Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Designing single-site alloy catalysts using a degree-of-isolation descriptor

Abstract

Geometrically isolated metal atoms in alloy catalysts can target efficient and selective catalysis. However, the geometric and electronic disturbance between the active atom and its neighbouring atoms, that is, diverse microenvironments, makes the active site ambiguous. Herein, we demonstrate a methodology to describe the microenvironment and determine the effectiveness of active sites in single-site alloys. A simple descriptor, degree-of-isolation, is proposed, considering both electronic regulation and geometric modulation within a PtM ensemble (M = transition metal). The catalytic performance of PtM single-site alloy is examined thoroughly using this descriptor for an industrially important reaction, propane dehydrogenation. The volcano-shaped isolation–selectivity plot reveals a Sabatier-type principle for designing selective single-site alloys. Specifically, for a single-site alloy with a high degree-of-isolation, alternation of the active centre has a great impact on tuning selectivity, validated by the outstanding consistency between experimental propylene selectivity and the computational descriptor.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Electronic regulation of Pt site.
Fig. 2: Geometric modulation of Pt site.
Fig. 3: Volcano-shaped isolation–selectivity plot.
Fig. 4: Experimental synthesis, characterization and PDH performance.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available within this Article and its Supplementary Information files or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Kyriakou, G. et al. Isolated metal atom geometries as a strategy for selective heterogeneous hydrogenations. Science 335, 1209–1212 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Feng, Q. et al. Isolated single-atom Pd sites in intermetallic nanostructures: high catalytic selectivity for semihydrogenation of alkynes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 7294–7301 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun, G. et al. Breaking the scaling relationship via thermally stable Pt/Cu single atom alloys for catalytic dehydrogenation. Nat. Commun. 9, 4454 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Childers, D. J. et al. Modifying structure-sensitive reactions by addition of Zn to Pd. J. Catal. 318, 75–84 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakaya, Y., Hirayama, J., Yamazoe, S., Shimizu, K. I. & Furukawa, S. Single-atom Pt in intermetallics as an ultrastable and selective catalyst for propane dehydrogenation. Nat. Commun. 11, 2838 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marcinkowski, M. D. et al. Pt/Cu single-atom alloys as coke-resistant catalysts for efficient C–H activation. Nat. Chem. 10, 325–332 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ryan, T. H. et al. First-principles design of a single-atom-alloy propane dehydrogenation catalyst. Science 372, 1444–1447 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas, J. M. The concept, reality and utility of single-site heterogeneous catalysts (SSHCs). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 7647–7661 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Karamad, M., Tripkovic, V. & Rossmeisl, J. Intermetallic alloys as CO electroreduction catalysts—role of isolated active sites. ACS Catal. 4, 2268–2273 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, L., Zhou, M., Wang, A. & Zhang, T. Selective hydrogenation over supported metal catalysts: from nanoparticles to single atoms. Chem. Rev. 120, 683–733 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Han, A. et al. Isolating contiguous Pt atoms and forming Pt–Zn intermetallic nanoparticles to regulate selectivity in 4-nitrophenylacetylene hydrogenation. Nat. Commun. 10, 3787 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hannagan, R. T., Giannakakis, G., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. & Sykes, E. C. H. Single-atom alloy catalysis. Chem. Rev. 120, 12044–12088 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, S. et al. Propane dehydrogenation on single-site [PtZn4] intermetallic catalysts. Chem 7, 387–405 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, X. et al. Microenvironment modulation of single-atom catalysts and their roles in electrochemical energy conversion. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb6833 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Qin, R., Liu, K., Wu, Q. & Zheng, N. Surface coordination chemistry of atomically dispersed metal catalysts. Chem. Rev. 120, 11810–11899 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pei, G. X. et al. Promotional effect of Pd single atoms on Au nanoparticles supported on silica for the selective hydrogenation of acetylene in excess ethylene. New J. Chem. 38, 2043–2051 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pei, G. X. et al. Ag alloyed Pd single-atom catalysts for efficient selective hydrogenation of acetylene to ethylene in excess ethylene. ACS Catal. 5, 3717–3725 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pei, G. X. et al. Performance of Cu-alloyed Pd single-atom catalyst for semihydrogenation of acetylene under simulated front-end conditions. ACS Catal. 7, 1491–1500 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sattler, J. J., Ruiz-Martinez, J., Santillan-Jimenez, E. & Weckhuysen, B. M. Catalytic dehydrogenation of light alkanes on metals and metal oxides. Chem. Rev. 114, 10613–10653 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, Y., Hu, P., Yang, J., Zhu, Y. A. & Chen, D. C–H bond activation in light alkanes: a theoretical perspective. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 4299–4358 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, S. et al. Propane dehydrogenation: catalyst development, new chemistry, and emerging technologies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 3315–3354 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, Y., Hu, Z.-P., Lv, X., Chen, L. & Yuan, Z.-Y. Ultrasmall PtZn bimetallic nanoclusters encapsulated in silicalite-1 zeolite with superior performance for propane dehydrogenation. J. Catal. 385, 61–69 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun, Q. et al. Subnanometer bimetallic platinum–zinc clusters in zeolites for propane dehydrogenation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 19450–19459 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rochlitz, L. et al. Silica-supported, narrowly distributed, subnanometric Pt–Zn particles from single sites with high propane dehydrogenation performance. Chem. Sci. 11, 1549–1555 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hammer, B. & Nørskov, J. K. Why gold is the noblest of all the metals. Nature 376, 238–240 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao, Z.-J. et al. Theory-guided design of catalytic materials using scaling relationships and reactivity descriptors. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 792–804 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Miedema, A. R. The electronegativity parameter for transition metals: heat of formation and charge transfer in alloys. J. Less-Common Met. 32, 117–136 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nykänen, L. & Honkala, K. Selectivity in propene dehydrogenation on Pt and Pt3Sn surfaces from first principles. ACS Catal. 3, 3026–3030 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zha, S. et al. Identification of Pt-based catalysts for propane dehydrogenation via a probability analysis. Chem. Sci. 9, 3925–3931 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang, M.-L., Zhu, Y.-A., Zhou, X.-G., Sui, Z.-J. & Chen, D. First-principles calculations of propane dehydrogenation over PtSn catalysts. ACS Catal. 2, 1247–1258 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Purdy, S. C. et al. Origin of electronic modification of platinum in a Pt3V alloy and its consequences for propane dehydrogenation catalysis. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3, 1410–1422 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hammer, B. & Nørskov, J. K. Theoretical surface science and catalysis—calculations and concepts. Adv. Catal. 45, 71–129 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Studt, F. et al. Identification of non-precious metal alloy catalysts for selective hydrogenation of acetylene. Science 320, 1320–1322 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mavrikakis, M., Hammer, B. & Nørskov, J. K. Effect of strain on the reactivity of metal surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2819–2822 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Raub, E. & Mahler, W. Alloys of manganese with platinum, iridium, rhodium, and ruthenium. Z. Metallkde 46, 282–290 (1955).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Elezovic, N. R. et al. Synthesis and characterization Pt nanocatalysts on tungsten based supports for oxygen reduction reaction. Appl. Catal. B 125, 390–397 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wu, Z. et al. Changes in catalytic and adsorptive properties of 2 nm Pt3Mn nanoparticles by subsurface atoms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 14870–14877 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Cai, W. et al. Subsurface catalysis-mediated selectivity of dehydrogenation reaction. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar5418 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wellendorff, J. et al. Density functionals for surface science: exchange–correlation model development with Bayesian error estimation. Phys. Rev. B 85, 235149 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901–9904 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Henkelman, G. & Jónsson, H. A dimer method for finding saddle points on high dimensional potential surfaces using only first derivatives. J. Chem. Phys. 111, 7010–7022 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Campbell, C. T., Arnadottir, L. & Sellers, J. R. V. Kinetic prefactors of reactions on solid surfaces. Z. Phys. Chem. 227, 1435–1454 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Bader, R. F. W. A quantum theory of molecular structure and its applications. Chem. Rev. 91, 893–928 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Maintz, S., Deringer, V. L., Tchougreeff, A. L. & Dronskowski, R. LOBSTER: a tool to extract chemical bonding from plane-wave based DFT. J. Comput. Chem. 37, 1030–1035 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Dronskowski, R. & Bloechl, P. E. Crystal orbital Hamilton populations (COHP): energy-resolved visualization of chemical bonding in solids based on density-functional calculations. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 8617–8624 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Dunnington, B. D. & Schmidt, J. R. Generalization of natural bond orbital analysis to periodic systems: applications to solids and surfaces via plane-wave density functional theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 1902–1911 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFA1500704), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22121004, U22A20409, U1862207), the Haihe Laboratory of Sustainable Chemical Transformations, the Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (BP0618007) and the XPLORER PRIZE for financial support. We also acknowledge generous computing resources at the High Performance Computing Center of Tianjin University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.G. conceived and coordinated the research. X.C. and Z.-J.Z. designed and performed the DFT calculations. R.L., S.Z. and L.L. assisted with the DFT calculations. Z.L., S.C., G.S., X.C. and C.P. contributed to the experiments. All authors wrote the manuscript and have reviewed, discussed and approved the results and conclusions of this Article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinlong Gong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Nanotechnology thanks Sharon Mitchell and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Electronic regulation of Pt site.

a, The surface structure of PtNi(110), PtCo(110), PtFe(110), Pt3Ni(111), Pt3Co(111) and Pt3Fe(111). Color: Pt-blue, Ni-green, Co-red, Fe-yellow. The interatomic distance of Pt–Pt is annotated (unit: Å). b, Crystal orbital Hamilton populations (COHP) between Pt atom and C atom for π or di-σ adsorbed C3H6. The fermi level is at 0 eV. c, The relationship between Δχ and electron transfer from M to Pt for Pt(111), Pt3M(111) and PtM(110). The relationship between Δχ and antibonding occupation of Pt–C bond for top-adsorbed CH3 on Pt(111), Pt3M(111) and PtM(110). M = 3d transition metals. The mole ratio (k = cM/cPt) is introduced as a constant term to differentiate alloy composition.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 PtZn intermetallic alloy with the atom colored with charge density (unit: |e|).

a, The surface structure of PtZn(110). b, The surface structure of PtZn(101). The interatomic distance of Pt–Pt is annotated (unit: Å). The elementary steps of PDH are investigated along two directions consisting of the closest Pt atoms. The red arrow indicates electron transfer from M to Pt. The ordered arrangement of constituent atoms in intermetallic alloy brings about homogeneous geometric and electronic structures.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 The transformation of the most stable adsorption configurations of C3H5 on the close-packed surface of PtM.

a, The alternation of active center for alloys with different ϕ and different alloying elements. b, A schematic diagram to illustrate the change of active center. The most stable adsorption manner on PtHf and PtZr are calculated using a constrained structure to avoid surface reconstruction. PtAu and PtW with a negative ϕ are not discussed in the main text as they are directly excluded due to unfavorable electronic structure (a negative Δχ) for designing selective catalyst.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Segregation energy of Pt and Mn to the surface.

a, Optimized geometries of PtMn particle. b, The segregation energy of Pt and Mn to the surface of PtMn particle. The lowest segregation energy is used. c, Different number of segregation atom to the surface is calculated. The insets show the structure after optimization. For a certain number of atoms that segregates to the surface, the structure with lower energy is used. Color: Pt-blue, Mn-orange.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 AIMD simulations of PtMn particle.

a, Temperature and energy profiles of AIMD simulation for PtMn particle, which is modelled by 32 Pt atom and 31 Mn atom. b, Radius distribution functions (RDFs) between Pt and Mn atoms of PtMn particle. The last 8 ps and every 2 ps are used to perform RDFs to compare the equilibrium. The trends of four times RDFs are the same, which means the system is in an equilibrium state. c-f, The snapshots (top and side view) at 22, 24, 26, and 28 ps. The structure of PtMn particle is maintained despite of slight movement. Color: Pt-blue, Mn-orange.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 AIMD simulations at 873 K of PtMn(110).

a, Temperature and energy profiles of AIMD simulation for PtMn(110), which is modelled by (4 × 4) supercell with five layers. The inset shows the structure of PtMn(110) before simulation. b, Radius distribution functions (RDFs) between Pt and Mn atoms of PtMn(110). The last 8 ps and every 2 ps are used to perform RDFs to compare the equilibrium. The trends of four times RDFs are the same, which means the system is in an equilibrium state. c-f, The snapshots (top and side view) at 42, 62, 72, and 82 ps. The structure of PtMn is maintained despite of slight movement. The bonding with bond length below 3 Å is shown. Color: Pt-blue, Mn-orange.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 The volcano-shaped relationship between ϕ and experimental C3H6 selectivity.

a, Experimental test under different reaction temperature and WHSV of propane (823 K, WHSV of propane = 8.5 h−1, C3H8:H2=1:1, with N2 balance). b, Experimental test under a higher propane partial pressure and WHSV of propane (873 K, WHSV of propane = 8.5 h−1, C3H8:H2=2:1, without N2 balance). The data of PtZn is a quote of reference13. The experimental selectivity of C3H6 under different reaction conditions maintains a similar volcanic relationship with the descriptor (ϕ), further enhancing the reliability of ϕ.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 The comparison of dehydrogenation behavior over PtMn(110), Pt(111), and PtMn particle.

The potential diagram of propylene dehydrogenation at a, edge site of PtMn particle, and b, corner site of PtMn particle. The insets show the geometries of the adsorbed C3H6, the transition state (TS) of C3H6 dehydrogenation, and the adsorbed C3H5 over PtMn particle. Color: Pt-blue, Mn-orange. c, d, The selectivity comparison between PtMn(110), Pt(111), and PtMn particle. Pt(111) is taken as the reference. The potential diagram shows that the adsorption strength of C3H6 at edge or corner site of PtMn particle becomes stronger than PtMn(110). Especially, the corner site exhibits stronger adsorption of the coke precursor (C3H5) compared with PtMn(110). Moreover, the transition states of C3H6 dehydrogenation are more stable over the low-coordinated sites than PtMn(110). This leads to a decreased selectivity, which can facilitate coke formation and contribute to the deactivation at the initial stage of catalysis.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 9 Extension and applicability of ‘degree-of-isolation’.

a, The relationship between ϕe and experimental ethylene selectivity for Au-, Ag-, and Cu-alloyed Pd SAA catalyst in the semi-hydrogenation of acetylene. The experimental data is a quote from references16,17,18. b, The relationship between ϕe and experimental propylene selectivity for subsurface alloy with Pt-skin structure, and Fe, Co, or Ni as alloying elements in subsurface regions. The experimental data is a quote from reference38.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–16 and Tables 1–3.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 8

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 9

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, X., Zhao, ZJ., Lu, Z. et al. Designing single-site alloy catalysts using a degree-of-isolation descriptor. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 611–616 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-023-01344-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-023-01344-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing