Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Carbon nanotubes added to the SIN List as a nanomaterial of Very High Concern

Nature Nanotechnology volume 15, pages 3–4 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

To the Editor — On 14 November 2019 at a public event in Brussels, Belgium, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) became the first nanomaterial to be added to the SIN (‘Substitute It Now’) List by the Swedish non-profit organization, ChemSec (https://chemsec.org/sin-list/). In attendance were representatives from companies, non-governmental organizations, the European Parliament, the European Commission and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). The event marks the end of a one year collaborative project between ChemSec and the Department of Environmental Engineering at the Technical University of Denmark where we aimed to identify potential nanomaterials of very high concern.

The SIN List is a comprehensive database of chemicals that ChemSec believe should be restricted or banned in the EU, but have not been because of the slow functioning of the European Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulation. As REACH implementation has so far been slow, companies, public procurers, financial investors and others have turned to the SIN List for guidance on which chemicals to stay away from. Historically, updates of the SIN List with new categories of chemicals have raised much attention both in the political arena as well as in the corporate world. For instance, the addition of endocrine disruptive chemicals (EDCs) was recognized by UNEP as one of the most robust and scientific lists of EDCs1. In 2016, the SIN List was included in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index by RobecoSAM2. It is also included in various ecolabels3, certification requirements4 and procurement schemes, especially in the Nordic countries5. Many companies, including H&M6, Akzo Nobel7 and Scandic8 have stated that they look closely at the SIN List when prioritizing chemicals for phase-out.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. The International Panel on Chemical Pollution (IPCP) Overview Report I: A Compilation of Lists of Chemicals Recognised as Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs) or Suggested as Potential EDCs (United Nations Environment Programme, 2016).

  2. Chemicals management added to Dow Jones sustainability indices. Chemical Watch https://chemicalwatch.com/54821/chemicals-management-added-to-dow-jones-sustainability-indices (2017).

  3. Instruction Chemicals Information, Impact And Testing (English translation of title) (Naturskyddsföreningen, 2015); https://www.naturskyddsforeningen.se/sites/default/files/dokument-media/handledning_kemikalier.pdf.

  4. Aktuellt. Byggvarubedömningen https://byggvarubedomningen.se/aktuellt/sundahus-och-byggvarubedomningen-samarbetar-om-kriterier-for-hormonstorande-amnen/ (2019).

  5. Utgångspunkter för Upphandlingsmyndighetens kemikaliekrav. Upphandlingsmyndigheten https://www.upphandlingsmyndigheten.se/hallbarhet/upphandla-for-en-giftfri-miljo/utgangspunkter-for-upphandlingsmyndighetens-kemikaliekrav/ (2018).

  6. Weissbach, Y. Chemical Management at H&M (H&M, 2017); https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/22979590/230217_substitution_webinar_hm_en.pdf/615ba03a-f265-9e9c-a5ee-f2a1de592cae

  7. AkzoNobel committed to zero harm and positive impact from products. Coatings World https://www.coatingsworld.com/contents/view_blog/2017-05-12/akzonobel-committed-to-zero-harm-and-positive-impact-from-products/ (2017).

  8. Scandic’s Guidelines to Sustainable Procurement (Scandic, 2018); https://www.scandichotelsgroup.com/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/05/scandics-guidelines-to-sustainable-procurement.pdf

  9. Some Nanomaterials and Some Fibres Vol. 11 (IARC, 2017); https://monographs.iarc.fr/iarc-monographs-on-the-evaluation-of-carcinogenic-risks-to-humans-5/

  10. Annex III inventory. ECHA https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals/annex-iii-inventory/-/dislist/details/AIII-100.109.645 (2019).

  11. Carbon Nanotube Single-walled (>55%) below 2nm(diam.), 5-15micro m(length). ECHA https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.109.645 (2019).

  12. Rittinghausen, S. et al. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 11, 59 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakamoto, Y. et al. J. Toxicol. Sci. 43, 587–600 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ema, M. et al. Nanotoxicol. 10, 391–412 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kobayashi, N. et al. J. Occup. Health 59, 394–407 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hougaard, K. S. et al. Reprod. Toxicol. 41, 86–97 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Philbrook, N. A. et al. Reprod Toxicol 32, 442–448 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Campagnolo, L. et al. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 10, 21 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pietroiusti, A. et al. ACS Nano 5, 4624–33 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Driscoll, K. E. et al. Toxicol. Sci. 55, 24–35 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Allen, B. L. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 17194–17205 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, L. et al. Environ. Pollut. 181, 335–339 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hartmann, N. I. B. et al. Environmental Fate and Behaviour of Nanomaterials Environmental Project No. 1594 (Danish Environmental Protection Agency, 2014); https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/106171114/MST_rapport_Environmental_and_behaviour_of_nanomaterials.pdf.pdf

  24. Carbon Nanotubes Environmental project No. 1805 (Danish Environmental Protection Agency, 2015); https://www2.mst.dk/Udgiv/publications/2015/12/978-87-93352-98-8.pdf

  25. Broomfield, M., Steffen, F. H. & Florent, P. Support for 3rd Regulatory Review on Nanomaterials (European Commission, 2016); https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/cf73479b-b601-11e6-9e3c-01aa75ed71a1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technical University of Denmark, Department of Environmental Engineering, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark

    Steffen Foss Hansen

  2. ChemSec - The International Chemical Secretariat, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Anna Lennquist

Authors
  1. Steffen Foss Hansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna Lennquist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Foss Hansen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hansen, S.F., Lennquist, A. Carbon nanotubes added to the SIN List as a nanomaterial of Very High Concern. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 3–4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0613-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0613-9

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing