Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Efficient electrocatalytic valorization of chlorinated organic water pollutant to ethylene

Nature Nanotechnology volume 18, pages 160–167 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Electrochemistry can provide an efficient and sustainable way to treat environmental waters polluted by chlorinated organic compounds. However, the electrochemical valorization of 1,2-dichloroethane (DCA) is currently challenged by the lack of a catalyst that can selectively convert DCA in aqueous solutions into ethylene. Here we report a catalyst comprising cobalt phthalocyanine molecules assembled on multiwalled carbon nanotubes that can electrochemically decompose aqueous DCA with high current and energy efficiencies. Ethylene is produced at high rates with unprecedented ~100% Faradaic efficiency across wide electrode potential and reactant concentration ranges. Kinetic studies and density functional theory calculations reveal that the rate-determining step is the first C–Cl bond breaking, which does not involve protons—a key mechanistic feature that enables cobalt phthalocyanine/carbon nanotube to efficiently catalyse DCA dechlorination and suppress the hydrogen evolution reaction. The nanotubular structure of the catalyst enables us to shape it into a flow-through electrified membrane, which we have used to demonstrate >95% DCA removal from simulated water samples with environmentally relevant DCA and electrolyte concentrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: CoPc/CNT catalyst.
Fig. 2: Electrocatalytic properties for DCA dechlorination measured in 0.1 M aqueous KHCO3 saturated with DCA (~87 mM).
Fig. 3: Calculated reaction pathway of electrochemical DCA dechlorination catalysed by CoPc.
Fig. 4: CoPc/CNT-functionalized electrochemical membrane for the treatment of DCA-contaminated water.

Data availability

The atomic coordinates of the optimized structures (at neutral charge) for DFT calculations are provided in Supplementary Data 1. The measurement data presented within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for 1,2-Dichloroethane (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2001); https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp38.pdf

  2. Field, J. A. & Sierra-Alvare, R. Biodegradability of chlorinated solvents and related chlorinated aliphatic compounds. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 3, 185–254 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. American Chemistry Council. 2020 Guide to the Business of Chemistry (2020); https://www.americanchemistry.com/content/download/3640/file/2020-Guide-to-the-Business-of-Chemistry.pdf

  4. Sherwood, J. European restrictions on 1,2‐dichloroethane: C−H activation research and development should be liberated and not limited. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 14286–14290 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leow, D. et al. Activation of remote meta-C–H bonds assisted by an end-on template. Nature 486, 518–522 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, X. C. et al. Ligand-enabled meta-C–H activation using a transient mediator. Nature 519, 334–338 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Phipps, R. J. & Gaunt, M. J. A meta-selective copper-catalyzed C–H bond arylation. Science 323, 1593–1597 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. The 2019 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) National Analysis (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2019); https://www.epa.gov/trinationalanalysis/releases-chemical-and-industry

  9. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (United StatesEnvironmental Protection Agency, 2009); https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-06/documents/npwdr_complete_table.pdf

  10. Vogel, T. et al. ES&T critical reviews: transformations of halogenated aliphatic compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 21, 722–736 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Capel, P. D. & Larson, S. J. A chemodynamic approach for estimating losses of target organic chemicals from water during sample holding time. Chemosphere 30, 1097–1107 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. van der Zaan, B. et al. Degradation of 1,2-dichloroethane by microbial communities from river sediment at various redox conditions. Water Res. 43, 3207–3216 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De Luna, P. et al. What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes? Science 364, eaav3506 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams, C. K. et al. Electrocatalytic dechlorination of dichloromethane in water using a heterogenized molecular copper complex. Inorg. Chem. 60, 4915–4923 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams, C. K. et al. Hydrodechlorination of dichloromethane by a metal‐free triazole‐porphyrin electrocatalyst: demonstration of main‐group element electrocatalysis. Chem. Eur. J. 27, 6240–6246 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Scialdone, O. et al. Electrochemical abatement of chloroethanes in water: reduction, oxidation and combined processes. Electrochim. Acta 55, 701–708 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Scialdone, O. et al. Electrochemical incineration of 1,2-dichloroethane: effect of the electrode material. Electrochim. Acta 53, 7220–7225 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sonoyama, N. & Sakata, T. Electrochemical continuous decomposition of chloroform and other volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons in water using a column type metal impregnated carbon fiber electrode. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33, 3438–3442 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hori, Y. et al. Electrochemical dechlorination of chlorinated hydrocarbons—electrochemical reduction of chloroform in acetonitrile/water mixtures at high current density. Chem. Lett. 32, 230–231 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gan, G. et al. Active sites in single-atom Fe–Nx–C nanosheets for selective electrochemical dechlorination of 1,2-dichloroethane to ethylene. ACS Nano 14, 9929–9937 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, F. et al. Manganese-based spinel core–shell nanostructures for efficient electrocatalysis of 1,2-dichloroethane. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 3, 10778–10786 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gan, G. et al. Identification of catalytic active sites in nitrogen-doped carbon for electrocatalytic dechlorination of 1,2-dichloroethane. ACS Catal. 9, 10931–10939 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gan, G. et al. Nature of intrinsic defects in carbon materials for electrochemical dechlorination of 1,2-dichloroethane to ethylene. ACS Catal. 11, 14284–14292 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu, Y. et al. Domino electroreduction of CO2 to methanol on a molecular catalyst. Nature 575, 639–642 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, X. et al. Highly selective and active CO2 reduction electrocatalysts based on cobalt phthalocyanine/carbon nanotube hybrid structures. Nat. Commun. 8, 14675 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, H. et al. An ultrafast nickel–iron battery from strongly coupled inorganic nanoparticle/nanocarbon hybrid materials. Nat. Commun. 3, 917 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yueshen, W. et al. Direct electrosynthesis of methylamine from carbon dioxide and nitrate. Nat. Sustain. 4, 725–730 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu, Y. et al. Graphene‐veiled gold substrate for surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Adv. Mater. 25, 928–933 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Esenpınar, A. A. et al. Synthesis and electrochemistry of tetrakis (7-coumarinthio-4-methyl)-phthalocyanines, and preparation of their cinnamic acid and sodium cinnamate derivatives. Polyhedron 28, 33–42 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Akyüz, D. et al. Metallophthalocyanines bearing polymerizable {[5‐({(1E)‐[4‐(diethylamino)phenyl]methylene}amino)‐1‐naphthy1]oxy} groups as electrochemical pesticide sensor. Electroanalysis 29, 2913–2924 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wiberg, K. B. The deuterium isotope effect. Chem. Rev. 55, 713–743 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kahyarian, A. et al. Mechanism of the hydrogen evolution reaction in mildly acidic environments on gold. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, H365 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fang, Y. H. et al. Tafel kinetics of electrocatalytic reactions: from experiment to first-principles. ACS Catal. 4, 4364–4376 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Huang, D. et al. Elucidating the role of single-atom Pd for electrocatalytic hydrodechlorination. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 13306–13316 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mao, X. et al. Redox control for electrochemical dechlorination of trichloroethylene in bicarbonate aqueous media. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 6517–6523 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hernandez, E. et al. Elastic properties of C and BxCyNz composite nanotubes. Phy. Rev. Lett. 80, 4502–4505 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Guanghua, G. et al. Energetics, structure, mechanical and vibrational properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnology 9, 184–191 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang, Y. et al. Reaction mechanism for the hydrogen evolution reaction on the basal plane sulfur vacancy site of MoS2 using grand canonical potential kinetics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 16773–16782 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Drinking Water Advisory: Consumer Acceptability Advice and Health Effects Analysis on Sulfate (United States Environmental Protection, 2003); http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ccl/pdf/sulfate.pdf

  40. Sun, M. et al. Electrified membranes for water treatment applications. ACS EST Engg. 1, 725–752 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Shahriary, L. et al. Graphene oxide synthesized by using modified Hummers approach. Int. J. Renew. Energy Environ. Eng. 2, 58–63 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  42. An, S. et al. A graphene oxide cookbook: exploring chemical and colloidal properties as a function of synthesis parameters. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 588, 725–736 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251–14269 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Mathew, K. et al. Implicit solvation model for density-functional study of nanocrystal surfaces and reaction pathways. J. Chem. Phys. 140, 084106 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sundararaman, R. & Goddard, W. A. III The charge-asymmetric nonlocally determined local-electric (CANDLE) solvation model. J. Chem. Phys. 142, 064107 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sundararaman, R. et al. JDFTx: software for joint density-functional theory. SoftwareX 6, 278–284 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Perdew, J. P. et al. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Johnson, E. R. & Becke, A. D. A post-Hartree-Fock model of intermolecular interactions: Inclusion of higher-order corrections. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 174104 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Monkhorst, H. J. & Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188–5192 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Henkelman, G. et al. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901–9904 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Garrity, K. F. et al. Pseudopotentials for high-throughput DFT calculations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 81, 446–452 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Bochevarov, A. D. et al. Jaguar: a high-performance quantum chemistry software program with strengths in life and materials sciences. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 113, 2110–2142 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Abraham, M. H. et al. Thermodynamics of solute transfer from water to hexadecane. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 291–300 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Berzinsh, U. et al. Isotope shift in the electron affinity of chlorine. Phys. Rev. A 51, 231–238 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Kelly, C. P. et al. Single-ion solvation free energies and the normal hydrogen electrode potential in methanol, acetonitrile, and dimethyl sulfoxide. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 408–422 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work (materials synthesis, structural characterization and catalysis work) was primarily supported as part of the Center for Hybrid Approaches in Solar Energy to Liquid Fuels (CHASE), an Energy Innovation Hub funded by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under award no. DE-SC0021173 (H.W.). Computational work was supported by the Liquid Sunlight Alliance, which is supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Fuels from Sunlight Hub under award no. DE-SC0021266 (W.A.G.) and an individual fellowship from the Resnick Sustainability Institute at Caltech (S.K.), and used the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE) for DFT calculations, which is supported by National Science Foundation grant no. ACI-1548562 (W.A.G.). Electrified membrane filtration work was supported by the NSF Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology-Enabled Water Treatment (EEC-1449500; M.E.). STEM and EDX characterizations were supported by the NSF career award no. 1749742 (J.J.C.). We thank J. Lee and J. D. Fortner (Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Yale University) for providing graphene oxide.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Chungseok Choi, Xiaoxiong Wang, Soonho Kwon.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    Chungseok Choi, Conor L. Rooney, Nia J. Harmon & Hailiang Wang

  2. Energy Sciences Institute, Yale University, West Haven, CT, USA

    Chungseok Choi, Conor L. Rooney, Nia J. Harmon, Judy J. Cha & Hailiang Wang

  3. Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    Xiaoxiong Wang & Menachem Elimelech

  4. Materials and Process Simulation Center (MSC), California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

    Soonho Kwon & William A. Goddard III

  5. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

    James L. Hart, Quynh P. Sam & Judy J. Cha

  6. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Yale University, West Haven, CT, USA

    Judy J. Cha

Authors
  1. Chungseok Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoxiong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Soonho Kwon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. James L. Hart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Conor L. Rooney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nia J. Harmon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Quynh P. Sam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Judy J. Cha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. William A. Goddard III
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Menachem Elimelech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Hailiang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.C. and H.W. conceived and designed the project. C.C. and C.L.R. prepared the CoPc/CNT. C.C. conducted the electrocatalytic DCA dechlorination. X.W. conducted the flow-through DCA dechlorination with supervision from M.E. S.K. carried out the DFT calculations with supervision from W.A.G. J.L.H. and Q.P.S. performed the TEM imaging with supervision from J.J.C. N.J.H. performed the ICP-MS measurements. C.C. and H.W. wrote the manuscript with input from X.W. and S.K. H.W. supervised the project. All the authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to William A. Goddard III, Menachem Elimelech or Hailiang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Nanotechnology thanks Guohua Chen and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–25 and Tables 1 and 2.

Supplementary Data 1

Coordinates of the optimized structures (at neutral charge) in this Article.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, C., Wang, X., Kwon, S. et al. Efficient electrocatalytic valorization of chlorinated organic water pollutant to ethylene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 160–167 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-022-01277-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-022-01277-z

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Find nanotechnology articles, nanomaterial data and patents all in one place. Visit Nano by Nature Research