z., F.X., Y.-A.C. and J.-W.P. wrote the manuscript, with input from all authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information
Nature Photonics thanks Xueshi Guo and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Experimental results for the parallel strategies of MsPe for mode 2 and mode 3.
a,c, The average outcome probability in the measurement basis σx⊗2, for two-photon entangled states (2′5′ and 4′6 respectively). Blue (orange) lines represent the average outcome probability P+2′5′ and P+4′6 (P+2′5′ and P+4′6) for mode 2 and mode 3. b,d, The fisher information per trial, fitted from \({P}_{2^{\prime} 5^{\prime} }\) and \({P}_{4^{\prime} 6}\) for MsPs, respectively. The shaded areas correspond to the 90% confidence region, derived from uncertainty in the fitting parameters. Error bars are calculated from measurement statistics and too small to be visible. Red dot-dashed line: the theoretical limit for MePs. Blue dashed line: the theoretical limit of MsPe. Black dotted line: the theoretical value of the SNL for MsPs.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, LZ., Zhang, YZ., Li, ZD. et al. Distributed quantum phase estimation with entangled photons. Nat. Photonics 15, 137–142 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-00718-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-00718-2
This article is cited by
-
Distributed quantum sensing of multiple phases with fewer photons
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Verifying the security of a continuous variable quantum communication protocol via quantum metrology
npj Quantum Information (2024)
-
Variational quantum algorithm for experimental photonic multiparameter estimation
npj Quantum Information (2024)
-
Conference key agreement in a quantum network
npj Quantum Information (2023)
-
Experimental metrology beyond the standard quantum limit for a wide resources range
npj Quantum Information (2023)