Abstract
Exosomes are promising therapeutics for tissue repair and regeneration to induce and guide appropriate immune responses in dystrophic pathologies. However, manipulating exosomes to control their biodistribution and targeting them in vivo to achieve adequate therapeutic benefits still poses a major challenge. Here we overcome this limitation by developing an externally controlled delivery system for primed annexin A1 myo-exosomes (Exomyo). Effective nanocarriers are realized by immobilizing the Exomyo onto ferromagnetic nanotubes to achieve controlled delivery and localization of Exomyo to skeletal muscles by systemic injection using an external magnetic field. Quantitative muscle-level analyses revealed that macrophages dominate the uptake of Exomyo from these ferromagnetic nanotubes in vivo to synergistically promote beneficial muscle responses in a murine animal model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Our findings provide insights into the development of exosome-based therapies for muscle diseases and, in general, highlight the formulation of effective functional nanocarriers aimed at optimizing exosome biodistribution.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Timely resolution of inflammation is necessary to restore muscle homeostasis following infection or damage and avoid chronic inflammatory pathologies, including muscular dystrophies. Macrophages are key players in this process due to their capacity to transition from a generally proinflammatory state to an anti-inflammatory phenotype. Engineered exosomes, extracellular vesicles <200 nm in size1,2, can carry multiple signalling biomolecules, including pro-resolving immune mediators, such as annexin A1 (ANXA1), which has emerged as a key regulator of macrophage polarization2,3. Previous studies of exosome delivery for treatment of different forms of muscular dystrophy have had promising results4,5,6, suggesting that accurate manipulation of exosomes can facilitate tissue repair during pathological processes. However, systemic biodistribution is challenging due to the influence of exosomal composition, in particular the lipid and protein content, on pharmacokinetics and bioavailability2,7,8,9.
A potential solution to this issue is the use of exosome carriers that can be controlled by external stimuli for accurate targeting and delivery, allowing on-demand manipulation of the biodistribution of therapeutic exosomes10. We propose using ferromagnetic nanotubes (NT-MAGs) for magnetic-field-controlled exosome delivery and localization in vivo. The NT-MAGs are primed with surface-anchored ANXA1 myo-exosomes (Exomyo) by exploiting a Coulombic interaction. We demonstrate that the NT-MAGs can effectively bind and transport Exomyo and, after systemic injection, accumulate in designated muscles in a murine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), the mdx mouse11, upon application of an external magnetic field. This controlled delivery maximizes the biological functions of Exomyo in dystrophic muscles, leading to improved muscle function.
Results
Improved muscle function with serial exosome injection
Exosomes derived from myogenic cells can elicit functional improvements and alleviate muscle wasting in animal models of muscular dystrophy, sarcopenia and cachexia12,13. In contrast, endogenously secreted exosomes may have a protective role or contribute to spreading pathology in DMD14. We collected exosomes from C2C12 cell culture medium (ExoC2C12) following the MISEV2018 guidelines15. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of ExoC2C12 revealed the presence of cup-shaped vesicles, characteristic of exosomes15 (Fig. 1a). Western blotting confirmed the expression of markers related to exosomal tetraspanins and proteins crucial for exosome formation (Fig. 1b). The absence of non-exosomal markers excluded potential contaminants or non-exosomal elements (Supplementary Fig. 1a). CFSE staining of ExoC2C12 was confirmed by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM) (Fig. 1c) and Amnis imaging flow cytometry (Fig. 1d).
Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) of ExoC2C12 revealed the presence of proteins belonging to Gene Ontology (GO) pathways involved in cell proliferation and movement, skeletal muscle cell differentiation, energy homeostasis, and inflammatory and anti-inflammatory processes (Fig. 1e). Among the most expressed proteins, ANXA1 plays a major role in promoting resolution of the inflammatory state, neutrophil apoptosis and rewiring macrophages towards an anti-inflammatory phenotype with enhanced efferocytosis capacity16,17,18,19,20. Using cytochalasin D as a cytoskeletal perturbator18,21, C2C12 cells were primed in vitro. ANXA1 expression linearly increased across increasing concentrations of cytochalasin D (Fig. 1f). Proteomic analysis confirmed the increased expression of exosomal ANXA1 when using 100 μM cytochalasin D (Fig. 1e).
To investigate the role of Exomyo in myogenic fate decisions in dystrophic muscle cells, satellite cells (SCs) were isolated from the hind limbs of 3-month-old mdx mice and induced to differentiate into myotubes (Fig. 1g). Exomyo fostered the development of myotubes with a greater length and width than ExoC2C12 or medium alone. This suggests the participation of Exomyo in later stages of myogenic differentiation (Fig. 1g). In parallel, freshly isolated macrophages from the muscles of 3-month-old mdx mice were cultured for 5 days in the presence of 108 Exomyo or 108 ExoC2C12. Untreated macrophages expressed elevated levels of canonical inflammatory M1 genes22. In contrast, macrophages treated with Exomyo exhibited heightened expression of anti-inflammatory M2-associated genes22 and concurrent downregulation of M1 genes compared with macrophages treated with 108 ExoC2C12 (Fig. 1h and Supplementary Discussion 1). These findings provide compelling evidence of the induction of M2 macrophage polarization by Exomyo.
To investigate the muscle-targeting ability of Exomyo in dystrophic mice, we labelled 109 Exomyo and 109 ExoC2C12 with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) and injected them into the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle of mdx mice intramuscularly or intravenously. The intramuscular injection resulted in a higher percentage of CFSE+ exosomes than intravenous delivery (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Discussion 2), confirming the rapid clearance and low accumulation of systemically injected exosomes in target muscles23.
Histological analysis revealed a significant increase in myofibre cross-sectional area (CSA) with intramuscular injection of Exomyo versus ExoC2C12, intravenous administration of Exomyo or ExoC2C12, or untreated mdx mice (Fig. 2b). In addition, intramuscular Exomyo increased the percentage of oxidative succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)+ myofibres in mdx mice compared with intramuscular ExoC2C12 and intravenous administration (Fig. 2c). Fibrosis was not different between the tested groups (Fig. 2d). Thus, Exomyo triggers metabolic reprogramming in dystrophic muscles after direct injection.
To boost the functional delivery of Exomyo, mdx mice were given up to three doses of exosomes, once a week. The bioavailability of CFSE-labelled Exomyo was determined by ex vivo optical bioluminescence imaging 21 days after the first injection. CFSE-Exomyo was detectable in the TA only after direct injection; systemic injections led to accumulation of CFSE-Exomyo in filter organs (for example, liver and spleen; Supplementary Fig. 1b). Immunofluorescent staining of dystrophic muscle injected with Exomyo confirmed the longer retention of CFSE with increasing number of doses. Accumulation was observed around F-actin-positive muscle fibres and inside bona fide regenerative small fibres (Fig. 2e). Analysis of SDH immunoreactivity in muscle revealed a significant increase in oxidative SDH+ fibres after the third intramuscular Exomyo injection compared with intravenous injection at all time points (Fig. 2f). A significant increase in tetanic force was observed in dystrophic muscle treated with three serial intramuscular injections of Exomyo versus intravenous injection (Fig. 2g).
To determine whether the enhanced muscle force and metabolic remodelling were determined by reduced inflammation, we surveyed the protein levels of proinflammatory M1 (tumour necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin 6 (IL-6)), anti-inflammatory M2 (transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ), CD206) and innate immune memory (TLR4/AKT/RELB) markers of macrophages in TA muscle from Exomyo-treated mdx mice (Fig. 2h). Three doses of Exomyo resulted in a notable reduction in TNF and IL-6 (Fig. 2h) concomitant with diminished activity in the TLR4/AKT/RELB cascade and decreased expression of CD206. There was a concurrent reduction in TGFβ, contributing to pathologic muscle fibrosis (Fig. 2h). Collectively, these findings indicate attenuation of the dystrophic inflammatory milieu following repeated intramuscular administration of Exomyo. In addition, three doses of Exomyo may reduce the extrinsic signalling activating SCs, as indicated by the decrease in MYOD and PAX7 protein expression (Fig. 2h). In muscle injected with three doses, 25% of CD45+ cells coexpressed macrophage markers CD68 and CFSE, whereas 2.9% of CD45− cells expressed the SC markers integrin-α7 and CFSE (Supplementary Fig. 1c). These findings support the hypothesis that preferential uptake of Exomyo from immune system cells and tissue-confined Exomyo enrichment may be responsible for driving macrophage immunomodulation, ameliorating skeletal muscle metabolism and improving muscle force in dystrophic mdx mice.
Fabrication of exosome nanocarriers
Synthetic hydrated magnesium silicate (Mg3(Si2O5)(OH)4) nanotubes (NTs) were fabricated under hydrothermal conditions, followed by a multistep chemical treatment to generate alternating layers of silica and brucite in a tubular configuration (Fig. 3a). TEM and X-ray diffraction confirmed that crystalline NTs with a length of 115 nm and diameter of 22 nm were obtained (Fig. 3b,c). The brucitic external surface induces a positive Z-potential, allowing the binding of anionic species through an ionic self-assembly (ISA) scheme24. The exosome surface is negatively charged by the presence of glycosylated proteins25, enabling the exosome to anchor to the NT surface in an aqueous environment (Fig. 3d). Exosomes were effectively immobilized onto the NT surface (Fig. 3e). The colocalization and stability of Alexa Fluor 647-stained NTs (Supplementary Fig. 2a–c) carrying Exomyo were demonstrated directly in buffer solution by dSTORM (Fig. 3f)26 and Amnis imaging flow cytometry (Fig. 3g,h)27.
The NTs were sensitized to the magnetic field by partially covering their surface with ferromagnetic nanoparticles capped by tetramethyl ammonium 11-aminoundecanoate (TAU; Extended Data Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 2d–f). TEM (Extended Data Fig. 1b) and infrared spectroscopy of the functionalized magnetic NTs demonstrated effective electrostatic binding (Supplementary Fig. 2g,h). Functionalized NTs were assembled with Exomyo to work as ferromagnetic nanocarriers (NT-MAG-Exomyo) (Extended Data Fig. 1b). The amounts of nanoparticles and exosomes were chosen to maximize the loading efficiency while limiting exosome degradation and NT aggregation. In the best configuration, 500 μg of NT-MAG-Exomyo was able to carry 5 × 109 exosomes (Supplementary Fig. 2i–l). We analysed the stability of NT-MAG-Exomyo in an aqueous environment by monitoring the release of Exomyo at acidic and normal pH (6.5 and 7.4, respectively). The results indicated faster release of Exomyo at pH 6.5 than at pH 7.4, with significant differences in the percentages of released Exomyo, especially in the first 6 h in a slightly acidic environment (Extended Data Fig. 1c), suggesting the possibility of modulating exosome release in a tissue pH-dependent28,29,30.
We investigated the response of NT-MAG-Exomyo to the magnetic field in an aqueous environment by measuring the longitudinal (R1) and traverse (R2) magnetic relaxation rates as a function of the ferromagnetic NT concentration (Extended Data Fig. 1d). The R2 of NT-MAG-Exomyo was enhanced by a factor of 2 with respect to NT-MAGs, probably due to better colloidal stability in the aqueous medium because of the presence of exosome. Nevertheless, we observed a stable and linear response to the external magnetic field for both R1 and R2. NT-MAG-Exomyo had magnetic relaxivity as high as R2 = 10.7 s−1 (mg/ml)−1 and R1 = 0.7 s−1 (mg/ml)−1, resulting in an R2/R1 of 15.2, which makes the nanocarriers suitable as negative contrast agents for MRI (Extended Data Fig. 1d)31.
The controlled delivery of exosomes by an external magnetic field was assessed in vitro using a 3D-printed silicon/polylactic acid closed circuit with artificial blood medium (Extended Data Fig. 1e). The circuit, connected to a peristaltic pump for NT-MAG-Exomyo circulation, featured one branch linked to an external reservoir via a septum covered by murine aortic wall; application of a 0.5 T magnetic field localized Exomyo within the arterial elastic lamina, suggesting that NT-MAG-Exomyo can effectively be guided through the blood vessels by magnetic force (Extended Data Fig. 1f and Supplementary Discussion 3).
We tested the magnetic-field-assisted delivery of NT-MAG-Exomyo in vivo using a ring-magnet-generated static field of 1.4 T. C57Bl and mdx mice were treated by systemic injection of Exomyo, NT-MAG-Alexa 647 or NT-MAG-Exomyo in the presence or absence of the magnet and analysed 24 h later by optical bioluminescence imaging (Fig. 4a). The ring magnet was positioned around the limbs (Supplementary Fig. 3) during and for 30 min after injection to ensure the targeted delivery of NT-MAGs into the muscle. Without the external magnetic field, NT-MAG-Alexa-647-treated mice had a stronger signal near the proximal caudal vein with minimal to negligible signal in the whole body. In contrast, mice treated with Exomyo and NT-MAG-Exomyo had signals in various organs, including the muscles, liver, spleen, intestines and lungs. An amplified signal was observed in the mdx mice, probably due to impaired permeability of the dystrophic vasculature, resulting in fast clearance and vessel exit (Fig. 4a). We observed more confined tissue retention of NT-MAG-Alexa 647 than NT-MAG-Exomyo, probably due to the better colloidal stability of NT-MAGs when decorated with exosomes (Fig. 4a). NT-MAG-Exomyo-injected mice exposed to the magnetic field had a clear signal confined to the hind limbs (Fig. 4a). On MRI, signal localization at 24 h without magnet placement was around the proximal caudal vein in NT-MAG-Exomyo-injected C57Bl and mdx mice. A stronger muscle signal was observed in magnet-exposed hind limbs (Fig. 4b), confirming magnetic-field-driven localization of the exosomes in muscle after systemic administration of NT-MAG-Exomyo. Thirty days after intravenous NT-MAG-Exomyo administration in C57Bl and mdx mice, significantly higher percentages of NT-MAG-Exomyo were detected upon exposure to the magnetic field (Fig. 4c).
Repetitive magnetic muscle targeting alleviates mdx myopathy
Systemic delivery of bare Exomyo was inadequate to mitigate dystrophic muscle features, whereas repeated intramuscular delivery resulted in overall amelioration of the local muscle microenvironment and enhanced muscle function. However, the transferability to human patients would be constrained by the inability to treat all muscles in the body. To overcome this hurdle, we investigated the effects of weekly magnetic delivery of intravenously injected NT-MAG-Exomyo in 3-month-old mdx and C57Bl mice (NT-MAG-Exomyo I, one injection; NT-MAG-Exomyo II, two injections; NT-MAG-Exomyo III, three injections) compared to age-matched mdx and C57Bl mice that received three intravenous injections of PBS (vehicle), once a week. Compared to C57Bl mice, mdx mice injected with vehicle were not able to sustain exercise (Supplementary Fig. 4a). No differences in treadmill data were observed between NT-MAG-Exomyo I, II and III mice and vehicle-administered C57Bl mice, indicating the lack of toxicity and side effects of NT-MAG-Exomyo (Supplementary Fig. 4b). NT-MAG-Exomyo III mdx mice were less prone to fatigue and displayed better treadmill performance independent of the work intensity (Supplementary Fig. 4c and Supplementary Discussion 4). NT-MAG-Exomyo also alleviated myopathy in mdx mice, and the CSA increased with increasing number of NT-MAG-Exomyo doses (Supplementary Fig. 5a and Supplementary Discussion 5). The frequency distribution confirmed the smaller CSA in mdx mice that received vehicle and NT-MAG-Exomyo I (Supplementary Fig. 5a and Supplementary Discussion 5). Hydroxyproline quantification revealed that fibrosis was reduced in NT-MAG-Exomyo-treated mdx mice compared with controls, with a sharp drop in muscles from NT-MAG-Exomyo III mice (Supplementary Fig. 5b).
Furthermore, to investigate whether improved muscle performance in mdx mice was specifically ascribable to Exomyo accumulation in muscles, driven by a magnetic field, we compared the effects of weekly magnetic delivery of intravenously injected NT-MAG-Exomyo (NT-MAG-Exomyo III, three injections) and NT-Exomyo (NT-Exomyo III, three injections), non-responsive to magnetic field, in 3-month-old mdx mice. NT-MAG-Exomyo III mdx mice presented with reduced muscle exhaustion and improved endurance compared with NT-Exomyo III mdx mice, which presented a fatigue pattern comparable to the vehicle-treated mdx group (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Discussion 6).
The number of Ly6C+ infiltrating macrophages was decreased in TA muscle from NT-MAG-Exomyo III mdx mice compared with vehicle-treated and NT-ExoMyo III mdx mice (Supplementary Fig. 6). The NT-MAG-Exomyo III mdx mice had a notable decrease in the number of M1 CD68+ CD206− macrophages, accompanied by a concurrent increase in M2 CD68+ CD206+ macrophages (Fig. 5b), suggesting that NT-MAG-Exomyo facilitated M2 polarization, indicating a potential immunomodulatory effect. Histological analyses of TA muscles isolated from NT-MAG-Exomyo III mdx mice showed significantly less muscle degeneration than in vehicle-treated and NT-Exomyo III mdx mice, as indicated by a reduced number of degenerating fibres (IgG+) and an increased percentage of healthy peripherally nucleated fibres and regenerating eMHC+ fibres (Fig. 5c). In addition, myofibre size was significantly increased in TA from NT-MAG-Exomyo III mdx mice compared with vehicle-treated and NT-Exomyo III mdx mice, suggesting metabolic reprogramming in the muscle (Fig. 5d). Accordingly, the number of SDH+ myofibres increased in the TA from NT-MAG-Exomyo III mdx mice (Fig. 5e). Hydroxyproline was significantly decreased in TA from NT-MAG-Exomyo III mdx mice compared with vehicle-treated and NT-Exomyo III mdx mice, confirming reduced fibrosis (Fig. 5f).
To clarify the modifications to muscle metabolism, we studied the effect of NT-MAG-Exomyo III on oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) proteins and related systems. No changes were observed in the muscle expression of different subunits of respiratory complex I, III, IV and V between the NT-MAG-Exomyo III and NT-Exomyo III mdx groups (Fig. 5g). However, the complex II (SDH) subunit was significantly overexpressed in NT-MAG-Exomyo III mdx mice (Fig. 5g). Mdx muscles exhibit altered mitochondrial respiration32, and heightened high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) release from necrotic fibres and M1 macrophages33,34,35. We found that HMGB1 expression was significantly lower in muscles from NT-MAG-Exomyo III mdx mice compared with both vehicle and NT-Exomyo III mdx mice (Fig. 5g). Notably, downstream HMGB1 receptors were significantly downregulated in muscles from NT-MAG-Exomyo III mdx mice. To investigate whether the reduction in the HMGB1 pathway was associated with decreased inflammatory pathways, we specifically focused on the proinflammatory TNF and NF-κB signalling pathways. Downregulation of TNF and similar amounts of IkBα were observed in muscles from NT-MAG-Exomyo III mdx mice (Fig. 5g). Compared with both vehicle-treated and NT-Exomyo III, the NT-MAG-Exomyo III mdx mice had reduced levels of total NF-κB and NF-κB subunit RELB (Fig. 5g). Extracellular HMGB1 serves as a promoter of autophagy through the mTOR mechanisms36, and dystrophic muscles in the NT-MAG-Exomyo III group showed a significant reduction in the AKT/mTOR/4E-BP12/S6Rb signalling pathway. This group also tended to have reduced levels of autophagy-selective substrates (Fig. 5g).
Magnetic delivery of Exomyo shifts dystrophic muscle traits
Next, we further characterized the molecular traits induced by repetitive intravenous infusion of NT-MAG-Exomyo (NT-MAG-Exomyo I, II and III; Supplementary Information, RNA-seq file 1) compared to vehicle-administered mice, and by NT-MAG-Exomyo III compared to non-magnetic NT-Exomyo injection (NT-Exomyo III; Supplementary Information, RNA-seq file 2). Thirty days after the first injection, the mice were killed, and hind limb muscles were prepared for RNA sequencing analyses of single muscle fibres and muscle-infiltrating macrophages containing CFSE-positive exosomes (Ly6ChiCFSEhi; iMACs).
Substantial dissimilarities in the gene expression patterns were found between iMACs and single muscle fibres from NT-MAG-Exomyo groups compared to controls (Extended Data Fig. 2a–c, Extended Data Fig. 3a,b and Supplementary Discussion 7), and NT-MAG-Exomyo III compared to NT-Exomyo III (Fig. 6a–c,e–g and Supplementary Discussion 7). Gene Ontology (GO) pathway analysis revealed that the top 15 upregulated pathways in iMACs (Fig. 6d) shared among the three NT-MAG-Exomyo groups were associated with ‘mitochondrial,’ ‘aerobic respiration’ and ‘oxidative phosphorylation’ (Extended Data Fig. 2d and Supplementary Discussion 7). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and volcano plot analysis of the NT-MAG-Exomyo III group showed upregulation of oxidative genes and a shift in iMAC phenotype towards anti-inflammatory pathways (Supplementary Fig. 7 and Supplementary Discussion 7). GSEA and volcano plot analysis of iMACs from the comparison of NT-MAG-Exomyo III versus NT-Exomyo III confirmed the upregulation of genes involved in reprogramming metabolism and mRNA translation of M2 macrophages in NT-MAG-Exomyo III, whereas a limited pool of dysregulated genes was found in NT-Exomyo III versus vehicle (Supplementary Figs. 8a and 9a and Supplementary Discussion 7). KEGG analysis of iMACs from NT-Exomyo III revealed upregulated genes in inflammatory/apoptosis signalling pathways (‘prion disease’, ‘Huntington disease’, ‘diabetic cardiomyopathy’) (Supplementary Fig. 9a). In addition, NT-Exomyo III had repressed genes in pathways that are known to be induced by canonical M2 activation37 (‘tight junction’, ‘adherens junction’) (Supplementary Fig. 9a). Taken together, these data demonstrate that Exomyo uptake by iMACs shifts their phenotype toward a profile characterized by enhanced oxidative and anti-inflammatory M2 metabolic pathways.
The oxidative pathway was also upregulated in single muscle fibres isolated from NT-MAG-Exomyo II and NT-MAG-Exomyo III mice (Extended Data Fig. 3d and Supplementary Discussion 8). GSEA of myofibres from NT-MAG-Exomyo II and NT-MAG-Exomyo III mice revealed enrichment of genes involved in skeletal muscle contraction and transition between fast and slow fibres (Supplementary Fig. 10 and Supplementary Discussion 8). Upregulated KEGG pathways confirmed enrichment of ‘oxidative phosphorylation’ and ‘cardiac muscle contraction’ genes in single muscle fibres from NT-MAG-Exomyo mice, regardless of dose (Supplementary 10). Single muscle fibres from NT-MAG Exomyo III mice showed upregulated GO pathways associated with RNA splicing/maturation and downregulation of several genes involved in the extracellular matrix response to inflammatory stimuli compared with the NT-Exomyo group (Fig. 6h, Supplementary Figs. 8b and 9b and Supplementary Discussion 8). The average gene expression in single muscle fibres from NT-Exomyo III mice recapitulated the main features of the vehicle group (Supplementary Fig. 9b). The above results demonstrate a metabolic reprogramming of TA muscle fibres after magnetic delivery of NT-MAG-Exomyo.
Discussion
Significant advances in the field of exosome biology have created new possibilities for therapeutic interventions38,39. Exosomes can be engineered to deliver therapeutic payloads, with the ability to target specific cells or tissues5,40,41,42. Given the growing interest in exosomes promoting muscle regeneration3,4,6, we investigated the efficacy of magnetic delivery in a well-defined model of DMD. To modulate the inflammatory milieu of dystrophic skeletal muscle, we enriched exosomes for ANXA1, a proresolving mediator in anti-inflammatory and repair mechanisms18,43,44. In vitro, enriched exosomes effectively promoted the transition of proinflammatory macrophages to an anti-inflammatory state and facilitated the myogenic maturation of dystrophic muscle progenitors. In vivo, we exploited ferromagnetic nanocarriers for controlled delivery and muscle accumulation of Exomyo upon systemic injection. With repeated weekly administration, effective muscle repair was observed in mdx mice. The uptake of exosomes by infiltrating macrophages suppressed inflammatory pathways and caused a metabolic shift towards enhanced oxidative metabolism in dystrophic muscle fibres. This muscle fibre–macrophage interaction reduces muscle fibre remodelling, thereby improving muscle contraction. The proposed nanocarrier-based approach is an affordable, efficient and low-cost strategy for developing therapeutic exosomes that could improve the quality of life for individuals with muscular dystrophies.
Methods
Animals and ethics statement
Animal experiments conformed with Italian law (DLvo 116/92) and were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences of Turin and the Ministry of Health (PR 72833) and Istituto Besta of Milan (833/2019-PR). Two-month-old male C57Bl/10 and mdx mice from Charles River were housed in ventilated cages with a 12 h light/dark cycle and free access to water and standard autoclaved chow. Mice were allowed to acclimate for at least 4 weeks prior to analysis. For all experiments, we used 3-month-old male C57Bl and mdx mice.
For intramuscular injection, mice were injected in the TA muscle. For systemic administration, mice were injected in the tail vein. A dose of 109 Exomyo was injected in 100 μl PBS 1×. Mice were anaesthetized with 2% isoflurane before being killed by cervical dislocation.
In one experimental group, mdx mice were intramuscularly (n = 36) or intravenously (n = 36) injected with ExoC2C12 or Exomyo and analysed 24 h, 7 days and 21 days after injection (n = 6 per time point). Untreated mdx mice (n = 6 each time point) were used as controls.
In another experimental group, mdx mice were intramuscularly (n = 24) or intravenously (n = 18) injected with Exomyo once, twice or three times, once per week (n = 6 mice for systemic administration, n = 12 mice for TA injections). Untreated mdx (n = 6) were used as controls. Mice were killed 30 days after the first injection.
For optical imaging and MRI of the biodistribution at 24 h, C57Bl mice (n = 3 each group) and mdx mice (n = 3 each group) were injected intravenously with Exomyo or NT-MAG-647 or NT-MAG-Exomyo. NT-MAG-Exomyo injection was evaluated with or without magnet placement. PBS-injected mice (n = 3 C57Bl, n = 3 mdx) served as controls.
For testing the magnetic-field-assisted delivery of NT-MAGs in vivo, we used a ring-magnet-generated static field of 1.4 T. Upon systemic injection, the ring magnet was positioned around the mouse limbs and maintained in place for 30 min after treatment.
For Amnis imaging flow cytometry analysis of long-term retention of NT-MAG-Exomyo within muscles, 30 days after systemic injection, C57Bl and mdx mice were injected with PBS (n = 3 each) or NT-MAG-Exomyo (n = 6 with magnet placement; n = 3 without magnet placement).
To evaluate the effects of weekly magnetic delivery NT-MAG-Exomyo, we intravenously injected 3-month-old mdx mice once (NT-MAG-Exomyo I, n = 8), twice (NT-MAG-Exomyo II, n = 8) or three times (NT-MAG-Exomyo III, n = 8) once a week. As controls, one group of mdx mice was administered three injections of non-magnetic NT-Exomyo (NT-Exomyo III, n = 8), and a second group received three intravenous injections of PBS (vehicle, n = 8), once a week. For motor behaviour analysis and to exclude the possibility of NT-MAG-Exomyo toxic systemic effects, 3-month-old C57Bl mice were also intravenously injected with NT-MAG-Exomyo, once (NT-MAG-Exomyo I, n = 3), twice (NT-MAG-Exomyo II, n = 3) or three times (NT-MAG-Exomyo III, n = 3) once a week, or with three intravenous injections of PBS (vehicle, n = 3). Mice were killed 30 days after the first injection.
Exosome isolation and characterization
Murine C2C12 myoblast cells (CRL-1772, ATCC) were cultured in DMEM high glucose until 60% confluent. The medium was changed to exosome-depleted 10% FBS-supplemented DMEM medium for 48 h and cell culture media was collected and centrifuged to remove debris. The supernatant was filtered and sequentially ultracentrifuged for 2 h at 4 °C (40,000g and 130,000g; Optima XE, Ti 45 fixed-angle rotor) to pellet exosomes. Protein concentrations were measured using the microBCA Protein Assay Kit. For TEM, the pellet was resuspended in PBS 1× and 5 µl directly loaded onto formvar carbon-coated grids45,46. Exosome concentration and size distribution were determined by NTA using a NanoSight NS300. The supernatant was collected from C2C12 cells pretreated with 100 μM cytochalasin D to isolate ANXA1-primed exosomes. For Western blotting, 106, 107, 108 and 109 exosomes (15 µl) were lysed in RIPA assay buffer (25 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100). Exosome lysates were diluted in Laemmli sample buffer 4× and boiled at 95 °C for 10 min; for CD9, CD81 and CD63 Western blot, exosome lysates were diluted in non-reducing LDS sample buffer 4× (ref. 47). Antibodies were incubated with the membrane overnight at 4 °C in 5% milk in TBS-T with shaking. The dilution of antibodies is listed in Supplementary Table 1. Densitometric analysis was performed using ImageJ (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/).
Proteomic analysis
Exosome pellets (1010 Exomyo and 1010 ExoC2C12) were suspended in 0.1 M ammonium bicarbonate (pH 7.9) and sonicated with a Branson Sonifier48. Exosomal proteins (50 ± 0.5 µg) were analysed by nanochromatography on a cHiPLC-nanoflex system coupled to a Q-Exactive mass spectrometer using a 65 min gradient of 5–45% eluent B (A, 0.1% formic acid in water; B, 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) at a flow rate of 300 nl min−1. Full mass spectra were recorded in positive-ion mode over 400–1,600 m/z at 70,000 full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) resolution, followed by 10 MS/MS spectra at a resolution of 17,500 FWHM. All generated data were searched using Proteome Discoverer 2.1 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) based on the SEQUEST search engine and Mus musculus UniProt FASTA database (UP000000589, March 2018, 61,307 entries; www.uniprot.gov). The false discovery rate was set to 1, meaning 100%, to allow for subsequent peptide-spectrum match (PSM) rescoring via Prosit and Percolator implemented in Proteomics DB49. After rescoring, PSMs and peptides were filtered at a false discovery rate of 1% (calculated at sample level). The MS data have been deposited with the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE50 partner repository with the dataset identifier ftp://MSV000094590@massive.ucsd.edu.
Exosome CFSE labelling
For CFSE staining, exosomes were labelled with 40 μM CFSE dye for 60 min at 4 °C. To eliminate unbound fluorophore, we concentrated exosomes using a 3 kDA MWKO filter for 30 min at 15,000g at 4 °C. CFSE-labelled samples were retained above the filter and collected for further analysis. Unless otherwise specified, Exomyo were labelled with CFSE for immunofluorescence characterization and in vivo detection.
In vitro model of Exomyo and ExoC2C12 treatment
To induce myogenic differentiation, 70% confluent fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-isolated SCs were grown in exosome-depleted low-serum fusion-promoting medium (high-glucose DMEM with 2% FBS) with or without the addition of 108 Exomyo and 108 ExoC2C12. Myotube formation was evaluated after 7 days of differentiation. Nuclei and cytoskeletal staining were carried out with desmin and 1 μM 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Images were acquired using a Leica DMIRE2 microscope, and the fusion index was determined for each picture by dividing the total number of nuclei in myotubes by the total number of counted nuclei. Myotube area, length and width were extracted from each image using ImageJ. To characterize polarization, freshly isolated macrophages were treated for 24 h in the presence or absence of 108 Exomyo and 108 ExoC2C12 in DMEM High Glucose, 20% exosome-depleted FBS, 30% L929 cell (ATCC) conditioned medium containing 1% amphotericin B and 100 μg ml−1 penicillin/streptomycin (Supplementary Table 2).
Immunocapture of ExoMyo
TA muscles were collected from mdx mice intramuscularly injected with Exomyo. The tissues were dissociated into single-cell suspensions in 0.2 mg ml−1 liberase, and mononuclear cells collected after layering onto Optiprep gradient. CD45+ cells were purified by positive selection using an MACS separation MS column and a MiniMACS separator according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Negatively selected CD45− cells were eluted through the LS column and centrifuged at 500g for 5 min at 4 °C. The magnetically labelled and retained CD45+ cells were flushed from the column, collected and centrifuged at 500g for 5 min at 4 °C. The CD45− fraction was labelled for myogenic marker ITGA 7 PE viol 770 and the CD45+ fraction for macrophage marker CD68 APC. For the same samples, CFSE-positive cells were acquired using the BD Canto II machine and analysed by FlowJo 9 software (at least 5–10 × 104 events for each gate). For exosome collection from murine muscles, TA and quadriceps muscles were harvested from mice injected intramuscularly or intravenously with Exomyo and ExoC2C12. The tissues were cut into 1 mm3 pieces and digested in 2 mg ml−1 collagenase D in high-glucose DMEM for 1 h at 37 °C with light shaking. After digestion, the solution was sequentially filtered through 100 μm, 40 μm and 1 μm filters. Exosomes were captured using an ExoFlow 2.0 CD63 kit for tissue culture media according to the manufacturer’s instructions and a commercial magnetic stand, DynaMag-2. After washing away bead-bound exosomes and excess stain, the expression of CFSE and exosomal markers CD9 and CD81 was confirmed by FACS analysis. Anti-CD9-APC Cy7 and anti-CD81-PE Cy7 were incubated with exosomes for 20 min at 4 °C. Controls were incubated with isotype control mouse IgG1k-PE antibody. The dilutions of antibodies are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Samples were analysed on a BD Canto II machine and quantified using FlowJo 9. For Amnis analysis of NT-MAG-Exomyo, filtered hind-limb-muscle-derived supernatants were run directly on an ImageStreamX MK II.
Synthesis of stoichiometric Mg3(Si2O5)(OH)4 NTs
NTs were synthesized by an optimized method51. A reactor with a 100 cm3 polypropylene vessel was used for the hydrothermal reaction (250 °C, 16 h) of 1,522 mg Na2SiO3 and 764 mg MgCl2 in 220 ml of an aqueous solution of NaOH (0.4 M) (Supplementary Table 2). The solution precipitate was washed repeatedly with deionized water and dried (3 h, 110 °C).
NT functionalization with Alexa Fluor 647 or Exomyo
First, 40 mg chrysotile powder was suspended in 10 ml of 5 × 10−3 PBS (pH 7.4), and then 2.5 ml of Alexa Fluor 647 solution (9.8 × 10−6 M in PBS) was added slowly while stirring52. NTs were centrifuged and dried at 50 °C for 3 h. Different degrees of surface coverage were obtained using 1:5 and 1:10 dilutions of the PBS Alexa Fluor 647 solution. The optical properties of stained NTs were checked by measuring the steady-state photoluminescence with a Cary Eclipse spectrofluorometer. Time-resolved photoluminescence experiments were performed with an Edinburgh Instruments FLS-980 spectrofluorometer. To attach Exomyo, NTs were suspended in PBS 1×, and Exomyo were added at various dilutions (1:10–1:100 v/v) overnight. Adsorption occurred at 4 °C for 12 h on a rotating shaker.
Structural and compositional characterization
Powder X-ray diffraction was performed with a Miniflex 600 diffractometer in Bragg–Brentano configuration. Attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared spectra were obtained on dried samples with a Nicolet iS20 spectrometer.
High-resolution TEM
TEM observations were carried out using a JEM 2100 Plus electron microscope. First, 1–2 mg of powder was dissolved in 2 ml of distilled water, and then 3 μl of the solution was placed on carbon-coated copper grids.
Exomyo binding and adsorption onto fluorescent NTs
First, 109 Exomyo were added directly to PBS containing sonicated Alexa 647-labelled NTs at various dilutions (1:10–1:100, v/v). Adsorption then occurred as described above. For dSTORM high-resolution fluorescence imaging using a Leica SR GSD 3D TIRF, samples were deposited on a coverslip previously coated with a Cell Tak-compatible adhesive.
ImageStream acquisition and analysis
Exomyo, Alexa 647-labelled NTs (50 µl) and Exomyo absorbed onto Alexa 647-labelled NTs were suspended in 100 µl 0.1 µm filtered PBS 1× for imaging flow cytometer (ImageStreamX MK II System, Amnis). The ImageStreamX MK II System was equipped with three lasers (405, 488 and 642 nm), a six-channel charge-coupled device camera and the Multimag option, but no extended depth-of-field option. All events were collected with a 60× (numerical aperture, 0.9) objective at low speed and high sensitivity with 7 μm core size. Speed beads were running throughout the acquisition. Exomyo CFSE was excited by a 488 nm laser and emission collected in Ch02. AlexaFluor647 was excited by a 642 nm laser and emission collected in Ch05. Single-stained samples were acquired with identical laser settings. Side-scatter illumination was used for compensation. Purified Exomyo were diluted 1:100 to avoid swarming effects and images analysed using IDEAS 6.2 software: ExoMyo were identified by the signal intensity in Ch02 (intensity_Ch02) plotted against intensity_Ch06 as events with very low scatter and low/mid green fluorescence intensity. To avoid false positives, CFSE dye alone was also analysed. NT-Alexa 647 was identified by intensity_Ch05 and their strong scattering signal in Ch06. Exomyo-loaded NT-Alexa 647 was identified by plotting intensity_Ch05 against intensity_Ch02.
For Amnis analysis of NT-MAG- Exomyo, supernatants derived from hind limb muscles were prepared as described above and run on an ImageStreamX MK II. To obtain a collection gate (R6) that can confirm the presence of NT-MAG-Exomyo in the samples, a scatter plot was drawn based on the scattering properties of the fibres (intensity_Ch06) and the CFSE signal of the exosomes (intensity_Ch02).
Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles
Fe3O4 nanoparticles were synthesized from ferric acetyl acetonate, 1-dodecanediol, oleic acid, oleylamine, diphenyl ether and N-(3-aminopropyl)53. A mixture of 2.023 g 1-dodecanediol (10 mM), 1.605 g oleylamine (6 mM) and 1.694 g oleic acid (6 mM) was added to 20 ml of 2 mM ferric acetyl acetonate in divinely ether. The solution was thoroughly degassed by purging with nitrogen. The solution was heated to 200 °C under vigorous stirring conditions for 30 min, and refluxed for another 30 min at 250 °C. The solution colour turned dark, indicating the formation of oleic-acid-capped Fe3O4 nanoparticles. The product was cooled to room temperature, followed by repeated washes in n-hexane and centrifugation to separate the nanoparticles, and finally dried in vacuum.
Water-dispersible magnetic nanoparticles
A ligand exchange protocol54 was applied to obtain hydrophilic MAG nanoparticles with carboxylic functional groups (COO–) as capping agents. MAG nanoparticles were dispersed in n-hexane (∼20 mg ml−1) and added to a suspension of TAU in dichloromethane (20 mg ml−1). After vigorous stirring for 30 min, the particles were separated using a magnet.
Synthesis of ferromagnetic NTs
Magnetic NTs were prepared in water according to the ISA method52: 40 mg of chrysotile powder was suspended in 8 ml of PBS (pH 7.4). An equally buffered solution of TAU-capped ferromagnetic nanoparticles (2 mg ml−1) was added slowly under stirring. Addition was stopped after 10 ml. At this point, the compound was repeatedly centrifuged and washed with water. Functionalized NTs were dried at 110 °C for 3 h. Fluorescent magnetic NTs (NT-MAG-Alexa 647) were prepared following the same procedure using Alexa Fluor 647 labelled NTs.
Magnetic relaxivity measurements
NT-induced relaxation was performed on a 2 mg ml−1 NT solution in PBS performing up to five dilutions. A 0.5 T Bruker Minispec mq20 broadband spectrometer (1H Larmor frequency, 19.65 MHz) was used for magnetic relaxometry. Experiments were performed at 303 K (29.85 °C) ± 0.1 K using a BVT3000 Eurotherm nitrogen gas thermal apparatus. First, 120 μl of each solution was put in a tube (outside diameter, 10 mm) and positioned in the magnet. All samples were thermalized for 10 min before performing any experiment. The T1 relaxation time was measured using the saturation recovery pulse sequence, performing eight scans with a 0.1 s recycle delay and gain between 76 and 78 dB by acquiring 18 points with different recovery times. The relaxation time T2 was measured using the CPMG pulse sequence, acquiring eight scans with a 3 s recycle delay and a gain between 76 and 78 dB (refs. 54,55,56). Once all relaxation data were acquired, we plotted the inverse R1 = 1/T1 and R2 = 1/T2 as a function of the NT concentration.
NT-MAG-Exomyo release
Exomyo were added overnight to a dispersion of NT-MAGs according to a maximal loading capacity of 5 × 109 Exomyo for 500 μg NT-MAG. The NT-MAG-Exomyo suspension was centrifuged at 2,000g for 5 min and transferred into buffer solution at two different pH levels (6.5 and 7.4). Aliquots of NT-MAG-Exomyo suspension were collected after 1, 6 and 24 h and centrifuged to precipitate NT-MAGs still carrying Exomyo. Supernatants containing the released CFSE exosomes were measured either with a Glomax microplate reader using excitation at 488 nm and an emission filter of 500–520 nm, or by NTA to evaluate the particle number.
Static magnetic field tests
The static magnetic field used to drive the exosome nanocarriers was generated by a solid-state cylindrical neodymium magnet (N42, 0.5 T field) for the in vitro experiments and by a diameter (outer) 50 mm × diameter (inner) 30 mm × height 10 mm neodymium ring magnet (N42, 1.4 T field in the ring centre) for the in vivo experiments. Both magnets were purchased from Hangzhou Yang Yi Magnetics.
In vivo bioluminescence
Two-dimensional optical imaging of bioluminescence was performed using a Bruker 2D U-OI system including a computer-controlled filter wheel with narrowband emission filters for multispectral bioluminescence, fluorescence and imaging. The intensity of the bioluminescence was represented using a colour scale. Images were acquired 24 h and 7 days after injection. Mice were imaged in a ventral position using epi-illumination 2D fluorescence imaging. An exposure time of 3 min and binning of 4 was used to maximize the sensitivity of the bioluminescence signal but avoid saturation of the detector. Images were acquired with two excitation filters, 472 nm for CFSE and 575 nm for Alexa 647, and emissions were collected at 520 nm and 615 nm, respectively. Images were generated using 2D Optical Living Image software.
In vivo muscular MRI
A preclinical 7 T MRI scanner (Bruker, BioSpec 70/30 USR, Paravision 5.0) was equipped with 450/675 mT m−1 gradients (slow speed, 3,400–4,500 T m−1 s−1; rise time, 140 μs). The receiver was a rat heart phased-array coil with four internal preamplifiers, coupled with a 72 mm linear volume coil as the transmitter. The mice were induced under general anaesthesia using 1.5–2% isoflurane vaporized in 100% oxygen (flow, 1 l min−1). They were placed in a prone position with their hind limbs fixed at the centre of the coil. Respiration and body temperature were monitored and maintained at approximately 30 breaths per minute and 37 °C, respectively. Skeletal muscle was evaluated by the T2 relaxation time (T2-rt) as assessed by T2 mapping and fractional anisotropy using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Muscle T2 maps were obtained using a multislice–multiecho sequence with fat suppression (repetition time, 1,938 ms; 16 echo times, 10.73/171.68 ms; field of view, 20 mm × 20 mm; 256 × 256 matrix; spatial resolution, 0.078 × 0.078 mm per pixel; number of signal averages, 4) acquired in the axial plane (10 slices; thickness, 1 mm; gap, 0 mm). The DTI data were acquired using a SpinEcho-EPI (DTI-Epi) sequence with 30 diffusion gradient directions (repetition time, 3,750 ms; echo time, 33 ms; b-values for diffusion directions, 0–700 s mm−2; diffusion gradient duration, 4 ms; diffusion gradient separation, 20 ms; number of signal averages, 2). The DTI-Epi sequence shared the same geometric characteristics (field of view, 30 mm × 30 mm; 128 × 128 matrix; spatial resolution, 0.234 × 0.234 mm per pixel; 10 slices; slice thickness, 1 mm; gap, 0 mm).
Endurance and muscle strength
Mice were placed on a transparent treadmill belt with a constant 10% slope and stepwise increasing rotation speed: 10 cm s−1 from 0 to 5 min, 15 cm s−1 from 5 to 10 min, 20 cm s−1 from 10 to 20 min, 25 cm s−1 from 20 to 30 min, and 30 cm s−1 from 30 to 35 min. Data were recorded at 20 cm s−1 (low intensity), 25 cm s−1 (intermediate intensity) and 30 cm s−1 (high intensity). The number of accumulated shocks was recorded at each time point. In the event of evident physical exhaustion before the end of the test, the animals were removed from the apparatus and an arbitrary value assigned based on the total distance travelled. Functional measurements were performed in a blind manner. The tetanic force of the TA muscle was determined as described previously57, normalized to the muscle CSA and expressed as kN m−2.
Histology and immunofluorescence
TA muscle tissues were collected and frozen in liquid-nitrogen-cooled isopentane and cut on a cryostat into 10 µm slices. H&E staining was performed as described previously57. For immunofluorescence, slides were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 for 15 min and incubated with 10% donkey serum or goat serum for 1 h to block non-specific binding. Next, the slides were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution. Slides were mounted using Prolong Gold Antifade Reagent with DAPI. A Leica TCS SP8 confocal or a Leica DMi8 fluorescence microscope were used to acquire images. The enzymatic activity of SDH was assayed by placing the slides in SDH incubating solution containing sodium succinate as a substrate and nitroblue tetrazolium for 1 h at 37 °C to visualize the reaction. Initially, slides were incubated for 10 s in 30–60–90–60–30% acetone solution, and then for 30 s in 80–90–100% ethanol solution for dehydration. Finally, they were incubated in 100% xylene for 1 min before mounting with DPX reagent on coverslips. For H&E, immunofluorescence and SDH staining, whole section images were captured by a Leica CTR6000 Laser microdissector. Hydroxyproline content was determined (in μg) per milligramme of muscle as a measure of fibrosis58. All chemicals are listed in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.
Image quantification and statistical analysis
Histological and immunofluorescence images were captured with a Leica CTR6000 microscope and a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope, respectively. Quantitative analyses were performed in ImageJ (NIH). The threshold colour plugin of ImageJ was used to quantify H&E and SDH staining as the percentage area over a fixed grid area. Data were analysed by GraphPad Prism and expressed as means ± s.d. To compare multiple groups means, we performed one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test or Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test.
Single muscle fibre isolation
Single muscle fibres were isolated from TA muscles according to published protocols59. Briefly, the muscles were isolated from anaesthetized mice and incubated in in high-glucose DMEM containing 0.5% collagenase II for 3 h at 37 °C without shaking. After incubation, the muscles were transferred to prewarmed 60 mm dishes containing 5 ml DMEM supplemented with 10% horse serum. Residual connective tissue was removed with forceps, and the muscle was triturated using progressively smaller diameter glass pipettes to liberate single muscle fibres.
RNA isolation and sequencing analysis
Macrophages and single muscle fibres were frozen immediately after sorting in liquid nitrogen and RNA extracted using an RNeasy Micro kit. RNAs were qualified and quantified on an Agilent Tapestation 2200 using a high-sensitivity RNA chip. To prepare the library, 150–300 ng of total RNA was reverse-transcribed using Illumina’s TruSeq stranded mRNA library preparation kit. Each sample was fitted with one of 96 adapters containing a different 8 base molecular barcode for high-level multiplexing.
Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000. To ensure quality, the FASTQ files were checked with FastQC. We determined transcript/gene abundance using salmon v.1.10.2 and a specific transcriptome index (GRCm38). Normalization using edgeR v.3.42.0 was based on the read count matrix. Genes were considered expressed if their raw counts were >20 in at least two out of three replicates per condition. We used ggplot2 v.3.4.4 for volcano plot analysis of the RNA-seq expression data. Fold-changes between groups were calculated using the Bioconductor package EdgeR with the likelihood ratio test (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/edgeR.html). Genes were considered differentially expressed if ∣log(fold change)∣ ≥ 1.5 (ref. 60). Differentially expressed genes were submitted to clusterProfiler v.4.8.2 for GO analysis61 in the GO Ontology database (v.2021-05-01). We used all genes expressed in the experiment and the GO terms ‘biological processes’, ‘cellular components’, ‘molecular functions’ as the annotation dataset. Significantly enriched GO terms were identified by an adjusted P < 0.05. GSEA was performed by dedicated software (release 4.2.3) in the Molecular Signatures Database (MsigDB). The ‘Hallmark’ annotated gene set collection was used for analysis of ranked gene lists. Data have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE263457.
Statistical analysis and reproducibility
No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample sizes, but our sample sizes are similar to those reported in previous publications6,10. The sample sizes and the specific statistical tests for each experiment are detailed in each figure caption. Statistical analysis was performed using Excel and GraphPad Prism. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
Data availability
The MS data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier ftp://MSV000094590@massive.ucsd.edu. Transcriptomic data have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible via GEO Series accession number GSE263457. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Raposo, G. & Stoorvogel, W. Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J. Cell Biol. 200, 373–383 (2013).
Jeppesen, D. K. et al. Reassessment of exosome composition. Cell 177, 428–445 e418 (2019).
Monguio-Tortajada, M., Galvez-Monton, C., Bayes-Genis, A., Roura, S. & Borras, F. E. Extracellular vesicle isolation methods: rising impact of size-exclusion chromatography. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 76, 2369–2382 (2019).
Gartz, M., Darlington, A., Afzal, M. Z. & Strande, J. L. Exosomes exert cardioprotection in dystrophin-deficient cardiomyocytes via ERK1/2-p38/MAPK signaling. Sci. Rep. 8, 16519 (2018).
Yanez-Mo, M. et al. Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions. J. Extracell. Vesicles 4, 27066 (2015).
Alvarez-Erviti, L. et al. Delivery of siRNA to the mouse brain by systemic injection of targeted exosomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 341–345 (2011).
Cano, A. et al. Exosomes-based nanomedicine for neurodegenerative diseases: current insights and future challenges. Pharmaceutics https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15010298 (2023).
Yedigaryan, L. & Sampaolesi, M. Extracellular vesicles and Duchenne muscular dystrophy pathology: modulators of disease progression. Front. Physiol. 14, 1130063 (2023).
Yates, A. G. et al. In sickness and in health: the functional role of extracellular vesicles in physiology and pathology in vivo: part II: pathology. J. Extracell. Vesicles 11, e12190 (2022).
Liu, S. et al. Treatment of infarcted heart tissue via the capture and local delivery of circulating exosomes through antibody-conjugated magnetic nanoparticles. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 1063–1075 (2020).
McGreevy, J. W., Hakim, C. H., McIntosh, M. A. & Duan, D. Animal models of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: from basic mechanisms to gene therapy. Dis. Models Mech. 8, 195–213 (2015).
Annibalini, G. et al. Muscle and systemic molecular responses to a single flywheel based iso-inertial training session in resistance-trained men. Front. Physiol. 10, 554 (2019).
Coenen-Stass, A. M. et al. Selective release of muscle-specific, extracellular microRNAs during myogenic differentiation. Hum. Mol. Genet. 25, 3960–3974 (2016).
Fry, C. S., Kirby, T. J., Kosmac, K., McCarthy, J. J. & Peterson, C. A. Myogenic progenitor cells control extracellular matrix production by fibroblasts during skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Cell Stem Cell 20, 56–69 (2017).
Thery, C. et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J. Extracell. Vesicles 7, 1535750 (2018).
Sugimoto, M. A., Vago, J. P., Teixeira, M. M. & Sousa, L. P. Annexin A1 and the resolution of inflammation: modulation of neutrophil recruitment, apoptosis, and clearance. J. Immunol. Res. 2016, 8239258 (2016).
McArthur, S. et al. Annexin A1 drives macrophage skewing to accelerate muscle regeneration through AMPK activation. J. Clin. Invest. 130, 1156–1167 (2020).
Leoni, G. et al. Annexin A1-containing extracellular vesicles and polymeric nanoparticles promote epithelial wound repair. J. Clin. Invest. 125, 1215–1227 (2015).
Lim, L. H. & Pervaiz, S. Annexin 1: the new face of an old molecule. FASEB J. 21, 968–975 (2007).
Scannell, M. et al. Annexin-1 and peptide derivatives are released by apoptotic cells and stimulate phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils by macrophages. J. Immunol. 178, 4595–4605 (2007).
Fenteany, G. & Zhu, S. Small-molecule inhibitors of actin dynamics and cell motility. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 3, 593–616 (2003).
Orecchioni, M., Ghosheh, Y., Pramod, A. B. & Ley, K. Macrophage polarization: different gene signatures in M1(LPS+) vs classically and M2(LPS-) vs alternatively activated macrophages. Front. Immunol. 10, 1084 (2019).
Wiklander, O. P. et al. Extracellular vesicle in vivo biodistribution is determined by cell source, route of administration and targeting. J. Extracell. Vesicles 4, 26316 (2015).
Villa, I. et al. Functionalized scintillating nanotubes for simultaneous radio- and photodynamic therapy of cancer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 12997–13008 (2021).
Beit-Yannai, E., Tabak, S. & Stamer, W. D. Physical exosome:exosome interactions. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 22, 2001–2006 (2018).
Nizamudeen, Z. et al. Rapid and accurate analysis of stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles with super resolution microscopy and live imaging. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell. Res. 1865, 1891–1900 (2018).
Gorgens, A. et al. Optimisation of imaging flow cytometry for the analysis of single extracellular vesicles by using fluorescence-tagged vesicles as biological reference material. J. Extracell. Vesicles 8, 1587567 (2019).
Berkmann, J. C. et al. Early pH changes in musculoskeletal tissues upon injury—aerobic catabolic pathway activity linked to inter-individual differences in local pH. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072513 (2020).
Johnson, C. H., Ivanisevic, J. & Siuzdak, G. Metabolomics: beyond biomarkers and towards mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 451–459 (2016).
Parolini, I. et al. Microenvironmental pH is a key factor for exosome traffic in tumor cells. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 34211–34222 (2009).
Tromsdorf, U. I. et al. Size and surface effects on the MRI relaxivity of manganese ferrite nanoparticle contrast agents. Nano Lett. 7, 2422–2427 (2007).
Bellissimo, C. A., Garibotti, M. C. & Perry, C. G. R. Mitochondrial stress responses in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: metabolic dysfunction or adaptive reprogramming? Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 323, C718–C730 (2022).
Iverson, T. M., Singh, P. K. & Cecchini, G. An evolving view of complex II-noncanonical complexes, megacomplexes, respiration, signaling, and beyond. J. Biol. Chem. 299, 104761 (2023).
Sanchez-Gonzalez, C. et al. Dysfunctional oxidative phosphorylation shunts branched-chain amino acid catabolism onto lipogenesis in skeletal muscle. EMBO J. 39, e103812 (2020).
Careccia, G. et al. Rebalancing expression of HMGB1 redox isoforms to counteract muscular dystrophy. Sci. Transl. Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aay8416 (2021).
Tang, D. et al. Endogenous HMGB1 regulates autophagy. J. Cell Biol. 190, 881–892 (2010).
Xue, J. et al. Transcriptome-based network analysis reveals a spectrum model of human macrophage activation. Immunity 40, 274–288 (2014).
Zhang, H. et al. Exosomes as smart drug delivery vehicles for cancer immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 13, 1093607 (2022).
Dai, J. et al. Exosomes: key players in cancer and potential therapeutic strategy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 5, 145 (2020).
Luo, H. et al. Exosome-based nanoimmunotherapy targeting TAMs, a promising strategy for glioma. Cell Death Dis. 14, 235 (2023).
Safdar, A., Saleem, A. & Tarnopolsky, M. A. The potential of endurance exercise-derived exosomes to treat metabolic diseases. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 12, 504–517 (2016).
Cheng, L. & Hill, A. F. Therapeutically harnessing extracellular vesicles. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 21, 379–399 (2022).
Leoni, G. & Nusrat, A. Annexin A1: shifting the balance towards resolution and repair. Biol. Chem. 397, 971–979 (2016).
Dalli, J. et al. Annexin 1 mediates the rapid anti-inflammatory effects of neutrophil-derived microparticles. Blood 112, 2512–2519 (2008).
Soo, C. Y. et al. Nanoparticle tracking analysis monitors microvesicle and exosome secretion from immune cells. Immunology 136, 192–197 (2012).
van der Pol, E. et al. Particle size distribution of exosomes and microvesicles determined by transmission electron microscopy, flow cytometry, nanoparticle tracking analysis, and resistive pulse sensing. J. Thromb. Haemost. 12, 1182–1192 (2014).
Thery, C., Amigorena, S., Raposo, G. & Clayton, A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471143030.cb0322s30 (2006).
Bari, E. et al. Pilot production of mesenchymal stem/stromal freeze-dried secretome for cell-free regenerative nanomedicine: a validated GMP-compliant process. Cells https://doi.org/10.3390/cells7110190 (2018).
Gessulat, S. et al. Prosit: proteome-wide prediction of peptide tandem mass spectra by deep learning. Nat. Methods 16, 509–518 (2019).
Vizcaino, J. A. et al. 2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D447–D456 (2016).
Secchi, V. et al. Energy partitioning in multicomponent nanoscintillators for enhanced localized radiotherapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 24693–24700 (2023).
De Luca, G. et al. Self-organizing functional materials via ionic self assembly: porphyrins H- and J-aggregates on synthetic chrysotile nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 6920–6921 (2009).
Sun, S. & Zeng, H. Size-controlled synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 8204–8205 (2002).
Dey, S., Mohanta, K. & Pal, A. J. Magnetic-field-assisted layer-by-layer electrostatic assembly of ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Langmuir 26, 9627–9631 (2010).
Mauri, M. et al. Time domain nuclear magnetic resonance: a key complementary technique for the forensic differentiation of foam traces. Anal. Methods 5, 4336–4344 (2013).
Mauri, M., Thomann, Y., Schneider, H. & Saalwächter, K. Spin-diffusion NMR at low field for the study of multiphase solids. Solid State Nucl. Mag. 34, 125–141 (2008).
Farini, A. et al. Therapeutic potential of immunoproteasome inhibition in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Mol. Ther. 24, 1898–1912 (2016).
Graham, K. M. et al. Excessive collagen accumulation in dystrophic (mdx) respiratory musculature is independent of enhanced activation of the NF-κB pathway. J. Neurol. Sci. 294, 43–50 (2010).
Pegoli, G., Lucini, F., Mozzetta, C. & Lanzuolo, C. Single myofiber isolation and culture from a murine model of Emery–Dreifuss muscular dystrophy in early post-natal development. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/61516 (2020).
Metsalu, T. & Vilo, J. ClustVis: a web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using principal component analysis and heatmap. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W566–W570 (2015).
Gene Ontology Consortium. Gene Ontology Consortium: going forward. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D1049–D1056 (2015).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the RF-2016-02362263 ‘Multimodal nanotracking for exosome-based therapy in DMD’ (theory enhancing), ‘Isolamento di nanoparticelle naturali da utilizzare come agenti anti-infiammatori/anti-fibrotici’, 5 × 1000, Fondazione Patrimonio e dalla Direzione Scientifica Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (2022). The Torrente laboratory is also funded by ‘Multiomics pRofiling of patient spEcific Models to predict druggable targets in severe neuromuscular rare diseases (REMODEL)’, Unmet Medical Needs, Fondazione Regionale per la Ricerca Biomedica (FRRB) (2022), ‘At the origin of congenital muscular dystrophy: shedding light on the Tdark proteins DPM2 and DPM3’, Bando ‘Cariplo Telethon Alliance GJC2021’ (2022), ‘Nanoparticles in Freidreich Ataxia’ National Center for Gene Therapy and Drugs based on RNA Technology, Spoke #1: Genetic diseases, PNRR CN3 RNA, 2022, Associazione Centro Dino Ferrari. A.M. is funded by PNRR CN3 RNA, 2022, PNRR project ANTHEM: AdvaNced Technologies for Human-centrEd Medicine—PNC0000003 Spoke #2—NextGenerationEU. The funders of the study had no role in the study design, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report. We thank V. Berno for outstanding assistance in the acquisition and interpretation of the Amnis imaging flow cytometry data. We also thank S. Gatti for the use of the Bruker 2D U-OI system for bioluminescence studies. We thank A. Bianchi for his help in realizing the artificial circulatory system model.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.V., Y.T., A.M. and V.S. conceived and designed the experiments. C.V., Y.T., V.S. and A.M. wrote the paper. V.S. synthesized the ferromagnetic nanocarriers and performed optical and photoluminescence experiments, infrared spectroscopy characterization and TEM. A.F. performed animal transplantation. E.T., L.V.P. and L.P. performed cytofluorimetric analyses. M. Macchi performed transcriptomic analyses. D.Z. performed Amnis imaging flow cytometry studies. F.P. and D.A. performed MRI analyses. M. Mauri and R.S. performed NMR experiments. M.C. performed X-ray diffraction experiments. P.M. and A.D.P. performed proteomic analysis. M. Molinaro, R.O. and F.S. performed Western blotting, histological and immunofluorescent analyses. L.T. performed RNA extraction for RNA bulk sequencing. C.V. performed in vitro and in vivo validation studies. C.V. interpreted and analysed the data. All the stated authors were involved in the critical revision of the manuscript and approved the final version of the article, including the authorship list. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Nanotechnology thanks Ahmed Ibrahim, Maurilio Sampaolesi and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Magnetic targeting ability of exosome nanocarriers in vitro.
a, Schematic of the two-step ionic self-assembly mechanism exploited to attach ferromagnetic nanoparticles (MAG-tau) and ExoMyo to the surface of nanotubes (NTs) to obtain multifunctional nanocarriers (NT-MAG-Exomyo). b, Transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) images of NTs functionalized with MAG-tau (top, NT-MAG, scale bar = 50 nm) and of NT-MAG-Exomyo (bottom, scale bar = 100 nm). Black and green arrows indicate the MAG-tau nanoparticles and exosomes, respectively. c, Exomyo release dynamic as a function of the environmental pH in buffer solution. Data are shown as mean ± SD; n = 3 independent experiments; two-way ANOVA followed by the post hoc Tukey multiple comparison test. d, Measurement of the magnetic relaxation rates, R2 and R1, as a function of the concentration of NT-MAG (left) and NT-MAG-Exomyo (right) in aqueous suspension. e, Digital image of the artificial circulatory system model exploited to investigate the effect of an external magnetic field on the diffusion of NT-MAG-647 and NT-MAG-Exomyo in the blood flux and across a biological tissue barrier. Schematic figure illustrating the arterial wall of C57Bl mice leaned against the reservoir. For magnetic delivery, a 0.5 Tesla ring magnet was applied to the reservoir. f, Confocal microscope images showing the localization of NT- MAG- 647 within the arterial elastic lamina (grey for contrast phase image) with and without magnet placement; confocal microscope image of NT-MAG-Exomyo (green) accumulating within the arterial elastic lamina (grey for contrast phase image, blue pseudocolor for laminin staining) 30 min after magnetic targeting. The amount of collected NT-MAG in the reservoir was calculated from the percentage of relative fluorescence. Scale bars = 20 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SD; n = 3 samples per group in two independent experiments; two-tailed unpaired t-test.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Transcriptomic profiling of muscle iMAC isolated from mdx mice treated with NT-MAG-Exomyo III.
Transcriptomic analysis of freshly FACS-purified circulating macrophages that infiltrate hind limb muscle tissues and entrapped CFSE+ exosomes (Ly6ChiCFSEhi; iMAC) in NT-MAG-Exomyo I (n = 3), NT-MAG-Exomyo II (n = 3) and NT-MAG-Exomyo III (n = 3). Mdx mice systemically injected with PBS was used as control (vehicle, n = 3). a, Heatmap representation of Euclidean distances between log2 counts per million gene expression values across all samples. The colour scale represents the distance values, ranging from 0 (indicating identical gene expression) in red to 300 (indicating the highest distance) in blue. The heatmap provides a visual representation of the similarity or dissimilarity of gene expression patterns among samples. b, Heatmap representation of log CPM expression values for the top 100 differentially expressed genes between groups. The colour scale ranges from blue (indicating low expression) to red (indicating high expression). Expression values have been standardized. c, The Venn diagram representation of the shared DEGs between groups. d, Gene Ontology (GO) pathway analysis of up- and downregulated genes. One-sided version of Fisher’s exact test used to determine whether known biological functions or processes are overrepresented in the list of differentially expressed genes. The p-values are adjusted according to Benjamini–Hochberg method. P-value and q-value cutoff are 0.01 and 0.05, respectively. The size of each dot is proportional to the number of genes in the corresponding category. The colour scale represents the significance of the analysis for each category: red denotes higher significance; blue denotes lower significance.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Transcriptomic profiling of muscle fibres isolated from mdx mice treated with NT-MAG-Exomyo III.
Transcriptomic analysis of single muscle fibres (MS) of hind limb muscle tissues of mdx vehicle (n = 3), NT-MAG-Exomyo I (n = 3), NT-MAG-Exomyo II (n = 3) and NT-MAG-Exomyo III. a, Heatmap representation of Euclidean distances between log2 counts per million gene expression values across all samples. The colour scale represents the distance values, ranging from 0 (indicating identical gene expression) in red to 300 (indicating the highest distance) in blue. The heatmap provides a visual representation of the similarity or dissimilarity of gene expression patterns among samples. b, Heatmap representation of log CPM expression values for the top 100 differentially expressed genes between groups. The colour scale ranges from blue (indicating low expression) to red (indicating high expression). Expression values have been standardized. c, The Venn diagram representation of the shared DEGs between groups. d, Gene Ontology (GO) pathway analysis of up- and downregulated genes. One-sided version of Fisher’s exact test used to determine whether known biological functions or processes are overrepresented in the list of differentially expressed genes. The p-values are adjusted according to Benjamini–Hochberg method. P-value and q-value cutoff are 0.01 and 0.05, respectively. The size of each dot is proportional to the number of genes in the corresponding category. The colour scale represents the significance of the analysis for each category: red denotes higher significance; blue denotes lower significance.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Discussion 1–8, Methods, Figs. 1–10, Tables 1–3 and References.
Supplementary Data
Source Data for Supplementary Fig. 1. Unprocessed western Blots and/or gels, statistical source data.
Supplementary Data
Source Data for Supplementary Fig. 2. Unprocessed western Blots and/or gels, statistical source data.
Supplementary Data
Source Data for Supplementary Fig. 4. Unprocessed western Blots and/or gels, statistical source data.
Supplementary Data
Source Data for Supplementary Fig. 5. Unprocessed western Blots and/or gels, statistical source data.
Supplementary Data
Source Data for Supplementary Fig. 6. Unprocessed western Blots and/or gels, statistical source data.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 1
Unprocessed western Blots and/or gels, statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 2
Unprocessed western Blots and/or gels, statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 4
Statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 5
Unprocessed western Blots and/or gels, statistical source data.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1
Statistical source data.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Villa, C., Secchi, V., Macchi, M. et al. Magnetic-field-driven targeting of exosomes modulates immune and metabolic changes in dystrophic muscle. Nat. Nanotechnol. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-024-01725-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-024-01725-y