High-efficiency organic solar cells with low non-radiative recombination loss and low energetic disorder

Abstract

Energy loss within organic solar cells (OSCs) is undesirable as it reduces cell efficiency1,2,3,4. In particular, non-radiative recombination loss3 and energetic disorder5, which are closely related to the tail states below the band edge and the overall photon energy loss, need to be minimized to improve cell performance. Here, we report how the use of a small-molecule acceptor with torsion-free molecular conformation can achieve a very low degree of energetic disorder and mitigate energy loss in OSCs. The resulting single-junction OSC has an energy loss due to non-radiative recombination of just 0.17 eV and a high power conversion efficiency of up to 16.54% (certified as 15.89% by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory). The findings take studies of organic photovoltaics deeper into a new regime, beyond the limits of energetic disorder and large energy offset for charge generation.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Photon energy loss analysis in solar cells.
Fig. 2: Chemical structure of the polymer donor and small-molecular acceptor used in this study and optical properties of the absorbers.
Fig. 3: Photovoltaic characterization.
Fig. 4: Sensitive EQE measurements, analysis of energetic disorder and dependence of EL spectra on injection current densities.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Raw data essential to the work are available online as Source Data files.

Code availability

Computer code used to generate results (to calculate the spontaneous emission rate, simulate maximum open-circuit voltage, generate fits to the spectral features in EL spectra) for this study is available from the corresponding author (H.W.) upon request.

References

  1. 1.

    Hou, J. H., Inganas, O., Friend, R. H. & Gao, F. Organic solar cells based on non-fullerene acceptors. Nat. Mater. 17, 119–128 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Qian, D. P. et al. Design rules for minimizing voltage losses in high-efficiency organic solar cells. Nat. Mater. 17, 703–709 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kirchartz, T. & Rau, U. What makes a good solar cell? Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1703385 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Yao, J. Z. et al. Quantifying losses in open-circuit voltage in solution-processable solar cells. Phys. Rev. Appl. 4, 014020 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Venkateshvaran, D. et al. Approaching disorder-free transport in high-mobility conjugated polymers. Nature 515, 384–388 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zhang, S., Qin, Y., Zhu, J. & Hou, J. Over 14% efficiency in polymer solar cells enabled by a chlorinated polymer donor. Adv. Mater. 30, 1800868 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yuan, J. et al. Single-junction organic solar cell with over 15% efficiency using fused-ring acceptor with electron-deficient core. Joule 3, 1140–1151 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cui, Y. et al. Over 16% efficiency organic photovoltaic cells enabled by a chlorinated acceptor with increased open-circuit voltages. Nat. Commun. 10, 2515 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fan, B. et al. Achieving over 16% efficiency for single-junction organic solar cells. Sci. China Chem. 62, 746–752 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Meng, L. X. et al. Organic and solution-processed tandem solar cells with 17.3% efficiency. Science 361, 1094–1098 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yoshikawa, K. et al. Silicon heterojunction solar cell with interdigitated back contacts for a photoconversion efficiency over 26%. Nat. Energy 2, 17032 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Liu, Z. F. et al. Open-circuit voltages exceeding 1.26 V in planar methylammonium lead iodide perovskite solar cells. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 110–117 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Cheng, P., Li, G., Zhan, X. W. & Yang, Y. Next-generation organic photovoltaics based on non-fullerene acceptors. Nat. Photon. 12, 131–142 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Gruber, M. et al. Thermodynamic efficiency limit of molecular donor–acceptor solar cells and its application to diindenoperylene/C60-based planar heterojunction devices. Adv. Energy Mater. 2, 1100–1108 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liu, J. et al. Fast charge separation in a non-fullerene organic solar cell with a small driving force. Nat. Energy 1, 16089 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Blakesley, J. C. & Neher, D. Relationship between energetic disorder and open-circuit voltage in bulk heterojunction organic solar cells. Phys. Rev. B 84, 075210 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Craciun, N. I., Wildeman, J. & Blom, P. W. M. Universal Arrhenius temperature activated charge transport in diodes from disordered organic semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 056601 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Garcia-Belmonte, G. et al. Influence of the intermediate density-of-states occupancy on open-circuit voltage of bulk heterojunction solar cells with different fullerene acceptors. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 2566–2571 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Collins, S. D., Proctor, C. M., Ran, N. A. & Nguyen, T.-Q. Understanding open-circuit voltage loss through the density of states in organic bulk heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1501721 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Garcia-Belmonte, G. & Bisquert, J. Open-circuit voltage limit caused by recombination through tail states in bulk heterojunction polymer-fullerene solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 113301 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kuik, M., Koster, L. J. A., Wetzelaer, G. A. H. & Blom, P. W. M. Trap-assisted recombination in disordered organic semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 256805 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Xie, S. K. et al. Effects of nonradiative losses at charge transfer states and energetic disorder on the open-circuit voltage in nonfullerene organic solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1705659 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    He, Z. et al. Single-junction polymer solar cells with high efficiency and photovoltage. Nat. Photon. 9, 174–179 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ran, N. A. et al. Harvesting the full potential of photons with organic solar cells. Adv. Mater. 28, 1482–1488 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhang, Z. H. et al. Conformation locking on fused-ring electron acceptor for high performance nonfullerene organic solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1705095 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wang, Y. M. et al. Optical gaps of organic solar cells as a reference for comparing voltage losses. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1801352 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Rau, U. Reciprocity relation between photovoltaic quantum efficiency and electroluminescent emission of solar cells. Phys. Rev. B 76, 085303 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Rau, U., Blank, B., Müller, T. C. M. & Kirchartz, T. Efficiency potential of photovoltaic materials and devices unveiled by detailed-balance analysis. Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 044016 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Markvart, T. Solar cell as a heat engine: energy–entropy analysis of photovoltaic conversion. Phys. Stat. Sol. 205, 2752–2756 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Miller, O. D., Yablonovitch, E. & Kurtz, S. R. Strong internal and external luminescence as solar cells approach the Shockley–Queisser limit. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2, 303–311 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Nikolis, V. C. et al. Reducing voltage losses in cascade organic solar cells while maintaining high external quantum efficiencies. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1700855 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ullbrich, S. et al. Emissive and charge-generating donor–acceptor interfaces for organic optoelectronics with low voltage losses. Nat. Mater. 18, 459–464 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Azzouzi, M. et al. Nonradiative energy losses in bulk-heterojunction organic photovoltaics. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031055 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kirchartz, T., Pieters, B. E., Kirkpatrick, J., Rau, U. & Nelson, J. Recombination via tail states in polythiophene:fullerene solar cells. Phys. Rev. B 83, 115209 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kirchartz, T. & Nelson, J. Meaning of reaction orders in polymer:fullerene solar cells. Phys. Rev. B 86, 165201 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Urbach, F. The long-wavelength edge of photographic sensitivity and of the electronic absorption of solids. Phys. Rev. 92, 1324–1324 (1953).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Gong, W. et al. Influence of energetic disorder on electroluminescence emission in polymer:fullerene solar cells. Phys. Rev. B 86, 024201 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Vandewal, K., Tvingstedt, K., Gadisa, A., Inganäs, O. & Manca, J. V. Relating the open-circuit voltage to interface molecular properties of donor:acceptor bulk heterojunction solar cells. Phys. Rev. B 81, 125204–125211 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Menke, S. M. et al. Order enables efficient electron–hole separation at an organic heterojunction with a small energy loss. Nat. Commun. 9, 277 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hörmann, U. et al. Quantification of energy losses in organic solar cells from temperature-dependent device characteristics. Phys. Rev. B 88, 235307 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

H.W. thanks the National Natural Science Foundation of China for financial support (no. 51521002). Y.Z. acknowledges the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21875286), the National Key Research & Development Projects of China (no. 2017YFA0206600) and the Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hunan Province (2017JJ1029). Z.H. acknowledges the National Natural Science Foundation of China for financial support (nos. 51622302 and 21733005). We thank T. Song and H. Meng for solar cell performance verification, J. Zhang for acquiring GIWAXS analysis and B. Xiao for temperature-dependent current–voltage characteristics measurements. We thank S. Bilson for proof reading.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.Z. and H.W. conceived the idea. S.L. fabricated and characterized the devices. Y.Z., J.Y. and M.L. designed the molecule structure of the electron acceptor, and J.Y. and M.L. synthesized the compound. W.D. and S.L. performed sensitive EQE, EL, photoluminescence and temperature-dependent photovoltage/photocurrent characteristics measurements. W.D. carried out analysis of the EL spectra and temperature-dependent photovoltage characteristics, and carried out the transient absorption measurements. Y.X. determined the optical gap, the energy of the charge transfer states of the absorbers and carried out IQE measurements. J.Y. performed morphological characterization. Q.L. performed transient photovoltage and transient photocurrent measurements. S.L. and Z.H. prepared and brought samples to NIM for certification. S.L. coordinated solar cells performance verification at NREL and prepared the samples. H.W., Y.Z. and Y.C. coordinated the project. H.W. and Y.Z. wrote the manuscript, while all authors contributed to data analysis, interpretation and discussion of the results.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yingping Zou or Hongbin Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 The context page of test report by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).

a, The test summary for a champion cell (#892-b) tested under the initial asymptotic scan. The asymptotic scan was measured through holding the device at the bias near the maximal power condition. b, The test summary for the cell tested in the second round asymptotic scan. c, The test summary for the cell tested under the standard sweep condition. Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Photon energy loss analysis on the devices investigated in this study.

Device parameters of representative devices from various photovoltaic material systems in literature are also included for comparison.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–18, Tables 1 and 2, and references.

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data Fig. 2

Absorbance spectra Source Data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Current density–voltage (JV) characteristics and EQE spectra Source Data of the best-performing OSCs.

Source Data Fig. 4

The measured EL spectrum, the experimental EQE spectrum and the deduced EQE spectrum determined from the EL spectrum Source Data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Test report by NREL Source Data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, S., Yuan, J., Deng, W. et al. High-efficiency organic solar cells with low non-radiative recombination loss and low energetic disorder. Nat. Photonics 14, 300–305 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0573-5

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing