Broadband continuous single-mode tuning of a short-cavity quantum-cascade VECSEL

Article metrics

Abstract

Changing the length of a laser cavity is a simple technique for continuously tuning the wavelength of a laser but is rarely used for broad fractional tuning, with a notable exception of the vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL)1,2. This is because, to avoid mode hopping, the cavity must be kept optically short to ensure a large free spectral range compared to the gain bandwidth of the amplifying material. Terahertz quantum-cascade lasers are ideal candidates for such a short cavity scheme as they demonstrate exceptional gain bandwidths (up to octave spanning)3 and can be integrated with broadband amplifying metasurfaces4. We present such a quantum-cascade metasurface-based vertical-external-cavity surface-emitting laser (VECSEL) that exhibits over 20% continuous fractional tuning of a single laser mode. Such tuning is possible because the metasurface has subwavelength thickness, which allows lasing on low-order Fabry–Pérot cavity modes. Good beam quality and high output power are simultaneously obtained.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Metasurface cavity design and electromagnetic simulations.
Fig. 2: Measurement results on longitudinal mode m = 4 with 19% fractional tuning at 77 K.
Fig. 3: Measurement results on longitudinal mode m = 2 with 25% fractional tuning at 77 K.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Wu, M. S., Vail, E. C., Li, G. S., Yuen, W. & Chang-Hasnain, C. J. Tunable micromachined vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser. Electron. Lett. 31, 1671–1672 (1995).

  2. 2.

    Huang, M. C. Y., Zhou, Y. & Chang-Hasnain, C. J. A nanoelectromechanical tunable laser. Nat. Photon. 2, 180–184 (2008).

  3. 3.

    Rosch, M., Scalari, G., Beck, M. & Faist, J. Octave-spanning semiconductor laser. Nat. Photon. 9, 42–47 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Xu, L. Y. et al. Metasurface external cavity laser. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 221105 (2015).

  5. 5.

    Jayaraman, V. et al. OCT imaging up to 760 kHz axial scan rate using single-mode 1310 nm MEMS-tunable VCSELs with >100 nm tuning range. In Conference on Lasers and Electro-optics (CLEO) (IEEE, 2011).

  6. 6.

    Lee, A. W. M., Kao, T. Y., Burghoff, D., Hu, Q. & Reno, J. L. Terahertz tomography using quantum-cascade lasers. Opt. Lett. 37, 217–219 (2012).

  7. 7.

    Coldren, L. A. et al. Tunable semiconductor lasers: a tutorial. J. Light. Technol. 22, 193–202 (2004).

  8. 8.

    Duarte, F. J. Tunable Laser Optics 2nd edn (CRC Press, 2015).

  9. 9.

    Godard, A. Infrared (2–12 μm) solid-state laser sources: a review. C. R. Phys. 8, 1100–1128 (2007).

  10. 10.

    Jayaraman, V., Chuang, Z. M. & Coldren, L. A. Theory, design, and performance of extended tuning range semiconductor-lasers with sampled gratings. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 29, 1824–1834 (1993).

  11. 11.

    Kundu, I. et al. Quasi-continuous frequency tunable terahertz quantum cascade lasers with coupled cavity and integrated photonic lattice. Opt. Express 25, 486–496 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Slivken, S. et al. Sampled grating, distributed feedback quantum cascade lasers with broad tunability and continuous operation at room temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 261112 (2012).

  13. 13.

    Liu, A. Q. & Zhang, X. M. A review of MEMS external-cavity tunable lasers. J. Micromech. Microeng. 17, R1–R13 (2007).

  14. 14.

    Wysocki, G. et al. Widely tunable mode-hop free external cavity quantum cascade lasers for high resolution spectroscopy and chemical sensing. Appl. Phys. B 92, 305–311 (2008).

  15. 15.

    Turitsyn, S. K. et al. Random distributed feedback fibre laser. Nat. Photon. 4, 231–235 (2010).

  16. 16.

    Vijayraghavan, K. et al. Broadly tunable terahertz generation in mid-infrared quantum cascade lasers. Nat. Commun. 4, 2021 (2013).

  17. 17.

    Jayaraman, V., Cole, G. D., Robertson, M., Uddin, A. & Cable, A. High-sweep-rate 1,310 nm MEMS-VCSEL with 150 nm continuous tuning range. Electron. Lett. 48, 867–868 (2012).

  18. 18.

    Qiao, P. F., Cook, K. T., Li, K. & Chang-Hasnain, C. J. Wavelength-swept VCSELs. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 23, 1700516 (2017).

  19. 19.

    Xu, L. Y. et al. Terahertz metasurface quantum-cascade VECSELs: theory and performance. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 23, 1200512 (2017).

  20. 20.

    Hugi, A. et al. External cavity quantum cascade laser tunable from 7.6 to 11.4 μm. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 061103 (2009).

  21. 21.

    Lee, A. W. M., Williams, B. S., Kumar, S., Hu, Q. & Reno, J. L. Tunable terahertz quantum cascade lasers with external gratings. Opt. Lett. 35, 910–912 (2010).

  22. 22.

    Ren, Y. et al. Fast terahertz imaging using a quantum cascade amplifier. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 011107 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Castellano, F. et al. Tuning a microcavity-coupled terahertz laser. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 261108 (2015).

  24. 24.

    Mahler, L., Tredicucci, A., Beltram, F., Beere, H. E. & Ritchie, D. A. Tuning a distributed feedback laser with a coupled microcavity. Opt. Express 18, 19185–19191 (2010).

  25. 25.

    Qin, Q., Williams, B. S., Kumar, S., Reno, J. L. & Hu, Q. Tuning a terahertz wire laser. Nat. Photon. 3, 732–737 (2009).

  26. 26.

    Qin, Q., Reno, J. L. & Hu, Q. MEMS-based tunable terahertz wire-laser over 330 GHz. Opt. Lett. 36, 692–694 (2011).

  27. 27.

    Orlova, E. E. et al. Antenna model for wire lasers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 173904 (2006).

  28. 28.

    Curwen, C. A., Reno, J. L. & Williams, B. S. Terahertz quantum cascade VECSEL with watt-level output power. Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 011104 (2018).

  29. 29.

    Xu, L. Y., Chen, D. G., Itoh, T., Reno, J. L. & Williams, B. S. Focusing metasurface quantum-cascade laser with a near diffraction-limited beam. Opt. Express 24, 24117–24128 (2016).

  30. 30.

    Xu, L. Y., Curwen, C. A., Reno, J. L. & Williams, B. S. High performance terahertz metasurface quantum-cascade VECSEL with an intra-cryostat cavity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 101101 (2017).

  31. 31.

    Burnett, B. A., Pan, A., Chui, C. O. & Williams, B. S. Robust density matrix simulation of terahertz quantum cascade lasers. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 8, 492–501 (2018).

  32. 32.

    Gordon, I. E. et al. The HITRAN2016 molecular spectroscopic database. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 203, 3–69 (2017).

  33. 33.

    Li, L. H. et al. Terahertz quantum cascade lasers with >1 W output powers. Electron. Lett. 50, 309–310 (2014).

  34. 34.

    Amanti, M. I. et al. Bound-to-continuum terahertz quantum cascade laser with a single-quantum-well phonon extraction/injection stage. New J. Phys. 11, 125022 (2009).

  35. 35.

    Williams, B. S., Kumar, S., Hu, Q. & Reno, J. L. Operation of terahertz quantum-cascade lasers at 164 K in pulsed mode and at 117 K in continuous-wave mode. Opt. Express 13, 3331–3339 (2005).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) (1150071, 1407711, 1711892) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (NNX16AC73G). Microfabrication was performed at the UCLA Nanoelectronics Research Facility, and wire bonding was performed at the UCLA Center for High Frequency Electronics. This work was performed, in part, at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, an Office of Science User Facility operated for the US DOE Office of Science. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-mission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, for the US DOE’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA-0003525. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of the US DOE or the United States Government.

Author information

C.A.C. and B.S.W. conceived of the idea. C.A.C. derived the experimental strategy, fabricated the devices, performed the measurements and analysed the data. J.L.R. performed the molecular beam epitaxy growth. C.A.C. and B.S.W. co-wrote the manuscript. All work was done under the supervision of B.S.W.

Correspondence to Benjamin S. Williams.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary details, Figs. 1–6 and refs. 1–4.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark