Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

New guidance brings clarity to environmental hazard and behaviour testing of nanomaterials

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Friedersdorf, L. E., Bjorkland, R., Klaper, R. D., Sayes, C. M. & Wiesner, M. R. Nat. Nanotech. 14, 996–998 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    OECD Guidance document 23: Guidance Document on Aquatic Toxicity Testing of Difficult Substances and Mixtures (OECD, 2019).

  3. 3.

    Petersen, E. J. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 9532–9547 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Grieger, K. D., Hansen, S. F. & Baun, A. Nanotoxicology 3, 222–233 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kühnel, D. & Nickel, C. Sci. Tot. Environ. 472, 347–353 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Diamond, S. et al. Review of OECD/OPPTS-Harmonized and OPPTS Ecotoxicity Test Guidelines for Their Applicability to Manufactured Nanomaterials EPA/600/R-09/065 (US EPA, 2009).

  7. 7.

    Handy, R. D. et al. & Kennedy, A. Ecotoxicology 21, 933–972 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    OECD Guidance document 317: Guidance Document on Aquatic and Sediment Toxicological Testing of Nanomaterials (OECD, 2020).

  9. 9.

    OECD Guidance Document 318: Guidance Document for the Testing of Dissolution and Dispersion Stability Of Nanomaterials and the Use of the Data for Further Environmental Testing and Assessment Strategies (OECD, 2020).

  10. 10.

    Kennedy, A. J. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 12490–12499 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hoheisel, S. M., Diamond, S. & Mount, D. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 31, 2557–2563 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hull, M., Kennedy, A. J., Detzel, C., Vikesland, P. J. & Chappell, M. A. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 10881–10882 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Phalen, R. F., Mendez, L. B. & Oldham, M. J. Inhal. Toxicol. 22, 6–14 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Oberdorster, G., Oberdorster, E. & Oberdorster, J. Environ. Health Perspect. 115, A290–A291 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Delmaar, C. J. E. et al. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 34, 1015–1022 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Van Hoecke, K., de Schamphelaere, K. A. C., Meeren, V. D., Lucas, S. & Janssen, C. R. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27, 1948–1957 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Petersen, E. J. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 4226–4246 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Petersen, E. J. et al. Chem. Res. Toxicol. (in the press).

  19. 19.

    Henry, T. B. et al. Environ. Health Perspect. 115, 1059–1065 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Svendsen, C. et al. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 731–742 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Monikh, F. A. et al. Nanoimpact 11, 42–50 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hanna, S. K. et al. Environ. Sci. Nano 3, 1080–1089 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sun, X.-D. et al. Nat. Nanotech. 15, 755–760 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Koelmans, A. A., Bakir, A., Burton, G. A. & Janssen, C. R. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 3315–3326 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Geitner, N. K. et al. Environ. Sci.: Nano 7, 13–36 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by German Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety under the projects FKZ 3713 65 406 and Refoplan 3719 664 010; the US Army Environmental Quality/Installations Research Program and SafeRapidNano congressional interest; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada Strategic Partnership Grants for Projects (STPGP) grant to G.G.G. (grant no. 463674); NSERC, Environment Canada and National Research Council of Canada Nanotechnology Initiative (grant no. RES0002319); and Alberta Innovates Technology Futures nanoWorks collaborative research agreement (grant no. 200900065).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elijah Joel Petersen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petersen, E.J., Goss, G.G., von der Kammer, F. et al. New guidance brings clarity to environmental hazard and behaviour testing of nanomaterials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 482–483 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-00889-1

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Find nanotechnology articles, nanomaterial data and patents all in one place. Visit Nano by Nature Research