Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

New guidance brings clarity to environmental hazard and behaviour testing of nanomaterials

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Friedersdorf, L. E., Bjorkland, R., Klaper, R. D., Sayes, C. M. & Wiesner, M. R. Nat. Nanotech. 14, 996–998 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. OECD Guidance document 23: Guidance Document on Aquatic Toxicity Testing of Difficult Substances and Mixtures (OECD, 2019).

  3. Petersen, E. J. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 9532–9547 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grieger, K. D., Hansen, S. F. & Baun, A. Nanotoxicology 3, 222–233 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kühnel, D. & Nickel, C. Sci. Tot. Environ. 472, 347–353 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Diamond, S. et al. Review of OECD/OPPTS-Harmonized and OPPTS Ecotoxicity Test Guidelines for Their Applicability to Manufactured Nanomaterials EPA/600/R-09/065 (US EPA, 2009).

  7. Handy, R. D. et al. & Kennedy, A. Ecotoxicology 21, 933–972 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. OECD Guidance document 317: Guidance Document on Aquatic and Sediment Toxicological Testing of Nanomaterials (OECD, 2020).

  9. OECD Guidance Document 318: Guidance Document for the Testing of Dissolution and Dispersion Stability Of Nanomaterials and the Use of the Data for Further Environmental Testing and Assessment Strategies (OECD, 2020).

  10. Kennedy, A. J. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 12490–12499 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoheisel, S. M., Diamond, S. & Mount, D. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 31, 2557–2563 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hull, M., Kennedy, A. J., Detzel, C., Vikesland, P. J. & Chappell, M. A. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 10881–10882 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Phalen, R. F., Mendez, L. B. & Oldham, M. J. Inhal. Toxicol. 22, 6–14 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oberdorster, G., Oberdorster, E. & Oberdorster, J. Environ. Health Perspect. 115, A290–A291 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Delmaar, C. J. E. et al. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 34, 1015–1022 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Hoecke, K., de Schamphelaere, K. A. C., Meeren, V. D., Lucas, S. & Janssen, C. R. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27, 1948–1957 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Petersen, E. J. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 4226–4246 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Petersen, E. J. et al. Chem. Res. Toxicol. (in the press).

  19. Henry, T. B. et al. Environ. Health Perspect. 115, 1059–1065 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Svendsen, C. et al. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 731–742 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Monikh, F. A. et al. Nanoimpact 11, 42–50 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hanna, S. K. et al. Environ. Sci. Nano 3, 1080–1089 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun, X.-D. et al. Nat. Nanotech. 15, 755–760 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Koelmans, A. A., Bakir, A., Burton, G. A. & Janssen, C. R. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 3315–3326 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Geitner, N. K. et al. Environ. Sci.: Nano 7, 13–36 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was supported by German Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety under the projects FKZ 3713 65 406 and Refoplan 3719 664 010; the US Army Environmental Quality/Installations Research Program and SafeRapidNano congressional interest; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada Strategic Partnership Grants for Projects (STPGP) grant to G.G.G. (grant no. 463674); NSERC, Environment Canada and National Research Council of Canada Nanotechnology Initiative (grant no. RES0002319); and Alberta Innovates Technology Futures nanoWorks collaborative research agreement (grant no. 200900065).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elijah Joel Petersen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petersen, E.J., Goss, G.G., von der Kammer, F. et al. New guidance brings clarity to environmental hazard and behaviour testing of nanomaterials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 482–483 (2021).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing