Article | Published:

Single upconversion nanoparticle imaging at sub-10 W cm−2 irradiance

Nature Photonicsvolume 12pages548553 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) are promising single-molecule probes given their non-blinking, photobleaching-resistant luminescence on infrared excitation. However, the weak luminescence of sub-50 nm UCNPs limits their single-particle detection to above 10 kW cm−2, which is impractical for live cell imaging. Here, we systematically characterize single-particle luminescence for UCNPs with various formulations over a 106 variation in incident power, down to 8 W cm−2. A core–shell–shell (CSS) structure (NaYF4@NaYb1−xF4:Erx@NaYF4) is shown to be significantly brighter than the commonly used NaY0.78F4:Yb0.2Er0.02. At 8 W cm−2, the 8% Er3+ CSS particles exhibit a 150-fold enhancement given their high sensitizer Yb3+ content and the presence of an inert shell to prevent energy migration to defects. Moreover, we reveal power-dependent luminescence enhancement from the inert shell, which explains the discrepancy in enhancement factors reported by ensemble and previous single-particle measurements. These brighter probes open the possibility of cellular and single-molecule tracking at low irradiance.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Auzel, F. Upconversion and anti-Stokes processes with f and d ions in solids. Chem. Rev. 104, 139–174 (2004).

  2. 2.

    Zhou, J., Liu, Q., Feng, W., Sun, Y. & Li, F. Upconversion luminescent materials: advances and applications. Chem. Rev. 115, 395–465 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Chen, G., Qiu, H., Prasad, P. N. & Chen, X. Upconversion nanoparticles: design, nanochemistry, and applications in theranostics. Chem. Rev. 114, 5161–5214 (2014).

  4. 4.

    Li, X., Zhang, F. & Zhao, D. Lab on upconversion nanoparticles: optical properties and applications engineering via designed nanostructure. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 1346–1378 (2015).

  5. 5.

    Wang, H.-Q., Batentschuk, M., Osvet, A., Pinna, L. & Brabec, C. J. Rare-earth ion doped up-conversion materials for photovoltaic applications. Adv. Mater. 23, 2675–2680 (2011).

  6. 6.

    Yang, D. et al. Current advances in lanthanide ion (Ln3+)-based upconversion nanomaterials for drug delivery. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 1416–1448 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Zheng, W. et al. Lanthanide-doped upconversion nano-bioprobes: electronic structures, optical properties, and biodetection. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 1379–1415 (2015).

  8. 8.

    Liu, J. et al. Ultrasensitive nanosensors based on upconversion nanoparticles for selective hypoxia imaging in vivo upon near-infrared excitation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 9701–9709 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Fischer, L. H., Harms, G. S. & Wolfbeis, O. S. Upconverting nanoparticles for nanoscale thermometry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 4546–4551 (2011).

  10. 10.

    Gargas, D. J. et al. Engineering bright sub-10-nm upconverting nanocrystals for single-molecule imaging. Nat. Nanotech. 9, 300–305 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Wu, S. et al. Non-blinking and photostable upconverted luminescence from single lanthanide-doped nanocrystals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10917–10921 (2009).

  12. 12.

    Zhao, J. et al. Single-nanocrystal sensitivity achieved by enhanced upconversion luminescence. Nat. Nanotech. 8, 729–734 (2013).

  13. 13.

    Ma, C. et al. Optimal /sensitizer concentration in single upconversion nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 17, 2858–2864 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Liu, Y. et al. Amplified stimulated emission in upconversion nanoparticles for super-resolution nanoscopy. Nature 543, 229–233 (2017).

  15. 15.

    Nadort, A. et al. Quantitative imaging of single upconversion nanoparticles in biological tissue. PLoS ONE 8, e63292 (2013).

  16. 16.

    Wang, F. et al. Microscopic inspection and tracking of single upconversion nanoparticles in living cells. Light Sci. Appl. 7, 18007 (2018).

  17. 17.

    Liu, Q. et al. Sub-10 nm hexagonal lanthanide-doped NaLuF4 upconversion nanocrystals for sensitive bioimaging in vivo. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 17122–17125 (2011).

  18. 18.

    Wang, G., Peng, Q. & Li, Y. Upconversion luminescence of monodisperse CaF2:Yb3+/Er3+ nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 14200–14201 (2009).

  19. 19.

    Wang, F. et al. Tuning upconversion through energy migration in core–shell nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 10, 968 (2011).

  20. 20.

    Vetrone, F., Naccache, R., Mahalingam, V., Morgan, C. G. & Capobianco, J. A. The active-core/active-shell approach: a strategy to enhance the upconversion luminescence in lanthanide-doped nanoparticles. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 2924–2929 (2009).

  21. 21.

    Chen, G. et al. (α-NaYbF4:Tm3+)/CaF2 core/shell nanoparticles with efficient near-infrared to near-infrared upconversion for high-contrast deep tissue bioimaging. ACS Nano 6, 8280–8287 (2012).

  22. 22.

    Zou, W., Visser, C., Maduro, J. A., Pshenichnikov, M. S. & Hummelen, J. C. Broadband dye-sensitized upconversion of near-infrared light. Nat. Photon. 6, 560–564 (2012).

  23. 23.

    Chen, X., Peng, D., Ju, Q. & Wang, F. Photon upconversion in core–shell nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 1318–1330 (2015).

  24. 24.

    Wang, F., Wang, J. & Liu, X. Direct evidence of a surface quenching effect on size-dependent luminescence of upconversion nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. 49, 7456–7460 (2010).

  25. 25.

    Johnson, N. J. et al. Direct evidence for coupled surface and concentration quenching dynamics in lanthanide-doped nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 3275–3282 (2017).

  26. 26.

    Fischer, S., Bronstein, N. D., Swabeck, J. K., Chan, E. M. & Alivisatos, A. P. Precise tuning of surface quenching for luminescence enhancement in core–shell lanthanide-doped nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 16, 7241–7247 (2016).

  27. 27.

    Wu, D. M., García-Etxarri, A., Salleo, A. & Dionne, J. A. Plasmon-enhanced upconversion. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 4020–4031 (2014).

  28. 28.

    He, J. et al. Plasmonic enhancement and polarization dependence of nonlinear upconversion emissions from single gold nanorod@SiO2@CaF2:Yb3+,Er3+ hybrid core–shell–satellite nanostructures. Light Sci. Appl. 6, e16217 (2017).

  29. 29.

    Damasco, J. A. et al. Size-tunable and monodisperse Tm3+/Gd3+-doped hexagonal NaYbF4 nanoparticles with engineered efficient near infrared-to-near infrared upconversion for in vivo imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 13884–13893 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Burgess, A. E. The Rose model, revisited. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 633–646 (1999).

  31. 31.

    Cheezum, M. K., Walker, W. F. & Guilford, W. H. Quantitative comparison of algorithms for tracking single fluorescent particles. Biophys. J. 81, 2378–2388 (2001).

  32. 32.

    Xiong, L. Q. et al. High contrast upconversion luminescence targeted imaging in vivo using peptide-labeled nanophosphors. Anal. Chem. 81, 8687–8694 (2009).

  33. 33.

    Boyer, J. C. & van Veggel, F. C. Absolute quantum yield measurements of colloidal NaYF4:Er3+,Yb3+ upconverting nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2, 1417–1419 (2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

S.C. acknowledges financial support from the Moore Foundation (no. 4309) and the Stanford Neurosciences Institute (no. 119600). TEM and SEM imaging were performed at the Stanford Microscopy Facility (National Institutes of Health grant SIG number 1S10RR02678001). EDX mapping and high-resolution TEM were performed at the TEM facility of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications. The authors thank A. Brunger, E. Chan, B. Cohen, J. Collins, J. Dionne, D. Jin and X. Liu for helpful discussions.

Author information

Author notes

    • Lydia-Marie Joubert

    Present address: Central Analytical Facilities, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

  1. These authors contributed equally to this work: Qian Liu, Yunxiang Zhang, Chunte Sam Peng.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    • Qian Liu
    • , Yunxiang Zhang
    • , Chunte Sam Peng
    •  & Steven Chu
  2. Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    • Qian Liu
    • , Yunxiang Zhang
    • , Chunte Sam Peng
    •  & Steven Chu
  3. Institute of Advanced Materials (IAM), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, China

    • Tianshe Yang
  4. CSIF Beckman Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    • Lydia-Marie Joubert

Authors

  1. Search for Qian Liu in:

  2. Search for Yunxiang Zhang in:

  3. Search for Chunte Sam Peng in:

  4. Search for Tianshe Yang in:

  5. Search for Lydia-Marie Joubert in:

  6. Search for Steven Chu in:

Contributions

Q.L., Y.Z., C.S.P., T. Y. and L.-M.J. were responsible for the experimental work. Q.L., Y.Z., C.S.P. and S.C. conceived the project. S.C. supervised the research. All authors discussed the results. The manuscript was written by Q.L., Y.Z., C.S.P. and S.C.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Chu.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Material synthesis and characterization; Supplementary References 1–6; Supplementary Figures 1–20; Supplementary Tables 1–2.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0217-1

Further reading