Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Real-time mass spectrometric characterization of the solid–electrolyte interphase of a lithium-ion battery

Abstract

The solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) dictates the performance of most batteries, but the understanding of its chemistry and structure is limited by the lack of in situ experimental tools. In this work, we present a dynamic picture of the SEI formation in lithium-ion batteries using in operando liquid secondary ion mass spectrometry in combination with molecular dynamics simulations. We find that before any interphasial chemistry occurs (during the initial charging), an electric double layer forms at the electrode/electrolyte interface due to the self-assembly of solvent molecules. The formation of the double layer is directed by Li+ and the electrode surface potential. The structure of this double layer predicts the eventual interphasial chemistry; in particular, the negatively charged electrode surface repels salt anions from the inner layer and results in an inner SEI that is thin, dense and inorganic in nature. It is this dense layer that is responsible for conducting Li+ and insulating electrons, the main functions of the SEI. An electrolyte-permeable and organic-rich outer layer appears after the formation of the inner layer. In the presence of a highly concentrated, fluoride-rich electrolyte, the inner SEI layer has an elevated concentration of LiF due to the presence of anions in the double layer. These real-time nanoscale observations will be helpful in engineering better interphases for future batteries.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: A schematic illustration of in situ liquid-SIMS analysis of solid-liquid interface.
Fig. 2: A schematic illustration of the formation of an SEI layer at the Cu anode surface with 1.0 M LiFSI in DME as the electrolyte and the corresponding positive ion and negative ion SIMS depth profiles.
Fig. 3: 3D maps of important secondary ion species.
Fig. 4: Simulation snapshots and line plots of the ion distribution near to a Cu electrode and a 1.0 M LiFSI in DME electrolyte interface with increasing voltage.
Fig. 5: An SEI model based on the observations in this work.

Data availability

All data that support the findings of this study have been included in the main text and Supplementary Information. The original data are archived at the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The original code for MD simulation is kept at the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and is available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Xu, K. Nonaqueous liquid electrolytes for lithium-based rechargeable batteries. Chem. Rev. 104, 4303–4418 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gauthier, M. et al. Electrode–electrolyte interface in Li-ion batteries: current understanding and new insights. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 4653–4672 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu, K. Electrolytes and interphases in Li-ion batteries and beyond. Chem. Rev. 114, 11503–11618 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, A. J., Burns, J. C., Trussler, S. & Dahn, J. R. Precision measurements of the Coulombic efficiency of lithium-ion batteries and of electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 157, A196–A202 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shim, J., Kostecki, R., Richardson, T., Song, X. & Striebel, K. A. Electrochemical analysis for cycle performance and capacity fading of a lithium-ion battery cycled at elevated temperature. J. Power Sources 112, 222–230 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Menkin, S., Golodnitsky, D. & Peled, E. Artificial solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) for improved cycleability and safety of lithium-ion cells for EV applications. Electrochem. Commun. 11, 1789–1791 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Winter, M. The solid electrolyte interphase—the most important and the least understood solid electrolyte in rechargeable Li batteries. Z. Phys. Chem. 223, 1395–1406 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, X. F. et al. New insights on the structure of electrochemically deposited lithium metal and its solid electrolyte interphases via cryogenic TEM. Nano Lett. 17, 7606–7612 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zachman, M. J., Tu, Z. Y., Choudhury, S., Archer, L. A. & Kourkoutis, L. F. Cryo-stem mapping of solid–liquid interfaces and dendrites in lithium-metal batteries. Nature 560, 345–349 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu, Z. et al. In situ mass spectrometric determination of molecular structural evolution at the solid electrolyte interphase in lithium-ion batteries. Nano Lett. 15, 6170–6176 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Frackowiak, E. & Béguin, F. Carbon materials for the electrochemical storage of energy in capacitors. Carbon 39, 937–950 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang, C. et al. 4.0 V aqueous Li-ion batteries. Joule 1, 122–132 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gourdin, G., Zheng, D., Smith, P. H. & Qu, D. In situ electrochemical–mass spectroscopic investigation of solid electrolyte interphase formation on the surface of a carbon electrode. Electrochim. Acta 112, 735–746 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, F. et al. Hybrid aqueous/non-aqueous electrolyte for safe and high-energy Li-ion batteries. Joule 2, 927–937 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sacci, R. L. et al. Nanoscale imaging of fundamental Li battery chemistry: solid–electrolyte interphase formation and preferential growth of lithium metal nanoclusters. Nano Lett. 15, 2011–2018 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Leenheer, A. J., Jungjohann, K. L., Zavadil, K. R., Sullivan, J. P. & Harris, C. T. Lithium electrodeposition dynamics in aprotic electrolyte observed in situ via transmission electron microscopy. ACS Nano 9, 4379–4389 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mehdi, B. L. et al. Observation and quantification of nanoscale processes in lithium batteries by operando electrochemical (S)TEM. Nano Lett. 15, 2168–2173 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cresce, Av, Russell, S. M., Baker, D. R., Gaskell, K. J. & Xu, K. In situ and quantitative characterization of solid electrolyte interphases. Nano Lett. 14, 1405–1412 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, T. C. et al. In situ quantification of interphasial chemistry in Li-ion battery. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 50–56 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Oswald, S., Nikolowski, K. & Ehrenberg, H. Quasi in situ XPS investigations on intercalation mechanisms in li-ion battery materials. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 393, 1871–1877 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nazri, G. & Muller, R. H. In situ X‐ray diffraction of surface layers on lithium in nonaqueous electrolyte. J. Electrochem. Soc. 132, 1385–1387 (1985).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wagner, M. R., Albering, J. H., Moeller, K. C., Besenhard, J. O. & Winter, M. XRD evidence for the electrochemical formation of in PC-based electrolytes. Electrochem. Commun. 7, 947–952 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bhattacharyya, R. et al. In situ NMR observation of the formation of metallic lithium microstructures in lithium batteries. Nat. Mater. 9, 504–510 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, Y. Y. et al. Potential-dynamic surface chemistry controls the electrocatalytic processes of ethanol oxidation on gold surfaces. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 215–221 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, J. G. et al. Direct molecular evidence of proton transfer and mass dynamics at the electrode–electrolyte interface. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 251–258 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Qian, J. F. et al. High rate and stable cycling of lithium metal anode. Nat. Commun. 6, 6362 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Edström, K., Herstedt, M. & Abraham, D. P. A new look at the solid electrolyte interphase on graphite anodes in Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 153, 380–384 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, C., Meng, Y. S. & Xu, K. Perspective—fluorinating interphases. J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, A5184–A5186 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Suo, L. M. et al. ‘Water-in-salt’ electrolyte enables high-voltage aqueous lithium-ion chemistries. Science 350, 938–943 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fan, X. L. et al. Non-flammable electrolyte enables Li-metal batteries with aggressive cathode chemistries. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 715–722 (2018); erratum 13, 1191 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lu, P. & Harris, S. J. Lithium transport within the solid electrolyte interphase. Electrochem. Commun. 13, 1035–1037 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hayamizu, K., Aihara, Y., Arai, S. & Martinez, C. G. Pulse-gradient spin-echo 1H, 7Li, and 19F NMR diffusion and ionic conductivity measurements of 14 organic electrolytes containing LiN(SO2CF3)2. J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 519–524 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cresce, A. V. et al. Anion solvation in carbonate-based electrolytes. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 27255–27264 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nie, M. & Lucht, B. L. Role of lithium salt on solid electrolyte interface (SEI) formation and structure in lithium ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 161, A1001–A1006 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ding, Y. Z. et al. In situ molecular imaging of the biofilm and its matrix. Anal. Chem. 88, 11244–11252 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, J. et al. Superconcentrated electrolytes for a high-voltage lithium-ion battery. Nat. Commun. 7, 12032 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wan, C. et al. Multinuclear NMR study of the solid electrolyte interface formed in lithium metal batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface 9, 14741–14748 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Nie, M. et al. Role of solution structure in solid electrolyte interphase formation on graphite with LiPF6 in propylene carbonate. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 25381–25389 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. von Cresce, A. & Xu, K. Electrolyte additive in support of 5 V Li ion chemistry. J. Electrochem. Soc. 158, A337–A342 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang, Q. et al. Synergetic effects of inorganic components in solid electrolyte interphase on high cycle efficiency of lithium ion batteries. Nano Lett. 16, 2011–2016 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhou, Y. F. et al. Improving the molecular ion signal intensity for in situ liquid SIMS analysis. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 27, 2006–2013 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Duan, Y. et al. A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 24, 1999–2012 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu, X. H., Han, Y. N. & Yan, T. Y. Temperature effects on the capacitance of an imidazolium-based ionic liquid on a graphite electrode: a molecular dynamics simulation. ChemPhysChem 15, 2503–2509 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Borodin, O. Polarizable force field development and molecular dynamics simulations of ionic liquids. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 11463–11478 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hess, B., Kutzner, C., van der Spoel, D. & Lindahl, E. Gromacs 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 435–447 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Bedrov, D., Borodin, O., Li, Z. & Smith, G. D. Influence of polarization on structural, thermodynamic, and dynamic properties of ionic liquids obtained from molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 4984–4997 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) programs (mainly an FY 16 Open Call LDRD and partially Chemical Dynamics Initiative) at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). C.W. thanks the support of the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies of the US Department of Energy under the Advanced Battery Materials Research (BMR) Program and the US–Germany Cooperation on Energy Storage. O.B. and K.X. at ARL were supported as part of the Joint Center for Energy Storage Research, an Energy Innovation Hub funded by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (agreement SN2020957). Battelle operates PNNL for the US Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract DE-AC05- 76RL01830. The research was performed using the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL), a national scientific user facility sponsored by the Department of Energy’s Office of Biological and Environmental Research and located at PNNL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z.Z., C.W. and K.X. conceived the project. Y.Zhou prepared the battery cells. Y.Zhou and X.Y. conducted the in situ liquid-SIMS characterizations. Y.Zhou, Y.Zhang and J.W. organized the SIMS data and drew relevant figures. M.S. and Z.X. performed the MD simulations. Z.Z. and Y.Zhou drafted the manuscript with help from C.W. and K.X.. X.R., R.C. and W.X. provided the relevant chemicals. W.X., D.R.B., Y.D., O.B., Y.W. and X.-L.W. contributed to the discussion and revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kang Xu, Zhijie Xu, Chongmin Wang or Zihua Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A US patent (10,505,234 B2) was granted to Battelle Memorial Institute for the protection of the innovation of the liquid battery cell used in this work.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Nanotechnology thanks Bing Joe Hwang and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary discussion, Figs. 1–8 and refs. 1–9.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Su, M., Yu, X. et al. Real-time mass spectrometric characterization of the solid–electrolyte interphase of a lithium-ion battery. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 224–230 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0618-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0618-4

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing