Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

From nanoscale interface characterization to sustainable energy storage using all-solid-state batteries

An Author Correction to this article was published on 05 March 2021

This article has been updated


The recent discovery of highly conductive solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) has led to tremendous progress in the development of all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs). Though promising, they still face barriers that limit their practical application, such as poor interfacial stability, scalability challenges and production safety. Additionally, efforts to develop sustainable manufacturing of lithium ion batteries are still lacking, with no prevailing strategy developed yet to handle recyclability of ASSBs. To date, most SSE research has been largely focused on the discovery of novel electrolytes. Recent review articles have extensively examined a broad spectrum of these SSEs using evaluation factors such as conductivity and chemical stability. Recognizing this, in this Review we seek to evaluate SSEs beyond conventional factors and offer a perspective on various bulk, interface and nanoscale phenomena that require urgent attention within the scientific community. We provide a realistic assessment of the current state-of-the-art characterization techniques and evaluate future full cell ASSB prototyping strategies. We hope to offer rational solutions to overcome some major fundamental obstacles faced by the ASSB community, as well as potential strategies toward a sustainable ASSB recycling model.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Solid-state batteries development.
Fig. 2: Electrochemical stability of various solid electrolytes and their effects on cell performance.
Fig. 3: Summary of current effective methods to characterize all-solid-state batteries.
Fig. 4: Manufacturing considerations for ASSBs and the role of polymeric binders.
Fig. 5: Strategies toward sustainable battery recycling.

Change history


  1. 1.

    Yu, C. et al. Facile synthesis toward the optimal structure-conductivity characteristics of the argyrodite Li6PS5Cl solid-state electrolyte. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 33296–33306 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Nguyen, H. et al. Single-step synthesis of highly conductive Na3PS4 solid electrolyte for sodium all solid-state batteries. J. Power Sources 435, 126623 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kato, Y. et al. High-power all-solid-state batteries using sulfide superionic conductors. Nat. Energy 1, 16030 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Zhu, Y., He, X. & Mo, Y. Origin of outstanding stability in the lithium solid electrolyte materials: insights from thermodynamic analyses based on first-principles calculations. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 23685–23693 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Zhang, H. et al. Single lithium-ion conducting solid polymer electrolytes: advances and perspectives. Chem Soc Rev 46, 797–815 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mindemark, J., Lacey, M. J., Bowden, T. & Brandell, D. Beyond PEO—alternative host materials for Li+ conducting solid polymer electrolytes. Prog. Polym. Sci. 81, 114–143 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yao, P. et al. Review on polymer-based composite electrolytes for lithium batteries. Front. Chem. 7, 522 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Auvergniot, J. et al. Interface stability of argyrodite Li6PS5Cl toward LiCoO2, LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2, and LiMn2O4 in bulk all-solid-state batteries. Chem. Mater. 29, 3883–3890 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Auvergniot, J. et al. Redox activity of argyrodite Li6PS5Cl electrolyte in all-solid-state Li-ion battery: an XPS study. Solid State Ionics 300, 78–85 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Haruyama, J., Sodeyama, K., Han, L., Takada, K. & Tateyama, Y. Space–charge layer effect at interface between oxide cathode and sulfide electrolyte in all-solid-state lithium-ion battery. Chem. Mater. 26, 4248–4255 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ohta, N. et al. Enhancement of the high-rate capability of solid-state lithium batteries by nanoscale interfacial modification. Adv. Mater. 18, 2226–2229 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Li, X. et al. LiNbO3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 cathode with high discharge capacity and rate performance for all-solid-state lithium battery. J. Energy Chem. 40, 39–45 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Haruyama, J., Sodeyama, K. & Tateyama, Y. Cation mixing properties toward Co diffusion at the LiCoO2 cathode/sulfide electrolyte interface in a solid-state battery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 286–292 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sakuda, A., Hayashi, A. & Tatsumisago, M. Interfacial observation between LiCoO2 electrode and li2s−p2s5 solid electrolytes of all-solid-state lithium secondary batteries using transmission electron microscopy. Chem. Mater. 22, 949–956 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Woo, J. H. et al. Nanoscale interface modification of LiCoO2 by Al2O3 atomic layer deposition for solid-state li batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 159, A1120–A1124 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Okada, K. et al. Preparation and electrochemical properties of LiAlO2 coated Li(Ni1/3Mn1/3Co1/3)O2 for all-solid-state batteries. Solid State Ionics 255, 120–127 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Xiao, Y., Miara, L. J., Wang, Y. & Ceder, G. Computational Screening of Cathode Coatings for Solid-State. Batteries. Joule 3, 1252–1275 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Koerver, R. et al. Capacity fade in solid-state batteries: interphase formation and chemomechanical processes in nickel-rich layered oxide cathodes and lithium thiophosphate solid electrolytes. Chem. Mater. 29, 5574–5582 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wenzel, S. et al. Direct observation of the interfacial instability of the fast ionic conductor Li10GeP2S12 at the lithium metal anode. Chem. Mater. 28, 2400–2407 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Han, X. et al. Negating interfacial impedance in garnet-based solid-state Li metal batteries. Nat. Mater. 16, 572–579 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Yersak, T., Salvador, J. R., Schmidt, R. D. & Cai, M. Hot pressed, fiber-reinforced (Li2S)70(P2S5)30 solid-state electrolyte separators for Li metal batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 3523–3531 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kim, S. H. et al. In situ observation of lithium metal plating in a sulfur-based solid electrolyte for all-solid-state batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 13650–13657 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tao, X. et al. Solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries operated at 37 °C with composites of nanostructured Li7La3Zr2O12/carbon foam and polymer. Nano Lett. 17, 2967–2972 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ates, T., Keller, M., Kulisch, J., Adermann, T. & Passerini, S. Development of an all-solid-state lithium battery by slurry-coating procedures using a sulfidic electrolyte. Energy Storage Mater. 17, 204–210 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Han, F., Yue, J., Zhu, X. & Wang, C. Suppressing Li dendrite formation in Li2S-P2S5 solid electrolyte by LiI incorporation. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1703644 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Li, Y. et al. Mastering the interface for advanced all-solid-state lithium rechargeable batteries. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13313–13317 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kerman, K., Luntz, A., Viswanathan, V., Chiang, Y.-M. & Chen, Z. Review—practical challenges hindering the development of solid state Li ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A1731–A1744 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Aguesse, F. et al. Investigating the dendritic growth during full cell cycling of garnet electrolyte in direct contact with Li metal. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 3808–3816 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Swamy, T. et al. Lithium metal penetration induced by electrodeposition through solid electrolytes: example in single-crystal Li6La3ZrTaO12 garnet. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, A3648–A3655 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Neudecker, B. J., Dudney, N. J. & Bates, J. B. “Lithium-free” thin-film battery with in situ plated Li snode. J. Electrochem. Soc. 147, 517–523 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Li, J., Ma, C., Chi, M., Liang, C. & Dudney, N. J. Solid electrolyte: the key for high-voltage lithium batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1401408 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Fang, C. et al. Quantifying inactive lithium in lithium metal batteries. Nature 572, 511–515 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sharafi, A. et al. Surface chemistry mechanism of ultra-low interfacial resistance in the solid-state electrolyte Li7La3Zr2O12. Chem. Mater. 29, 7961–7968 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Tao, Y. et al. Lithium superionic conducting oxysulfide solid electrolyte with excellent stability against lithium metal for all-solid-state cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, A96–A101 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sun, Y. et al. Oxygen substitution effects in Li10GeP2S12 solid electrolyte. J. Power Sources 324, 798–803 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Asano, T. et al. Solid halide electrolytes with high lithium-ion conductivity for application in 4 V class bulk-type all-solid-state batteries. Adv. Mater. 30, e1803075 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kamaya, N. et al. A lithium superionic conductor. Nat. Mater. 10, 682–686 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Han, F., Zhu, Y., He, X., Mo, Y. & Wang, C. Electrochemical stability of Li10GeP2S12 and Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1501590 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Han, F., Gao, T., Zhu, Y., Gaskell, K. J. & Wang, C. A battery made from a single material. Adv. Mater. 27, 3473–3483 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Yan, X., Li, Z., Wen, Z. & Han, W. Li/Li7La3Zr2O12/LiFePO4 All-solid-state battery with ultrathin nanoscale solid electrolyte. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 1431–1435 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Shi, X. et al. Fabrication and electrochemical properties of LATP/PVDF composite electrolytes for rechargeable lithium-ion battery. Solid State Ion. 325, 112–119 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zhang, W. et al. The detrimental effects of carbon additives in Li10GeP2S12 based solid-state batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 35888–35896 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Xu, L. et al. Interfaces in solid-state lithium batteries. Joule 2, 1991–2015 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lewis, J. A., Tippens, J., Cortes, F. J. Q. & McDowell, M. T. Chemo-mechanical challenges in solid-state batteries. Trends Chem. 1, 845–857 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Manthiram, A., Yu, X. & Wang, S. Lithium battery chemistries enabled by solid-state electrolytes. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 16103 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ren, Y., Shen, Y., Lin, Y. & Nan, C.-W. Direct observation of lithium dendrites inside garnet-type lithium-ion solid electrolyte. Electrochem. Commun. 57, 27–30 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Seitzman, N. et al. Toward all-solid-state lithium batteries: three-dimensional visualization of lithium migration in β-Li3PS4 ceramic electrolyte. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, A3732–A3737 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Li, T. et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction and analysis of all-solid Li-ion battery electrode using synchrotron transmission X-ray microscopy tomography. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 16927–16931 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Chen-Wiegart, Y.-cK., Liu, Z., Faber, K. T., Barnett, S. A. & Wang, J. 3D analysis of a LiCoO2–Li(Ni1/3Mn1/3Co1/3)O2 Li-ion battery positive electrode using x-ray nano-tomography. Electrochem. Commun. 28, 127–130 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Wang, C. et al. In situ neutron depth profiling of lithium metal-garnet interfaces for solid state batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 14257–14264 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Marbella, L. E. et al. 7Li NMR chemical shift imaging to detect microstructural growth of lithium in all-solid-state batteries. Chem. Mater. 31, 2762–2769 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Lee, J. Z. et al. Cryogenic focused ion beam characterization of lithium metal anodes. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 489–493 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Choi, S. et al. Quantitative analysis of microstructures and reaction interfaces on composite cathodes in all-solid-state batteries using a three-dimensional reconstruction technique. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 23740–23747 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Santhanagopalan, D. et al. Interface limited lithium transport in solid-state batteries. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 298–303 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Hakari, T. et al. Structural and electronic-state changes of a sulfide solid electrolyte during the Li deinsertion–insertion processes. Chem. Mater. 29, 4768–4774 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Schnell, J. et al. All-solid-state lithium-ion and lithium metal batteries – paving the way to large-scale production. J. Power Sources 382, 160–175 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Zhang, X. et al. Synergistic coupling between Li6.75La3Zr1.75Ta0.25O12 and poly(vinylidene fluoride) induces high ionic conductivity, mechanical strength, and thermal stability of solid composite electrolytes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 13779–13785 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Jung, Y.-C., Lee, S.-M., Choi, J.-H., Jang, S. S. & Kim, D.-W. All Solid-State Lithium Batteries Assembled with Hybrid Solid Electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A704–A710 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Nam, Y. J., Oh, D. Y., Jung, S. H. & Jung, Y. S. Toward practical all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries with high energy density and safety: comparative study for electrodes fabricated by dry- and slurry-mixing processes. J. Power Sources 375, 93–101 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Tan, D. H. S. et al. Enabling thin and flexible solid-state composite electrolytes by the scalable solution process. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 6542–6550 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Sakuda, A. et al. All-solid-state battery electrode sheets prepared by a slurry coating process. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A2474–A2478 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Hippauf, F. et al. Overcoming binder limitations of sheet-type solid-state cathodes using a solvent-free dry-film approach. Energy Storage Mater. 21, 390–398 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Lee, K. et al. Selection of binder and solvent for solution-processed all-solid-state battery. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A2075–A2081 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Lee, K., Lee, J., Choi, S., Char, K. & Choi, J. W. Thiol–ene click reaction for fine polarity tuning of polymeric binders in solution-processed all-solid-state batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 94–101 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Hayashi, A., Muramatsu, H., Ohtomo, T., Hama, S. & Tatsumisago, M. Improvement of chemical stability of Li3PS4 glass electrolytes by adding MxOy (M = Fe, Zn, and Bi) nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 6320 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Liang, X., Han, D., Wang, Y., Lan, L. & Mao, J. Preparation and performance study of a PVDF–LATP ceramic composite polymer electrolyte membrane for solid-state batteries. RSC Adv. 8, 40498–40504 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Oh, D. Y. et al. Excellent compatibility of solvate ionic liquids with sulfide solid electrolytes: toward favorable ionic contacts in bulk-type all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500865 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Zeng, X., Li, J. & Ren, Y. Prediction of various discarded lithium batteries in china. In Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST) 1–4 (IEEE, 2012).

  69. 69.

    Oh, D. Y. et al. Slurry‐fabricable Li+ conductive polymeric binders for practical all‐solid‐state lithium‐ion batteries enabled by solvate ionic liquids. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1802927 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Yamamoto, M., Terauchi, Y., Sakuda, A. & Takahashi, M. Binder-free sheet-type all-solid-state batteries with enhanced rate capabilities and high energy densities. Sci. Rep. 8, 1212 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Xu, J. et al. A review of processes and technologies for the recycling of lithium-ion secondary batteries. J. Power Sources 177, 512–527 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    May, G. J., Davidson, A. & Monahov, B. Lead batteries for utility energy storage: a review. J. Energy Storage 15, 145–157 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Zhang, X. et al. Toward sustainable and systematic recycling of spent rechargeable batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 7239–7302 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Li, L. et al. The recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries: a review of current processes and technologies. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 1, 461–482 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Liu, T. et al. Sustainability-inspired cell design for a fully recyclable sodium ion battery. Nat. Commun. 10, 1965 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Zheng, X. et al. A mini-review on metal recycling from spent lithium ion batteries. Engineering 4, 361–370 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Nowak, S. & Winter, M. The role of sub- and supercritical CO2 as “Processing Solvent” for the recycling and sample preparation of lithium ion battery electrolytes. Molecules 22, 403 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Miura, A. et al. Liquid-phase syntheses of sulfide electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium battery. Nat. Rev. Chem. 3, 189–198 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Wang, Y. et al. Mechanism of formation of Li7P3S11 solid electrolytes through liquid phase synthesis. Chem. Mater. 30, 990–997 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Kim, D. H. et al. Infiltration of solution-processable solid electrolytes into conventional Li-Ion-battery electrodes for all-solid-state Li-Ion batteries. Nano Lett 17, 3013–3020 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Calpa, M., Rosero-Navarro, N. C., Miura, A. & Tadanaga, K. Instantaneous preparation of high lithium-ion conducting sulfide solid electrolyte Li7P3S11 by a liquid phase process. RSC Adv. 7, 46499–46504 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Jung, S.-K. et al. Understanding the degradation mechanisms of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 cathode material in lithium ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1300787 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Zhang, X. et al. sustainable recycling and regeneration of cathode scraps from industrial production of lithium-ion batteries. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 4, 7041–7049 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Shi, Y., Zhang, M., Meng, Y. S. & Chen, Z. Ambient‐pressure relithiation of degraded LixNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 (0 < x < 1) via eutectic solutions for direct regeneration of lithium‐ion battery cathodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1900454 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Wang, S. et al. Lithium chlorides and bromides as promising solid-state chemistries for fast ion conductors with good electrochemical stability. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 8039–8043 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Wang, Z. et al. In situ STEM-EELS observation of nanoscale interfacial phenomena in all-solid-state batteries. Nano Lett. 16, 3760–3767 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Sang, L., Haasch, R. T., Gewirth, A. A. & Nuzzo, R. G. Evolution at the solid electrolyte/gold electrode interface during lithium deposition and stripping. Chem. Mater. 29, 3029–3037 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was financially supported by the LG Chem through the Battery Innovation Contest (BIC) program as well as the Energy & Biosciences Institute through the EBI-Shell program. Z.C. acknowledges funding from the US Department of Energy via ReCell Center and the start-up fund support from the Jacob School of Engineering at University of California San Diego. Y.S.M. acknowledges the funding support from Zable Endowed Chair Fund.

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zheng Chen or Ying Shirley Meng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, D.H.S., Banerjee, A., Chen, Z. et al. From nanoscale interface characterization to sustainable energy storage using all-solid-state batteries. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 170–180 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Find nanotechnology articles, nanomaterial data and patents all in one place. Visit Nano by Nature Research