Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Power-efficient neural network with artificial dendrites

Nature Nanotechnology volume 15, pages 776–782 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

In the nervous system, dendrites, branches of neurons that transmit signals between synapses and soma, play a critical role in processing functions, such as nonlinear integration of postsynaptic signals. The lack of these critical functions in artificial neural networks compromises their performance, for example in terms of flexibility, energy efficiency and the ability to handle complex tasks. Here, by developing artificial dendrites, we experimentally demonstrate a complete neural network fully integrated with synapses, dendrites and soma, implemented using scalable memristor devices. We perform a digit recognition task and simulate a multilayer network using experimentally derived device characteristics. The power consumption is more than three orders of magnitude lower than that of a central processing unit and 70 times lower than that of a typical application-specific integrated circuit chip. This network, equipped with functional dendrites, shows the potential of substantial overall performance improvement, for example by extracting critical information from a noisy background with significantly reduced power consumption and enhanced accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Overview of the biological and artificial neural networks with dendrites.
Fig. 2: Implementation of artificial dendrites.
Fig. 3: Hardware implementation of the neural network with artificial dendrite.
Fig. 4: Comparison of the results of neural networks with and without artificial dendrites.
Fig. 5: Implementation and benchmark of a single-layer neural network.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset used in this study is publicly available52 at http://ufldl.stanford.edu/housenumbers/. Other data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The code that supports the multilayer neural network simulations in this study is available at https://github.com/Tsinghua-LEMON-Lab/Dendritic-computing. Other codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Simonyan, K. & Zisserman, A. Two-stream convolutional networks for action recognition in videos. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 568–576 (MIT Press, 2014).

  2. Deng, L. et al. Recent advances in deep learning for speech research at Microsoft. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 8604–8608 (IEEE, 2013).

  3. Esteva, A. et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 542, 115–118 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Silver, D. et al. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 529, 484–489 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, C., Seff, A., Kornhauser, A. & Xiao, J. Deepdriving: learning affordance for direct perception in autonomous driving. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2722–2730 (IEEE, 2015).

  6. Quoc, V. L. Building high-level features using large scale unsupervised learning. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 8595–8598 (IEEE, 2013).

  7. Jouppi, N. P. et al. In-datacenter performance analysis of a tensor processing unit. In Proceedings of the 44th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture 1–12 (ACM, 2017).

  8. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang, J. et al. Bridging biological and artificial neural networks with emerging neuromorphic devices: fundamentals, progress and challenges. Adv. Mater. 31, 1902761 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsien, J. Z. Principles of intelligence: on evolutionary logic of the brain. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 9, 186 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moore, J. J. et al. Dynamics of cortical dendritic membrane potential and spikes in freely behaving rats. Science 355, eaaj1497 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Takahashi, N., Oertner, T. G., Hegemann, P. & Larkum, M. E. Active cortical dendrites modulate perception. Science 354, 1587–1590 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Takahashi, N. et al. Locally synchronized synaptic inputs. Science 335, 353–356 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Trenholm, S. et al. Nonlinear dendritic integration of electrical and chemical synaptic inputs drives fine-scale correlations. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1759–1766 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Antic, S. D., Zhou, W.-L., Moore, A. R., Short, S. M. & Ikonomu, K. D. The decade of the dendritic NMDA spike. J. Neurosci. Res. 88, 2991–3001 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lavzin, M., Rapoport, S., Polsky, A., Garion, L. & Schiller, J. Nonlinear dendritic processing determines angular tuning of barrel cortex neurons in vivo. Nature 490, 397–401 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Trong, T. M. H., Motley, S. E., Wagner, J., Kerr, R. R. & Kozloski, J. Dendritic spines modify action potential back-propagation in a multicompartment neuronal model. IBM J. Res. Dev. 61, 11:11–11:13 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hawkins, J. & Ahmad, S. Why neurons have thousands of synapses, a theory of sequence memory in neocortex. Front. Neural Circuits 10, 23 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schemmel, J., Kriener, L., Müller, P. & Meier, K. An accelerated analog neuromorphic hardware system emulating NMDA- and calcium-based non-linear dendrites. In Proc. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2217–2226 (IEEE, 2017).

  20. Bhaduri, A., Banerjee, A., Roy, S., Kar, S. & Basu, A. Spiking neural classifier with lumped dendritic nonlinearity and binary synapses: a current mode VLSI implementation and analysis. Neural Comput. 30, 723–760 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, Z. et al. Memristors with diffusive dynamics as synaptic emulators for neuromorphic computing. Nat. Mater. 16, 101–108 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Prezioso, M. et al. Training and operation of an integrated neuromorphic network based on metal-oxide memristors. Nature 521, 61–64 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi, S. et al. SiGe epitaxial memory for neuromorphic computing with reproducible high performance based on engineered dislocations. Nat. Mater. 17, 335–340 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tuma, T., Pantazi, A., Le Gallo, M., Sebastian, A. & Eleftheriou, E. Stochastic phase-change neurons. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 693–699 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pickett, M. D., Medeiros-Ribeiro, G. & Williams, R. S. A scalable neuristor built with Mott memristors. Nat. Mater. 12, 114–117 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stoliar, P. et al. A leaky-integrate-and-fire neuron analog realized with a Mott insulator. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1604740 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ambrogio, S. et al. Equivalent-accuracy accelerated neural-network training using analogue memory. Nature 558, 60–67 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sheridan, P. M. et al. Sparse coding with memristor networks. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 784–789 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, Z. et al. Fully memristive neural networks for pattern classification with unsupervised learning. Nat. Electron. 1, 137–145 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yao, P. Fully hardware-implemented memristor convolutional neural network. Nature 577, 641–646 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Agmon-Snir, H., Carr, C. E. & Rinzel, J. The role of dendrites in auditory coincidence detection. Nature 393, 268–272 (1998).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Magee, J. C. Dendritic integration of excitatory synaptic input. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1, 181–190 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Branco, T., Clark, B. A. & Hausser, M. Dendritic discrimination of temporal input sequences in cortical neurons. Science 329, 1671–1675 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Vaidya, S. P. & Johnston, D. Temporal synchrony and gamma-to-theta power conversion in the dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1812–1820 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Stuart, G. J. & Spruston, N. Dendritic integration: 60 years of progress. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1713–1721 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cazemier, J. L., Clascá, F. & Tiesinga, P. H. E. Connectomic analysis of brain networks: novel techniques and future directions. Front. Neuroanat. 10, 110 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fu, Z.-X. et al. Dendritic mitoflash as a putative signal for stabilizing long-term synaptic plasticity. Nat. Commun. 8, 31 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bono, J. & Clopath, C. Modeling somatic and dendritic spike mediated plasticity at the single neuron and network level. Nat. Commun. 8, 706 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  39. De Paola, V. et al. Cell type-specific structural plasticity of axonal branches and boutons in the adult neocortex. Neuron 49, 861–875 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lai, H. C. & Jan, L. Y. The distribution and targeting of neuronal voltage-gated ion channels. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 548–562 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Strukov, D. B. & Williams, R. S. Exponential ionic drift: fast switching and low volatility of thin-film memristors. Appl. Phys. A 94, 515–519 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wedig, A. et al. Nanoscale cation motion in TaOx, HfOx and TiOx memristive systems. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 67–74 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kamiya, K. et al. Physics in designing desirable ReRAM stack structure—atomistic recipes based on oxygen chemical potential control and charge injection/removal. In Proc. International Electron Devices Meeting 20.22.21–20.22.24 (IEEE, 2012).

  44. Goux, L. et al. Ultralow sub-500 nA operating current high-performance TiN/Al2O3/HfO2/Hf/TiN bipolar RRAM achieved through understanding-based stack-engineering. In Proc. Symposium on VLSI Technology (VLSIT) 159–160 (IEEE, 2012).

  45. Palmer, L. M. et al. NMDA spikes enhance action potential generation during sensory input. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 383–390 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ujfalussy, B. B., Makara, J. K., Lengyel, M. & Branco, T. Global and multiplexed dendritic computations under in vivo-like conditions. Neuron 100, 579–592 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Muñoz, W., Tremblay, R., Levenstein, D. & Rudy, B. Layer-specific modulation of neocortical dendritic inhibition during active wakefulness. Science 355, 954–959 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Chang, T., Jo, S.-H. & Lu, W. Short-term memory to long-term memory transition in a nanoscale memristor. ACS Nano 5, 7669–7676 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ohno, T. et al. Short-term plasticity and long-term potentiation mimicked in single inorganic synapses. Nat. Mater. 10, 591–595 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Gao, B., Wu, H., Kang, J., Yu, H. & Qian, H. Oxide-based analog synapse: physical modeling, experimental characterization and optimization. In Proc. IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 7.3.1–7.3.4 (IEEE, 2016).

  51. Yao, P. et al. Face classification using electronic synapses. Nat. Commun. 8, 15199 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Netzer, Y. et al. Reading digits in natural images with unsupervised feature learning. In Proc. NIPS Workshop on Deep Learning and Unsupervised Feature Learning 1–9 (ACM, 2011).

  53. Pei, J. et al. Towards artificial general intelligence with hybrid Tianjic chip architecture. Nature 572, 106–111 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Gidon, A. et al. Dendritic action potentials and computation in human layer 2/3 cortical neurons. Science 367, 83–87 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the China Key Research and Development Program (2019YFB2205403), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61851404, 61674089 and 91964104), Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project (Z191100007519008) and the National Young Thousand Talents Program.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Xinyi Li, Jianshi Tang, Qingtian Zhang.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Microelectronics, Beijing Innovation Center for Future Chips (ICFC), Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

    Xinyi Li, Jianshi Tang, Qingtian Zhang, Bin Gao, Wei Wu, Wenqiang Zhang, Peng Yao, Ning Deng, He Qian & Huaqiang Wu

  2. Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (BNRist), Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

    Jianshi Tang, Bin Gao, Ning Deng, He Qian & Huaqiang Wu

  3. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA

    J. Joshua Yang

  4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

    Sen Song

  5. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

    Lei Deng & Yuan Xie

  6. Alibaba DAMO Academy, Hangzhou, China

    Yuan Xie

Authors
  1. Xinyi Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jianshi Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qingtian Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bin Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Joshua Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sen Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Wei Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wenqiang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Peng Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ning Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Lei Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Yuan Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. He Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Huaqiang Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X.L., H.W. and S.S. conceived and designed the experiments. X.L. and Q.Z. performed the experiments. X.L., J.T., B.G. and H.W. analysed the data. P.Y., W.Z., L.D. and Y.X. contributed to the benchmark. W.W., N.D., J.J.Y. and H.Q. contributed to the materials and analysis. X.L., J.T., B.G. and H.W. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. H.W. and H.Q. supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huaqiang Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Nanotechnology thanks Alexantrou Serb and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Characterizations of artificial dendrite device.

Current response from the fabricated artificial dendrite device under a positive and b negative voltage pulses, respectively. c, Cross-sectional transmission electron microscope image of the device and the corresponding elements distribution profile from energy-dispersive spectroscopy (scale bar, 20 nm). An oxygen-rich layer (light color) was observed at the TaOx/Pt interface, which was formed probably due to oxygen scavenge by Pt.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Device-to-device variation of the artificial dendrite devices.

a, Measured current response of three typical artificial dendrites in the integrated neural network shown in Fig. 5c under different applied voltages (from bottom to top: 2 V, 2.5 V and then from 3 V to 5 V in steps of 0.1 V). b, Measurement of the nonlinear filtering and integration property on eight artificial dendrite devices in response to a series of voltage pulses. c, Measurement of the nonlinear current response to a linearly ramped voltage pulse from 18 devices on a 4-inch wafer.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Inhibitory input and relaxation effects on the artificial dendrite device.

One inhibitory input cancelled out the integration effect of (a) one, (b) two, and (c) three excitatory inputs, respectively. d, Current response of the artificial dendrite to a series of voltage pulses to show the device in off, on, and relaxation states. Small voltage pulses (2 V, 1 ms) are applied before and after an on-switching voltage pulse (5 V, 10 ms).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Nonlinear current response of the artificial dendrite device.

Measured current responses on the artificial dendrite device in the (a) off-state, and (b) on-state, respectively. c, Current response under three consecutive voltage pulses (5 V in amplitude) lasting 1 ms applied at short intervals of 100 μs.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Simulation of multilayer neural network with artificial dendrites.

a, Illustration of the neural network example: three layers with sizes of (3072, 500, 10), nine dendritic branches for each neuron in the hidden layer, and four dendritic branches for each output neuron. b, Illustration of the neural network inference process on the SVHN dataset, where most noise information was filtered out through hierarchical dendritic filtering. For comparison, the image after the dendritic processing (that is, interlayer image) was reconstructed by combining different branches of the image processed by each dendrite, which was calculated by multiplying the dendrite’s output with the element-wise product of the input pixels and the corresponding synaptic weights.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Performance analysis of the multilayer neural network with artificial dendrites.

a, Power advantage as a function of the I-V nonlinearity (see definition in Supplementary Information S10) of the artificial dendrites with different ON/OFF ratios (while Vapplied is 5 V). b, Power advantage as a function of the I-V nonlinearity of the artificial dendrites with different applied voltages (while ON/OFF ratio is 10). c, Power advantage vs. I-V nonlinearity of the artificial dendrites (while Vapplied is 2 V and ON/OFF ratio is 100). The power advantage is defined as the ratio between the power consumption of the neural networks without and with artificial dendrites. d, Recognition accuracy vs. I-V nonlinearity of the artificial dendrites. The power consumption is calculated as the integral of the applied voltage and the output current of each soma at each time step.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Electrical characterizations of the optimized dendrite and soma devices.

a, Measured current response of the optimized dendrite device, 5 × 5 μm2 in size, with a low operation voltage of 2 V. b, More than 200 cycles of current response on the optimized dendrite device demonstrate a much reduced operation time of 10 μs under a voltage pulse of 3 V. c, Measured I-V curves for the optimized soma device with a reduced size of 2 × 2 μm2. d, Using an input voltage of 5 V for the optimized dendrite-soma unit, so that the required time duration of one image inference process can be reduced down to tens of microseconds.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 Comparison of the recognition accuracy and power consumption on different hardware platforms.

MLP, multilayer perceptron for the classification of complete SVHN dataset.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–13, Discussion, Table 1 and refs. 1–7.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 2

Unprocessed measurement source data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Unprocessed measurement source data.

Source Data Fig. 5

Calculated source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Unprocessed measurement source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Unprocessed measurement source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Unprocessed measurement source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4

Unprocessed measurement source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Unprocessed measurement and simulation source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6

Simulation source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7

Unprocessed measurement source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 8

Calculated source data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Tang, J., Zhang, Q. et al. Power-efficient neural network with artificial dendrites. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 776–782 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-0722-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-0722-5

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing