Article | Published:

Experimental Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement beyond qubits

Nature Photonics (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Quantum entanglement is important for emerging quantum technologies such as quantum computation and secure quantum networks. To boost these technologies, a race is currently ongoing to increase the number of particles in multiparticle entangled states, such as Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger (GHZ) states. An alternative route is to increase the number of entangled quantum levels. Here, we overcome present experimental and technological challenges to create a three-particle GHZ state entangled in three levels for every particle. The resulting qutrit-entangled states are able to carry more information than entangled states of qubits. Our method, inspired by the computer algorithm Melvin, relies on a new multi-port that coherently manipulates several photons simultaneously in higher dimensions. The realization required us to develop a new high-brightness four-photon source entangled in orbital angular momentum. Our results allow qualitatively new refutations of local-realistic world views. We also expect that they will open up pathways for a further boost to quantum technologies.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Shor, P. W. Fault-tolerant quantum computation. In Proc. 37th Conf. Foundations of Computer Science 56–65 (IEEE, 1996).

  2. 2.

    Hillery, M., Bužek, V. & Berthiaume, A. Quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. A 59, 1829–1834 (1999).

  3. 3.

    Greenberger, D. M., Horne, M. A. & Zeilinger, A. in Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe (ed. Kafatos, M.) 69–72 (Springer, The Netherlands, 1989).

  4. 4.

    Greenberger, D. M., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A. & Zeilinger, A. Bell’s theorem without inequalities. Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131–1143 (1990).

  5. 5.

    Krenn, M., Malik, M., Fickler, R., Lapkiewicz, R. & Zeilinger, A. Automated search for new quantum experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 090405 (2016).

  6. 6.

    Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935).

  7. 7.

    Mermin, N. D. Extreme quantum entanglement in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1838–1840 (1990).

  8. 8.

    Monz, T. et al. 14-qubit entanglement: creation and coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 130506 (2011).

  9. 9.

    Bouwmeester, D., Pan, J.-W., Daniell, M., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. Observation of three-photon Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1345–1349 (1999).

  10. 10.

    Pan, J.-W., Bouwmeester, D., Daniell, M., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental test of quantum nonlocality in three-photon Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement. Nature 403, 515 (2000).

  11. 11.

    Wang, X.-L. et al. Experimental ten-photon entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 210502 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Kelly, J. et al. State preservation by repetitive error detection in a superconducting quantum circuit. Nature 519, 66–69 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Song, C. et al. 10-qubit entanglement and parallel logic operations with a superconducting circuit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180511 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Pan, J.-W. et al. Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 777–838 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Ryu, J., Lee, C., Żukowski, M. & Lee, J. Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger theorem for N qudits. Phys. Rev. A 88, 042101 (2013).

  16. 16.

    Ryu, J. et al. Multisetting Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger theorem. Phys. Rev. A 89, 024103 (2014).

  17. 17.

    Lawrence, J. Rotational covariance and Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger theorems for three or more particles of any dimension. Phys. Rev. A 89, 012105 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Tang, W., Yu, S. & Oh, C. Multisetting Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger paradoxes. Phys. Rev. A 95, 012131 (2017).

  19. 19.

    Malik, M. et al. Multi-photon entanglement in high dimensions. Nat. Photon. 10, 248–252 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Hiesmayr, B., De Dood, M. & Löffler, W. Observation of four-photon orbital angular momentum entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 073601 (2016).

  21. 21.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Simultaneous entanglement swapping of multiple orbital angular momentum states of light. Nat. Commun. 8, 632 (2017).

  22. 22.

    Krenn, M., Gu, X. & Zeilinger, A. Quantum experiments and graphs: multiparty states as coherent superpositions of perfect matchings. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240403 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Gu, X., Erhard, M., Zeilinger, A. & Krenn, M. Quantum experiments and graphs II: computation and state generation with probabilistic sources and linear optics. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.10736 (2018).

  24. 24.

    Schlederer, F., Krenn, M., Fickler, R., Malik, M. & Zeilinger, A. Cyclic transformation of orbital angular momentum modes. New J. Phys. 18, 043019 (2016).

  25. 25.

    Babazadeh, A. et al. High-dimensional single-photon quantum gates: concepts and experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180510 (2017).

  26. 26.

    Krenn, M., Hochrainer, A., Lahiri, M. & Zeilinger, A. Entanglement by path identity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 080401 (2017).

  27. 27.

    Allen, L., Beijersbergen, M. W., Spreeuw, R. & Woerdman, J. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre–Gaussian laser modes. Phys. Rev. A 45, 8185 (1992).

  28. 28.

    Mair, A., Vaziri, A., Weihs, G. & Zeilinger, A. Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons. Nature 412, 313–316 (2001).

  29. 29.

    Yao, A. M. & Padgett, M. J. Orbital angular momentum: origins, behavior and applications. Adv. Opt. Photonics 3, 161–204 (2011).

  30. 30.

    Krenn, M., Malik, M., Erhard, M. & Zeilinger, A. Orbital angular momentum of photons and the entanglement of Laguerre–Gaussian modes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 375, 20150442 (2017).

  31. 31.

    Hong, C., Ou, Z.-Y. & Mandel, L. Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044–2046 (1987).

  32. 32.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Engineering two-photon high-dimensional states through quantum interference. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501165 (2016).

  33. 33.

    Miatto, F. et al. Bounds and optimisation of orbital angular momentum bandwidths within parametric downconversion systems. Eur. Phys. J. D 66, 1–6 (2012).

  34. 34.

    Leach, J., Padgett, M. J., Barnett, S. M., Franke-Arnold, S. & Courtial, J. Measuring the orbital angular momentum of a single photon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 257901 (2002).

  35. 35.

    Erhard, M., Malik, M. & Zeilinger, A. A quantum router for high-dimensional entanglement. Quantum Sci. Technol. 2, 014001 (2017).

  36. 36.

    Huber, M. & de Vicente, J. I. Structure of multidimensional entanglement in multipartite systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 030501 (2013).

  37. 37.

    Bavaresco, J. et al. Measurements in two bases are sufficient for certifying high-dimensional entanglement. Nat. Phys. 14, 1032–1037 (2018).

  38. 38.

    Mirhosseini, M., Malik, M., Shi, Z. & Boyd, R. W. Efficient separation of the orbital angular momentum eigenstates of light. Nat. Commun. 4, 2781 (2013).

  39. 39.

    Lawrence, J. Mermin inequalities for perfect correlations in many-qutrit systems. Phys. Rev. A 95, 042123 (2017).

  40. 40.

    Graffitti, F., Kundys, D., Reid, D. T., Brańczyk, A. M. & Fedrizzi, A. Pure down-conversion photons through sub-coherence-length domain engineering. Quantum Sci. Technol. 2, 035001 (2017).

  41. 41.

    Barreiro, J. T., Wei, T.-C. & Kwiat, P. G. Beating the channel capacity limit for linear photonic superdense coding. Nat. Phys. 4, 282–286 (2008).

  42. 42.

    Sheridan, L. & Scarani, V. Security proof for quantum key distribution using qudit systems. Phys. Rev. A 82, 030301 (2010).

  43. 43.

    Bocharov, A., Roetteler, M. & Svore, K. M. Factoring with qutrits: Shor's algorithm on ternary and metaplectic quantum architectures. Phys. Rev. A 96, 012306 (2017).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Lawrence, M. Huber, C. Brukner, A. Hochrainer, R. Fickler, T. Scheidl, F. Steinlechner and X. Gu for fruitful discussions. This work was supported by the Austrian Academy of Sciences (ÖAW), by the European Research Council (SIQS grant no. 600645 EU-FP7-ICT) and the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) with SFB F40 (FOQUS) and FWF project CoQuS no. W1210-N16. M.M. acknowledges support from the European Commission through a Marie Curie fellowship (OAMGHZ) and the joint Czech–Austrian project MultiQUEST (FWF I3053-N27), and the QuantERA ERA-NET Co-fund (FWF I3553-N36).

Author information

Author notes

    • Mehul Malik

    Present address: Institute of Photonics and Quantum Sciences (IPaQS), Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK

Affiliations

  1. Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI), Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria

    • Manuel Erhard
    • , Mehul Malik
    • , Mario Krenn
    •  & Anton Zeilinger
  2. Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    • Manuel Erhard
    • , Mehul Malik
    • , Mario Krenn
    •  & Anton Zeilinger

Authors

  1. Search for Manuel Erhard in:

  2. Search for Mehul Malik in:

  3. Search for Mario Krenn in:

  4. Search for Anton Zeilinger in:

Contributions

The computer algorithm Melvin inspired an initial practical solution for the experiment. M.E. and M.M. performed the experiment. All authors analysed the data, discussed the results and wrote the manuscript. A.Z. initiated the research and supervised the project.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Manuel Erhard or Anton Zeilinger.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary notes and figures.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0257-6