Controllably buckling an array of vertical field effect transistors enables intracellular electrophysiological mapping with high spatial and temporal resolutions.
The ability to directly measure intracellular electrophysiology in electrogenic cells has provided abundant insights into the biophysical functions of nerves, muscles, and synapses, which is thereby crucial for neurophysiological, cardiological, and pharmacological research1. The patch-clamp technique that involves inserting a glass micropipette into the interior of individual cells has been the gold standard for high-precision intracellular recording. However, the patch-clamp technique is highly invasive and unsuitable for multiplexing and parallelization (typically ≤10 simultaneous measurements), limiting its utility in many applications due to low testing throughput. Impressive improvement has been made in miniaturizing the glass micropipette into a nanopipette (that is, 15–30 nm in the tip diameter) to reduce the invasiveness, but the testing throughput still remains limited by the difficulty of keeping a large quantity of nanopipettes in the cells2. In the past decade, multidisciplinary efforts to combine nanotechnologies have enabled rapid success in producing alternative solutions using either passive or active bioprobes at the cellular and subcellular length scales3,4,5. A prominent example of the passive bioprobes involves using a total of 4,096 multiplexed platinum black nanoelectrodes to simultaneously record action potential propagations from thousands of connected neurons (that is, high spatial resolution)6. Another example of the active bioprobes involves using a number (≤10) of nanoscale field effect transistors (FETs) at the tip of curved silicon nanowires that can spontaneously penetrate the cell membranes and then capture subthreshold and low-amplitude intracellular signals (that is, high temporal resolution)7. Despite great advances, current approaches exhibit a trade-off between spatial and temporal scales in the multiplexed intracellular recording.
Writing in Nature Nanotechnology, Yue Gu et al. now integrate a scalable array of FETs into a bioprobe, enabling the multiplexed three-dimensional (3D) mapping of intracellular electrophysiological signals and their conduction paths with high spatial and temporal resolutions8. The authors employ a compressive buckling technique that allows the pre-fabricated planar FETs to be geometrically transformed into a 3D pop-up structure in a controlled fashion through the guidance of foldable hinges9 (Fig. 1). The resulting bioprobe exhibits a vertically ordered array of FETs that can penetrate through the cell membrane with minimal invasiveness and also record the transmembrane potentials with high fidelity. To further reduce the invasiveness, the surface of the probe tips can be functionalized with phospholipid bilayers to form tight intracellular junctions and smooth internalization. The bioprobe supports the faithful recording of subthreshold action potentials (that is, cell membrane oscillations of 5–15 mV) from cardiomyocytes with high sensitivity-to-noise ratios and temporal resolution comparable to the gold standard patch-clamp technique. The bioprobe is also capable of monitoring the dynamic change in the beating rhythm, resting membrane potential, and action potential duration of cardiomyocytes in the presence of ion channel blocking drugs (for example, nifedipine and tetrodotoxin), highlighting its potential utility in pharmaceutical screening. Uniquely, the bioprobe is scalable in overall size and configuration to better interface with the curvilinear surface of large tissues, thereby enhancing the recording quality and testing throughput. For instance, the authors tailor the bioprobe to deploy a total of 128 FETs within a 3D constructed cardiac tissue at different heights (that is, 48 FETs each at 20 and 40 μm, 32 FETs at 60 μm) in a uniformly distributed manner. The resulting bioprobe is able to capture the intracellular action potentials of the cardiac tissue and also reveal the signal conduction paths in 3D. Leveraging the high spatial and temporal resolutions of the bioprobe, the authors successfully measure the intracellular signal conduction velocity of a cardiomyocyte (that is, 0.182 m s–1) and a cardiac tissue (that is, 0.0188 ± 0.0075 m s–1).
In principle, the bioprobe could be more scalable to adopt most cells and maybe even smaller subcellular compartments through fine refinement of the tip size, spacing, and relative positions. Therefore, the intracellular information recorded from the scaled bioprobes would be useful for better understanding of subcellular electrophysiology, organellar ionic dynamics, organelle–cell membrane interaction, and electrical coupling between different cells. Beyond the applications presented by the authors, it may also be interesting to further scale up the bioprobe toward interfacing with human 3D organoids that closely mimic their corresponding in vivo organs. In this context, the resulting bioprobe could be useful in allowing the minimally invasive penetration of multiple FETs through the organoid membrane for real-time intra-organoid recording in a conceptually similar manner to recently reported 3D mesostructures10. In the era of a global pandemic, one could also envision the use of the intra-organoid recording for evaluating the unknown effects of clinical antiviral drugs for COVID-19, such as Kevzara and Actemra, on a specific organoid of interest. In addition, these bioprobes, which are built on a stretchable soft elastomer, may permit their use in in vivo recording settings on animal studies in a manner that can reduce the invasiveness and also ensure the recording fidelity against tissue movements. Although several technical obstacles remain in the bioprobe and other similar nanosensors for improving long-term stability in intracellular recording, the study by Yue Gu et al., encompassing 3D pop-up nanostructures and their implementation into a deeper understanding of intracellular responses, represents a noticeable leap.
Jiang, Y. & Tian, B. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 473–490 (2018).
Jayant, K. et al. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 335–342 (2017).
Hong, G. & Lieber, C. M. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 330–345 (2019).
Abbott, J. et al. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 460–466 (2017).
Robinson, J. T. et al. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 180–184 (2012).
Abbott, J. et al. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 232–241 (2020).
Zhao, Y. et al. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 783–790 (2019).
Gu, Y. et al. Nat. Nanotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-01040-w (2021).
Xu, S. et al. Science 347, 154–159 (2015).
Ryu, H. et al. Adv. Mater. 33, 2100026 (2021).
The authors declare no competing interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Park, W., Lee, C.H. Buckled scalable intracellular bioprobes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 222–223 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-01028-6